
Royal Ascot ready to roll with MPs worried future of racing is ‘on the line'
Hundreds of staff were putting the finishing touches to Ascot racecourse on Monday ahead of the five-day Royal meeting. The champagne is on ice, a variety of crustaceans have been plucked from the seabed and transported to Berkshire and the famous grey horses that lead the royal procession are ready to be harnessed. The most valuable, historic and glamorous show on turf is good to go.
So it was a little jarring, to say the least, to spend an hour on Monday lunchtime in the company of assorted heavy-hitters from the racing industry and a pair of racing-friendly MPs from either side of the House, hearing warnings of a 'triple whammy of challenges' that, according to a report from the All-Party Parliamentary Group (APPG) for Racing and Bloodstock which was published on Monday, 'present no less than an existential threat to the sport.'
John Gosden, who will saddle the hot favourite Field Of Gold in Tuesday's St James's Palace Stakes, the feature event on Royal Ascot's opening day, was among them. There were almost certainly things he would rather have been doing on the eve of the biggest meeting of the year, but he was keen to voice his support for the findings of the report, entitled 'Securing Racing's Future: The Threat to British Horseracing'.
'We are liable to be actually brought down by this,' Gosden said. 'Here, we have a gene pool of the thoroughbred that is by far superior to anything else in the world, and yet, we are going to blow it down the river. [And] what makes me beyond angry is that it's never grasped how important we are internationally.'
The report was co-produced by Dan Carden, the Labour MP for Liverpool Walton, and Nick Timothy, a Conservative whose West Suffolk constituency includes Newmarket, the joint-chairs of the APPG, but claims cross-party support for its concerns from both Liberal Democrat and Reform MPs.
In addition to a Treasury proposal to equalise the rate of duty payable on betting on sport with what is currently a higher rate for casino-style gaming products – which could reduce racing's attractiveness as a betting medium for both operators and punters – the MPs' report highlights the issue of 'financial risk' checks on gamblers and an ongoing impasse over reform to the Levy system, which returns money to racing from off-course gambling, as the other components of its 'triple whammy'.
'The government needs to carefully consider the unintended consequences of its decision in all of these areas,' the report warns. 'It is no exaggeration to say that the future of Britain's biggest sport is on the line.'
It was a sobering way to start Ascot week, but the report will form the basis of the British Horseracing Authority's response to the Treasury's proposals in a consultation process which is due to end on 21 July. And the serene self-confidence of the Royal meeting, with everything in its allotted place and, for the most part, just as it was two centuries ago will offer at least some reassurance as worries about what the future might bring are parked for the next five days for a celebration of the best of British racing.
The Breeders' Cup in America has more Grade One races. Arc weekend at Longchamp has the richest event of the season and half a dozen Group Ones on a single afternoon.
But neither can boast the variety or depth of quality that comes as standard at Royal Ascot, where the daily feature events at 4.20pm are joined by historic handicaps like the Wokingham and Royal Hunt Cup, where fields of up to 30 horses charge down the straight mile. Cheltenham's festival in March is often seen as a more competitive meeting overall, but the average SP of the winners has been higher at Ascot in recent seasons.
It is a meeting that sets its stall out from the start, with a Group One at the top of the opening day card and two more in quick succession, and does not, by any reasonable assessment, have a single afternoon that ranks as either superior or inferior to the rest. Contrary to popular belief, in fact, Ladies' Day on Thursday – when the Gold Cup, first run in 1807, is the feature event – has never been marketed as such by the track itself. And while other tracks struggle to shift tickets for their main events, Ascot is trying to find space to accommodate nearly 400 visiting executives from tracks around the world, eager to find out for themselves how Britain's top racecourse seemingly goes from strength to strength.
Without the grass-roots industry to support it, of course, the top of the pyramid would soon topple. So this week's Royal meeting, with the King and Queen in attendance for most or all of the days and horses drawn from around the world to compete, is a timely reminder that there are still some things that Britain does quite well and also, perhaps, that you do not know what you've got 'til it's gone.
It adds an extra dimension to the St James's Palace Stakes when the three major Guineas winners from Newmarket, the Curragh and Longchamp are in the field and Epsom's loss is very much Royal Ascot's gain following the late scratching of Ruling Court, the 2,000 Guineas winner, from the Derby 10 days ago.
Ruling Court was half a length in front of Field Of Gold at Newmarket but John & Thady Gosden's colt was finishing best of all after allowing Ruling Court to get first run, and subsequently trounced his field in the Irish equivalent at the Curragh.
The market for Tuesday's feature race on day one at Royal Ascot very much takes the view that Field Of Gold was unlucky at Newmarket, and he is odds-on to reverse the form with Ruling Court.
Aidan O'Brien's Henri Matisse (4.20), meanwhile, is third-favourite among the principals, despite having won the French 2,000 Guineas – around a right-handed bend on good-to-firm ground – with something to spare.
O'Brien has two stable companions in the field to ensure a strong pace, the race should set up ideally for Ryan Moore's mount as a result and a price of around 7-2 looks more than fair for Henri Matisse to give his trainer a record-extending 10th win in the race.
Royal Ascot 2.30 The first four home in the Lockinge Stakes renew rivalry in the traditional opener to the meeting and Notable Speech, fourth at Newbury but less than three lengths behind the winner, could find the most improvement back on a fast surface.
Royal Ascot 3.05 Twelve of the 21 declared runners for the Coventry Stakes arrive here unbeaten, and American Gulf, who was well-backed before a decisive debut win at Windsor, could spring a minor surprise at around 10-1.
Royal Ascot 3.40 Last year's winner Asfoora arrives without a prep run this time around and is blinkered for the first time but she has won off a break in the past and is an obvious pick on last year's form.
Royal Ascot 5.00 All the focus is on Willie Mullins's Reaching High in the royal colours, but his stable companion Poniros, the 100-1 Triumph Hurdle winner in March, is potentially very well handicapped returning to the Flat and the booking of William Buick suggests he is far from just a second-string.
Stratford-On-Avon 2.05 Market House 2.40 Duel Au Soleil 3.13 Alshadian 3.50 Carigeen Kampala 4.30 A Dublin Job 5.10 Fillyfudge
Thirsk 2.15 Royal Fixation 2.50 Ghaiyya 3.23 Blue Anthem 4.00 Captain Vallo 4.40 Blue Rc 5.20 Golden Rainbow 5.50 Jojo Rabbit
Royal Ascot 2.30 Notable Speech (nb) 3.05 American Gulf 3.40 Asfoora 4.20 Henri Matisse 5.00 Poniros 5.35 Ecureuil Secret (nap) 6.10 Charlus
Southwell 5.25 Frostmagic 5.55 Keldeo 6.30 Your Love 7.00 Irish Dancer 7.30 Panelli 8.00 Time Allowed 8.30 Petra Celera 9.00 Loch Leven
Beverley 6.15 Command The Stars 6.45 Forest Caper 7.15 Dumfries 7.45 Freddy Robinson 8.15 Little Ted 8.45 Triple Force
Royal Ascot 5.35 This is a significant step up for Ecureuil Secret after a convincing handicap success at Epsom's Derby meeting but he already looks like a much-improved performer after being gelded over the winter.
Royal Ascot 6.10 Willie Mullins is going for a hat-trick in this 14-furlong handicap and while the lightly raced Charlus was beaten out of sight on his latest start in the Triumph Hurdle, he showed distinct promise in four starts on the Flat for Jean-Claude Rouget in France.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
12 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Conspiracy of silence over grooming gangs' race doomed thousands of girls to abuse: Sickening evidence covered up 'for fear of appearing racist', damning report finds
Public bodies covered up sickening evidence about Asian grooming gangs 'for fear of appearing racist', a major report found yesterday. The long-awaited review by Whitehall troubleshooter Louise Casey found that councils, police forces and the Home Office repeatedly 'shied away' from dealing with 'uncomfortable' questions about the ethnicity of rapists preying on thousands of vulnerable girls. Baroness Casey last night hit out at 'do-gooders' who tried to bury the facts of such cases, yet only ended up giving racists 'more ammunition'. Despite years of warnings, she said, the quality of data collected at a national level remained 'woeful and a dereliction of public duty'. With ethnicity still recorded in only a third of cases, the baroness said it was impossible to be certain about patterns of offending at a national level. But her report highlighted data collected by police in Rotherham, Greater Manchester and West Yorkshire which showed a 'disproportionate number of men from Asian ethnic backgrounds' among those suspected of grooming offences. In Rotherham, an investigation into historic cases by the National Crime Agency found that two-thirds of suspects were of Pakistani heritage, despite them accounting for just 4 per cent of the local population. The report also examined a dozen major live police operations into grooming gangs and found a 'significant proportion' of suspects are asylum seekers or were born abroad. In other developments: Fact-box text Downing Street refused to back down on the PM's toxic claim that Conservatives calling for a public inquiry were jumping on a 'far-Right bandwagon', despite now ordering one himself. Ms Cooper said she would change the law to ensure any adult having sex with a child aged under 16 is automatically charged with rape; Foreign nationals convicted of child-sex offences will be barred from claiming asylum; Lady Casey said a 2020 Home Office paper which dismissed concerns about the ethnicity of grooming gang offenders 'does not seem to be evidenced in research'. In one case in Newcastle, an asylum seeker convicted of offences 'spoke in a derogatory way about lack of morals in British girls and the ease with which he was able to access sex, drugs and alcohol'. Lady Casey said it was 'not racist to want to examine the ethnicity of offenders'. But she pointed to a culture of public bodies avoiding the issue 'for fear of appearing racist, raising community tensions or causing community cohesion problems'. Her report said most local reviews had shown 'a palpable discomfort in any discussion of ethnicity'. And it said 'flawed data' was being 'used repeatedly to dismiss claims about "Asian grooming gangs" as sensational, biased or untrue'. The crossbench peer told Sky News that establishing the facts can 'take the pain out of this'. She said: 'I think you've got sort of do-gooders that don't really want this to be found because, you know, "Oh, God, then all the racists are going to be more racist". 'Well, actually, people that are racist are going to use this anyway. All you're doing with the hate mongers and the racists is giving them more and more ammunition.' Lady Casey added: 'Follow the facts and if anything is ever difficult, have a really good look at it.' The report also accused the authorities of failing to take victims seriously, saying many girls who tried to report abuse had been 'ignored, treated like criminals and often arrested themselves'. Home Secretary Yvette Cooper issued a public apology on behalf of the state to the victims of the gangs. She said she offered 'an unequivocal apology for the unimaginable pain and suffering that you have suffered, and for the failure of our country's institutions, over decades, to prevent that harm and keep you safe'. Ms Cooper said she was accepting the recommendations of Lady Casey's 'damning' report in full – including ordering a public inquiry which Labour has resisted. The report triggered angry clashes in the Commons, where Kemi Badenoch rounded on Sir Keir Starmer for smearing those pressing for a public inquiry of jumping on a 'far-Right bandwagon'. The baroness said it was time to end the 'sanitised' language around so-called grooming gangs. ' I want to set it out in unsanitised terms,' she wrote. 'We are talking about multiple sexual assaults committed against children by multiple men on multiple occasions; beatings and gang rapes.' The national inquiry will be time-limited and is likely to investigate offending in only a handful of local areas, despite warnings that similar activity may have taken place in 50 towns and cities across the country. But it will have the power to compel witnesses to give evidence.


Times
12 minutes ago
- Times
UK facing global insecurity with ‘one hand tied behind its back'
Britain is confronting a period of unprecedented global insecurity with 'one hand tied behind its back' because of potential cuts to the UK's conflict resolution budget, two former heads of MI5 have warned. In a letter to Sir Keir Starmer, Lord Evans of Weardale and Baroness Manningham-Buller — both former director-generals of MI5 — have joined more than 60 senior military, political and intelligence figures calling on the prime minister to rethink government plans that deprioritise peacebuilding work. The letter is also signed by Lord Sedwill, the former cabinet secretary and national security adviser, as well as Lord Dannatt, the former chief of the general staff, and Sir Andrew Graham, deputy commander of coalition forces in Iraq. The signatories call on Starmer to ringfence the UK's 'vital work in the prevention and resolution of conflict' from budget cuts, before the publication of the government's national security strategy, expected this month. At last week's spending review, ministers announced that the amount of aid money available to the government's £1 billion integrated security fund, which includes conflict resolution work, would be cut from £326 million to £194 million next year. However, senior figures in national security believe these cuts will be self-defeating and dent the UK's ability to deal with problems like conflict-driven migration before they affect the UK. The letter is also backed by a number of prominent politicians including the chairs of the Commons defence and international development select committees, as well as Lord Kinnock, the former Labour Party leader. In the letter they warn Starmer that violent conflict is affecting more countries than at any point since the Second World War, fuelling migration and disrupting economies. At the same time they say the UK is retreating from aid initiatives that 'prevent, resolve and address the root causes of conflicts' and 'help societies recover'. 'We are gravely concerned that these initiatives may disappear amidst cuts to the aid budget,' they write. 'This would be a false economy, as conflicts left to escalate and spread will lead to further insecurity, forced displacement and humanitarian crises to which the armed forces and aid agencies must respond.' They are calling on the government to make a clear commitment in the forthcoming national security strategy to adequately fund the integrated security fund with a ringfenced budget. Without this, they warn, the UK risks facing the global conflict crisis 'with one hand tied behind its back'. Ministers have said they would publish the national security strategy before the Nato summit in the Hague next week. It is expected to place greater emphasis on resilience to non-traditional threats, including cyberattacks and technological competition with China. Evans, who was director-general of MI5 until 2013 and now chairs the landmine clearance charity the Halo Trust, said that he was concerned that the government was prioritising 'clearing up the mess' after conflicts had occurred rather than preventing them in the first place. 'In practical terms if you can stop a conflict early then surely that represents good value for money,' he said. Lord McConnell of Glenscorrodale, a former UK special representative for peacebuilding, added: 'The UK is rightly building up our armed forces to deter violent conflict, but we must also invest in conflict prevention and resolution. 'If we do not, we will be engaging with one hand tied behind our back. The national security strategy and the budget allocations following the spending review should ensure defence, diplomacy and development work hand in hand.'


The Independent
15 minutes ago
- The Independent
US and UK announce a trade deal, but steel imports are still being negotiated
U.S. President Donald Trump and British Prime Minister Keir Starmer said Monday that they had signed a trade deal that will slash tariffs on U.K. auto and aerospace industry imports, but they are still discussing how to handle steel production. The pair spoke to reporters at the Group of Seven summit in the Canadian Rockies, with Trump brandishing the pages of what he said was a long-awaited agreement. The rollout was anything but smooth, however, as Trump dropped the papers and at first said his administration had reached an agreement with the European Union when he meant the United Kingdom. The president nonetheless insisted the pact is 'a fair deal for both' and would 'produce a lot of jobs, a lot of income.' 'We just signed it,' Trump said, 'and it's done.' Starmer said it meant 'a very good day for both our countries, a real sign of strength.' Reaching an agreement is significant as Trump has threatened much of the world with steep import tariffs that have unsettled markets and raised the possibility of a global trade war. He has since backed off on many of his proposed levies but also continued to suggest that administration officials were furiously negotiating new trade pacts with dozens of countries — even as few have actually materialized. Trump said 'the U.K. is very well protected,' from tariffs. 'You know why? Because I like them.' The signing of the deal at the G7 followed Trump and Starmer's announcement in May that they'd reached a framework for a trade pact that would slash U.S. import taxes on British cars, steel and aluminum in return for greater access to the British market for U.S. products, including beef and ethanol. But Monday's agreement fully covers only British cars and aerospace materials, with more work to come on steel. Trump said more details on that would be available soon. After the two leaders spoke, the White House released a statement seeking to clarify matters, saying that with respect to steel and aluminum, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick will 'determine a quota of products that can enter the United States without being subject' to previous tariffs imposed by the Trump administration. The British government said the new agreement removes U.S. tariffs on U.K. aerospace products, exempting Britain from a 10% levy the Trump White House has sought to impose on all other countries — a boost to British firms, including engine-maker Rolls-Royce. It also sets the tax on British autos at 10% from the end of the month, down from the current 27.5%. U.K. Business and Trade Secretary Jonathan Reynolds said the deal protects 'jobs and livelihoods in some of our most vital sectors.' But there was no final agreement to cut the tax on British steel to zero as originally foreseen. Britain has been spared the 50% tariff imposed on global steel, instead getting a 25% rate. It will stay at that level while talks continue on lowering it. There also was no final deal on pharmaceuticals, where 'work will continue,' the U.K. said. The deal signed Monday also confirms that American farmers can export 13,000 metric tons (29 million pounds) of beef to the U.K. each year, and vice versa — though a British ban on hormone-treated beef remains in place. That's more detail than both countries offered in May when they announced a framework deal. That framework didn't immediately take effect, leaving British businesses uncertain about whether the U.K. could be exposed to any surprise hikes from Trump. British businesses, and the U.K. government, were then blindsided earlier this month when Trump doubled metals tariffs on countries around the world to 50%. He later clarified the level would remain at 25% for the U.K. The British government said Monday that the plan was still for '0% tariffs on core steel products as agreed.'