Driver who crashed into primary school killing two eight-year-old girls could face criminal charges two years on - after new witnesses come forward
Police are preparing a file of evidence for prosecutors to consider charges against Claire Freemantle, 48, who had avoided prosecution after saying she had suffered her first ever epileptic seizure at the wheel.
The development comes on the second anniversary of Nuria Sajjad and Selena Lau dying after the Land Rover Defender veered off the road and smashed through a fence into The Study Prep School in Wimbledon, south-west London, as children and staff were enjoying an end-of-term tea party.
Nine children and three adults were also seriously injured in the crash on the morning of July 6, 2023.
Today, the grieving families and community are holding a memorial event to commemorate the girls.
In a poignant reminder, Nuria and Selena's classmates marked the end of their time at the prep school on Friday before moving on to secondary education.
Ms Freemantle was arrested at the scene and investigated by police. But prosecutors decided not to bring any criminal charges in June 2024 after Ms Freemantle said she had suffered an epileptic seizure.
In October, the Mail revealed Met Police had decided to reopen the probe after a serious case review uncovered significant flaws in the way officers conducted the initial inquiry, including consideration of medical evidence which led to the case being dropped.
One of the key issues in the original investigation was the diagnosis of epilepsy, which is notoriously difficult to detect without brain scans shortly after a seizure, and a detailed consideration of a patient's medical history.
The review is also understood to have been critical of missed opportunities by the original investigation team in the Road Traffic Collisions Unit who failed to interview key witnesses at the scene about the driver's behaviour in the immediate aftermath.
The case was subsequently reopened and handed to a top detective superintendent from Specialist Crime Command.
Police then made a successful appeal for people who witnessed the crash to come forward to help officers understand whether the driver's behaviour was consistent with her diagnosis.
In January, Ms Freemantle was rearrested on suspicion of causing death by dangerous driving. She remains on bail. The bereaved families welcomed the case being reopened 'into the death of our beautiful girls and the harm caused to those injured and who witnessed the tragedy'.
Ms Freemantle has said she had no recollection of what happened after losing consciousness.
She said last year: 'Since I became aware of the terrible event that took place on July 6, the devastating consequences for all those affected have not left my thoughts and will be with me for the rest of my life.
'I have since been diagnosed as having suffered an epileptic seizure with loss of consciousness.
'This was not a pre-existing condition,' she added.
'As a result of losing consciousness, I have no recollection of what took place.'
Met Police said: 'Our thoughts are with Nuria and Selena's loved ones at this time.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
13 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Showjumper, 37, and horse rider, 26, face jail after being found guilty over threesome with underage girl
A horse riding instructor and woman rider are facing jail for targeting an underage teenage girl for threesome sex. Equestrian boss Guy Simmonds, 37, and fellow rider Lauren Jarvis, 26, plotted the sex session despite knowing the schoolgirl was under 16 - and the pair then agreed a 'pact of silence' after horse riding lessons. A court heard the pair had 'no doubt at all' that the schoolgirl was under 16 before the threesome and vowed to keep it secret. They have now been found guilty of sexual activity with a child.. Prosecutor James Hartson said: 'At all times he knew how old she was and so did Jarvis. The victim told him herself in one of the very first messages she sent him. 'They didn't care about her age when they were planning and engaging in a so-called threesome with the victim. 'They also knew what they did was wrong and they agreed a pact of silence when they got wind she had started to talk about it.' Cardiff Crown Court heard Simmonds bragged he was a 'top showjumper' after targeting the underage girl on Facebook. Mr Hartson said there was a 'clear element of grooming behaviour' from Simmonds before the threesome in Jarvis' home in January last year. In one message read to court, the girl asked Simmonds what he would make her do and he replied: 'You will both do what daddy says. It will be fun.' Simmonds later messaged Jarvis saying: 'Hey, I have a feeling that she has said about us. 'If anyone asks for sake of both of us nothing ever happened that night xx.' Jarvis replied: 'Hey, who's she told? 'Oh god has she really, what's she trying to do, make our lives hell? Of course I will xx.' The court heard Simmonds told police in interview he did not have any from of sexual contact with the victim. But he made calls to his mother from prison instructing her to pay the victim's 'fickle' family £50,0000 to drop the charges. He said: 'There is £20,000 in my account. Just f***ing give it to them. 'I don't care. £20,000 now and then £10,000 a year for three years.' Simmonds claimed he had been given permission to 'stray' from his partner Rebecca Dimes, 34, on the condition she 'did not want to know anything about it.' Jarvis claimed any messages about a threesome were 'banter and a wind up'. Simmonds, of Undy in Gwent, and Jarvis, from Newport, were both found guilty by a jury of sexual activity with a child. Simmonds was found not guilty on five other charges of sexual activity with a child relating to the same victim. Judge Lucy Crowther adjourned the case for sentencing on September 29.
Times
13 minutes ago
- Times
Neil Woodford and his firm fined £46m over fund's collapse
The fallen fund manager Neil Woodford and his defunct firm have been fined £46 million for their role in the collapse of their high-profile fund, and he was banned from any senior City role including managing money for retail investors. The Financial Conduct Authority said Woodford, whose asset management empire collapsed in 2019 after its principal Woodford Equity Income Fund was capsized by a wave of redemption requests, was not fit and proper to run retail funds or hold any senior City role. Woodford, 65, is facing a £5.9 million fine while Woodford Investment Management, of which he is the majority shareholder, is being hit with a £40 million penalty. Woodford's personal penalty was doubled on the grounds that a smaller sum would not have had been a sufficient deterrent to prevent other fund managers making the same choices, the FCA said. The size of the fine was also determined by Woodford's 'extremely prominent profile' in the investment industry and because of the damage he had inflicted on confidence in the wider retail fund management sector. The judgments remain 'provisional' as Woodford, who has repeatedly denied any wrongdoing, is challenging them in the Upper Tribunal. Responding to the watchdog's decision notice, he said he strongly disagreed with it and suggested he would expose the FCA's own regulatory failings in the affair. The tribunal case, he said, would 'shed much-needed light on the events leading to and following the fund's suspension, including the regulator's role in those events'. Hundreds of thousands of investors were left out of pocket when the Woodford Equity Income Fund was suspended in 2019 and later put into liquidation. They have got back £1 billion less than the value of their holdings on the day the £3.6 billion fund was suspended. • Johanna Noble: Woodford scandal shows why we still need to name and shame Woodford's reputation sank from a lionised stockpicking genius to negligent incompetent in the space of a few months. At the heart of the matter was Woodford's refusal to accept any responsibility for managing the liquidity of the Woodford Equity Income Fund so it was able to withstand redemption requests without resorting to a fire sale of assets, the FCA said. At his zenith, Woodford attracted more than £15 billion of institutional and investor money when he defected from Invesco Perpetual with a superlative track record to set up his own firm WIM in 2014. In the four years before the collapse he and his co-founder Craig Newman extracted £98 million in dividends from WIM. Woodford used the money to indulge his passion for Ferraris and Porsches, a stable of horses, a 423-hectare Cotswold farm and a £6.35 million Devon holiday home. • Neil Woodford's tearful video claim: 'We did nothing wrong' The FCA concluded that between July 2018 and June 2019 WIM and Woodford made 'unreasonable and inappropriate investment decisions' and 'disproportionately sold more liquid investments [those that are easier to sell] and bought less liquid ones over this period'. Steve Smart, joint enforcement director at the FCA, said: 'Being a leader in financial services comes with responsibilities as well as profile. Mr Woodford simply doesn't accept he had any role in managing the liquidity of the fund. The very minimum investors should expect is those managing their money make sensible decisions and take their senior role seriously. Neither Neil Woodford nor Woodford Investment Management did so, putting at risk the money people had entrusted them with.' The honours forfeiture committee in the Cabinet Office has come under fresh pressure to remove the CBE awarded to Woodford in 2013 for services to the UK economy. A campaign group including MPs and financial think tanks renewed its call for the honour to be revoked because of the 'terrible harm' he caused. Woodford has argued that the bulk of investor losses were down to the decision to liquidate the Woodford Equity Income Fund rather than reopen it after the suspension pause. The FCA accepted that Woodford's conduct did not amount to a lack of integrity, but was merely negligent.
Telegraph
13 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Speeding motorcyclist incriminated himself in social media post
A motorcyclist who filmed himself speeding at almost 100 mph was caught on his dash-cam footage after it went viral on Instagram. Benjamin Males, 22, was incriminated by his social media post, which attracted more than a million views when he uploaded the video in April, despite his efforts to conceal his identity by tagging the video's location as Mexico. The footage showed the motorcyclist speeding along country roads in Shropshire at 98mph and pulling dangerous wheelies. The rider also went on to have several near misses and reached speeds of 89 mph in a 50 mph zone in wet conditions, according to West Mercia Police. 'An appalling disregard for road safety' At one point, he almost lost control after zooming across a roundabout, and his front wheel can be seen lifting off the ground. Police officers were able to identify Males as the rider in the footage and said the video showed 'an appalling disregard for road safety'. He was arrested and charged with five counts of dangerous driving, which he pleaded guilty to at Telford Magistrates Court on Wednesday, July 30. Males of Shrewsbury was disqualified from driving for 18 months, after which he must then pass an extended test. 'Dangerous behaviour on our roads' He was also ordered to carry out 240 hours of unpaid work, given a rehabilitation order and fined £199. PC Jack Jackson, from Telford's Operational Policing Unit, said: 'I want to make it absolutely clear that we will take robust action when we see dangerous behaviour on our roads, including when it's posted online. 'The footage in this case, uploaded by Males himself to Instagram, showed an appalling disregard for road safety. 'His conviction should serve as a stark warning that social media is not a shield from prosecution. 'We have at our disposal a variety of means to identify individuals from social media, even when they take extra measures to obscure their identity, and this serves as proof of the effectiveness of our investigations. 'Dangerous riding doesn't just put the rider at risk, it endangers innocent road users and influences others to copy reckless behaviour. 'If you choose to put lives at risk on our roads, you can expect to be held accountable.'
