
Kamala's comeback bid sparks Democrat donor meltdown amid fears she'll sink party in California
' potential comeback bid for California 's gubernatorial race is falling flat as the state's liberal donors say they are still 'traumatized' from her loss to Donald Trump.
The former Democratic nominee for president has been considering a run for California Governor, with several declared candidates promising to drop out of the race if she enters.
Harris would instantly become the frontrunner in the race, but Democratic donors say they are less than enthusiastic about the former vice president's resurgence.
Insiders told Politico that donors are still suffering a hangover from Harris' landslide loss to Donald Trump in November, after she burned through hundreds of millions of dollars only to ultimately lose every swing state.
'Kamala just reminds you we are in this complete s*** storm,' one donor told the outlet.
'With Biden, we got bamboozled… I think she did the best she could in that situation, but obviously she knew about the cognitive decline too.
'I've written so many checks because I knew the Trump administration would be horrible, but we're living in a nightmare because of the Democrats. I'm furious at them, truly.'
Harris has not publicly said she will enter the race, but sources told The Hill this week that she is 'leaning toward' entering the Democratic primary, saying the chance to get back in the spotlight has given her 'a glimmer in her eyes.'
But while Harris is said to be excited by the prospect of re-entering public office, many of the donors who supported her last run for the White House say they are less enthused.
'There was more enthusiasm at first,' Mather Martin, a San Francisco-based fundraiser who has worked for past Harris campaigns, told Politico. 'I think it waned a bit.'
One California donor who contributed six-figures to Harris' run against Donald Trump said they fear a comeback campaign would only remind Democrats of how 'traumatizing' her loss to Trump was.
Harris reportedly held several meetings in the Bay Area this month to feel out a possible run for governor, and believes she would have an advantage in the field as she remains a big name in a Democratic Party that has not found a new leader following Trump's landslide in November.
She was reportedly considering another run for the presidency in 2028, but is leaning toward California Governor.
One insider told The Hill: 'She has a lot of people in her ear telling her that it makes the most sense and she can do the most good.'
One key sticking point looming over any potential run appears to be the reported cognitive decline of former President Joe Biden, raising questions over whether Harris was privy to his struggles in office.
One of Harris' would-be opponents in the race, former Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa, used this as ammunition in a recent X post last month.
'Voters deserve to know the truth, what did Kamala Harris and Xavier Becerra know, when did they know it, and most importantly, why didn't either of them speak out?' he wrote - also referencing former California Attorney General Xavier Becerra, who was also a member of the Biden administration as secretary of Health and Human Services.
'This cover up directly led to a second Donald Trump term.'
As one Democrat donor put it to Politico, fundraisers 'realize it's just going to bring up the whole pathetic last presidential, which no one wants to hear about again. And then it's the whole 'Did you know Joe Biden?' thing.'
They concluded: 'She still would probably lead, but honestly, no one is incredibly pumped.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Scottish Sun
an hour ago
- Scottish Sun
Donald Trump plans to ‘visit his three Scottish golf courses next month'
DON HIS WAY Donald Trump plans to 'visit his three Scottish golf courses next month' DONALD Trump is reportedly planning to visit his three Scottish golf courses next month. The US President is set to head to Scotland for the first time since his election victory last year. Advertisement 4 Donald Trump is reportedly planning on visiting Scotland next month Credit: AFP 4 He is likely to visit his three golf courses including Turnberry which was vandalised earlier this year Credit: Alamy The MailOnline reports that, in the final two weeks in July, security services are preparing for Air Force One to land at Prestwick Airport. A ring of steel is expected to be thrown around the President amid fears of major protests following the US military's attack on Iran's nuclear stockpile. During his first stint in office, thousands of Scots took to the streets in Glasgow, Edinburgh and Aberdeen in 2018 to protest against his visit. It comes after Mr Trump previously revealed he plans to visit Scotland during his second state visit to the UK. Advertisement The US President was given the historic invitation to officially come to Britain. It is the first time an American leader has been offered as second state visit. He was handed the invitation by Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer in the White House. Mr Trump was hoping to informally meet King Charles this summer at one of his Scottish residences - Balmoral or Dumfries House - ahead of the second state visit likely to take place in September. Advertisement But it is understood that their diaries do not align. The President is likely to visit his Turnberry golf course in Ayrshire - which was vandalised by pro-Palestinian protesters in March. 'Daddy' Trump stopped Israel and Iran war, Nato chief tells 'strong' Don He will also visit his controversial Trump International course in Aberdeen. And Mr Trump may also take time to check in on his brand new 18-hole course, which is set to open at the Aberdeenshire property, named the MacLeod course after the President's mum. Advertisement A Trump visit to Scotland has proved controversial both politicians and the public. First Minister John Swinney called for his second visit to be axed after Trump's explosive bust-up with Ukrainian president Zelensky in the Oval Office. But the SNP leader was branded a hypocrite after he met with Eric Trump over tea and biscuits at Bute House. And several people have been charged over alleged vandalism at the President's Turnberry golf course. Advertisement 4 He will also visit his controversial Trump International course in Aberdeen Credit: AFP


Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
Iran ‘one month' from enriching uranium for nuclear bomb
The head of the UN's nuclear watchdog has warned that Iran is able to start enriching uranium for a possible bomb 'in a matter of months'. Despite the US targeting the three most significant nuclear sites in Iran last week with bunker-busting bombs, Rafael Grossi from the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), said its damage was 'not total'. His latest claims contradict US President Donald Trump who said the operation had 'totally obliterated' the nuclear sites, Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan. Mr Grossi said: 'Frankly speaking, one cannot claim that everything has disappeared and there is nothing there.' Speaking to CBS News, he said that Tehran could have 'in a matter of months... a few cascades of centrifuges spinning and producing enriched uranium', warning Iran still possessed the 'industrial and technological capacities... so if they so wish, they will be able to start doing this again'. On Thursday, Mr Grossi had also said Isfahan was home to a new enrichment plant, which would soon be opened by Iran. Just before Israel's surprise attacks on June 13, Iran had announced it had built a new facility which would soon be equipped and brought online, but did not state its location. The extent of damages imposed by the strikes has caused huge debate. The Pentagon's intelligence assessment claimed they had imposed limited damage, only setting Tehran's nuclear programme back by a few months.


The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
How Fox News helped champion Trump's attacks on Iran: ‘I agree with the president'
The US bombing of Iran last weekend prompted sober reporting from the mainstream US media, along with considered discussion of whether the US had violated international law in attacking a foreign country. Fox News, however, took a different tack, championing a war that, according to reports, it had helped convince Donald Trump to start. 'This will go down in history as one of the greatest military victories,' roared Sean Hannity, arguably Fox News's best known host, on Saturday night. After the right-wing network aired Trump's White House address which hailed the strikes as a success, Hannity continued in the same vein. 'I agree with the president,' he said. 'This is one of the most skilled, important, imperative peacekeeping, peace-through-strength-keeping operations in the last 40 years, and certainly the reign of terror in Iran, whether they know it or not, is coming to a quick end.' Hannity, who said he had spoken to Trump before going on air, then brought on Mark Levin, a conservative talkshow host who reportedly urged Trump to allow Israel to attack Iran during a private lunch in early June. Levin was not impartial. 'You're looking at a historic figure,' Levin said of Trump. 'We just kicked their ass.' His voice rising, Levin added: 'These Islamo-Nazis were building nuclear weapons to attack us too, with intercontinental ballistic missiles. Guess what? You can go to bed peacefully tonight and know that's not gonna happen. 'This mission was never going to fail under this commander in chief,' Levin said, before concluding: 'This is historic, he is historic, the United States military is historic.' It made sense that Fox News would cheer the strikes. It had spent days appearing to support the idea. On 17 June, host Brian Kilmeade pulled up a map of all the places Iran might attack – a map which included Germany, Italy and parts of the Middle East. He then showed off some photos of all the rockets Iran has, as Mark Dubowitz, from the pro-Israel thinktank Foundation for Defense of Democracies, speculated that Iran could deliver a 'nuclear payload'. 'Do you think we should help [Israel] finish the job at Fordo?' Kilmeade asked Dubowitz. 'We gotta help them finish the job,' Dubowitz said. 'Only we can slice through the concrete, slice through the mountain under which the nuclear site is buried.' Kilmeade concluded: 'President Trump's got some big decisions.' And it wasn't just Kilmeade. 'Iran wants to hold the world hostage,' a chyron blared during Jesse Watters show on 19 June. Later the chyron switched: 'An unarmed Iran would give US leverage', after Watters said 'there's risks to action and there's risks in inaction' before comparing the situation to a person undergoing 'life-saving surgery'. Trump, a known cable news watcher, was paying attention, according to the New York Times. 'The president was closely monitoring Fox News, which was airing wall-to-wall praise of Israel's military operation and featuring guests urging Mr Trump to get more involved,' the Times reported. It added that some of Trump's aides 'lamented' that Tucker Carlson, who has emerged as an anti-interventionist voice, was no longer on the network. That split between right-wing media has been stark. Many non-conservatives found themselves in the novel position of agreeing with Carlson, as he repeatedly stated in the days ahead of the attacks that the US should not get involved. On 18 June, Carlson confronted Republican senator Ted Cruz, shouting: 'You don't know anything about Iran!' in a memorable exchange. But Fox News had the president's ear, and it was awash with fawning praise after the attacks, as a series of guests, many of whom had vested interests in Iran being attacked, lined up to champion Trump. Among those was Amir Avivi, a retired Israeli general who has proposed forcibly relocating Palestinians to Egypt. 'This was an excellent opportunity to end the war which was led by president Trump and the Israeli people thank him for his leadership.' Avivi said, adding that Trump had created a 'global deterrence'. Still, in the Maga world, even the most sycophantic media organizations can never be absolutely certain of their footing. Pete Hegseth, the US defense secretary, went on a performative rant at the Pentagon on Thursday, lashing out on specific journalists he accused of not having been Pravda enough in their reporting of the strikes. 'Jennifer, you've been about the worst,' Hegseth said to Jennifer Griffin, a Fox News reporter, when she asked if the government was certain that highly enriched uranium had now been removed from Fordow. Continuing to experiment with grammar, Hegseth told Griffin she had also been: 'The one who misrepresents the most intentionally.' Could this be a rift between the administration and its most ardent supporter? No. Griffin offered a light pushback to Hegseth before agreeing with him that the Iran mission was 'absolutely' the most successful she had witnessed during her time reporting at the Pentagon. That seemed to do the trick. 'I appreciate that,' Hegseth said.