How Fox News helped champion Trump's attacks on Iran: ‘I agree with the president'
Fox News, however, took a different tack, championing a war that, according to reports, it had helped convince Donald Trump to start.
'This will go down in history as one of the greatest military victories,' roared Sean Hannity, arguably Fox News's best known host, on Saturday night.
After the right-wing network aired Trump's White House address which hailed the strikes as a success, Hannity continued in the same vein.
'I agree with the president,' he said. 'This is one of the most skilled, important, imperative peacekeeping, peace-through-strength-keeping operations in the last 40 years, and certainly the reign of terror in Iran, whether they know it or not, is coming to a quick end.'
Hannity, who said he had spoken to Trump before going on air, then brought on Mark Levin, a conservative talkshow host who reportedly urged Trump to allow Israel to attack Iran during a private lunch in early June.
Levin was not impartial.
'You're looking at a historic figure,' Levin said of Trump. 'We just kicked their ass.'
His voice rising, Levin added: 'These Islamo-Nazis were building nuclear weapons to attack us too, with intercontinental ballistic missiles. Guess what? You can go to bed peacefully tonight and know that's not gonna happen.
'This mission was never going to fail under this commander in chief,' Levin said, before concluding: 'This is historic, he is historic, the United States military is historic.'
It made sense that Fox News would cheer the strikes. It had spent days appearing to support the idea. On 17 June, host Brian Kilmeade pulled up a map of all the places Iran might attack – a map which included Germany, Italy and parts of the Middle East. He then showed off some photos of all the rockets Iran has, as Mark Dubowitz, from the pro-Israel thinktank Foundation for Defense of Democracies, speculated that Iran could deliver a 'nuclear payload'.
'Do you think we should help [Israel] finish the job at Fordo?' Kilmeade asked Dubowitz.
'We gotta help them finish the job,' Dubowitz said. 'Only we can slice through the concrete, slice through the mountain under which the nuclear site is buried.'
Kilmeade concluded: 'President Trump's got some big decisions.'
And it wasn't just Kilmeade.
'Iran wants to hold the world hostage,' a chyron blared during Jesse Watters show on 19 June. Later the chyron switched: 'An unarmed Iran would give US leverage', after Watters said 'there's risks to action and there's risks in inaction' before comparing the situation to a person undergoing 'life-saving surgery'.
Trump, a known cable news watcher, was paying attention, according to the New York Times.
'The president was closely monitoring Fox News, which was airing wall-to-wall praise of Israel's military operation and featuring guests urging Mr Trump to get more involved,' the Times reported. It added that some of Trump's aides 'lamented' that Tucker Carlson, who has emerged as an anti-interventionist voice, was no longer on the network.
That split between right-wing media has been stark. Many non-conservatives found themselves in the novel position of agreeing with Carlson, as he repeatedly stated in the days ahead of the attacks that the US should not get involved. On 18 June, Carlson confronted Republican senator Ted Cruz, shouting: 'You don't know anything about Iran!' in a memorable exchange.
But Fox News had the president's ear, and it was awash with fawning praise after the attacks, as a series of guests, many of whom had vested interests in Iran being attacked, lined up to champion Trump.
Among those was Amir Avivi, a retired Israeli general who has proposed forcibly relocating Palestinians to Egypt.
'This was an excellent opportunity to end the war which was led by president Trump and the Israeli people thank him for his leadership.' Avivi said, adding that Trump had created a 'global deterrence'.
Still, in the Maga world, even the most sycophantic media organizations can never be absolutely certain of their footing.
Pete Hegseth, the US defense secretary, went on a performative rant at the Pentagon on Thursday, lashing out on specific journalists he accused of not having been Pravda enough in their reporting of the strikes.
'Jennifer, you've been about the worst,' Hegseth said to Jennifer Griffin, a Fox News reporter, when she asked if the government was certain that highly enriched uranium had now been removed from Fordow.
Continuing to experiment with grammar, Hegseth told Griffin she had also been: 'The one who misrepresents the most intentionally.'
Could this be a rift between the administration and its most ardent supporter? No. Griffin offered a light pushback to Hegseth before agreeing with him that the Iran mission was 'absolutely' the most successful she had witnessed during her time reporting at the Pentagon.
That seemed to do the trick. 'I appreciate that,' Hegseth said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BreakingNews.ie
15 minutes ago
- BreakingNews.ie
Israel prepares to move Palestinians to southern Gaza ahead of offensive
Israel announced on Saturday that it is preparing to move Palestinians from combat zones to southern Gaza as plans move ahead for a military offensive in some of the territory's most populated areas. The Israeli military body in charge of humanitarian aid to Gaza, Cogat, said the supply of tents and other shelter equipment to the territory would resume on Sunday ahead of the mass movement of Palestinians to the south. Advertisement The military said it had no comment on when that movement would begin. Meanwhile, anxious families of Israeli hostages called for a 'nationwide day of stoppage' in Israel on Sunday to express growing frustration over 22 months of war. Families of hostages fear the coming offensive further endangers the 50 hostages remaining in Gaza, just 20 of them thought to still be alive. The families and supporters have pressed the government for a deal to stop the war – a call that some former Israeli army and intelligence chiefs have also made in recent weeks. Advertisement 'I want to believe that there is hope, and it will not come from above, it will come only from us,' said Dana Silberman Sitton, sister of Shiri Bibas and aunt of Kfir and Ariel Bibas, who were killed in captivity. She spoke at a weekly rally in Tel Aviv.
BBC News
15 minutes ago
- BBC News
Trump shifts ceasefire position ahead of Zelensky talks
Donald Trump has said he wants to bypass a ceasefire in Ukraine to move directly to a permanent peace agreement after his meeting with Russian President Vladimir a major shift of position, the US president said on Truth Social following Friday's summit that this would be "the best way to end the horrific war between Russia and Ukraine", adding ceasefires often "do not hold up".Trump will welcome Volodymyr Zelensky, Ukraine's president, to Washington on Monday and urged him to agree to a peace a phone call with Trump after the summit, Zelensky called for a real, lasting peace, while adding that "the fire must cease" and killings stop. Trump's comments indicate a dramatic shift in his position on how to end the war, having said only on Friday ahead of the summit that he wanted a ceasefire "rapidly".Ukraine's main demand has been a quick ceasefire before talks about a longer-term settlement, and Trump reportedly told European leaders beforehand that his goal for the summit was to obtain a ceasefire deal. Meanwhile, multiple news outlets reported on Saturday that Putin had presented an offer that involved Ukraine handing over complete control of its eastern Donetsk region, which is 70% occupied by Russia. In return, Russia would reportedly agree to front lines being frozen and other unspecified concessions were apparently US president, who has previously said any peace deal would involve "some swapping of territories", is said to have relayed the offer to Zelensky in a phone call following the summit. Just days ago, Ukraine's president ruled out ceding control of the Donbas, saying it could be used as a springboard for future Russian attacks. The BBC's US partner CBS has reported, citing diplomatic sources, that European diplomats were concerned Trump may try to pressure Zelensky on Monday into agreeing to deal terms he and Putin may have discussed at the summit. CBS quotes sources as saying that Trump told European leaders in a call after the summit that Putin would make "some concessions", but failed to specify what they were. In an interview with Fox News following Friday's summit, Trump was asked what advice he has for the Ukrainian leader, to which he responded by saying "make a deal"."Russia's a very big power and they're not," he had previously threatened "very severe consequences" if Putin did not agree to end the war, last month setting a deadline for Moscow to reach a ceasefire or face tough new sanctions, including secondary was announced by way of an agreement by either president following Friday's summit, but Trump insisted progress had been Saturday, Putin described the summit as "very useful" and said he had been able "set out our position" to Trump. "We had the opportunity, which we did, to talk about the genesis, about the causes of this crisis. It is the elimination of these root causes that should be the basis for settlement," the Russian president the "coalition of the willing" - a group of countries that have pledged to strengthen support for Ukraine that includes the UK, France, and Germany - will hold a call on Sunday afternoon before Zelensky's visit to the White House on Monday. A group of European leaders, including French President Emmanuel Macron, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz and European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, said "the next step must now be further talks including President Zelensky".The leaders said they were "ready to work" towards a trilateral summit with European support."We stand ready to uphold the pressure on Russia," they said, adding: "It will be up to Ukraine to make decisions on its territory. International borders must not be changed by force."UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer praised Trump's efforts to end the war, saying they had "brought us closer than ever before"."While progress has been made, the next step must be further talks involving President Zelenskyy. The path to peace in Ukraine cannot be decided without him," he in Kyiv, Ukrainians have described feeling "crushed" by the scenes from Alaska."I understand that for negotiations you shake hands, you can't just slap Putin in the face when he arrives. But this spectacle with the red carpet and the kneeling soldiers, it's terrible, it makes no sense," Serhii Orlyk, a 50-year-old veteran from the eastern Donetsk region said.
Telegraph
15 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Trump ‘played into Putin's hands'
Donald Trump has 'played into Vladimir Putin 's hands' by dropping his demands for a Russian ceasefire, a senior Ukrainian politician has warned. By aligning himself with Putin's 'insincere' peace proposal, the US president risked repeating Neville Chamberlain's betrayal of Czechoslovakia at the Munich conference of 1938, Oleksandr Merezhko, the chairman of the Ukrainian parliament's foreign affairs committee, said. 'If Trump is serious about supporting Putin's peace treaty idea without calling for a ceasefire first, then it looks very much like a betrayal,' Mr Merezhko told The Telegraph. 'It looks like Munich 1938,' he added referring to the decision to carve out Czechoslovakia's Sudetenland and award it to Hitler in the vain hope of staving off war. Mr Trump's effusive welcome of Putin at their summit in Alaska coupled with subsequent revelations of the concessions the US president appears to have made have triggered widespread anguish in Ukraine. Mr Merezhko said he believed Mr Trump had allowed Putin to hoodwink him into believing he was offering something bigger than a ceasefire, while remaining intent on destroying Ukraine. After emerging from his talks with the Russian leader, the US president said he now agreed with Putin that the best way to end the war was 'to go directly for a peace agreement and not a mere ceasefire agreement'. Yet in accepting that framework – and splitting from Ukraine and his European allies in doing so – Mr Trump had allowed himself to be captured by a long-held Kremlin narrative. 'When Putin talks of a peace treaty and addressing the root causes of the conflict, what he really means is the surrender and capitulation of Ukraine,' Mr Merezhko said. 'Trump has played into the hands of Putin. In choosing to support this idea it is a clear sign that unfortunately he is on the road to aligning with Putin.' In Kyiv, residents shared their dismay over the welcome given to Putin by Mr Trump. Olena and Yuriy, a couple who lost their son in the war, said they watched the Alaska summit unfold on television and were sickened by images of the Russian leader responsible for the invasion being welcomed on a red carpet. They spoke to The Telegraph as they put up a photograph of their son on the memorial wall of fallen soldiers at Saint Michael Square. 'The soldiers of the United States of America were unrolling this red carpet before Putin,' Yuriy said. 'For what reason is a person given such respect, who actually invaded our country?' In a nearby café, the events in Alaska were the topic of the day. 'We are supposed to be allies,' said Yevgheny Sofychuk, 39, who was getting a coffee during his morning dog walk. 'They behaved in a way that suggests they [Russia] are better.' The barista interrupts, 'All I want to say is that Trump is a chicken.' No ceasefire deal was reached at Friday's summit in Alaska and one Ukrainian MP described the outcome as one of the 'worst' possible for Ukraine. 'Putin has won some time for him and his troops,' she said. 'President Trump, in his own words, got a very good meeting. Ukraine got nothing.' On Saturday, after a call between Mr Trump, Volodymyr Zelensky and European leaders, the US president outlined a new proposal under which Ukraine would concede the entirety of the Donbas – Donetsk and Luhansk oblasts – in exchange for Article 5-style security guarantees, though these guarantees would not involve Nato membership. It has also been suggested that in other regions, such as Kherson and Zaporizhzhia, the front line will be frozen, according to officials who spoke on the condition of anonymity to several media outlets. While the fate of the Donbas region is already part of public debate, some Ukrainians said they would rather continue fighting for the land, even at the risk of losing it, than concede it to Putin. 'Our boys have been fighting and dying and they will never give away those territories. They are not ready for this.' Katerina, 35, said. 'But on the other side, for us civilian citizens, we've been working hard. We've lost a lot of relatives, lost properties, lost emotional and nerve cells. We want it to be over.' While Ukraine's constitution forbids recognition of any territory ceded to Russia, Serhii, 44, argued for a national deliberation. 'I think we should conduct some kind of pan-Ukrainian referendum to decide. It's a tough choice and there are no good options,' he admitted. 'The people of Donbas should also be consulted. I know that many there don't care much who is in charge – Russians or Ukrainians. Some are fine with being under Russian rule – that's a fact.' He added that with so much mixed messaging, it is hard to know whether Ukraine still has any 'cards' to play. 'If it's really bad and we are not in a position to choose or decide, then why should they ask us anyway? But if we still have some cards, then why not bargain for a bit longer?' Standing beside Serhii was a friend, pale-faced and silent. He refused to give his name or comment, explaining only that he has just returned from Russian captivity and the subject was too sensitive. Back at the memorial wall of heroes, the photograph of Olena and Yuriy's son now fills a once-empty space. The wall runs the length of a city block, with large sections of blue plaster still bare — spaces that could yet be filled if Ukraine continues the fight. 'Even if Trump stops all this weapons support,' said his father, Yuriy, 'we Ukrainians, those who care about our future, will be standing up to the very end.'
