
Inside the European centres favoured for cross-border tax planning
Countries are estimated to be losing €416 billion ($492 billion) in tax revenue each year due to profit shifting by multinational corporations and offshore tax arrangements by wealthy individuals, according to the State of Tax Justice 2024 report by the Tax Justice Network.
The UK, along with its Overseas Territories and Crown Dependencies, is cited in the report as the largest contributor to global tax revenue losses, accounting for 26% of the total.
The report finds that Europe and its associated jurisdictions are collectively linked to over 70% of the risk of corporate tax base erosion globally.
So, which European jurisdictions are most frequently used in international tax planning structures? Which countries play a prominent role in enabling such practices? And where do current rules make it easier for corporations to minimise their tax liabilities?
The Corporate Tax Haven Index (CTHI) assesses jurisdictions based on how much they contribute to enabling multinational corporations to shift profits and reduce tax payments, using a system of scores and indicators developed by the Tax Justice Network.
A jurisdiction's CTHI value reflects the extent of its involvement in facilitating global corporate tax base erosion, as calculated by the index. According to the 2024 report, countries are ranked by the scale and aggressiveness of their tax systems in offering corporate tax avoidance opportunities.
The UK's network of Overseas Territories and Crown Dependencies features prominently. The British Virgin Islands, Cayman Islands, and Bermuda occupy the top three positions in the index, each scoring over 2,400 points.
Among European jurisdictions, Switzerland holds the highest score outside the UK network (2,279), while the Netherlands (1,945) ranks highest within the European Union.
Among Europe's top five economies, the UK (894) has the highest CTHI value, closely followed by France (883). Germany scores 590, with Spain at 557. Italy performs the best with a score of 342—since a lower score indicates better performance in limiting corporate tax avoidance.
The CTHI Share is a critical metric that measures the proportion of global corporate tax avoidance risk attributed to each jurisdiction. According to the report, the UK and its network of Overseas Territories and Crown Dependencies are responsible for one-third of global corporate tax avoidance risks, while EU countries account for another third.
Breaking it down further, just three British Overseas Territories account for 19.7% of global corporate tax avoidance risks: the British Virgin Islands (7.1%), the Cayman Islands (6.7%), and Bermuda (5.8%).
In comparison, the UK itself accounts for just 2.1% — still the highest share among Europe's top five economies, followed closely by France, also at 2.1%.
Germany and Spain have similar shares, at 1.4% and 1.3% respectively, while Italy is responsible for just 0.8%.
Switzerland holds a 5.3% share. When other European countries and their associated jurisdictions are included, Europe's total share reaches 72%.
The Haven Score is another key indicator used in the report. It measures the extent to which a jurisdiction's laws and regulations create opportunities for corporate tax avoidance, whether intentional or not.
In 2024, the UK's network of Overseas Territories and Crown Dependencies dominated the rankings, with eight jurisdictions receiving the highest possible score of 100. The UK's score is 59.
Aside from the UK network, Switzerland (89) has the highest Haven Score in Europe, while Ireland and Cyprus (both 79) lead within the EU. Portugal has the lowest score at 46.
In 2021 alone, multinational corporations are estimated to have shifted €1.2 trillion worth of profits into jurisdictions with low or no tax rates, contributing to a €294 billion loss in direct tax revenue for governments globally.
Global Scale Weight is another indicator that measures how much financial activity conducted by multinational corporations enters or exits a given jurisdiction.
Europe and its overseas territories account for 61% of global financial activity, with the UK and its network holding the largest individual share at 16%.
Among individual European countries, the Netherlands has the highest scale weight at 11.1%, followed by Luxembourg at 8.8%. The UK (8.3%), Germany (4.2%), Switzerland and Ireland (both at 3.4%), and France (3.1%) are also among the European countries with the highest scale weights.
When a country offers special tax incentives or preferential tax arrangements to multinational corporations, these companies often end up paying significantly less than the statutory corporate income tax rate on their profits. This can result in much lower lower effective tax rates—known as the Lowest Available Corporate Income Tax Rate (LACIT). This measure is produced by the Tax Justice Network through analysis of potential legal disparities and tax planning strategies.
According to the OECD, the statutory corporate income tax rate is zero in all eight of the UK's Overseas Territories and Crown Dependencies. However, there are significant discrepancies between statutory rates and the documented lowest available corporate income tax rates (LACIT) in several jurisdictions.
The gap between statutory corporate tax rates and LACIT rates highlights the potential for tax planning strategies that can result in much lower effective rates. For example, in Luxembourg, the statutory rate is 24.9%, while the LACIT is just 0.3%.
In Switzerland, the statutory rate is 19.7% vs. 2.6% LACIT, and in Ireland, the gap is 12.5% vs. almost zero. Belgium shows a difference of 25% vs. 3%, while Malta has the largest gap, with a statutory rate of 35% and a LACIT of just 5%.
The Netherlands also demonstrates a sharp contrast, with a statutory rate of 25.8% vs. 5% for the LACIT. In its overseas territories, such as Aruba and Curaçao, statutory rates drop from over 20% to 0%.
Nvidia's shares surged 5.6% on Tuesday, boosted by a tens-of-billions-of-dollars artificial intelligence (AI) investment plan agreed between the US and Saudi Arabia. However, the AI powerhouse's stock remains down 4.5% year-to-date as of market close on 13 May, facing challenges stemming from US-China trade tensions and the launch of China's DeepSeek, a lower-cost AI model.
CEO Jensen Huang was among the US tech leaders—alongside Tesla's Elon Musk, OpenAI's Sam Altman, AMD's Lisa Su, Palantir's Alex Karp, and other executives—who accompanied President Trump on his visit to Saudi Arabia. At the investment conference, the White House announced a $600 billion investment pledge by the Middle Eastern kingdom into the US, including a nearly $142 billion defence sales deal, an $80 billion commitment into 'cutting-edge transformative technologies' in both countries, and other agreements across energy, aerospace, and sports sectors.
Trump also vowed to lift all sanctions against Syria during his visit, a political gesture to warm the relationship with key Middle East countries. He is also going to meet leaders of Qatar and the United Arab Emirates (UAE) later this week.
Nvidia announced it will partner with HUMAIN, a subsidiary of Saudi Arabia's Public Investment Fund focused on AI, to transform the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA) into 'a global powerhouse in AI, cloud and enterprise computing, digital twins and robotics.' Nvidia will supply its most advanced AI chips over the next five years, including 18,000 units of the GB200 Grace Blackwell AI supercomputer with its InfiniBand networking in the initial phase. The purchase forms part of a broader project for HUMAIN to build AI factories in the kingdom, with a projected capacity of up to 500 megawatts.
The announcement also includes a deal with the Saudi Data & AI Authority (SDAIA), which will 'deploy up to 5,000 Blackwell GPUs for a sovereign AI factory and enable smart city solutions.' Aramco Digital, the technology arm of oil giant Saudi Aramco, will also collaborate with Nvidia to develop AI infrastructure in the country.
Saudi Arabia, an oil-rich nation, is seeking to diversify its economy, which still relies heavily on crude exports. The kingdom aims to attract $100 billion in foreign direct investment annually, as outlined under its Vision 2030 strategy.
According to a Bloomberg report, the Trump administration is also considering a deal with the UAE, which would permit the import of over one million advanced Nvidia chips—well above the export limits imposed under the Biden administration.
Other major US tech firms, including AMD, Global AI, Amazon, Cisco, and OpenAI, also announced AI investment plans in Saudi Arabia during the event.
Trump's Middle East trip is shaping up to be a major win for US AI chipmakers, as the president looks to ease export curbs to China. On the same day, the US Department of Commerce (DOC) announced that it is rescinding the AI diffusion rule imposed during former President Joe Biden's administration, which had been due to take effect on 15 May.
Biden's administration had implemented fresh restrictions on AI chip exports to China in January, its final month in office, expanding controls to much of the world, amid concerns that China was accessing US AI chips via third countries. Both Saudi Arabia and the UAE had also been subject to those restrictions.
'The Trump administration will pursue a bold, inclusive strategy to advance American AI technology with trusted foreign partners, while keeping the technology out of the hands of our adversaries. At the same time, we reject the Biden administration's attempt to impose its own ill-conceived and counterproductive AI policies on the American people,' stated the DOC.
The department added that the Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) issued new guidance to strengthen controls over overseas exports of AI chips to limit China's access to advanced US technologies.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Euronews
4 hours ago
- Euronews
What's at stake for Europe if Strait of Hormuz is blocked?
Revolutionary Guard commander Sardar Esmail Kowsari told local media in an interview closing the Strait of Hormuz "is under consideration, and Iran will make the best decision with determination." "Our hands are wide open when it comes to punishing the enemy, and the military response was only part of our overall response," added Kowsari, who is a member of parliament in addition to his military position. Iran's short- and medium-range missiles would be capable of targeting oil infrastructure platforms, pipelines in the Strait, or even attacking commercial vessels, and surface-to-surface missiles could target tankers or ports along the Gulf. Airstrikes using aircraft and drones could disable navigation or radar equipment at major shipping ports in the region. Unmanned drones like Iran's Shahed models could potentially be used to attack specific shipping lanes or infrastructure in the Strait. Iran could attempt to deploy warships to physically block access to the Strait. In 2012, Iran launched a cyberattack on Saudi Arabia's oil industry, showing its growing capability in this domain. The Strait of Hormuz is one of the most strategically vital chokepoints in the world, and any blockade by Iran would pose serious risks for Europe. Blocking the Strait was one of four Iranian responses to the conflict including terrorist acts on mainland Europe which security expert Claude Moniquet cited in an interview with Euronews. It would be 'a disaster for Europe', the former French intelligence office said. Here are some of the reasons why. Roughly 20% of global oil and a significant portion of natural gas pass through the Strait. Europe imports oil and liquefied natural gas (LNG) from Gulf states Saudi Arabia, Qatar, UAE much of which travels through the Strait. If Iran blocks it, global oil prices would spike, and Europe could face energy shortages, especially in countries dependent on Middle Eastern fuel. A sudden oil price surge would increase inflation, energy costs, and disrupt industries across Europe. Manufacturing, transport, and agriculture sectors would be especially vulnerable. Market reactions and volatility in European stock exchanges could be a knock-on effect. A blockade could trigger military confrontations involving the US, EU navies, and Gulf states, risking a broader regional war. Europe might be drawn into the conflict through NATO obligations or alliances, especially with countries like France or the UK maintaining naval presence in the region. Beyond oil, the Strait is a key route for global shipping. Disruption could delay European imports of raw materials, electronics, and consumer goods, affecting supply chains. Insurance premiums for shipping could spike, raising costs for European businesses and consumers. At least three people have been injured and 100 tonnes of humanitarian aid were destroyed after a Russian drone strike on a warehouse in Ukraine's southeastern city of Zaporizhzhia in the early hours of Saturday. The injured were two police officers and a civilian, according to local officials. The damage from the strike is estimated at around $3 million. The aid was set to be provided to people who were internally displaced, as well as to residents in frontline areas of the war. Shops, a multi-storey building and a public transport stop were also reportedly damaged in the attack. Oleksandr Beluga, founder of the NGO Beluga UA, told local media ""Now everything has been destroyed, two days ago we received help from 5 trucks. There is approximately $3 million worth of damage here." Aside from Zaporizhzhia, the regions of Kharkiv, Donetsk and Dnipro were also targeted in an attack which consisted of a total of 58 Shahedattack UAVs, as well as various types of imitation drones, reported the Ukrainian air force. 43 were neutralised, they said, with 23 being shot down and 20 having their signals jammed. Meanwhile, the Ukrainian military also reported that it had carried out overnight drone strikes targeting two Russian chemical plants that were tied to the production of explosives. "As part of efforts to reduce (Russia's) ability to produce explosives and ammunition, the Ukrainian Armed Forces' drone systems, in coordination with other Defense Forces units, struck critical facilities of Russia's military-industrial complex overnight," said Ukraine's General Staff. The chemical plants were reportedly located in Stavropol Krai and Samara Oblast. Both were identified as major suppliers of raw materials and components for the production of Russia's weapons and fuel. The Stavropol governor confirmed the strike, saying that drone debris had landed in the city's industrial zone. On Friday, the bodies of 1,200 soldiers were returned to Ukraine as part of an agreement reached between Russia and Ukraine during their 2 June peace talks in Istanbul. Ukraine's Coordination Headquarters for the Treatment of Prisoners of War released a statement saying that Russia returned 1,200 bodies, and 'according to the Russian side, the bodies belong to Ukrainian citizens, in particular military personnel.' It was the only tangible achievement of the Istanbul talks, with 1,212 bodies also being returned by Russia earlier this week, with 27 dead soldiers going the other way. The two sides conducted a prisoners of war swap on Thursday, which included badly wounded and gravely ill captives. Their numbers were not disclosed, however.


Local France
6 hours ago
- Local France
Which European countries currently have Schengen border checks in place?
The borderless Schengen area guarantees free movement to tens of millions of EU citizens, residents and visitors. It recently celebrated its 40th anniversary , and after originally starting with just five countries signing a convention pledging to 'gradually abolish' internal borders checks and allow people to travel around freely, today the Schengen area includes 25 of the 27 EU member states and the four countries of the European Free Trade Association (Iceland, Liechtenstein, Norway and Switzerland). According to the EU Council website, the Schengen area covers over 4.5 million square kilometres with a total population of almost 450 million people. Every day around 3.5 million people cross the Schengen internal borders for work, study or visits, and almost 1.7 million people reside in one Schengen country while working in another. Under the Schengen Borders Code, which sets the rules governing the Schengen area, internal border checks can be temporarily restored where there is a 'serious threat to public policy or internal security', from the organisation of a major sport event to a terrorist attack. These checks should be a 'last resort' measure, should be limited to the period 'strictly necessary' to respond to the threat and not last more than 6 months. In exceptional circumstances, internal border controls can be reintroduced for a maximum of two years. Several members of the bloc have reintroduced temporary border controls in recent years. The full list of countries that currently have controls in place is available here . READ ALSO: Schengen hits 40 - What problems lie ahead for Europe's border-free zone? Advertisement According to European Commission information, the following European countries have reintroduced temporary border checks for the following dates: Spain - 27/06/2025 – 05/07/2025 - IV United National International Conference on Financing for Development in Sevilla (30 June – 3 July 2025); land borders with France and Portugal, internal air borders of Alicante, Almería, Barcelona, Bilbao, Girona, Granada, Madrid, Málaga, Murcia, Sevilla and Valencia; internal maritime borders of Barcelona, Málaga and Palma de Mallorca. Italy - 19/06/2025 – 18/12/2025 - Continued threat of terrorist infiltrations into migratory flows along the Western Balkan route, ongoing crises in the Middle East and Ukraine, high level of irregular migration including a strong presence of criminal smuggling and trafficking networks, and heightened security risks associated with the Universal Jubilee of the Catholic Church; land borders with Slovenia. Italy - 19/12/2024 – 18/06/2025 - Continued threat of terrorist infiltrations into migratory flows along the Mediterranean route and the Balkan route, ongoing crises in Eastern Europe and the Middle East, increasing migratory pressures and the risk of terrorist infiltration, risk of violent actions against Israeli citizens and terrorist activity, and heightened security risks associated with the Universal Jubilee of the Catholic Church; land borders with Slovenia. Austria - 12/05/2025 – 11/11/2025 - Threats associated with the continued high levels of irregular migration and migrant smuggling across Austria's southern borders, as well as the strain on the asylum reception system and basic services, Russia's ongoing war of aggression against Ukraine and the security situation in the Middle East, intensifying the threat posed by Islamist extremism and terrorism; land borders with Hungary and Slovenia. Austria - 16/04/2025 – 15/10/2025 - Threats associated with irregular migration, such as via the Balkan routes (including expected migratory pressure), as well as the strain on the asylum reception system and basic services, Russia's ongoing war of aggression against Ukraine, and the security situation in the Middle East aggravated by terrorist groups; land borders with Slovakia and Czechia. Advertisement Denmark - 12/05/2025 – 11/11/2025 - Serious threats to public policy and internal security posed by possible sabotage actions from Russia, as well as continuous terrorism-related events and organised crime, notably, tied to the Israeli-Hamas conflict and driven by radicalisation from groups such as Islamic State and Al-Qaida. These threats include potential attacks on Jewish and Israeli targets; land and sea borders with Germany but may extend to all internal borders. Norway - 12/05/2025 – 11/11/2025 - General threat aimed at the energy sector, threats of sabotage posed by the Russian intelligence service, as well as to increase infrastructure protection; ports with ferry connections to the Schengen area Sweden - 12/05/2025 – 11/11/2025 - Serious threats to public policy and internal security arise from organised cross-border crime and terrorism, highlighted by attacks involving military-grade explosives against foreign institutions and the public, including the involvement of foreign state actors leveraging criminal gangs, coupled with persistent threats from violent Islamist groups and individuals; all internal borders (land, air, and sea) and land borders with Denmark. Advertisement France - 01/05/2025 – 31/10/2025 - Serious threats to public policy, public order, and internal security posed by persistent jihadist threats, a rise in antisemitic attacks, the growing criminal networks facilitating irregular migration and smuggling, and irregular migration flows towards the Franco-British border that risk infiltration by radicalised individuals, as well as the irregular crossings on the Channel and North Sea borders, along with rising violence among migrants, particularly in northern coastal areas such as Dunkirk and Calais, leading to tense and perilous situations for both migrants and law enforcement; all internal borders (land, air, and sea) with Belgium, Germany, Luxembourg, the Swiss Confederation, Spain, and Italy. Germany - 16/03/2025 – 15/09/2025 - Serious threats to public security and order posed by continued high levels of irregular migration and migrant smuggling, and the strain on the asylum reception system. The impact of the global security situation (including Russia's war of aggression against Ukraine and the situation in the Middle East) on security and migration; land borders with France, Luxembourg, Belgium, the Netherlands, Denmark, Austria, Switzerland, Czechia, and Poland. READ ALSO: How long can Germany keep its border checks in place ? Advertisement Slovenia - 22/06/2025 – 21/12/2025 - Serious threats to public policy and internal security posed by a high level of terrorist threats and organised crime, including human smuggling and arms trafficking, the risk of terrorist infiltrations into migratory flows via the Western Balkans, hybrid threats from the Russian Federation and Belarus, as well as instability in the EU's neighbourhood, including Russia's ongoing aggression against Ukraine and instability following the fall of Assad's regime in Syria; land borders with Croatia and Hungary. The Netherlands - 09/06/2025 - 08/12/2025 - Serious threat to public policy caused by high levels of asylum applications, irregular migration, migrant smuggling, and secondary movements, leading to an overburdening of the migration system in general and the asylum system in particular, as well as pressure on public services, including housing, health care and education; land and air borders with Belgium and Germany. Bulgaria - 01/01/2025 – 30/06/2025 - Security risks related to illegal migration, including smuggling activities, as well as migratory pressure caused by ongoing crises in the Middle East and Africa, particularly in Syria, Afghanistan, and Gaza/Lebanon; land borders with Romania. Slovenia - 22/12/2024 – 21/06/2025 - Serious threats to public policy and internal security posed by continuous terrorism-related events and organised crime, including smuggling and arms trafficking, the risk of terrorist infiltrations into migratory flows via the Western Balkans, and radicalised Islamists potentially entering European cities during the holiday season, as well as hybrid threats from the Russian Federation, Russia's ongoing aggression in Ukraine, Russian nationals attempting to illegally enter Slovenia; land borders with Croatia and Hungary.


France 24
a day ago
- France 24
Spain economy minister urges fair, balanced EU-US tariff deal
"There is still a long way to go to reach an agreement, but there remains the will to do so," Cuerpo told AFP in an interview on Thursday. His comments came on the sidelines of a trip to Houston, Texas, as he sought to reassure Spanish businesses rattled by US President Donald Trump's wide-ranging tariffs. Trump has slapped a 10 percent tariff on almost all trading partners including the European Union since returning to the presidency in January. He also threatened to impose heftier duties of 50 percent on the bloc, although pausing the higher rate until July 9. For now, Trump's existing tariffs, including 25 percent US duties on imported automobiles and 50 percent levies on steel and aluminum, are affecting European companies, Cuerpo said. Pressure is mounting as July approaches. US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick told CNBC this week that an EU deal will likely be among the last that Washington completes, even as he remained optimistic that both sides would reach this goal. Arriving at a deal by July 9 would be ideal as it signals "certainty and confidence," Cuerpo said. He maintained that things are "progressing," stressing that "there is unanimity among the 27 member states to reach a fair and balanced agreement." No 'overreaction' He added that while Europe has prepared a response package to Trump's tariffs, Brussels is holding off implementation so that it cannot be "interpreted as an escalation in this tariff conflict." It is critical that the EU gives a "very clear signal" that it wants to strike a deal with the Trump administration, he said. "The fundamental thing is to avoid any element of overreaction," he added. Besides the EU, higher US tariffs on goods from dozens of economies including Japan and India are also due to take effect in July. Trump has taken an especially harsh stance on China as Beijing pushed back on US levies, with both sides engaging in an escalating tariffs war that has only been temporarily rolled back. The Spanish minister expects Trump's tariffs to have limited effect on his country's economic growth this year, given its smaller exposure to the US market. But he warned that certain sectors like olive oil and wine are at higher risk as more of such exports head to the United States. In the interim, Cuerpo noted the importance too of the Mercosur agreement, a trade deal between the European Union and four South American nations including Brazil. Asked if a new global trade order is emerging, Cuerpo said: "This feeling is widely shared." "We are witnessing a rebalancing of these trade relations at the international level and what nobody knows is what's the new point we will reach," he added.