Boeing evades MAX crash trial with last-minute settlement
Paul Njoroge, who lost his wife and three children in the Ethiopian Airlines disaster in which 157 people died, was to seek damages from Boeing in a case in Chicago.
"The case has settled for a confidential amount," said a spokesperson for Clifford Law, the firm representing Njoroge, whose mother-in-law also died in the crash.
"The aviation team at Clifford Law Offices has been working round-the-clock in preparation for trial, but the mediator was able to help the parties come to an agreement on behalf of Paul Njoroge," added Robert Clifford, a senior partner at Clifford, in a statement.
Until now, Boeing has succeeded in avoiding civil trials connected to the 737 MAX crashes of 2018 and 2019, reaching a series of settlements, sometimes only hours before trials were set to begin.
The crash of Ethiopian Airlines flight 302 on March 10, 2019 took place six minutes after departing Addis Ababa for Nairobi.
Njoroge lost his wife Carolyne, who was 33, his mother-in-law Ann Karanja, and the couple's three children: six-year-old Ryan; Kelli, who was four; and nine-month-old Rubi.
Njoroge told a congressional panel in July 2019 he was haunted by ideas of the final moments of the flight, how his children "must have clung to their mother, crying, seeing the fright in her eyes."
"It is difficult for me to think of anything else but the horror they must have felt," he said. "I cannot get it out of my mind."
The trial set for Monday was expected to last five to seven days.
Between April 2019 and March 2021, family members of 155 Boeing victims joined litigation charging the aviation giant with wrongful death and negligence.
Boeing has accepted responsibility for the Ethiopian Airlines crash, blaming the design of the Maneuvering Characteristics Augmentation System (MCAS), a flight handling system that malfunctioned.
That system was also implicated in the Lion Air crash in 2018, when the 737 MAX 8 fell into the sea after taking off from Jakarta, Indonesia, killing all 189 people on board.
The Lion Air crash also spawned dozens of lawsuits in the United States. But as of July 2025, only one case remained open.
Boeing has said it has reached out-of-court agreements with more than 90 percent of civil complainants in the MAX cases.
The company also has a settlement pending that would resolve a long-running Department of Justice criminal probe connected to the MAX crashes.
Some MAX families are contesting the Department of Justice's accord with Boeing, arguing that the company should face federal prosecution. US District Judge Reed O'Connor, in Texas, has yet to make a final decision on the proposed accord. - AFP
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Sun
2 hours ago
- The Sun
Senior Chinese diplomat Liu Jianchao taken in for questioning: WSJ
BEIJING: A senior Chinese diplomat considered a contender for future foreign minister has been detained by authorities for questioning, the Wall Street Journal reported on Sunday. Liu Jianchao, head of a department under the ruling Communist Party that oversees relations with foreign political parties, was 'taken away' after returning to Beijing from a work trip abroad in late July, according to people familiar with the matter, the report said. The reason for his detention could not be determined, it added. China's foreign ministry did not immediately respond to a request by AFP to confirm the report. Liu, 61, has previously served in key diplomatic roles including ambassadorships to the Philippines and Indonesia and foreign ministry spokesperson. He has also led various national and regional bodies tasked with implementing President Xi Jinping's signature crackdown on corruption. His detention represents the highest-level inquiry into a Chinese diplomat since Qin Gang, who was removed as foreign minister in 2023 following reports of an extramarital affair. Liu has been widely viewed as a rising figure in the Chinese diplomatic world. In early July, he accused the United States' defence chief of 'inciting confrontation and conflict' by urging American allies to bolster their militaries to counter China. His most recent public engagement was on July 29 in Algeria, following meetings in several African countries, Singapore and elsewhere late last month, according to the website of the International Department, which he currently heads - AFP
The Star
7 hours ago
- The Star
US tariffs a wake-up call for smarter trade for India
STARTING this month, American consumers shopping for Indian goods and Indian exporters shipping to the United States will feel the sting of a new 25% tariff slapped by the Trump administration, on top of an earlier 25%. In a move framed as protecting domestic manufacturing, Washington's latest trade salvo imposes up to 50% duties on a range of Indian exports – including on certain textiles, auto components and categories like generic pharmaceuticals and machinery parts. But while headlines focus on diplomatic retaliation and political posturing, the real story here is about consumers, on both sides of the trade wall. Whether it is a small apparel brand in Gujarat, a turmeric exporter in Erode, or a US importer sourcing affordable generics from Hyderabad, this tariff hike doesn't just punish trade, it punishes choice. Instead of a knee-jerk reaction, India should treat this moment as a strategic wake-up call. The global trading order is shifting fast. Protectionism is making a comeback under the 'national interest' banner, but everyday people bear its actual cost. Consumers pay more, get less, and lose access to innovation. Take the example of Indian pharma. The US relies on India for 40% of its affordable and high-quality generic medicines, a lifeline that keeps drug prices affordable for millions. With tariffs, those prices could spike, leaving American consumers and insurers to pay significantly more for basic medicines. That's bad business for both sides. Or consider Indian textile SMEs that export cotton garments to US retailers. These businesses already operate on razor-thin profit margins. Tariffs could render them uncompetitive overnight, leading to lost orders, layoffs, and reduced production. And American retailers won't absorb the shock; they'll pass it down to consumers through higher prices. This is the domino effect of protectionism: fewer options, higher prices, and stalled innovation. That's bad news for anyone who cares about affordability and variety, whether buying shoes in Chicago or selling saris in Surat. Rather than retaliating with blanket duties on US imports, India should seize the moment to make its economy more open, competitive, and consumer-friendly. — AFP The solution, however, is not to mirror America's tariff war with one of our own. Rather than retaliating with blanket duties on US imports, India should seize the moment to make its economy more open, competitive, and consumer-friendly. That means lowering our import tariffs, especially on consumer goods where global competition drives better quality and prices. It means signing trade deals that aren't just about political alliances but about securing cheaper medicines, cutting-edge tech, and better value for Indian consumers. It means slashing red tape at customs so Indian exporters can survive, not just US tariffs, but future global disruptions. Most importantly, it means putting consumer welfare at the heart of our trade policy – not treating it as a side effect. If the cost of a trade war is higher prices, fewer choices, and shrinking markets, the goal of trade reform must be the opposite: greater access, lower prices, and more freedom to choose. India has long spoken about becoming a global manufacturing hub. However, that ambition will remain half-baked unless we build an economy where producers and consumers benefit from openness, not protectionism. Trump's tariff bombshell is a challenge, but also an opportunity. Instead of playing defence, it is time India went on offence, with policies that protect not just producers, but also the millions of consumers who stand to gain from a freer, fairer global marketplace. Shrey Madaan is an Indian Policy Fellow with the Consumer Choice Center.
The Sun
8 hours ago
- The Sun
Colombian presidential candidate critical after new brain haemorrhage
BOGOTÁ: Colombian presidential candidate Miguel Uribe has suffered a setback in his recovery after a new cerebral haemorrhage left him in critical condition. The 39-year-old conservative senator was shot multiple times during a campaign event in Bogotá in June. Doctors at Santa Fe Foundation hospital confirmed Uribe now requires additional neurosurgical procedures. His condition has worsened, necessitating deep sedation, according to a medical statement released on Saturday. Uribe had shown signs of improvement in recent weeks, giving hope to his family and supporters. Authorities have arrested six suspects linked to the assassination attempt. Investigators believe the teenage shooter was hired by dissident members of the former FARC guerrilla group. Peace talks between the government and the dissident faction stalled last year without significant progress. Uribe was a leading right-wing contender for Colombia's 2026 presidential elections. The attack has reignited fears of a resurgence in Colombia's history of political violence. - AFP
