Yes, ‘Trump blinked.' And his inane economic fiascos will just keep on coming.
"WTF. Who's in charge?" Rep. Steven Horsford asked U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer Wednesday. (House Ways and Means Committee screengrab)
Did you hear the one about everybody worldwide, probably even the penguins on those islands, telling Trump they would do whatever Trump says because he's the greatest tariff negotiator in the whole history of ever?
Nevada Democratic U.S. Rep. Steven Horsford heard it, while he was in a House Ways and Means Committee hearing Wednesday in which Trump's U.S. Trade Representative, Jamieson Greer, was testifying.
And Horsford wasn't buying it.
Asked by Horsford for details on Trump's 'pause' on the trade war against pretty much the entire world that Trump launched with much fanfare last week, Greer said 'my understanding is that because so many countries decided not to retaliate…'
'Excuse me?' interjected an incredulous Horsford.
'China increased their tariffs on the United States. Trump blinked,' Horsford told Greer
Horsford could have added that the European Union Wednesday approved 25% tariffs on a host of U.S. goods aimed primarily at Republican states — not in response to Trump's preposterously named 'reciprocal' tariffs he announced on the also preposterously named 'Liberation Day' last week, but in retaliation for 25% tariffs Trump slapped on EU steel and aluminum last month. (Thursday the EU announced it would pause implementation of those tariffs to see if the 78-year-old toddler gets a clue while in his self-imposed time out over the next 90 days, although the EU phrased it more diplomatically.)
Horsford might also have reminded Greer that rather than trembling in terror at Trump's 'Liberation Day' tariffs, the EU had been crafting retaliatory tariffs to those, too, through joint consultation between not only member nations but also potentially affected industries, in a methodical and thoughtful process of the sort unthinkable under the Trump-Musk freak show.
And Hosford could have even noted that Canada Wednesday announced 25% tariffs on U.S. autos and parts exports, matching Trump's 25% tariffs on Canada autos and parts that went into effect last week.
Who's reciprocal now?
While Horsford was pressing Greer for details on what Trump's tariff policy is now and how and when the determination to pause the big beautiful tariffs Trump announced last week was made, it became obvious that Greer — Trump's top trade negotiator — only learned about it when a staffer whispered it into his ear during the Ways and Means hearing.
'WTF? Who's in charge?' Horsford exclaimed, adding that Trump had 'pulled the rug out from under' Greer and Horsford would feel sorry for him, except he doesn't.
'There's no strategy. You just found out, three seconds ago, sitting here. We saw you,' Horsford added.
'What does this even mean for your negotiating strategy?' Horsford continued. 'How are you in charge of negotiations if the president is tweeting about this from wherever the hell he is?'
At one point Wednesday Horsford referred to Trump administration tariff policy as 'amateur hour.' He's right. Trump's tariff policy isn't the product of some brilliant and carefully calibrated strategy. It's dictated by Trump's erratic temperament and crackpot obsessions.
But that's no reason to ignore Trump's venal side. And Horsford didn't.
Before Trump tweeted his tariff policy, he took to social media to tell everyone 'THIS IS A GREAT TIME TO BUY!!!'
When he posted that, did Trump already know that within hours he would make an announcement that was sure to prompt the markets to rebound, and the social media post was a signal for those in the know? Did Trump by some other means tip off people prior to his announcement, thus allowing them to score a substantial financial windfall yesterday?
Or as Horsford put it to Greer, 'Is this market manipulation?'
'No,' Greer responded.
'Why not?' Horsford asked. 'If it was a plan. If it was always the plan, how is this not market manipulation?'
'It's not market manipulation,' Greer responded.
'So if it's not market manipulation, what is it?' Horsford asked again. 'Who's benefitting? What billionaire just got richer?'
Whatever else it was, 'it sure is not a strategy,' Horsford added.
It's hard to imagine some billionaire or three didn't make a killing yesterday because Trump, wittingly or not, spilled the beans early. Trump and his courtiers are nothing if not messy.
Alas, even if Wednesday was a day of historic-folkloric insider trading, Oval Office style, the U.S. Supreme Court has decreed that laws are for mere mortals, not Trump.
Meanwhile, Trump wants everyone to believe he perfectly executed his 'Liberation Day' tariffs and the world surrendered to his invincible Trumpness, and it was all part of his brilliant plan.
But Horsford's right. Trump didn't 'pause' his tariffs because the world bowed down before him. Faced with markets crumbling because of him, nations standing up to him, and even some congressional Republicans publicly (gasp!) questioning his greatness, Trump lost his nerve, and blinked.
By the time the markets opened Thursday morning, Wednesday's rebound, which fell far short of recouping losses since Trump's Rose Garden 'reciprocal' tariff tantrum last week, was already in retreat.
And whether it's in 90 days, or 30 days, or every ten days, Trump's aforementioned erratic temperament, combined with Republican congressional cowardice, guarantees a lot more episodes just as nerve-wracking and destructive as the fiasco Trump foisted on us with his asinine 'Liberation Day.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Politico
12 minutes ago
- Politico
Bondi says violent LA protesters will face federal charges
At least nine people are facing federal charges for their involvement in protests against immigration enforcement in Los Angeles, Attorney General Pam Bondi said Monday. Demonstrators face charges for attacking police with Molotov cocktails, looting and spitting on law enforcement, Bondi said in a TV interview. 'We are going to prosecute them federally,' she said in an interview on Fox News. 'If California won't protect their law enforcement, we will protect the LAPD and the sheriff's office out there.' Sporadic but at times raucous protests broke out in several parts of the Los Angeles area in recent days, prompting President Donald Trump to deploy National Guard troops and Marines despite the fact that Gov. Gavin Newsom and Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass said the additional forces were not needed. Bondi said the Trump administration planned to take a hard line against demonstrators. 'You spit on a federal law enforcement officer no more,' she said. 'As President Trump said, you spit. we hit. Get ready. If you spit on a federal law enforcement officer, we are going to charge you with a crime federally. You are looking at up to five years maximum in prison.' Those charged already include David Huerta, president of the Service Employees International Union California, who was injured and arrested while protesting the arrest of workers in downtown Los Angeles. He was released Monday from federal custody on a $50,000 bond. The Trump administration's decisive treatment of demonstrators — and the president's focus on punishing those who assault police officers — stands in contrast to his sweeping pardons for roughly 1,500 people who stormed the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021, seeking to overturn the election. Trump has deployed up to 4,000 soldiers from the California National Guard to help quell the demonstrations over the protests of Newsom and Bass — who say the moves are worsening tensions. The state has sued to reverse the deployments. The White House also ordered 700 Marines to join the National Guard, though it's unclear exactly what role they will play. The San Francisco Chronicle reported on Monday evening that Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem had asked Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth to direct military forces to arrest 'lawbreakers.' DHS did not immediately respond to request for comment from POLITICO, and the Department of Defense declined to comment on the story. 'You can run, you can't hide,' Bondi told Fox. 'We are coming after you federally. If you assault a police officer, if you rob a store, if you loot, if you spit on a police officer, we are coming after you.'
Yahoo
18 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Senator Martin Heinrich calls for Torrance County ICE detention facility to be closed
Jun. 9—New Mexico's senior senator is calling for a New Mexico-based Immigration and Customs Enforcement detention facility to be closed, after his congressional staff observed troubling conditions during a visit in late May. "For years, detainees have been denied adequate access to legal services and medical care while being subjected to inhumane living conditions and continued instances of physical abuse," Sen. Martin Heinrich, D-N.M., wrote to Acting ICE Director Todd Lyons in a letter Thursday. The Torrance County Detention Facility is owned and operated by CoreCivic in Estancia. Heinrich has repeatedly pushed for CoreCivic's contract to be terminated, including in a December 2023 letter during the Biden administration. "CoreCivic is committed to providing safe, humane and appropriate care for the people in our facilities," CoreCivic spokesman Brian Todd said in a statement, pointing to the facility's overall "good" ratings in its 2024 and 2025 ICE Office of Detention Oversight audits. As the Trump administration has been trying to increase deportations, members of Congress have been attempting to conduct oversight of ICE detention centers around the country. When New Jersey Congresswoman LaMonica McIver and other Democratic officials tried to do an oversight visit to a Newark ICE center in May, she was charged with two counts of assault after a confrontation with officers trying to arrest the Newark mayor. On May 28, Heinrich's staff members were allowed to tour one housing unit at the Torrance County facility, but were denied access to two other housing units, after they heard at least 10 detainees file complaints of abuse, and lack of access to laundry and medical services. According to Todd, detainees have daily access to sign up for medical and mental health services, there are clinics staffed with licensed health professionals and medical personnel on site at all hours. "The agent claimed that a revised ICE visitation protocol prohibited congressional staff from visiting housing units with detainees present," the letter reads. "However, the document the agent cited made no mention of limiting congressional staff visitation to empty pods, and it in fact cited to a statutory authority explicitly forbidding ICE from denying congressional staff conducting oversight access." Congressional staff members found backed-up sinks, a drain in the middle of a common area backed up with sewage water, and non-functioning tablet devices — devices that people detained by ICE use to access legal services, according to Heinrich's letter. The conditions match those described by detainees and advocates, the letter says. Maintenance staff respond quickly to plumbing issues, Todd said in a statement, and the common area drain was backed up with water after debris collected in shower drains, not with sewage. CoreCivic is committed to providing detainees with access to counsel and courts, Todd said, although he did not respond to a question about the broken tablets. TCDF Warden George Dedos confirmed that the detention facility had no water from Estancia for three days, the letter says, and was unable to answer questions about the capacity of the facilities' two back-up water tanks or describe the contingency plan for when there is another water outage, "short of the total relocation of all the detainees." "He told my staff during their visit that the water shortage had not impacted their operations, but that runs contrary to what detainees said during that same visit," Heinrich wrote. His staff were told by detainees that "water was only turned on for one hour every three days for showers, they were provided only two bottles of drinking water per day, and they were unable to flush toilets for days at a time." CoreCivic was notified on April 29 that Estancia was having a water supply issue and tried to reduce its water consumption. Drinking water and bottled water were available, Todd said, and water was provided to help flush toilets "as an added measure to reduce water consumption." The laundry services and showers were placed on a schedule, but "those services were still available to all of those in our care," according to Todd. ICE did not respond to a request for comment.
Yahoo
18 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Sending money to family in foreign countries may be taxed more
Jun. 9—Families hoping to send money to loved ones in other countries may be hit with additional fees from a tax and spending bill proposed by the Trump administration that would slap a 3.5% tax on remittances sent by anyone who is not a U.S. citizen. The "One Big Beautiful Bill Act" passed through the House in May and is now being debated by the Senate. The budget bill has several proposed tax changes, which include taxing money sent from an estimated 40 million non-US citizens — including green card holders, temporary workers and undocumented immigrants — to family and friends in other countries. The bill had a 5% tax but was reduced to 3.5%. The bill is another way the Trump administration is hoping to dissuade immigrants, both documented and undocumented, from coming into the country and moving money out of the U.S. economy. Republicans believe the bill would increase the average take-home pay of U.S. citizens, while Democrats believe the bill and increased taxes are "a transfer of wealth from the working class to the rich," said Daniel Garcia, spokesperson for the Democratic Party of New Mexico. What is a remittance? Remittances refer to sending money from one person to another and is typically done between family members from one country to another. A person living and working in the U.S. would send money to family members typically living in a developing country, where this money is a source of income that contributes to the country's gross domestic product (GDP). Payments are typically sent using an electronic payment service or a money transfer app. Banks, credit unions and money transfer services charge a fee for processing remittances, and fees average 10%, according to the International Monetary Fund. Cryptocurrency exchanges are not as heavily regulated and can be a way to avoid additional taxes and surcharges. "Taxing remittances would amount to a form of double taxation, since migrants already pay taxes in the country where they work," Esteban Moctezuma Barragán, Mexican Ambassador, wrote in a statement. "Imposing a tax on these transfers would disproportionately affect those with the least, without accounting for their ability to pay," Barragán added. However, some believe the 3.5% tax fee would give financial support to public services and is the most "pro-worker, pro-family and pro-American legislation we've seen in decades," said Amy Barela, chairwoman of the Republican Party of New Mexico. "Let's be clear, this measure is not about targeting individuals," she wrote in a statement to the Journal. "It's about ensuring the 3.5% fee, although modest, would also have a very meaningful impact in helping offset costs associated with public services, border security, and community infrastructure — relieving some of the financial pressure on hardworking New Mexicans who continue to bear the burden of an imbalanced system." Crucial source of revenue Mexico is the second-largest receiver of personally wired money behind India, according to the Center for Strategic and International Studies. In 2024, Latin America received $160.9 billion, with the U.S. accounting for 96.6% of all remittances to Mexico. They also make up 20-30% of GDP in countries like El Salvador, Guatemala, Haiti and Honduras. "Remittance is a very important source of revenue in our government," said Patricia Pinzón, consul of Mexico. "This would affect Mexican families and the economy in general, but I would say the basic needs of Mexican families is the most worrying thing." However, "whatever happens in one economy will affect the other," said Pinzón. "Our economies are so interrelated that everything that happens here has a consequence in Mexico," she said. "Mexicans will not stop sending money; they'll just look for alternative ways to send it." Mexican migrant workers sent 16.7% of their labor income back to their families, and more than 80% of the income remains in the U.S. economy. The average amount of remittance sent to Mexico is roughly $350 every one to two months, which "could seem like nothing for the U.S., but it's money that a whole family lives on and covers their basics in Mexico," Pinzón said.
