Why Singaporeans are waiting hours at A&E — and what hospitals want you to do instead
CGH and SKH advised the public via Facebook yesterday to visit their EDs only for serious or life-threatening conditions, and to consult general practitioners or polyclinics for minor symptoms such as cough, sore throat or runny nose, The Straits Times reported.
KTPH, which began seeing a spike in ED cases after the recent long weekend, said the rise was not mainly due to Covid-19, despite a small increase in infections.
Health authorities said on May 13 that while there has been a rise in Covid-19 cases, current variants do not appear more transmissible or severe than earlier strains.
At 5.30pm on May 14, KTPH's website listed a wait time of 107 minutes with 135 patients in queue, dropping to 71 minutes and 124 patients by 6.30pm.
KTPH said its emergency department remains fully operational and under control, and that patients with critical conditions will still be seen immediately.
The Straits Times reported that during its visit to CGH yesterday, a notice outside the A&E department warned of waits lasting at least five to eight hours due to the surge in patients.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Boston Globe
an hour ago
- Boston Globe
RFK Jr.'s next target: the federal vaccine court
He said in a social media post last month that the vaccine court had 'devolved into a morass of inefficiency, favoritism and outright corruption.' Parents who believe their children were injured by vaccines are 'facing the monumental power and bottomless pockets of the US government,' he said. Kennedy has also claimed, falsely, that the compensation program prevents families from suing vaccine makers in traditional courts. (This is true of the COVID-19 vaccines, however, which are adjudicated in a separate program.) Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up And Kennedy has claimed that the vaccine court punishes and intimidates expert witnesses and petitioners' attorneys. Advertisement Experts fear that some of the changes Kennedy has hinted at could lead to an onslaught of lawsuits, jeopardizing the manufacture of vaccines and undermining their use. 'Kennedy can fix this system without burning it down,' said Tony Yang, a health policy expert at George Washington University. But Kennedy sounds 'more like a frustrated lawyer who lost cases than an eager secretary trying to fix things.' Indeed, allies of the secretary have fared poorly in the vaccine court. Their litigation in traditional courts -- including a 2022 lawsuit in which Kennedy delivered closing arguments -- also has fallen short. Advertisement The Department of Health and Human Services did not respond to repeated requests for comment. Public health officials in the United States have been tracking vaccine safety for decades and have long said that shots routinely given to children are safe. But all vaccines have at least occasional side effects, and there are rare instances of serious injury. Congress set up the vaccine court in 1986 after a spate of lawsuits began to drive vaccine makers out of the market. So-called special masters judge claims of injuries from vaccines, weighing the available evidence. The program covers most routine immunizations given to children and pregnant women, and is funded by a small tax on each shot. The vaccine court has paid $5.4 billion in claims since its inception, awarding compensation in about 42 percent of the roughly 28,000 claims filed. But in accordance with a great body of scientific evidence, the court's special masters have denied thousands of claims that childhood vaccines are linked to autism. Kennedy, a prominent vaccine skeptic, believes that there is such a link and has long accused government officials of hiding the risks. Some reforms widely seen as necessary would require Congress to intervene. Among them: more of the special masters who preside as judges over cases. Kennedy said in an interview last month that he wanted to ensure families seeking compensation 'get it very quickly, and they get it without the kind of adversarial impediments that have now been erected over the past 40 years.' A new fast-track system for rare injuries that studies have definitively linked to certain vaccines could speed up the process. In the current system, government lawyers sometimes fight families over settled links, said Altom Maglio, an attorney who has represented people in the vaccine court for 25 years. Advertisement 'Fighting tooth and nail is just not appropriate, and doesn't meet the goals,' he said. At the same time, special masters sometimes make awards even when the connection between a side effect and vaccine is tenuous, said Dr. Daniel Salmon, director of the Institute for Vaccine Safety at Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. 'There are a lot of things that are being compensated where there's inadequate evidence,' Salmon said. 'We need more science.' Kennedy has also suggested that injury claims regarding COVID-19 shots should be moved to the vaccine court. At present, those claims are piling up in a parallel federal system called the Countermeasures Injury Compensation Program. Of more than 14,000 injury claims filed regarding COVID vaccines, only 69 have been paid out. More than 9,400 are pending, and about 4,800 have been dismissed. Congress would need to act to move those claims to the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program. But adding the large COVID backlog to the vaccine court's own poses huge challenges, Yang said: 'You're complaining about your kitchen sink, it's clogged, and then you try to wash your bike in it.' There are some aspects of the program that Kennedy can change without Congress. That includes altering the official table detailing the injuries presumed to be linked to certain vaccines. Changing the table to say that certain vaccines cause autism or asthma, months or years after shots, for example, could hobble the system, opening the doors to tens of thousands of new claims that would previously have been dismissed. Advertisement 'He's talking about opening a can of worms that could result in Americans losing access to some vaccines and huge expenditures in court fees,' said Dr. Thomas R. Frieden, a former director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Kennedy has said, falsely, that the vaccine court is the 'exclusive remedy' for families seeking compensation. In fact, claimants can sue vaccine makers in traditional courts if the government does not respond to them within 240 days or if they are dissatisfied with its offer of compensation. But the traditional courts have not been any more generous to Americans who believe they were injured, said Renee Gentry, director of the Vaccine Injury Litigation Clinic at George Washington University. 'The idea that going to straight to civil litigation means you're going to win is absurd,' Gentry said. 'These are incredibly difficult cases.' She believes her clients are better off in the vaccine court. Some experts are concerned that Kennedy may open the door to at least one proposal already pending in Congress -- to abolish the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program altogether. 'I think he's been really clear,' said Richard Hughes IV, a lawyer who represents vaccine makers. 'He would be fine with the total collapse of the program.' This article originally appeared in
UPI
an hour ago
- UPI
Ousted FDA vaccine regulator Vinay Prasad returns to post
Vinay Prasad, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration's top vaccine regulator, is returning to his post less than two weeks after the White House had him ousted. File Photo by Jim Lo Scalzo/EPA The U.S. Food and Drug Administration's top vaccine regulator is returning to his post less than two weeks after the White House had him ousted. Dr. Vinay Prasad will again head the FDA's Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, which oversees vaccines and complex treatments for serious diseases, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services confirmed. HHS spokesperson Andrew Nixon said Prasad is resuming his role "at the FDA's request," according to The Washington Post. "Neither the White House nor HHS will allow the fake news media to distract from the critical work the FDA is carrying out under the Trump administration," Nixon added in a statement. Prasad, a hematologist-oncologist, joined the Trump administration as a senior health official after publicly criticizing the government's response to the COVID-19 pandemic. On July 29, he was removed from his role after some conservative figures such as far-right activist and conspiracy theorist Laura Loomer criticized his approach to drug approvals and his past political views. However, a White House review found the complaints to be disingenuous, according to two people familiar with the situation. White House spokesperson Kush Desai said it was "not only appropriate, but critical for the Administration to recruit the most qualified and experienced staffers who are totally aligned with President Trump's agenda to 'Make America Great Again.'" The reversal followed FDA Commissioner Dr. Marty Makary advocating for Prasad's return. "The idea that he was pushed out by anybody is simply untrue," Makary said at a news conference. "He saw some media headlines and didn't want to be a distraction. We have encouraged him to reconsider, and we're still doing that." In a post on X, Loomer criticized the decision, calling it an "egregious personnel decision," and vowed to increase her investigations into HHS and FDA officials. It is unclear whether Prasad will also return to his additional former role as the FDA's chief medical and scientific officer. More information Learn more about the role of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Copyright © 2025 HealthDay. All rights reserved.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Woman's snoring was symptom of rare form of cancer: 'Don't ignore it'
A mother in the U.K. who began snoring for the first time in her life was stunned to learn the unexpected symptom was a sign of a rare and potentially life-threatening cancer. "I started snoring, which I'd never done before," she recalled. "I was waking myself up, breathing through my mouth rather than my nose." Claire Barbery, 51, initially brushed off the blockage on one side of her nose, blaming it on the after-effects of Covid-19 or irritation from frequent testing while working at a care facility, as reported by SWNS. Doctors Reveal Key Signs Of Lyme Disease As Tick Season Intensifies Across Us It wasn't until the persistent congestion worsened and she started snoring in her sleep that she sought medical advice. "I very nearly canceled that appointment because I didn't want to be wasting NHS time," Barbery said, per SWNS. "There's nothing wrong, I thought. But looking back, that decision could have cost me my life." Read On The Fox News App Barbery tried using a steroid spray without success before being referred to an ear, nose, and throat (ENT) specialist in January 2023. After undergoing scans and a biopsy, she was diagnosed with olfactory neuroblastoma, a rare type of cancer that develops in the upper part of the nasal cavity. Doctors discovered a 5-centimeter tumor that had already begun eroding the bone at the base of Barbery's skull. Forget 10,000 Steps — Research Reveals The Real Number You Need For Better Health It was a dangerous and complex case requiring urgent intervention. The surgery was performed at Queen Elizabeth Hospital in Birmingham by consultant surgeon Shahz Ahmed, a skull base specialist, SWNS reported. The procedure, which was featured in the Channel 5 documentary "Surgeons: A Matter of Life or Death," involved removing the tumor along with Barbery's olfactory bulbs, leaving her with a permanent loss of smell. "Claire had a very rare form of cancer that needed to be removed," Ahmed said in the report. "Untreated, it could have metastasized and spread into the neck and the rest of the body." Because the tumor had already spread through the skull base into the bottom of the brain, the surgery posed serious risks due to the proximity to vital structures. "The key worries were operating between the left and the right eye," Ahmed said. "The main blood supply to the brain is in very close proximity, so the risk of seizures, stroke, injury to the brain and loss of life were all very real." The surgery was a success and there were no complications. Following the procedure, Barbery underwent six weeks of chemotherapy and radiotherapy. She is now under regular medical monitoring and continues to recover, gradually returning to work and enjoying time with her husband and daughters, SWNS reported. Now living in Newquay, Cornwall, Barbery is using her experience to advocate for awareness of head and neck cancers. Click Here To Sign Up For Our Health Newsletter She recently partnered with the Get A-Head Charitable Trust to raise awareness for World Head and Neck Cancer Day. "If you know your body, then you've got to push," she said. "If there's something wrong, don't ignore it." According to SWNS, Barbery's case is a reminder that even minor or unusual symptoms, like snoring, can sometimes be signs of something far more serious. For more Health articles, visit Looking back, Barbery said she's grateful she went to the appointment she almost canceled. "Even then, I didn't want to waste anyone's time," she admitted. "But that decision ended up saving my life."Original article source: Woman's snoring was symptom of rare form of cancer: 'Don't ignore it' Solve the daily Crossword
