China and U.S. plot pathways to AI dominance
In late July, the world's two superpowers in artificial intelligence (AI) laid out their near-term strategies. The plans diverge on how to achieve tech supremacy. They also both contain many contradictions and are based on numerous bold assumptions.
Yet whichever country best executes their imperfect AI roadmap will gain major advantages. And not only in re-shaping the global economy but also tilting the military balance of power in their favour.
The Trump administration's new AI Action Plan takes a predictably ultranationalist approach. 'America is the country that started the AI race,' Trump said in a speech the evening it was published. 'And as president of the United States, I'm here today to declare that America is going to win it.'
The Associated Press
China is aiming to take the lead in the battle for AI supremacy. Chinese President Xi Jinping is displayed on a screen as he delivers a speech at the closing ceremony for China's National People's Congress at the Great Hall of the People in Beijing on March 13.
To do so, the White House intends to give U.S. tech giants far more leeway. 'The action plan, at its highest level, reads just like a wish list from Silicon Valley,' an executive at the AI Now Institute, a non-partisan research organization, told media outlet Defense One.
Existing government guardrails will be rolled back and 'woke' safety measures will disappear. Federal funds will be withheld from states attempting to regulate AI on their own. Environmental laws that impede data centre construction are on the chopping block. Protectionist trade policies at home will be paired with efforts to champion American companies abroad.
Vague details for mitigating national security risks arising from cutting-edge models only appear on the manifesto's final two pages. Nevertheless, many experts have praised the plan. In particular, for committing the U.S. to unleashing domestic AI innovation, emphasizing digital literacy in the workforce and building enormous new computing power for American companies.
Although, the strategy doesn't specify any new funding. The brash anti-diplomacy of Trump's second act has also already done lasting damage. America's friends, including Canada, are increasingly motivated to wean themselves off U.S. technology.
'Even longstanding allies and partners are framed as mere markets to be captured in the interests of global American supremacy,' says Kat Duffy, a senior fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations. 'Ultimately, when it comes to global engagement, the plan sings a zero-sum tune.'
A populist crusade against America's universities and foreign workers is chasing away vital talent as well. Washington's heavy-handed tariff regime will aggravate the cost of expanding domestic digital infrastructure.
China, meanwhile, retains a stranglehold on the critical minerals market. And in many ways, the nation of 1.4 billion has already leapfrogged America in embracing AI in its economy and society. Beijing now intends to harness Chinese products and expertise to bolster its growing soft power throughout the developing world.
Released on Jul. 26 during this year's annual summer tech conference in Shanghai, China's 'global action plan' on AI proposes to help developing nations utilize Chinese technology for their own purposes. China already offers a full package of IT hardware, software, training and financing to nations in Africa, Asia, the Middle East and Latin America via its Digital Silk Road initiative.
A key selling feature going forward will be how client states can seamlessly integrate high-performance, open-source Chinese tools into local systems that are based on Chinese networks.
DeepSeek's AI reasoning model, for example, is already outcompeting Silicon Valley's closed-source, subscription-based AI products across the Global South. Developing nations thus gain greater flexibility to improve their health care, education and workforce training programs — all while entrenching Chinese technology in their domestic industries.
Indeed, the Trump administration recognizes this gravely threatens America's ambitions. The AI Action Plan thus presses U.S. firms to pivot to creating more open-source models.
Wednesdays
What's next in arts, life and pop culture.
Beijing also proposes setting up a new entity to facilitate international collaboration on AI development. This comes after President Xi Jinping in 2023 launched the China-led Global AI Governance Initiative, based on claims of wanting to advance safe, human-centred systems.
However, China's benevolent rhetoric shouldn't be taken at face value. It's the same country that's harnessed AI to craft the world's most fearsome surveillance state. The northwest region of Xinjiang, especially, has been rendered a digital gulag for Uyghur Muslims and other minorities. And China is busy exporting these dystopian technologies to dozens of countries worldwide.
'Some global AI industry leaders are concerned that Chinese open generative models could spread Chinese Communist Party propaganda to users by censoring or distorting information on Chinese history, global politics, and human rights issues,' warn two senior fellows at the Atlantic Council.
All told, if either China or the U.S. truly 'win' the AI race, it'll probably equate to a loss for almost everyone else.
Kyle Hiebert is a Montreal-based political risk analyst and former deputy editor of the Africa Conflict Monitor.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Global News
32 minutes ago
- Global News
Carney backs Ukraine role in peace talks in calls with Zelenskyy, Starmer
Prime Minister Mark Carney spoke with the leaders of Ukraine and Britain on Monday amid a flurry of international diplomatic efforts to shore up support for Ukraine ahead of negotiations between the U.S. and Russia aimed toward a peace deal. Carney's conversations came as U.S. President Donald Trump previewed his approach to Friday's planned summit with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Alaska, and suggested Kyiv and Moscow will both have to cede land to end the three-and-a-half-year war in Ukraine. A readout from the Prime Minister's Office of Carney's call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy — who has yet to be invited to the upcoming talks — said the two leaders 'agreed on the categorical imperatives of ending Russia's barbaric war' to achieve a lasting peace. 'The two leaders underscored that decisions on the future of Ukraine must be made by Ukrainians, that international borders cannot be changed by force, that diplomatic engagement must be reinforced by continued pressure on Russia to end its aggression, and the need for robust and credible security to enable Ukraine to defend its territorial integrity and sovereignty,' the readout said. Story continues below advertisement It added Carney and Zelenskyy 'welcomed the leadership of President Trump and the United States in working toward securing peace in Ukraine,' but also noted Carney endorsed a joint statement by European leaders on Saturday that emphasized Ukraine's sovereignty and territorial integrity must be protected. 'Prime Minister Carney affirmed Canada's steadfast support for Ukraine,' the readout said, pointing to billions of dollars in newly-committed military aid and last week's move to lower the price cap on Russian oil alongside European partners. 2:09 Zelenskyy rejects territorial concessions as Trump and Putin plan Alaska summit Carney and British Prime Minister Keir Starmer also spoke on Monday and welcomed diplomatic efforts toward peace 'and agreed that this must be built with Ukraine — not imposed upon it,' according to a readout from Downing Street. The PMO has yet to provide its own readout of the call with Starmer. Get breaking National news For news impacting Canada and around the world, sign up for breaking news alerts delivered directly to you when they happen. Sign up for breaking National newsletter Sign Up By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy Ukraine's European allies have been pushing for Ukraine's involvement in U.S. talks with Russia over fears that a negotiated deal could otherwise favour Moscow. Story continues below advertisement European Union foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas said on Monday that 'transatlantic unity, support to Ukraine and pressure on Russia' were needed to end the war and 'prevent future Russian aggression in Europe.' Trump told reporters on Monday that his upcoming talks with Putin will be 'really a feel-out meeting,' adding he would know 'probably in the first two minutes' whether progress was possible toward ending the war. Trump also said 'there'll be some land swapping going on' that will be 'for the good of Ukraine,' but also acknowledged there will be 'some bad stuff for both' sides. 'It's good and there's bad, but it's very complex because you have lines that are very uneven and there'll be some swapping,' he said. 'Russia's occupied a big portion of Ukraine. They've occupied some very prime territory. We're going to try and get some of that territory back for Ukraine.' 2:38 Zelenskyy rejects negotiations that exclude Kyiv as Trump-Putin meeting set for Alaska Putin is expected to be unwavering in his demands to keep all the territory his forces now occupy and to prevent Ukraine from joining NATO, with the long-term aim of returning it to Moscow's sphere of influence. Story continues below advertisement Zelenskyy has strongly condemned suggestions that Ukraine should have to give up any territory seized by Russia, noting Ukraine's territorial borders are enshrined in the country's constitution and any changes will need to be approved democratically by the Ukrainian people. Trump said Monday he's 'a little bit bothered' by that. He also said that, after his meeting with Putin, 'The next meeting will be with Zelenskyy and Putin' but it could also be a meeting with 'Putin and Zelenskyy and me.' Zelenskyy warned on Monday that any concessions to Russia would not persuade it to stop fighting and more pressure was needed on the Kremlin, which he noted was showing no signs it was preparing to wind down its military operations. 'Russia refuses to stop the killings, and therefore must not receive any rewards or benefits,' he wrote on X. 'Concessions do not persuade a killer.' German Chancellor Friedrich Merz invited Zelenskyy, Trump and a number of European leaders to meetings on Wednesday, his office said Monday. Other invitees included U.S. Vice-President JD Vance, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte and the leaders of France, Italy, Britain, Finland and Poland. Carney's office and the office of Foreign Affairs Minister Anita Anand have not responded to questions about whether Canada has been invited to take part. Story continues below advertisement —With files from the Canadian Press, The Associated Press and Reuters
National Observer
an hour ago
- National Observer
Manufactured crime crisis lets Trump flex raw power over Democratic cities. Will Canada be next?
So now we see how the takeover by US President Donald Trump will unfold. It will happen one city police force at a time, perhaps slowly, or not, depending on the extent of the blowback elicited by this latest power grab. The US president started Monday by ordering the National Guard to displace the local police force in the nation's capital of Washington. The pretext, which might be better called the pretense, is that the local police have failed to reign in rampant crime being perpetrated by individuals the president described as 'bloodthirsty criminals' and 'roving mobs of wild youth.' There are no statistics to back this claim. Violent crime in the city is at a 30-year low. But that doesn't matter to Trump. All he needed was one incident to help him craft a narrative he could sell to his followers. It was handed to him when Edward Coristine, a former employee with the Department of Government Efficiency, reported being terribly beaten in a car jacking incident. Local police responded and arrested two juvenile suspects. Other accomplices remain on the loose. Trump shared a photo of the shirtless and bloodied former federal employee on his social media platform Truth Social, a shameless move to elicit a visceral reaction among Americans to the crime. It goes without saying that one violent incident does not justify what amounts to martial law. The National Guard is a branch of the US military that is supposed to answer to both the state and federal government. Although typically called upon to deal with natural disasters and other state emergencies, Trump has been using it as a private military force to help enact his deportation agenda. In June, he rolled over the objections of California Governor Gavin Newsom and sent the National Guard to Los Angeles to quell protests against workplace raids and mass arrests by US Immigration and Customs Enforcement ICE agents. California, which depends on migrant labourers for its massive agricultural and service industry, opposes the crackdown on non-citizen residents. It has challenged the order in court, but whether Trump will heed the verdict if it doesn't go his way seems increasingly doubtful. The move by US President Donald Trump to have the National Guard displace the police force in Washington puts him in the same league as Venezuelan dictator Nicolas Maduro. writes for @ Trump in a news conference Monday warned Washington was only the first of a number of large cities, all of which coincidentally voted against him, that could be in line for the same treatment. 'We have also other cities that are bad, very bad. You look at Chicago, how bad it is. You look at Los Angeles how bad it is…. New York has a problem.' It begs the question, is crime the problem Trump is really talking about, or the fact that residents in large US cities tend to vote Democrat? It's worth noting that Zohran Mamdani, a self-described socialist and Democratic nominee for mayor of New York City, is trying to make opposition to Trump's agenda the defining factor in the upcoming New York mayoral race. While it's true that murder rates in US cities are high in comparison to other G7 countries, the statistics don't show the problem worsening. Looking at crime stats for Chicago, New York, and Los Angeles, it appears local police forces are having some success lowering at least the most serious offences. But again, that won't matter to Trump, who used similar bogus arguments about the flow of fentanyl from Canada to the US as justification to slap tariffs on Canadian imports. Data shows the vast majority of fentanyl flowing into the US comes from Mexico, not Canada. If there was any lingering doubt that Trump is a despot who will go to whatever lengths necessary to seize absolute control, it's been dispelled by this week's move against the Washington police force. This, and threats to control law enforcement in other Democratic cities well ahead of the 2026 midterms, puts Trump in the same league as Nicolas Maduro, who is widely thought to have rigged the 2024 election to cement his control over Venezuela. Trump's fondness for dictators like Hungary's Viktor Orban has never extended to Maduro, who is blamed for the flow of fentanyl to the US. The US recently upped a bounty for Maduro's arrest for narco-trafficking to US$50 million. Attempts by Trump's own supporters who stormed the Capitol to keep him in power after he lost the 2020 election failed because the Capitol Police overcame the mob. But imagine how that might have gone if Trump had a personal militia like the National Guard at his disposal. So here we are in Canada, with only a fragile line at the 49th parallel separating us from a power-hungry despot who is deliberately harming our economy, repeatedly muses about annexing Canada as the 51st state and is pushing our Prime Minister to further entwine our military with his own. It's a terrible position to be in. I'm with former NDP MP Charlie Angus, who is urging Prime Minister Mark Carney to forgo joining Trump's 'Golden Shield' missile initiative. Trump has shown he has no respect for laws or deals he doesn't like. He can't be trusted and the further away we can pull, the better. Sadly, our biggest threat is the dictator across our southern border.
Winnipeg Free Press
2 hours ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
Trump's moves toward taking over Washington are unprecedented. Here's what the law says
WASHINGTON (AP) — President Donald Trump took unprecedented steps toward federalizing Washington, D.C. on Monday, saying it's needed to fight crime even as city leaders pointed to data showing violence is down. He took command of the police department and deployed the National Guard under laws and Constitutional powers that give the federal government more sway over the nation's capital than other cities. Its historically majority Black population wasn't electing its own city council and mayor until 1973, when Republican President Richard Nixon signed the Home Rule Act. The measure still left significant power to the president and Congress, though no president has exercised the police powers before. He activated the National Guard The Constitution calls for the creation of the District of Columbia to serve as the federal seat of power under the jurisdiction of Congress rather than any state. While the Home Rule Act allowed for greater local control, the president can still call up the National Guard in Washington. His administration did it during Black Lives Matter protests in 2020, when members were later faulted for flying a helicopter too low over a crowd. The Guard was called out again during Trump's first term on Jan. 6, 2021, when his supporters overran the Capitol. Trump's second-term moves in Washington come as the legal battle continues over his deployment of the National Guard in another Democratic-led city, Los Angeles, despite the objections of Gov. Gavin Newsom. His authority is less clear there, but an appeals court has so far refused to intervene. A lower-court judge was starting a trial Monday to determine whether the deployment violated another federal law. He took over the police Section 740 of the Home Rule Act allows for the president to take over Washington's Metropolitan Police Department for 48 hours, with possible extensions to 30 days, during times of emergencies. No president has done so before, said Monica Hopkins, executive director of the ACLU of Washington. Trump cited a number of recent high-profile incidents, including the killing of a 21-year-old congressional intern and the beating of a DOGE staffer during an attempted carjacking. 'This is liberation day in D.C. and we're going to take our Capitol back,' the president said. The Democratic mayor of D.C., Muriel Bowser, called the takeover 'unprecedented.' She said that violent crime overall in Washington has decreased to a 30-year low, after a rise in 2023. Carjackings, for example, dropped about 50% in 2024, and are down again this year. More than half of those arrested, however, are juveniles, and the extent of those punishments is a point of contention for the Trump administration. He didn't specify how long it would last It wasn't immediately clear how long the takeover might last or exactly what it might mean. It could also face challenges in court. Congress still has power over things like the budget and laws passed by the city council, but would have to repeal the Home Rule Act to expand federal power in the district. It's something a few Republican lawmakers have pushed to do, but such an overhaul would almost certainly run into steep resistance from most Democrats, making it difficult to achieve. The law is specific to D.C., and doesn't affect other communities around the U.S. referred to as having their own 'home rule' powers in relationship to their state governments. Hopkins said Trump's moves in Washington could foreshadow similar tactics in other cities. 'That should alarm everyone,' she said, 'not just in Washington.'
