
Farming consolidation worries ag industry leaders
Industry leaders are pointing to U.S. Department of Agriculture figures that show the number of farms in California fell 10% between 2017 and 2022, while the average size of those farms increased by about the same proportion. Both trends were seen nationally during the same period but not to such an extent.
President Shannon Douglass of the California Farm Bureau Federation said the numbers are not surprising given how hard it is to do business in the state as compared with other farming regions around the world. She voiced particular concern about water availability and how costs disproportionately hit small farmers.
The head of the Kern County Farm Bureau, Jenny Holtermann, added that consolidation is always a concern as farmers shrink their farmland holdings or sell out altogether. She said implementation of California's Sustainable Groundwater Management Act, designed to bring pumping of underground aquifers into balance, is likely to leave some farmers unable to produce food.
"With increasing regulations, SGMA and the costs of inputs rising, farmers can only stay afloat for so long," she said by email Tuesday.
"We need our elected officials and policymakers to start to address our over-regulation and how they are pushing business out of California," she added. "Agriculture is vital to California and our food security for our country."
The USDA data doesn't just shine a light on consolidations between 2017 and 2022, the most recent year for which figures are available. It also provides insights on the industry's mixed profitability.
It shows the number of farms in the state reporting a profit dropped significantly during that five-year period but that those who reported a net gain made much more money than before.
Additionally, the numbers demonstrated that fewer California farms lost money in 2022 as compared with 2017, but those who did saw significantly bigger losses. Also, average profits in the Golden State were considerably higher than those in the country as a whole.
The federal numbers being highlighted by the California Farm Bureau Federation are available online at https://www.nass.usda.gov/Publications/AgCensus/2022/Full_Report/Volume_1,_Chapter_2_US_State_Level/. The organization plans to host a news conference on the consolidation-related findings today just outside the state Capitol building in downtown Sacramento.
According to the USDA, California's total farm count dropped to 63,134 in 2022. Nationally, it reported, the decline between 2017 and 2022 was about 7%.
The average size of California farms increased by 10% during that five-year period to reach 383 acres. Across the country, the size increase was just 5%, though the U.S. average finished the period higher, at 463 acres.
USDA data showed the number of Californian farms reporting a profit dropped about 18%, while the size of those net gains rose 76% to hit an average of $665,459 per year.
By comparison, the number of farms nationwide that made a profit shrank only 9%, according to the USDA, which noted the average size of those profits rose 78% to reach $224,025 per year.
In California, the number of farms reporting a net financial loss declined 5% between 2017 and 2022, the USDA reported. It noted the average size of those losses increased 87% to finish the year with a profit averaging $104,258.
The number of U.S. farms reporting a net loss also declined during the period, by 6%. But as happened in California, their losses rose — by 36% to reach $28,597 per year.
Douglass, the state farm bureau president, did not bring up the industry challenge presented by the Trump administration's threat to deport undocumented residents. But she acknowledged that mass deportations could present problems for farmers.
"I think that anytime we're talking about threats to our workforce, those are definitely challenges that impact our farms," she said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Miami Herald
19 minutes ago
- Miami Herald
More states ban soda and ‘junk food' purchases from SNAP benefits
Dive Brief: The Trump administration approved requests from another six states to prevent consumers from using food assistance benefits to buy soda, candy or other sugary snacks and USDA signed off on state waivers from West Virginia, Florida, Colorado, Louisiana, Oklahoma and Texas to amend the list of products that customers can purchase with SNAP states have now received approval to restrict benefits, with bans set to commence next year. The Department of Health and Human Services said the waivers aim to end the "subsidization of popular types of junk food." Dive Insight: SNAP consumers make up nearly a quarter of spending in the packaged foods industry, according to Numerator, and new restrictions stand to further limit sales at a time when consumption is already slowing. Restrictions on benefits also vary by state, adding to the confusion for the food industry. Some states are only banning sodas, while others are targeting energy drinks and candy. Florida is so far the only state to restrict SNAP purchases of prepared desserts. Adding to the complications, state bans also have different definitions for what's considered candy or sugary drinks. Indiana and Nebraska, for example, are both banning soft drink purchases but have different definitions of the beverage. Indiana says soft drinks encompass all nonalcoholic beverages with natural or artificial sweeteners, while Nebraska defines them as carbonated nonalcoholic beverages containing water, a sweetening agent, flavoring and carbon dioxide gas. Other states have even more complexity. Iowa, which has one of the most restrictive SNAP rules, is banning sugar-sweetened beverages that contain less than 50% juice, including sodas, energy drinks and flavored waters. The state is also restricting drink concentrates and powdered mix-ins. Iowa is also taking an expansive definition of candy, banning traditional gum and candies in addition to fruit leather, ready-to-eat caramel corn and granola bars unless they contain flour. Trail mix, or other snacks where fruits and nuts are combined with sugar or chocolate, is also banned. As some states provide detailed definitions, others remain vague. Arkansas is banning soda and "unhealthy drinks," without providing a description of what the latter entails. More states have moved toward restricting SNAP purchases as part of a push from HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and the "Make America Healthy Again" movement. Kennedy said in a statement that SNAP uses "taxpayer dollars to fund soda and candy-products that fuel America's diabetes and chronic disease epidemics." "These waivers help put real food back at the center of the program and empower states to lead the charge in protecting public health," Kennedy added. Purchasing patterns between SNAP households and non-SNAP households are roughly equal, the USDA found, with consumers spending the majority of their dollars on staples like meat, fruits, eggs and bread. More money was spent on soft drinks than any other item across all households, though SNAP users spent somewhat more. While SNAP participants are more likely to have higher rates of obesity, recent research from the National Institutes of Health suggests other factors like poor mental health may be driving unhealthy eating patterns. The food industry has long fought efforts to restrict SNAP purchases, arguing that the program addresses hunger and obesity by increasing access to retailers with healthier foods. "At a time when many Americans need the temporary assistance available through SNAP, it is more important than ever that policies promote benefit adequacy and access, not introduce unwise complexity or stigma," a coalition of industry groups, which includes FMI – The Food Industry Association, previously wrote to the White House. Copyright 2025 Industry Dive. All rights reserved.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Cattle Rally Continues on Wednesday
Live cattle futures are continuing to rally to new all time highs with contracts up $1.15 to $1.82. There were no deliveries issued for August live cattle on Tuesday. Cash trade has been quiet this week. The Central Stockyards Fed Cattle Exchange online auction showed $237 sales in TX on 479 head of the 1,558 head offered. Feeder cattle futures are rallying another $3.47 to $3.95 at midday. The CME Feeder Cattle Index was back up 21 cents to $336.03 on August 4. USDA Wholesale Boxed Beef prices continued to post a rebound in the Wednesday morning report, with the Chc/Sel spread at $23.17. Choice boxes were up $4.04 at $373.98, while Select was $4.87 higher to $350.81. USDA estimated cattle slaughter for Tuesday at 115,000 head, with the weekly total at 216,000 head. That was down 5,000 head from last week and 22,589 head lower vs. the same week in 2024. More News from Barchart Arabica Coffee Prices Sharply Higher on Brazil Coffee Crop Concerns Arabica Coffee Supported by Dry Conditions in Brazil Can Sugar Break Out from Its Bearish Trend? Markets move fast. Keep up by reading our FREE midday Barchart Brief newsletter for exclusive charts, analysis, and headlines. Aug 25 Live Cattle are at $235.425, up $1.150, Oct 25 Live Cattle are at $228.750, up $1.650, Dec 25 Live Cattle are at $229.975, up $1.825, Aug 25 Feeder Cattle are at $344.525, up $3.475 Sep 25 Feeder Cattle are at $343.500, up $3.950 Oct 25 Feeder Cattle are at $341.675, up $3.850 On the date of publication, Austin Schroeder did not have (either directly or indirectly) positions in any of the securities mentioned in this article. All information and data in this article is solely for informational purposes. This article was originally published on Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Hog Pulling Back on Wednesday
Lean hog futures are down a nickel in the nearby August contracts on Wednesday, with other contracts down 87 cents to $1.125 at midday. USDA's national base hog price was reported at $114.35 on Wednesday morning, up $3.37 from the day prior. The CME Lean Hog Index was down 43 cents at $109.56 on August 4. USDA's FOB plant pork cutout report from Wednesday AM was down $2.05 at $116.07 per cwt. The loin, picnic, and ham primals were the only reported lower. USDA estimated hog slaughter at 482,000 head for Tuesday, taking the week's total to 907,000 head. That was 3,000 head below last week but up 16,770 head from the same week last year. More News from Barchart Arabica Coffee Prices Sharply Higher on Brazil Coffee Crop Concerns Arabica Coffee Supported by Dry Conditions in Brazil Can Sugar Break Out from Its Bearish Trend? Tired of missing midday reversals? The FREE Barchart Brief newsletter keeps you in the know. Sign up now! Aug 25 Hogs are at $108.725, down $0.050, Oct 25 Hogs are at $91.675, down $1.125 Dec 25 Hogs is at $84.300, down $0.875, On the date of publication, Austin Schroeder did not have (either directly or indirectly) positions in any of the securities mentioned in this article. All information and data in this article is solely for informational purposes. This article was originally published on Sign in to access your portfolio