logo
Better Buy Now: Gold at $3,500 or an S&P 500 Index Fund?

Better Buy Now: Gold at $3,500 or an S&P 500 Index Fund?

Globe and Mail30-04-2025

The price of gold is hitting new all-time highs -- surpassing $3,500 per ounce. Meanwhile, the S&P 500 (SNPINDEX: ^GSPC) is in a correction. Some investors may be wondering if it is better at the moment to buy the dip in the S&P 500 or ride the gold wave higher.
Below I'll discuss why gold is doing so well, different ways to invest in gold -- including through an exchange-traded fund (ETF) -- and if gold is a better buy than an S&P 500 index fund.
Where to invest $1,000 right now? Our analyst team just revealed what they believe are the 10 best stocks to buy right now. Learn More »
Gold is piling on the gains
Gold prices are up over 30% year to date at the time of this writing, compared to a 12.3% sell-off in the S&P 500. Its price performance also slightly beat the S&P 500 in 2024.
Gold has been so hot that it's up more than the S&P 500 over the last three-year, five-year, and 10-year periods -- although the S&P 500 is beating it over the last five-year and 10-year periods when you account for dividends reinvested.
Still, gold's torrid run-up may come as a surprise, especially given the strong gains in the S&P 500 led by megacap growth stocks. It wasn't long ago that investors questioned when the first U.S. company would surpass $1 trillion in market cap. Apple, Microsoft, and Nvidia all closed out 2024 with market caps over $3 trillion.
Gold has made most of its gains over the S&P 500 during the last three years (there were two major sell-offs in the S&P 500 -- in 2022 and now in 2025) thanks to its steady rise in that time. Even with dividends included, the Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (NYSEMKT: VOO) is massively underperforming the SPDR Gold Shares ETF (NYSEMKT: GLD) fund over the last three years.
Data by YCharts.
The S&P 500 generally is driven higher by earnings and investor sentiment, and higher earnings justify higher stock prices. When sentiment is positive, investors may be willing to pay more for stocks, based on future earnings expectations.
Gold is based on supply and demand. It's a commodity, not a company.
Lower interest rates can reduce borrowing costs and drive gold prices higher. However, geopolitical uncertainty is an even greater catalyst for higher gold prices.
Tariff tensions, the threat of trade wars, and President Donald Trump's attacks on Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell can weaken confidence in U.S. markets and potentially jeopardize their credibility. As a result, fearful investors around the world may turn away from U.S. stocks toward gold.
Another driving factor is the People's Bank of China -- the largest official sector buyer of gold in 2023 and 2024. Reports indicate that the central bank boosted its gold reserves for the fifth consecutive month in March.
In sum, there are valid near-term factors driving gold prices higher. However, that doesn't mean investors should dump stocks in favor of gold.
Buying gold versus equity ETFs
Buying gold through jewelry, coins, or bullion comes with storage and security risks. The most straightforward and liquid way to buy and sell gold is through an ETF, such as the SPDR Gold Shares.
The fund uses a custodian that holds physical gold on its behalf, with the fund passing along a 0.4% expense ratio as a fee for its services. By comparison, the Vanguard S&P 500 ETF charges a mere 0.03% expense ratio.
The better buy now depends on your investment objectives and existing holdings. If you're looking to add a new asset class to your portfolio that can perform well, even if geopolitical tensions persist, then gold could be worth a closer look. However, if you're looking to invest in a variety of companies under the simplicity of one tradable ticker, then an S&P 500 index fund may be a better fit.
Another factor worth considering is what makes up the S&P 500. A whopping 35% of the Vanguard S&P 500 ETF is invested in just 10 companies -- Apple, Microsoft, Nvidia, Amazon, Alphabet, Meta Platforms, Berkshire Hathaway, Broadcom, Tesla, and JPMorgan Chase. If you already own sizable positions in these companies, then buying an S&P 500 index fund may not achieve the level of diversification you're looking for. There are plenty of low-cost ETFs out there that don't include these megacap names or are less top-heavy.
However, if you're looking for broad-based exposure to the market, then an S&P 500 index fund is a good starting point.
Integrating gold into a diversified portfolio
Gold has been on a tear in recent years, which has bridged the gap between gold's gains and the S&P 500 over the last decade. However, for most investors, it's probably best that gold serve more as a role player in a diversified portfolio, rather than the focal point.
Gold could fall or underperform the S&P 500 if the supply/demand imbalance changes. It's also more difficult to analyze because it isn't based on business fundamentals.
Another factor worth considering is that there aren't dividends on gold ETFs, whereas S&P 500 index funds and plenty of other equity-based ETFs have dividends, which provide passive income no matter what the market is doing.
Ultimately, the amount of gold to include in a portfolio depends on your risk tolerance and what you already own. Investors with ultra-long-term time horizons may be better off keeping gold exposure to a minimum, especially given the long-term opportunity cost of investing in gold instead of the stock market. However, the near-term catalysts for gold are undeniable, so it makes sense that gold is crushing the S&P 500 year to date.
Should you invest $1,000 in SPDR Gold Trust right now?
Before you buy stock in SPDR Gold Trust, consider this:
The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and SPDR Gold Trust wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.
Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $591,533!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $652,319!*
Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor 's total average return is859% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to158%for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor.
See the 10 stocks »
*Stock Advisor returns as of April 21, 2025
JPMorgan Chase is an advertising partner of Motley Fool Money. John Mackey, former CEO of Whole Foods Market, an Amazon subsidiary, is a member of The Motley Fool's board of directors. Suzanne Frey, an executive at Alphabet, is a member of The Motley Fool's board of directors. Randi Zuckerberg, a former director of market development and spokeswoman for Facebook and sister to Meta Platforms CEO Mark Zuckerberg, is a member of The Motley Fool's board of directors. Daniel Foelber has positions in Nvidia. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Alphabet, Amazon, Apple, Berkshire Hathaway, JPMorgan Chase, Meta Platforms, Microsoft, Nvidia, Tesla, and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF. The Motley Fool recommends Broadcom and recommends the following options: long January 2026 $395 calls on Microsoft and short January 2026 $405 calls on Microsoft. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

10 AI Stocks I'd Buy Without Hesitation
10 AI Stocks I'd Buy Without Hesitation

Globe and Mail

timean hour ago

  • Globe and Mail

10 AI Stocks I'd Buy Without Hesitation

Artificial intelligence (AI) has reached an inflection point where early leaders are separating from the pack, creating exceptional investment opportunities across the AI value chain. From semiconductor giants to software innovators, the winners in this space offer compelling multiyear growth stories as AI transforms from experimental technology to business necessity. Smart positioning in quality AI stocks today could deliver strong returns as this technology reshapes every industry over the next decade. The AI revolution is accelerating beyond even optimistic forecasts. Companies successfully harnessing AI are seeing dramatic improvements in productivity and customer outcomes, while those ignoring it risk obsolescence. The total addressable market reaches into the trillions, yet adoption remains early. This creates a rare window for investors to position themselves before the masses recognize AI's full potential. I've analyzed dozens of AI-related companies to identify those with sustainable competitive advantages and clear monetization paths. These 10 stocks offer diversified exposure across infrastructure, software, and applications. Each brings unique strengths to the AI ecosystem, and I'd confidently buy any at current level for long-term holdings. 1. AI chip dominance Nvidia (NASDAQ: NVDA) controls between 70% to 90% of the data center graphics processing unit (GPU) market, making its GPUs the industry standard for training large language models. The investment case rests on CUDA's decade-long ecosystem advantage, creating high switching costs. In Q1 of fiscal 2026, Nvidia reported record revenue of $44.1 billion, with data center revenue reaching $39.1 billion, a 73% increase year over year. Despite a $4.5 billion charge related to unsellable H20 GPUs due to U.S. export restrictions to China, Nvidia's dominance in AI infrastructure remains unchallenged. 2. Extreme ultraviolet monopoly ASML Holding (NASDAQ: ASML) manufactures the only extreme ultraviolet lithography machines capable of producing cutting-edge semiconductors, giving it the lion's share of the market for this critical technology. The company's substantial backlog provides multiyear revenue visibility, while research and development spending of around 4.3 billion euros annually maintains its technological moat. As AI drives demand for more advanced chips, ASML benefits, regardless of which chipmaker wins, making it a defensive play on AI infrastructure growth. 3. Enterprise AI transformation Microsoft (NASDAQ: MSFT) monetizes AI through proven channels, with Copilot subscriptions already generating billions in annualized revenue just months after launch. The company's advantage lies in distribution: 1.5 billion Office users worldwide and a dominant Azure cloud position enable rapid AI deployment at scale. Microsoft's track record of successfully monetizing new technologies through existing customer relationships reduces execution risk, while AI integration across all products drives pricing power. 4. AI-powered insurance disruptor Lemonade (NYSE: LMND) uses AI throughout insurance operations to slash costs and improve customer experience, with 70% of claims processed instantly without human intervention. The company's loss ratios have improved dramatically as its algorithms learn from expanding data sets, while operational expenses remain a fraction of traditional insurers. As Lemonade scales into auto insurance and other verticals, its AI-first approach creates structural advantages that legacy carriers cannot replicate without rebuilding from scratch. 5. Conversational AI pioneer SoundHound AI (NASDAQ: SOUN) provides voice AI technology to major automotive and restaurant brands, with revenue growing over 80% annually and gross margins expanding toward software-industry standards. The company's edge-computing approach processes voice on-device, addressing privacy concerns while reducing latency. Recent customer wins include multiple top 10 automakers and expanding restaurant chains, validating the technology as voice interfaces become standard across industries. 6. AI-powered data analytics Palantir Technologies (NASDAQ: PLTR) leverages two decades of classified government work to build AI platforms now driving over 70% annual commercial revenue growth. The company's Artificial Intelligence Platform (AIP) enables enterprises to deploy large language models on private data, addressing the security concerns limiting corporate AI adoption. With government contracts providing a stable base of revenue and commercial acceleration, Palantir offers both growth and stability in the emerging AI landscape. 7. AI data center infrastructure Applied Digital (NASDAQ: APLD) operates purpose-built data centers for high-performance computing, with facilities designed specifically for AI workload requirements, including advanced cooling and power density. The company has secured long-term contracts with Tier-1 customers for its entire 400MW capacity, providing predictable revenue growth. As AI compute demand outstrips supply, Applied Digital's specialized facilities command premium pricing, while its 2GW-plus development pipeline positions it for sustained growth. 8. Clean energy for AI Oklo (NYSE: OKLO) develops small modular reactors addressing AI data centers' massive energy requirements, with each reactor designed to provide 15MW to 50MW of clean baseload power. Recent regulatory streamlining and partnerships with data center operators validate the business model as tech companies seek carbon-free energy sources. The company's recycled fuel approach and compact design offer economic advantages over traditional nuclear energy, positioning it to benefit from AI's growing energy demands. 9. AI cloud infrastructure leader CoreWeave (NASDAQ: CRWV) specializes in GPU-accelerated cloud computing, offering AI-optimized infrastructure that major AI companies use for training and inference. The company is projected to generate $5 billion in revenue for 2025, with analysts expecting revenue to more than double to $11.6 billion in 2026 -- a 130% growth rate that validates its AI-first strategy. With established relationships serving leading AI labs and better GPU availability than most hyperscalers, CoreWeave has carved out a defensible niche in the fast-growing AI infrastructure market. 10. AI analytics specialist (NYSE: BBAI) applies AI to defense and commercial analytics, with expertise in computer vision and predictive modeling for mission-critical applications. The company reported Q1 2025 revenue of $34.8 million with 5% year-over-year growth and maintains a $385 million backlog, providing long-term revenue visibility. Recent contract wins in supply chain optimization and defense analytics demonstrate the value of specialized AI applications in regulated industries where accuracy and explainability matter most. Building an AI-powered portfolio These 10 stocks represent different layers of the AI ecosystem, from essential infrastructure to specialized applications. While AI investments are inherently volatile, each company demonstrates strong fundamentals, defensible market positions, and clear paths to sustainable growth. The convergence of technological capability, enterprise adoption, and massive addressable markets creates a compelling long-term opportunity for patient investors. Should you invest $1,000 in Nvidia right now? Before you buy stock in Nvidia, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Nvidia wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $656,825!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $865,550!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor 's total average return is994% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to172%for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 2, 2025 George Budwell has positions in Lemonade, Microsoft, Nvidia, and Palantir Technologies. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends ASML, Lemonade, Microsoft, Nvidia, and Palantir Technologies. The Motley Fool recommends the following options: long January 2026 $395 calls on Microsoft and short January 2026 $405 calls on Microsoft. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Nearly 2 in 3 say Canada should not join Trump's Golden Dome defence system: Nanos
Nearly 2 in 3 say Canada should not join Trump's Golden Dome defence system: Nanos

CTV News

timean hour ago

  • CTV News

Nearly 2 in 3 say Canada should not join Trump's Golden Dome defence system: Nanos

U.S. President Donald Trump attends the UFC-316 mixed martial arts event, at the Prudential Center, Saturday, June 7, 2025, in Newark, N.J., with UFC's Dana White, left. (AP Photo/Frank Franklin II) A majority of surveyed Canadians are against joining U.S. President Donald Trump's 'Golden Dome' missile defence system, new polling from Nanos Research shows. Conducted earlier this month for CTV News, the randomized survey of 1,120 Canadian adults found that 63 per cent of respondents said Canada 'should not be part of the American Golden Dome,' and should instead prioritize spending 'on the capability of Canadian Armed Forces.' Roughly 17 per cent of respondents supported paying the required costs to join the Golden Dome, with 20 per cent telling pollsters they were unsure. Respondents aged 35-54 were marginally more likely to show support for joining the defence pact (19.8 per cent) compared to other age groups, and men were roughly twice as likely as women to do so (22.6 and 11.6 per cent, respectively). Regionally, Golden Dome support was more common in the Prairies (20.3 per cent), British Columbia (19.9 per cent) and Quebec (19.6 per cent), and least common in Atlantic Canada (12 per cent) and Ontario (13.6 per cent). Golden Dome, golden price tag Last month, Trump unveiled his plan to construct the Golden Dome, a sprawling, multilayered defence grid he said would be capable of intercepting missiles launched from around the globe, and even from space. Said to cost US$175 billion, the president later announced on social media that the grid could include protections for Canada from outside threats, but with a substantial price tag. 'I told Canada, which very much wants to be part of our fabulous Golden Dome System, that it will cost $61 Billion Dollars if they remain a separate, but unequal, Nation, but will cost ZERO DOLLARS if they become our cherished 51st State,' he wrote in a post to Truth Social on May 27. Trump Truth Social Golden Dome Canada (Image credit: Truth Social) Prime Minister Mark Carney's office told CTV News in a statement that 'the prime minister has been clear at every opportunity, including in his conversations with President Trump, that Canada is an independent, sovereign nation, and it will remain one.' Carney has separately acknowledged the Dome, saying it 'has been discussed at a high level,' but that he was 'not sure one negotiates' on defence matters like this. 'These are military decisions that have been taken in that context, and we will evaluate it accordingly,' he said in a May press conference. Methodology The survey involved a randomized sample of 1,120 Canadians aged 18 years or older, and was conducted between June 1 and 3, 2025, online and over the phone. Results were 'statistically checked and weighted by age and gender,' in keeping with the latest federal census data, as well as geographically to provide a representative sample of Canada. The survey carries a margin of error of plus or minus 2.9 percentage points, 19 times out of 20. With files from CTV News' Lynn Chaya and Mike Le Couteur

Global streamers fight CRTC's rule requiring them to fund Canadian content
Global streamers fight CRTC's rule requiring them to fund Canadian content

Global News

time2 hours ago

  • Global News

Global streamers fight CRTC's rule requiring them to fund Canadian content

Some of the world's biggest streaming companies will argue in court on Monday that they shouldn't have to make CRTC-ordered financial contributions to Canadian content and news. The companies are fighting an order from the federal broadcast regulator that says they must pay five per cent of their annual Canadian revenues to funds devoted to producing Canadian content, including local TV news. The case, which consolidates several appeals by streamers, will be heard by the Federal Court of Appeal in Toronto. Apple, Amazon and Spotify are fighting the CRTC's 2024 order. Motion Picture Association-Canada, which represents such companies as Netflix and Paramount, is challenging a section of the CRTC's order requiring them to contribute to local news. In December, the court put a pause on the payments — estimated to be at least $1.25 million annually per company. Amazon, Apple and Spotify had argued that if they made the payments and then won the appeal and overturned the CRTC order, they wouldn't be able to recover the money. Story continues below advertisement In court documents, the streamers put forward a long list of arguments on why they shouldn't have to pay, including technical points regarding the CRTC's powers under the Broadcasting Act. Spotify argued that the contribution requirement amounts to a tax, which the CRTC doesn't have the authority to impose. The music streamer also took issue with the CRTC requiring the payments without first deciding how it will define Canadian content. Amazon argued the federal cabinet specified the CRTC's requirements have to be 'equitable.' It said the contribution requirement is 'inequitable because it applies only to foreign online undertakings and only to such undertakings with more than $25 million in annual Canadian broadcasting revenues.' Get daily National news Get the day's top news, political, economic, and current affairs headlines, delivered to your inbox once a day. Sign up for daily National newsletter Sign Up By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy Apple also said the regulator 'acted prematurely' and argued the CRTC didn't consider whether the order was 'equitable.' It pointed out Apple is required to contribute five per cent, while radio stations must only pay 0.5 per cent — and streamers don't have the same access to the funds into which they pay. The CRTC imposes different rules on Canadian content contributions from traditional media players. It requires large English-language broadcasters to contribute 30 per cent of revenues to Canadian programming. Motion Picture Association—Canada is only challenging one aspect of the CRTC's order — the part requiring companies to contribute 1.5 per cent of revenues to a fund for local news on independent TV stations. Story continues below advertisement It said in court documents that none of the streamers 'has any connection to news production' and argued the CRTC doesn't have the authority to require them to fund news. 'What the CRTC did, erroneously, is purport to justify the … contribution simply on the basis that local news is important and local news operations provided by independent television stations are short of money,' it said. 'That is a reason why news should be funded by someone, but is devoid of any analysis, legal or factual, as to why it is equitable for foreign online undertakings to fund Canadian news production.' In its response, the Canadian Association of Broadcasters said the CRTC has wide authority under the Broadcasting Act. It argued streamers have contributed to the funding crisis facing local news. 'While the industry was once dominated by traditional television and radio services, those services are now in decline, as Canadians increasingly turn to online streaming services,' the broadcasters said. 'For decades, traditional broadcasting undertakings have supported the production of Canadian content through a complex array of CRTC-directed measures … By contrast, online undertakings have not been required to provide any financial support to the Canadian broadcasting system, despite operating here for well over a decade.' A submission from the federal government in defence of the CRTC argued the regulator was within its rights to order the payments. Story continues below advertisement 'The orders challenged in these proceedings … are a valid exercise of the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission's regulatory powers. These orders seek to remedy the inequity that has resulted from the ascendance of online streaming giants like the Appellants,' the office of the attorney general said. 'Online undertakings have greatly profited from their access to Canadian audiences, without any corresponding obligation to make meaningful contributions supporting Canadian programming and creators — an obligation that has long been imposed on traditional domestic broadcasters.' The government said that if the streamers get their way, that would preserve 'an inequitable circumstance in which domestic broadcasters — operating in an industry under economic strain — shoulder a disproportionate regulatory burden.' 'This result would be plainly out of step with the policy aims of Parliament' and cabinet, it added. The court hearing comes as trade tensions between the U.S. and Canada have cast a shadow over the CRTC's attempts to regulate online streamers. The regulator launched a suite of proceedings and hearings as part of its implementation of the Online Streaming Act, legislation that in 2023 updated the Broadcasting Act to set up the CRTC to regulate streaming companies. In January, as U.S. President Donald Trump was inaugurated for his second term, groups representing U.S. businesses and big tech companies warned the CRTC that its efforts to modernize Canadian content rules could worsen trade relations and lead to retaliation. Story continues below advertisement Then, as the CRTC launched its hearing on modernizing the definition of Canadian content in May, Netflix, Paramount and Apple cancelled their individual appearances. While the companies didn't provide a reason, the move came shortly after Trump threatened to impose a tariff of up to 100 per cent on movies made outside the United States. Foreign streamers have long pointed to their existing spending in Canada in response to calls to bring them into the regulated system.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store