
Mexico's flag becomes lightning rod in Los Angeles protests
LOS ANGELES: The Mexican flag has become a flashpoint during protests in Los Angeles this week, waved by demonstrators proud of their heritage but cast by US President Donald Trump's administration as heralding a 'foreign invasion.'
For five days now protesters have held small and largely peaceful rallies against immigration raids in the sprawling city, as the rest of Los Angeles carried on largely as normal with red carpet premieres, awards shows, traffic and tourists.
But there have been some eyecatching -- albeit isolated and sporadic -- incidents of violence that produced dramatic images of protesters flying Mexican flags during clashes with law enforcement under smoke-filled skies.
It is those images that Trump and officials in his administration have seized on to help justify his extraordinary step of deploying thousands of US troops to the California city over the strident objection of local officials.
'The only flag that will wave triumphant over the streets of Los Angeles is the American flag -- so help me God,' the president told cheering soldiers Tuesday at Fort Bragg army base in North Carolina.
Republicans lined up behind Trump to frame the protests as an invasion, with the Mexican flag as its symbol and the demonstrators as insurrectionists.
'Look at all the foreign flags. Los Angeles is occupied territory,' top White House migration advisor Stephen Miller posted on X over footage of the demonstrations.
It is not illegal to fly foreign flags in the United States under the US Constitution's First Amendment, which guarantees freedom of speech.
But the Mexican flag has at times been a lightning rod in Los Angeles, the unofficial capital of the Mexican diaspora in the United States.
In 1994 the green, white and red banner was also waved by protesters as a sign of solidarity against legislation seeking to bar undocumented migrants from services including education and health care.
Then as now, it was seen by some as a symbol of anti-American defiance, becoming so polarizing that it helped to get the legislation passed, argues Mike Madrid, a Republican strategist who studies Latino voting trends.
'So it is a little bit odd to see the same strategy being used when it misfired so badly last time,' Madrid, who authored the recent book 'The Latino Century', told AFP.
'Great irony'
Protesters who spoke to US media this week, including those who said they were American citizens, said they were waving the flag to show pride in their heritage and solidarity with those facing deportation.
Diana Mena, a 28-year-old US citizen with Mexican parents, said she had family in the US military
'As much as I understand that we had a privilege to come here, I feel like it's very important to know where we came from,' she told AFP on Tuesday.
'I benefit from being in a place that has been able to provide me an opportunity to be able to advance, but that doesn't mean I'll ever forget my roots and my culture.'
The strategist Madrid, who himself is of Mexican heritage, argues the ability for people to be proud of both cultures presents a paradox for Trump, after the Latino community's rightward shift helped propel him to victory in 2024.
That shift comes as more Latinos are born in the country rather than arriving as immigrants, transforming them into working-class voters rather than an ethnic minority, he said.
'The idea that we will respond... to an ethnic appeal over an economic or pocketbook appeal, is very very misguided, it's really a relic of the 1990s,' he told AFP.
Many Latinos support Trump's crackdown on undocumented immigrants and illegal migration to the United States.
But the Latino vote is never cohesive 'unless the community perceives itself to be under attack... It's very clear who the president is attacking here,' Madrid said.
'The great irony is they're all moving towards him... That speaks to the dysfunction of the shrinking white Republican non-college-educated voter. Nativism animates the Republican Party's base.'
A police officer at the US Capitol in Washington told CBS News it made no sense for Republicans to be outraged over Mexican flags at the LA protests.
He invoked the image of Trump supporters who stormed the Capitol on January 6, 2021 carrying the banner of the rebel Southern states who fought the United States during the Civil War from 1861 to 1865.
'They don't remember the Confederate flags on January 6?'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Focus Malaysia
13 minutes ago
- Focus Malaysia
Is America pulling a fast one on China threat?
THE United States and Malaysia are standing poles apart when it comes to dealing with China, as revealed in the recent Shangri-la Dialogue in Singapore. When US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth took to the podium, he promptly portrayed China as a very dangerous enemy preparing to 'use military force to alter the balance of power in the Indo-Pacific (region).' 'The threat from China is real,' he told participants from 47 countries gathered at the annual security forum to debate some of the pressing security challenges in these increasingly turbulent times. Presumably, he is raising the red flag over a potential conflict with China should the communist behemoth invade tiny Taiwan that could ignite a wider regional or even a global conflagration. The Indo-Pacific region covers the whole of Asean including Australia, Fiji, Japan, South Korea and New Zealand. But Malaysian Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim, who also attended the forum, had a different take that is not exactly in line with the American political playbook. Essentially, he believes in promoting active non-alignment in foreign policy where all countries can pitch in to help 'shape a meaningful global order'. In other words, Malaysia, or Asean, will not side with anyone in a renewed Cold War. Being the Asean chair for this year, Anwar probably thinks he can steer the Asean ship of state away from the turbulent storms emanating from some hotspots around the world. But keeping-your-hands-off policy is unlikely to be effective as a diplomatic tool to calm tempers down because big powers will not listen to the likes of Anwar trying to broker a peace deal. These days the sounds of a world war are getting shriller and it appears the loudest noise is originating from China. America tells the nations in Southeast Asia and other countries the threat from that huge country is credible and hence, there is an urgent need to spend more on defence to meet the Chinese threat. Hegseth may be crying wolf but Asean must not dismiss his warning as just an American ploy to deliberately create trouble in order to pull the bloc away from Beijing and into the US orbit. Is the US pulling a fast one on the China threat? It is highly improbable that Washington wants to play a game of deception when the world knows that China is building up its military arsenal in a possible confrontation with the US over the contentious issue of Taiwan and territorial disputes in the South China Sea. When Hegseth removed the sugar from the coat to expose the unpalatable fact about this looming threat, he must have said it based on solid information about China's rapid military build-up. Where did he obtain such irrefutable proof of this disturbing development? It must have come from US satellite images which clearly showed China's massive expansion in the South China Sea's disputed Spratly Islands archipelago. Malaysia does not possess such technologically advanced 'spies in the skies' that can locate with pin-point accuracy any military activity in any country. Hence, it will be in the dark about what is secretly going on behind the Great Wall of China. But the US has sounded the alarm and Asean must sit up and prepare for a possible aggressive encounter with this giant northern neighbour. It would do well to remember that before Ukraine was invaded, the US, through satellite images, had warned its President Volodymyr Zelensky that Russia was massing troops on the country's borders for an invasion. But Zelensky dismissed the information as an attempt by the West to create unnecessary panic and he paid a heavy price for ignoring the dire warning. Now, a similar pattern is unfolding with, this time, China as the belligerent. There is no escaping from the fact that this superpower is flexing its military might as seen through the eyes of the spies in the skies. Although it is important to maintain vibrant ties with China, it is also equally crucial not to overlook the danger the nuclear-armed country poses to the rest of the world. In the rush to yet another world war, no country can stay neutral or stay safe. All will be sucked into the maelstrom. The weaker ones will have to seek protection from one of the superpowers or band together to help themselves. The danger is real and we ignore it to our own peril. ‒ June 12, 2025 Phlip Rodrigues is a retired journalist. The views expressed are solely of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Focus Malaysia. Main image: Reuters


Borneo Post
37 minutes ago
- Borneo Post
Trump says to set unilateral tariffs within weeks
Trump holds the US$5 million dollar Gold Card as he speaks to reporters while in flight on board Air Force One, en route to Miami, Florida on April 3, 2025. – AFP photo WASHINGTON (June 12): President Donald Trump plans to inform trading partners of unilateral US tariff rates in the coming weeks, as a July deadline approaches for steeper levies to kick in on dozens of economies. 'We're going to be sending letters out in about a week and a half, two weeks, to countries telling them what the deal is,' Trump told reporters late Wednesday, at the Kennedy Center in Washington where he was attending a theatre performance. In April, Trump imposed a blanket 10 percent tariff on most US trading partners and unveiled higher individual rates on dozens of economies including India and the European Union — although he swiftly paused the elevated rates. While negotiations have been ongoing, the pause on those higher duties is due to expire on July 9. So far, Washington has only announced a trade deal with the UK, alongside a temporary tariff de-escalation with China. Tensions remain elevated between the world's two biggest economies, with Washington recently accusing Beijing of slow-walking export approvals for rare earth minerals. It remains unclear if the steeper levies will return for all countries in early July. US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent told lawmakers earlier Wednesday that an extended pause is possible for those 'negotiating in good faith.' 'There are 18 important trading partners. We are working toward deals on those,' he said. Bessent said it is likely that for countries or trading blocs such as the EU, Washington would decide to 'roll the date forward to continue the good faith negotiations.' The Treasury chief added that following conversations with US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer, 'it's my belief that with smaller countries where we have lower levels of trade, we may be able to do a one-size-fits-all regional deal.' Trump's wide-ranging tariffs and higher rates on goods from China have roiled financial markets, snagged supply chains and weighed on consumer sentiment. While many of the levies also face court challenges, US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick has dismissed concerns that these could prompt countries to slow-run negotiations. – AFP


New Straits Times
an hour ago
- New Straits Times
'Trump's brain' behind migration crackdown
FOR Stephen Miller, the architect of United States President Donald Trump's hardline migration policy, the protests in Los Angeles were nothing less than the frontline of a "fight to save civilisation itself". Hyper-loyalist Miller, 39, has carved out a niche as Trump's most powerful and hawkish adviser on the Republican's signature issue of immigration. A combative presence on the White House driveway, Miller is frequently rolled out in public to double down on the president's comments in front of the cameras and frequently spars with reporters. But the sharp-suited adviser's comments on Los Angeles — which echo hard-right talking points about the decline of the West as it faces an "invasion" of migrants — underscored that the topic is not just political for him, but existential. His fingerprints have been all over the White House's unprecedented assertion of its right to use presidential power to pursue its agenda, often using centuries-old or rarely cited laws to deport migrants. And Miller, who is formally Trump's Deputy Chief of Staff for Policy and Homeland Security Adviser, is at the sharp end of things, too. It was Miller who, according to the Wall Street Journal, issued US Immigration and Customs Enforcement with orders last month to step up its work after the number of daily deportations under Trump fell below those carried out by Joe Biden's administration last year. Those orders led to the immigration raids on a Home Depot in Los Angeles that triggered clashes between protesters and federal agents — and Trump's decision to send in thousands of troops. Miller has since taken to social media to battle Democrats who accuse Trump of authoritarianism. "We've been saying for years this is a fight to save civilisation. Anyone with eyes can see that now," he said on X on Sunday. A few days earlier, he set out his right-wing worldview more explicitly as he pushed for Trump's new "big, beautiful" spending bill, which contains provisions for migration. "We will be debating these matters over the ruins of the West if we don't control migration," he wrote on June 4. Critics say such comments echo the far-right "replacement theory" about migration undermining Western society. Indeed, during Trump's first term, Miller's hardline stance made him something of an outlier. As a young firebrand, Miller was one of the architects of the so-called "Muslim travel bans" in Trump's first presidency, which later ran into legal difficulties after they were poorly drafted. Miller largely avoided the chaotic feuding that engulfed Trump's first White House, resulting in somewhat more moderate voices winning out on immigration policies. Miller, however, remained loyal, and stuck by his boss even as Trump's first term ended in the disgrace of the US Capitol attack on Jan 6, 2021. In the second Trump administration, Miller's views have become mainstream. "I call Stephen 'Trump's brain'," Republican former House speaker Kevin McCarthy told the New York Times just before Trump's inauguration. Miller was the driving force in particular behind the use of an obscure 200-year-old wartime law to deport undocumented migrants — and a vocal defender when that crackdown saw a man wrongly deported to El Salvador. He also outraged Democrats when he said on May 9 the White House was "looking into" suspending habeas corpus, which would prevent migrants targeted for mass deportations from appealing for their right to appear in court. One blip, however, came when Miller and his wife Katie found themselves caught up in the split between Trump and his billionaire adviser Elon Musk. Katie Miller had been a senior adviser and spokesman in Musk's Department of Government Efficiency. But the couple now find themselves, professionally speaking, on opposite sides of the break-up between the world's richest person and its most powerful.