Call for restoration of ‘Martyrs Day' heats up as NC set to hold meeting
The BJP has asserted it will strongly oppose holding of any official functions on July 13 to mark 'Martyrs Day'.
'July 13 is a very important day. It is the day of July 13, 1931 martyrs. The NC government should declare a holiday on Martyrs Day,' J&K Apni Party president and former minister Altaf Bukhari said.
He also demanded that the 'Martyrs' Day' be observed at the state level as it used to be.
Before Article 370 abrogation, July 13 was observed as 'Martyrs Day' in erstwhile J&K state to mark the killing of 22 Kashmiri civilians by Dogra troops under Maharaja Hari Singh on this day in 1931.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
27 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Karnataka Crowd Control Bill referred to House panel after Opposition seeks clarity on commercial, non-commercial events
The Karnataka Crowd Control (Meaning Crowd at Events and Place of Gathering) Bill, 2025, drafted following the stampede at M. Chinnaswamy Stadium on June 4 during RCB victory celebrations and introduced in the Legislative Assembly, was referred to a House committee on Thursday (August 21, 2025). This was after the entire Opposition dubbed the Bill as 'draconian' and argued that it attempted to curtail right to protests and comes in the way of gathering people at festivals and events in temples and fairs. The Bill seeks to hold event organisers responsible for any mishap and ensure that an event in which 7,000 people gather gets police permission. Organisers should apply for permission 10 days before the intended event, it says. It also requires organisers to execute an indemnity bond of ₹1 crore. The Bill prescribes imprisonment of three to seven years and a penalty of up to ₹1 crore or both for those organising events without permission. Offences under the proposed legislation are cognisable, non-bailable and triable by first class judicial magistrate. The exemptions Home Minister G. Parameshwara sought to clarify that family functions or events, such as marriages, mass marriages, religious events, and government events and student protests within the university campus will be exempted from the proposed legilation. However, Leader of the Opposition in the Assembly R. Ashok said the Bill has many sensitive issues and drawbacks. The Bill should clearly divide commercial events such as the one involving RCB and musical nights, and non-commercial events such as festivals or farmers' protests. He was not against imposing fines, imprisonment for lapses with regard to commercial events, he said. However, he said, the Bill should not become 'a weapon' for the police, especially against political parties. V. Sunil Kumar (BJP) said protests are planned overnight and having to apply for permission 10 days prior effectively means that protests will not be held. Umanath Kotian (BJP) asked the government if a temple would be held accountable if 'miscreants deliberately create trouble.' Expelled BJP member Basanagouda Patil Yatnal claimed it was an attempt to target the majority (Hindu) community. HM offers amendments After the Opposition's criticisms, the Home Minister said that the 10-day clause will be reduced to five. There would not be an indemnity bond for religious events, he added. However, as the dissatisfied Opposition pressed for discussion of the Bill in the next legislature session, Mr. Parameshwara referred the Bill to the House committee. The government also referred the Karnataka Land Revenue (Second) Amendment Bill, 2025 — which is related to the Jamma Bane lands in Kodagu district — to the House Committee.
New Indian Express
27 minutes ago
- New Indian Express
‘Lion's roar' in Madurai: Vijay vows statewide fight in 2026 Tamil Nadu polls
Actor-politician Vijay used his party's second state-level conference at Parapathi in Madurai district on Thursday to launch a sharp political offensive, positioning TVK as an alternative force while attacking all three major players in Tamil Nadu politics, the BJP, DMK and AIADMK. The TVK leader framed the BJP as his party's ideological adversary, accusing it of neglecting Tamil Nadu's interests and aligning with the RSS for appeasement. He invoked issues ranging from the arrest of Tamil Nadu fishermen and the demand for Katchatheevu's return to opposition against NEET, suggesting that the Centre was indifferent to the state's needs. He also alleged discrimination against minorities, warning that Tamils would not attach themselves to the BJP despite its calculations for the 2029 elections. Vijay also accused that the BJP is hiding the findings of Keezhadi. Vijay saved some of his sharpest words for the DMK government, accusing Chief Minister M K Stalin of betraying women, farmers and fishermen. He dismissed the state's flagship cash transfer scheme as inadequate and accused Stalin of deceiving vulnerable sections. His repeated reference to the chief minister as 'uncle' carried challenge, underscoring his intent to position himself against the ruling party's leadership. For the first time, he turned his criticism on the AIADMK, questioning its state after M G Ramachandran's death and hinting at compromises with the BJP whenever its leaders came under central scrutiny. This shift marked a clear break from his earlier avoidance of direct confrontation with the party founded by MGR.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
27 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Lying about US citizenship means lifetime ban, USCIS warns immigrants
USCIS warning, US citizenship lie, lifetime ban, immigration fraud, false claim rule, inadmissibility, US immigration law, Trump crackdown, immigrant population, deportation risk, visa denial, immigration guidanThe US Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) has issued a blunt warning to immigrants: Lying about being an American citizen could result in a permanent bar from entering or staying in the country. In its updated policy manual, the agency said it is 'restoring robust screening and vetting processes to detect aliens seeking to defraud or abuse the immigration system,' adding that 'aliens who use false information or deceitful practices to unfairly obtain immigration advantages will face serious consequences.' What the rule says The change centres on the 'false claim to US citizenship' ground of inadmissibility, which Congress introduced on September 30, 1996. Since then, any immigrant who makes such a claim to gain an immigration or legal benefit is permanently inadmissible, usually with no option for a waiver. USCIS explained that Congress allowed a narrow exception for those who had been permanent residents in the United States before turning 16. The agency also referred to a 2019 ruling by the Board of Immigration Appeals in Matter of Zhang. That decision established that a false claim can still have consequences even if the person did not knowingly misrepresent themselves. USCIS incorporated the ruling into its guidance in 2020, noting that 'it is not necessary to show intent to find an alien inadmissible for a false claim to US citizenship.' How officers will apply the guidance According to USCIS, the latest update 'provides the steps an officer should follow to determine inadmissibility' and sets out the factors that must be considered in evaluating a false claim case. The guidance applies immediately to all pending and future applications. The agency said the effort is not only about enforcement but also education. 'We are actively increasing public awareness among aliens and the public about the consequences of committing immigration fraud,' USCIS said. US immigrant population falls by 2 million The warning comes as new government data suggests the immigrant population in the United States may have fallen by around 2 million in the first six months of the year. Steven Camarota, director of research at the Washington-based Centre for Immigration Studies, said the figures may reflect President Donald Trump's stricter immigration approach. In his analysis, he wrote that tougher enforcement could be discouraging foreign-born respondents from completing surveys or from identifying themselves as immigrants. 'It is possible that the observed decline in the foreign-born was due, at least in part, to a greater reluctance by immigrants to participate.' Julia Gelatt, associate director of US immigration policy at the Migration Policy Institute, told USA Today that fear was shaping behaviour in many households. 'Because of the atmosphere – the mass deportation campaigns, the constant announcements – immigrants might be more reticent to answer,' she said. She added that many families could now be too scared to disclose their status. 'They may be afraid to say they are a noncitizen,' said
