Chinese Satellite Image Shows Changes at Key U.S. Indian Ocean Air Base
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
Chinese satellite imagery of the key U.S. base at Diego Garcia in the Indian Ocean, located a few thousand miles from Iran and China, shows that B-52 bombers have now left, according to open-intelligence source analysts.
Newsweek has reached out to the U.S. Indo-Pacific Command for comment.
Why It Matters
The departure of the bombers is an indication of a shift in U.S. expectations for military action.
Over the past few months, the U.S. had reinforced Diego Garcia with long-range strike assets, amid rising tensions with Iran. In June, the U.S. launched Operation Midnight Hammer, a major long-range stealth attack on Iran's nuclear infrastructure, with B‑2 Spirit stealth bombers — but they flew nonstop from Missouri rather than taking off from Diego Garcia.
The fragile situation in the Middle East means that U.S. forces could still be called into action at any time on numerous fronts.
Imagery released by Chinese commercial satellite company MizarVision shows U.S. aircraft stationed at the U.S. naval base on Diego Garcia in the Indian Ocean on July 21, 2025.
Imagery released by Chinese commercial satellite company MizarVision shows U.S. aircraft stationed at the U.S. naval base on Diego Garcia in the Indian Ocean on July 21, 2025.
MizarVision
What To Know
MizarVision, a Chinese satellite company, published a satellite image on its Weibo account that appeared to confirm the departure of the B-52 bombers from the U.S. base, also observed by other open-intelligence analysts on X.
High-definition satellite imagery shows that all B-52H aircraft deployed at Diego Garcia have been evacuated, while F-15 aircraft remain on the tarmac. Via Mizarvision #OSINT pic.twitter.com/glo4LE3qW3 — GEOINT (@lobsterlarryliu) July 22, 2025
"We have multi-layered defense systems on Diego Garcia that ensure the security and protection of our personnel and equipment," Commander Matthew Comer, Indo-Pacific Command spokesperson, told Newsweek in May, commenting on MizarVision's satellite image of the U.S. air force presence at the base.
The U.S. buildup at the base had included B‑2 bombers and B‑52 strategic bombers—later joined by six F‑15s and six KC‑135 tankers. However, Washington carried out a deception scheme with its Operation Midnight Hammer and the B-2 strikes were not launched from the base.
Diego Garcia, a remote atoll in the Indian Ocean, became one of the most important overseas U.S. military bases following a secret 1966 agreement between Washington and London, in which both countries jointly invested in establishing the base to support their shared defense interests.
Tensions over Iran's nuclear program are far from subsiding and despite a U.S.-brokered ceasefire between Israel and Iran following the June military conflict. Iran is due to meet European countries for nuclear talks in coming days, but both the United States and Israel have not ruled out the possibility of further military action.
What People Are Saying
Commander Matthew Comer, Indo-Pacific Command spokesperson, told Newsweek in May: "We have multi-layered defense systems on Diego Garcia that ensure the security and protection of our personnel and equipment."
U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth wrote on X in May: "Diego Garcia is a vital military base for the US."
Iranian President Masud Pezeshkian told Al-Jazeera Arabic on Tuesday: "We do not rely on the current ceasefire, and we are not optimistic about it."
What Happens Next
Iran and so-called E3 European countries will hold talks in coming days. If positive, these could pave the way for the resumption of nuclear negotiations with the U.S.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
9 minutes ago
- Newsweek
How US Pilots Trained to Fight Russia Will Soon Help Protect Putin
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. As Russian President Vladimir Putin prepares to make his first visit to the United States in a decade, U.S. warplanes that have intercepted Russian aircraft as recently as two weeks ago will soon play a key role in escorting the Kremlin chief to U.S. soil. "It is an interesting irony that the fabric used to intercept and defend North America from military incursions like those that Russia has done three times so far this year, will be used to protect the Russian president for this upcoming summit," Scott Clancy, a retired Royal Canadian Air Force major general who served as deputy commander of the North American Aerospace Defense Command (NORAD)'s Alaska Region, told Newsweek. NORAD is a unique joint U.S.-Canadian military organization tasked with enforcing security throughout North American airspace. For the U.S., this includes not only the mainland but also Alaska, where NORAD fighters most recently intercepted Russian Tu-95 bombers and Su-35 fighters flying within the state's Air Defense Identification Zone (ADIZ) on July 22. "NORAD conducts aerospace warning, aerospace control and maritime warning in defense of North America," NORAD spokesperson Captain Rebecca Garand told Newsweek. Yet "in addition to these critical mission sets," Garand pointed out another lesser known role for NORAD—and it's not just tracking Santa Claus. "NORAD is also responsible for working in coordination with the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) and Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) in the U.S., and Transport Canada and NAV CANADA in Canada, to support and enforce Temporary Flight Restriction (TFR) areas as well as airspace over National Security Special Events (NSSE), when required or requested," Garand said. In doing so, she said "NORAD employs a layered defense network of radars, satellites, and fighter aircraft to identify and respond to potential threats." "NORAD's response to air activity within a NORAD-enforced TFR that is not in compliance with authoritative law demonstrates the Command's execution of aerospace warning and control missions for the United States and Canada," Garand said. A NORAD F-35 intercepts a Russian Su-35 fighter and Tu-95 bomber over the Bering Sea, off of Alaska, on July 22, 2025. A NORAD F-35 intercepts a Russian Su-35 fighter and Tu-95 bomber over the Bering Sea, off of Alaska, on July 22, 2025. Alaskan NORAD Region/11th Air Force/U.S. Department of Defense Advanced Firepower Separated by just two miles at their closest point across the Bering Strait, Alaska effectively serves as the U.S. front line with Russia. As such, the state is also a hub for NORAD firepower stationed at two primary bases of Fairbanks and Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson, where President Donald Trump is set to receive Putin on Friday. In fact, "Alaska is the largest concentration of operational Gen 5 aircraft in the world between these two bases with F-22 Raptors at JBER and F-35s at Fairbanks," Clancy, who is today a fellow at the Canadian Global Affairs Institute, said. "These bases also are the location for the E-3 AWACS aircraft which does airborne surveillance and tactical battle management for the fighters, and the ever-crucial tanker aircraft without which, due to the extreme distances in the Arctic, nothing happens," he added. It's not just Russia that NORAD looks out for on this Arctic frontier. Last year, Chinese H-6 bombers joined Russian Tu-95 counterparts for the first time, prompting NORAD to scramble U.S. F-16s and F-35s, along with Canadian CF-18 fighters. Such encounters, which take place over international airspace designated as Alaska's ADIZ, have also inspired new exercises on the part of NORAD, including a March drill that saw an American B-1 bomber join F-16s and Canadian C-18s showcasing both nation's "readiness to defend North America and respond to global security challenges in partnership," according to a statement by NORAD's Alaska Command. The following month, in April, Alaska National Guard Major David Bedard reported on how the 176th Air Defense Squadron fielded a "state-of-the-art" third-generation battle command center known as the AN/FYQ-156 Tactical Command and Control System in order to ward off the combined patrol "careening toward the [ADIZ] and bringing the nuclear-capable long-range bombers closer to U.S. sovereign airspace." How It Works The precise details of the logistics surrounding the summit are not publicly disclosed for security reasons. But Clancy spoke of his previous experience during Trump's May 2019 visit to Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson. While then-NORAD Alaska Region commander U.S. General Boussiere greeted Trump on the tarmac, Clancy "was in the command center directing the intercept of potential threats." "NORAD's procedures and systems would work alongside the FAA to identify any deviation from the stringent protocols of the TFR, in order to delineate between normal air traffic and that which is suspicious," Clancy said. "NORAD would then use its fighter aircraft to further delineate between negligent contacts, and those which could be more nefarious." "They would do so by intercepting the aircraft," he added. "All of this is supported by a complex web of systems and conference calls set to provide decision makers the best chance of getting all the required information to make decisions pertaining to the aircraft and the safety of and security of the principles, especially POTUS." As for Putin, the protocol for his arrival was even more opaque, not least because his trip will mark the first time a Russian leader steps foot in Alaska since the territory was sold by Russia to the U.S. in 1867. Clancy suspected that Putin may opt to travel to Alaska without a Russian military escort in order to reduce the likelihood of any "antics" that may "take away from the newsworthiness of the summit" at a time when the Russian leader was "trying to own the narrative and portray himself as the driver of long-term peace in Ukraine." At the same time, he raised the possibility that the U.S. could also deploy aircraft to escort Putin's flight and potentially do so in coordination with Russian counterparts if necessary. "If Russian fighter aircraft were escorting President Putin's plane to the edge of or into the ADIZ," Clancy said, "this is where things get interesting." President Donald Trump speaks in front of an F-22 fighter jet during a visit to Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson, Alaska, on February 28, 2019. President Donald Trump speaks in front of an F-22 fighter jet during a visit to Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson, Alaska, on February 28, 2019. Staff Sergeant Westin Warburton/U.S. Air Force 'Our Highest Priority' In any case, the primary agency involved in orchestrating the security protocols surrounding the summit will be the U.S. Secret Service. The Secret Service, known primarily for protecting the president, also offers security to visiting heads of state. This practice was confirmed in relation to Putin's upcoming visit by former Secret Service agent Robert McDonald in comments shared Tuesday with the official TASS Russian News Agency. Putin is also expected to bring his own security detail from Russia's Presidential Security Service. In the U.S., the role of the Secret Service has been in the spotlight over the past year as Trump survived two assassination attempts, one in which he was injured by a sniper's bullet while on the 2024 campaign trail. Reached for comment, a Secret Service spokesperson told Newsweek that "the safety of the President is our highest priority." "In order to maintain operational security," the spokesperson said, "the Secret Service does not discuss the specific means and methods used to conduct our protective operations."
San Francisco Chronicle
10 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
China targets 2 Lithuanian banks in response to new EU sanctions
BEIJING (AP) — China imposed sanctions on two Lithuanian banks in what it said was retaliation for the European Union including two Chinese financial institutions in its latest round of sanctions against Russia. Lithuania's UAB Urbo Bankas and Mano Bankas AB are prohibited from having any cooperation with individuals or institutions in China, according to a statement Wednesday from the Ministry of Commerce. The European Union adopted a new round of sanctions against individuals and companies supporting Russia in its war with Ukraine in July, which went into effect August 9. Among them were multiple Chinese companies, although China's Ministry of Commerce did not name which financial institutions were affected. 'The EU, disregarding China's solemn position, insisted on adding two Chinese financial institutions to its sanctions list for alleged involvement in Russia, and formally implemented the sanctions on August 9," said the statement. It added the move "severely damages the legitimate rights and interests of Chinese companies, and has a serious negative impact on China-EU economic and trade relations and financial cooperation." NATO has in the past called China a 'decisive enabler' of Russia's war effort as its companies sold tools, equipment and microelectronics.
Newsweek
11 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Social Security is 90. Can It Be Saved for Future Generations?
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. August 14 marks Social Security's 90th anniversary - an achievement underscored by both its longevity and the scale of its impact. Social Security was created during the Great Depression to provide financial security for Americans. Signed into law by President Franklin D. Roosevelt on August 14 1935, as part of the New Deal, it established a federal safety net funded through payroll taxes. It initially offered retirement benefits for workers aged 65 and older, with later expansions adding disability insurance and survivor benefits. The program's goal was to reduce poverty among the elderly and stabilize the economy by ensuring a basic income. More than 73 million Americans now receive benefits from the program, making it one of the most significant pillars of the nation's social safety net. But its future is far from secure. According to the latest report from the Social Security Trustees, the program's two trust funds - the Old-Age and Survivors Insurance (OASI) and Disability Insurance (DI) funds - are projected to reach insolvency by 2034. At that point, benefits would be funded solely through incoming payroll taxes, triggering an automatic cut of around 21 percent unless Congress acts. This is not the first time Social Security has faced a funding cliff. In the early 1980s, the trust funds were similarly close to depletion. Lawmakers responded with reforms that included faster payroll tax increases, a gradual rise in the retirement age, and taxation of some Social Security benefits. Those measures extended the program's life, but four decades later, a new crisis looms. Today, as the crunch point sits less than a decade away, three distinct approaches have been tabled by lawmakers. Composite image created by Newsweek. Composite image created by Newsweek. Photo-illustration by Newsweek/Getty The Fair Share Act Introduced by Democrats Sheldon Whitehouse and Brendan Boyle, the Fair Share Act is aimed at shoring up Social Security and Medicare by targeting the highest earners. The bill would require taxpayers with incomes over $400,000 to pay Social Security taxes on all wage, self-employment, and investment income above that threshold. Under the current system, most taxpayers pay Social Security taxes on all their income - but because of the $160,200 wage cap, wealthier Americans stop contributing once they pass that amount in earnings. "This legislation would significantly extend Social Security solvency and would extend Medicare solvency by an estimated 20 years," Whitehouse and Boyle said. Tax attorney Nik Agharkar, owner and managing member of Crowne Point Tax, called the Fair Share Act "the clearest path to achieving long-term solvency" of the three options, noting that it could fund the program for 75 years. "Since the proposals made in the Fair Share Act increase taxes on our highest earners, which reverses decades of erosion to our payroll tax bases, while leaving middle- and lower-income workers untouched, it would likely be considered the most 'fair,' but certainly high-earners would disagree," Agharkar told Newsweek. A New Investment Fund A bipartisan offering comes from Republican Senator Bill Cassidy and Democratic Senator Tim Kaine. Their plan would create an additional investment fund separate from the existing trust funds. Unlike Social Security's current assets - which are invested exclusively in special-issued U.S. government bonds - the new fund would diversify into stocks, bonds, and other investments to secure higher returns. The proposal envisions an up-front $1.5 trillion investment to give the fund 75 years to grow. During that time, the Treasury would temporarily provide the cash needed, to be repaid once the new fund matures and begins supplementing payroll tax revenue. "There is a nationwide appetite to implement a bipartisan, commonsense plan like ours," Cassidy and Kaine wrote in a Washington Post op-ed. "Waiting until the Social Security Trust Fund is on the eve of crisis would have difficult and preventable consequences. Congress should seize the moment." Michael Montgomery, a political scientist at the University of Michigan-Dearborn, said this approach could represent the political middle ground. "Because it neither takes from future beneficiaries - something Democrats will oppose - nor requires high earners to contribute more - something Republicans will oppose - Cassidy-Kaine may be 'just right' for addressing Social Security and Medicare funding if our profoundly-divided Congress has the will to act," Montgomery told Newsweek. Raising the Retirement Age Another idea comes from the Republican Study Committee, which in March 2024 proposed "modest adjustments" to the retirement age for future retirees to reflect rising life expectancy. While not an official administration policy, the group includes 170 GOP lawmakers, among them allies of President Donald Trump. The committee said current seniors and those near retirement would not be affected. But analysis by the Congressional Budget Office shows that raising the age to 69 - up from the current 67 - could cut lifetime benefits by up to 13 percent for anyone born after 1971. The Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget has said it would only close 35 percent of the funding gap, meaning that if implemented, it would need to be used in tandem with other policies to make a meaningful impact. Political "Goldilocks" Michael Montgomery framed the three proposals as a "political 'Goldilocks' scenario," and that political realities remain a significant barrier in a "deeply divided Congress." The Fair Share Act's reliance on higher taxes for the wealthy could likely face stiff resistance from Republicans, while the investment fund requires a massive one-time outlay that could be politically unpalatable in Congress. Raising the retirement age, while less costly in budget terms, could be politically toxic given its impact on working-class Americans. Nik Agharkar cautioned that none of the options are ideal. "We should do more to get Congress to increase spending on Social Security through budget negotiations," he said, warning that political gridlock could push the issue to the brink. How Do Americans Feel? Social Security is often referred to as the "third rail" of American politics due to its enduring popularity. So it comes as no surprise that Americans want a say in how to fix the funding crisis. A July 2025 survey from The Senior Citizens League (TSCL), one of the nation's largest nonpartisan seniors groups, shows that the most popular solution, backed by 50 percent of respondents, is eliminating the cap on earnings subject to payroll taxes, like in the Sheldon-Whitehouse proposal. Other favored options include creating a fast-track process for Congress to vote on Social Security legislation (38 percent), increasing the payroll tax rate (31 percent), and applying the 6.2 percent tax to investment income for high earners (29 percent). More drastic or market-linked proposals received far less support: only 19 percent backed investing payroll taxes in stocks or other assets, 18 percent supported raising the retirement age to 70, and just 1 percent favored reducing cost-of-living adjustments.
