
Local reps criticize proposed dairy legislation
'Although I don't believe this ill-conceived legislation will reach the floor for a vote this session, I will continue to vehemently oppose it,' said state Assemblyman Billy Jones (D-Chateaugay Lake).
Jones is one of four upstate Democratic lawmakers which jointly issued a news release Monday opposing the legislation which Assemblywoman Linda Rosenthal (D-Manhattan) and Sen. Jabari Brisport (D-Brooklyn) introduced to prohibit the state Department of Environmental Conservation from issuing permits for new or expanding farms which seek to have herds of 700 or more dairy cows.
State Assemblyman Matt Simpson (R-Lake George) and state Sen. Dan Stec (R-Queensbury) also oppose the legislation.
'This bill is yet one more unnecessary and misplaced piece of agenda-driven legislation that will add to Albany's constant top-down pressure to make it impossible for our state's hardworking farms to compete,' Simpson said, in an e-mail Tuesday.
Simpson said the proposed legislation could force more North Country farmers out of business.
'Obviously, I oppose this asinine legislation. A new regulation limiting the number of livestock is the last thing New York's farmers need,' Stec said, the ranking Republican on the Senate Environmental Conservation Committee, in an email on Tuesday.
Stec agrees with Jones that the legislation, introduced in March and currently under consideration in the Environmental Conservation committees of both houses, likely will not reach a vote of the full Senate or Assembly this session.
At the heart of the debate is what defines a 'factory farm' versus a 'family farm.'
Rosenthal and Brisport said that large herds increase agriculture runoff which pollutes streams and lakes, causing toxic algai blooms which can make people or animals sick.
Rosenthal and Brisport also said that methane emitted from large herds increases greenhouse gasses which contribute to climate change.
Jones, however, said that many New York dairy farmers have had to increase the size of herds in order to be financially solvent.
'Being raised on a family dairy farm myself and representing many hard-working dairy farmers in the North Country, I know firsthand how misguided this proposed legislation is,' Jones said.
Rosenthal and Brisport said the legislation is intended to crack down on the proliferation of 'large-scale factory farms' in New York, a challenge some say does not exist in the state.
A 'factory farm,' also known as a concentrated animal feeding operation, is an industrialized farm in which large numbers of animals are kept primarily indoors in order to minimize operating costs.
Rosenthal and Brisport said that a study by Food and Water Watch, a national organization which advocates on food security and climate change issues, found a 21% increase in farms in New York between 2017 and 2021.
'These large-scale factory farms are often run by large corporations that squeeze out local competition to maximize profits,' the sponsors wrote in the justification section of the proposed legislation.
Opponents of the legislation said herd size is not the only consideration in categorizing a factory farm.
'I represent over 1,400 family farms. … Some of these family farms have more than 2,000 head in their herd,' said Assemblywoman Carrie Woerner (D-Round Lake), one of the three other Assembly Democrats who joined with Jones in the joint news release.
Farms which currently have more than 700 cows would not have to reduce their herd sizes, but would not be able to increase their herd sizes further, under the proposed legislation.
The other two upstate Democratic Assembly members which joined in the news release are Agriculture Committee Chairwoman Donna Lupardo (D-Endicott) and Assemblywoman Marie Butteschon (D-Marcy).
At the federal level, U. S. Rep. Elise Stefanik (R-Schuylerville) and Democratic congressional candidate Blake Gendebien both criticized the proposed state legislation to limit the size of dairy herds.
'New York Democrats must stop their attack on multi-generational, locally-rooted dairy farms that feed families all across our state,' Stefanik said, in a news release.
Stefanik has said she is considering seeking the Republican nomination for governor in 2026.
'New York City Dems don't get agriculture,' Gendebien posted on his campaign Facebook page on May 30, inviting the sponsors of the proposed legislation to visit his dairy farm at Lisbon, in St. Lawrence County, to gain a better understanding of agriculture issues.
Gendebien said in a telephone interview on Tuesday he is not surprised that upstate Democrats and Republican are united in their opposition to this particular legislation.
'We need farms of all sizes. They are all important,' he said.
Gendebien, a Democratic in the 21st Congressional District in 2026, said the trend toward larger herds is due to multiple siblings or other relatives partnering to achieve economy of scale in their operations.
Larger herds are necessary because the price-per-pound of milk has not kept up with inflation, he explained.
Gendebien said his herd is currently 500 cows, but he will need to expand the herd in the future in order for his three sons to come into the business when they are adults.
As well, farms will need to increase production to provide milk for a new Chobani yogurt plant being developed at Rome and two other dairy product plants planned for western New York, he said.
Gendebien said there are virtually none, if any, corporate farms in New York.
Of some-450 New York and New England farms he communicated with when he was a board member of Agrimark, the cooperative that makes Cabot and McAdam cheese, not one was owned by a corporation, he said.
Gendebien said that dairy cows are treated humanely in New York, whether free to roam in pastures or confined in barns with ample room to move around and adequate cooling and heating systems.
The Adirondack Council has not taken a position on the proposed legislation, said John Sheehan, a spokesman for the regional environmental group.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Boston Globe
4 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
Republican bid to help Trump move past Epstein falls flat
On Monday, Representative James Comer, Republican from Kentucky, the chair of the House Oversight Committee, said the Justice Department would begin sharing its Epstein records with his panel by Friday. He also suggested the release of the documents would take some time, all but ensuring that questions about the Epstein affair will drag on for weeks. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up At the same time, Democrats, in some cases with the help of Republicans, have laid a series of procedural traps that will make it all but impossible for the GOP to avoid confronting the issue again when Congress reconvenes in September. 'We're going to keep the pressure up — 100 percent,' Senator Ruben Gallego, Democrat from Arizona, said at an event in Iowa this month. 'As often as we can, until we know exactly what happened, why it happened.' Advertisement Even with Congress in recess, the Epstein case continues to generate attention in Washington. On Monday, William Barr, who was President Trump's attorney general when Epstein died, testified in a closed-door deposition for the Oversight Committee. Lawmakers of both parties concede the Trump administration could quiet the furor over the Epstein files on Capitol Hill and nationwide by simply releasing them to the public. Comer's statement on Monday was the only public indication to date that it might do so. All the while, several efforts connected to Epstein, a disgraced financier who was found dead in his prison cell in 2019, have been percolating and threaten to disrupt a busy month in which Congress also faces a Sept. 30 deadline to fund the government and avert a shutdown. Chief among them may be a maneuver led by Representive Thomas Massie, Republican fron Kentucky, who is a frequent Trump critic, to try to force a floor vote on the release of the files. Such a vote would thrust Republicans into a politically thorny position between Trump and constituents who are unhappy with the administration's handling of the case. Before leaving Washington, Massie and Representative Ro Khanna, a California Democrat, filed what is known as a discharge petition, which allows any member of the House to force legislation to the floor if a majority of members — 218 — sign on. Because of arcane procedural rules, the pair cannot start collecting signatures until they return in September, but they appear to have more than enough support to succeed. The timing all but guaranteed that the issue would hang over lawmakers throughout the August recess and that Republican leaders would be forced to address it when they returned. While they could try to table the effort, several rank-and-file Republicans earlier this year blocked a similar attempt to circumvent a measure that had majority support. Advertisement So far, 43 other lawmakers, 11 of them Republicans, have signed on to Massie and Khanna's initiative. Last week, the pair announced plans for a news conference with victims of Epstein and his longtime associate Ghislaine Maxwell, to be held outside the Capitol on lawmakers' second day back from their break. Democrats on the powerful House Rules Committee, a panel controlled by the speaker that determines which legislation reaches the floor, also plan to continue pressuring Republicans over the issue. Republican leaders never found a solution to the committee's impasse, which led them to send the House home a day ahead of schedule. But they seemed to take solace in the Trump administration's request that federal judges release transcripts of grand jury testimony in three cases related to Epstein and Maxwell. Both House Speaker Mike Johnson and Representative Steve Scalise, the number two Republican, suggested such a move might help alleviate concerns, adding that the House could not address the Epstein files while the courts were weighing in. 'That process is underway right now,' Johnson said last month. 'Now, we've got to zealously guard that and protect it and make sure it's happening. And if it doesn't, then we'll take appropriate action when everybody returns here.' Yet so far, federal judges in two of those three cases have denied the government's requests. A judge overseeing Maxwell's case said that the Justice Department's suggestion that grand jury testimony 'would bring to light meaningful new information' was 'demonstrably false.' A third judge, who oversaw Epstein's 2019 case, is still considering whether to unseal grand jury materials connected to that prosecution. Advertisement And Republicans and Democrats alike have argued that the grand jury testimony falls far short of the promise that Attorney General Pam Bondi and other top officials had made. Instead, they have turned to legal maneuvers meant to force the Justice Department to provide the Epstein files to Congress. This month, the Oversight Committee issued a subpoena to Bondi asking the Justice Department to give the committee its files related to Epstein and Maxwell by Tuesday. Comer, a staunch Trump ally, was forced to send the subpoena after a small group of Republicans joined Democrats in voting to approve it at a subcommittee meeting last month. On Monday, he told reporters he was confident that 'we're going to get the documents,' citing 'productive' conversations with the Justice Department. Senate Democrats have already started to pressure Republicans over the matter using a little-known and infrequently tested maneuver to try to force Bondi to turn over the Epstein files. Under a provision of federal law, government agencies are required to hand over relevant information if any five members of the Senate's chief oversight committee requests it. Senator Chuck Schumer, Democrat from New York, the minority leader, and seven other Democrats had asked the Justice Department to give them Epstein-related materials by Aug. 15. They also asked that a briefing be held for the committee's staff before the end of the month. So far, the committee has not received any material, and the briefing has not been scheduled, according to two people familiar with the matter who said they were not authorized to discuss it publicly. Advertisement Schumer has said Democrats are prepared to seek legal recourse if the Trump administration does not meet the letter's deadlines. On Friday, he began publicly pressuring Senator John Thune, Republican from South Dakota, the majority leader, to appoint a lawyer who would defend the Senate's legal authority for congressional oversight. 'If he chooses complicity — we'll take them to court ourselves,' Schumer wrote in a social media post. This article originally appeared in .


Bloomberg
5 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Jay Clayton Approved by Judges as Interim Manhattan US Attorney
Interim Manhattan US Attorney Jay Clayton avoided a protracted fight over his temporary appointment when a group of judges approved him to serve in the post pending confirmation as a permanent prosecutor by the US Senate. Clayton was appointed by President Donald Trump on April 21 and his temporary term expires within 120 days under federal law. Judges in the Southern District of New York have appointed Clayton to serve until a US Attorney nominated by the president and confirmed by the Senate takes office, according to a statement from the court's district executive.

Epoch Times
5 minutes ago
- Epoch Times
Mississippi to Send National Guard Troops to DC to Back Trump's Crackdown on Crime
Mississippi will send several hundred National Guard troops to Washington to assist President Donald Trump's effort to crack down on crime in the nation's capital, joining several other Republican-led states that have pledged military resources. In a statement posted on social media on Aug. 18, Mississippi Gov. Tate Reeves announced that he's approved the deployment of some 200 National Guard soldiers 'to support President Trump's effort to return law and order to our nation's capital.'