logo
Tax credits supporting innovation are about to expire. Texas should extend them

Tax credits supporting innovation are about to expire. Texas should extend them

Yahoo02-04-2025

Strong economies are built on investment, and innovation helps drive that investment.
Innovation makes workers more productive and leads to new businesses that pay taxes and create jobs. But while the Lone Star State is renowned for its strong economy, investment in Texas research and development (R&D) remains distressingly low. That limits the growth of future-shaping companies and employers before they can even get started.
With the Texas Legislature now in session, it's vital that legislators take on this issue by extending — and enhancing — the state's innovation investment. One way to do this is through R&D tax credits, which reward companies that invest in Texas R&D by reducing their tax burden.
Texas offered this economic development incentive from 2000 to 2007, then shut it down for seven years. A smaller program started again in 2014, but it will end in 2026 unless the Legislature extends it.
Senate Bill 2206, filed by state Sens. Paul Bettencourt and Joan Huffman, both Republicans from Houston, and HB 4393, by state Rep. Charlie Geren, R-Fort Worth, would extend the program and adjust it so it is easier to administer. Yet even if this important legislation passes, our state's R&D tax credit program will badly trail what is available in other states. Currently, Texas spends less on R&D relative to its population and state output than peer states do.
Our state's tentativeness is surprising, given the clear benefits of R&D tax credits. A study by Rice University's Baker Institute found that a strong R&D tax credit program could boost Texas' economy significantly — increasing the state's economic output by $1.3 billion in five years, $2.4 billion in 10 years, and $4.4 billion in 20 years, and consumer spending by $246 million in five years and $2 billion in 20 years.
Texans would reap the benefits as well. The Baker Institute study shows that R&D tax credits could create nearly 114,000 jobs in the first 10 years. With an average salary of $75,000, that adds up to more than $8.5 billion in wages.
Overall, the study estimates that the total benefits from R&D tax credits would be $14.6 billion after 10 years and $62 billion after 20 years.
By contrast, states that don't invest in R&D see slower economic growth and lower standards of living. While other incentives like property tax breaks are more common, R&D tax credits benefit a wider range of businesses.
These investments also pay for themselves. The Baker Institute study examined a moderately sized R&D tax credit program that would cost $661.4 million in 2025 — and found that it would grow the Texas economy enough to cover this cost.
So, the question isn't whether Texas can afford to extend the R&D tax credit; it's whether Texas can afford not to.
Economic growth is the most important part of a healthy economy. It produces opportunity and improves living standards in each successive generation.
R&D tax credits help deliver that healthy growth. They also allow smaller, non-established businesses to gain a foothold and compete in the marketplace. As those smaller firms succeed, they create new opportunities for others. And, with a healthy ecosystem of innovation investment, there are always new, cutting-edge companies coming into the pipeline.
Texans rightly celebrate our state's economic success over the past several decades. Innovation-focused programs, especially R&D tax credits, can ensure that success continues for future generations.
Extending the current program would help. Expanding it — especially to the point that it's competitive with other states — would ensure that the state will thrive in the future as much as it has in the past.
John W. Diamond directs the Center for Tax and Budget Policy at Rice University's Baker Institute; he was the lead author on the study of the economic effects of R&D tax incentives in Texas. Jennifer Rabb is president of the Texas Taxpayers and Research Association, which represents many of the state's biggest employers.
This article originally appeared on Austin American-Statesman: R&D tax credits fuel innovation. Texas should extend them | Opinion

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Black Caucus chair says Trump's actions on L.A. are impeachable
Black Caucus chair says Trump's actions on L.A. are impeachable

Axios

time7 minutes ago

  • Axios

Black Caucus chair says Trump's actions on L.A. are impeachable

Congressional Black Caucus chair Yvette Clarke (D-N.Y.) said Tuesday she believes President Trump mobilizing the National Guard and deploying Marines to Los Angeles rises to the level of an impeachable offense. Why it matters: It's a break with House Democrats' general aversion towards impeachment from the head of one of their most powerful groups. The comment comes amid growing animosity between Democrats and the Trump administration over the president's use of law enforcement to carry out a campaign of mass deportations. The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Driving the news: During a press conference, Clarke was asked if Trump's actions to quell protests in L.A. rise to the level of an impeachable offense "I definitely believe it is," she responded, "But we'll cross that bridge when we get to it." Clarke and other Democrats have argued that Trump has violated the U.S. Constitution by mobilizing the National Guard over Newsom's objections. Reality check: Democrats are highly unlikely to pursue an organized impeachment effort against Trump any time soon. Two rank-and-file members, Reps. Shri Thanedar (D-Mich.) and Al Green (D-Texas), have spearheaded their own rogue impeachment initiatives, but most Democrats have dissociated themselves with those efforts. Most Democrats are clear-eyed that impeachment would be doomed to failure with Republicans in control of Congress — and they often note that Trump won in 2024 despite previously being impeached twice. What they're saying: House Democratic Caucus chair Pete Aguilar (D-Calif.) told reporters at a subsequent press conference, "I've said before that ... House Democrats aren't focused on impeachment today."

Impeachment wars
Impeachment wars

Axios

time7 minutes ago

  • Axios

Impeachment wars

Rep. Jasmine Crockett's mere mention of a possible impeachment inquiry into President Trump has touched off negative reactions from some colleagues. "I think she's going to turn off a lot more people than gain," a House Democrat told us. Why it matters: House Democratic leaders are staying neutral. But many Democrats are allergic to the word after they impeached Trump twice only for him to return to power with full control of the government. Crockett (D-Texas), asked in a local news interview if she would pursue impeachment if Democrats retook the House in 2026 and she became Oversight Committee chair, said she would "absolutely at least do an inquiry." The other three candidates for the ranking member job on Oversight, Reps. Robert Garcia (D-Calif.), Stephen Lynch (D-Mass.) and Kweisi Mfume (D-Md.), told us they wouldn't go that far. 👿 "Turning this ranker race into a proxy for impeachment is unhelpful and unfair to her colleagues," said a House Democrat who predicted Republicans will "try to motivate their base by saying that a Democratic majority will inevitably lead to impeachment." Crockett told us the term "impeachment inquiry" would stress to the public the "next level of gravity" of the subject matter — such as Trump's pardons for big money allies and the Qatari jet scandal. "A lot of times we as Democrats can overthink stuff," Crockett said. "A lot of people ... felt like [Oversight Committee chair] James Comer was an embarrassment. But at the end of the day, who won the House?" The bottom line: House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries deferred to House Judiciary Committee ranking member Jamie Raskin (D-Md.), whose panel, he said, "has jurisdiction over impeachment."

US energy loan office should fund oil, gas, White House aide says
US energy loan office should fund oil, gas, White House aide says

Yahoo

time11 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

US energy loan office should fund oil, gas, White House aide says

WASHINGTON (Reuters) -The U.S. Energy Department's loan office should fund oil and gas infrastructure, a White House aide said on Tuesday. "One of the big problems is, in the past the ... loan program office has been used for a lot of these renewable projects," Jarrod Agen, a deputy assistant to the president and executive director of the National Energy Dominance Council, said at a Politico conference on energy. The Loan Programs Office grew rapidly under former President Joe Biden, thanks to legislation passed during his term, and has hundreds of billions of dollars in loan and loan guarantee capacity. Agen said the administration is changing the priority of the LPO, which is meant to help finance emerging energy projects that show promise but face difficulties getting bank loans. "So, yes, we want to invest more and prioritize projects that are oil and gas-related, nuclear-related," Agen said. President Donald Trump's new energy dominance council has focused on increasing already record-high oil and gas output and cutting climate and pollution regulations on fossil fuels. In his first term, Trump only used the LPO to finance the Vogtle nuclear plant in Georgia. The Trump administration wants to offer tens of billions of dollars in LPO financing over the next two years to projects developing nuclear and geothermal power and minerals used in everything from wind and solar power to weapons systems, according to the White House budget for fiscal 2026. Republicans in the House have pushed to slash LPO's lending. Sign in to access your portfolio

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store