Exclusive: Ansari proposes sweeping reform of federal rental aid
Freshman U.S. Rep. Yassamin Ansari (D-Phoenix) wants to completely revamp the way the federal government provides housing assistance to low-income families.
Why it matters: Arizona's housing agencies don't receive enough federal rental assistance to support all low-income families, which leads to significant waiting periods.
The Valley's surge in rental prices over the past decade has resulted in a higher number of Arizonans seeking assistance.
The big picture: The Housing Choice Voucher Program, the largest federally funded source of rental assistance, has remained largely unchanged since its inception in the 1970s.
Advocates want to see major modifications to the way families qualify for and receive assistance, but any significant expansion of the program would likely carry a multi-billion-dollar price tag.
State of play: Ansari introduced a bill Thursday that would increase the number of housing vouchers the federal government provides, expand the number of families who qualify, and reduce the amount those families pay in rent.
Ansari told Axios the goal of the sweeping proposal is to ensure all eligible American families receive assistance expeditiously.
How it currently works: Households that make less than 50% of the area median income (about $51,000 for a family of four in Phoenix) are eligible for a Housing Choice Voucher. Families that make less than 80% of the AMI (about $82,000 for a family of four) and have other special circumstances (disabilities, elderly, etc.) also qualify.
Yes, but: Only about 25% of eligible households actually receive vouchers each year because of funding limitations, which results in months- or years-long waitlists in most communities nationwide.
Once a family receives a voucher, they pay 30% of their income toward rent and the government covers the remainder.
How it would work: Ansari's bill would require the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) to increase the number of vouchers it provides year over year until all eligible families are covered. Ansari said the goal is to make the program an entitlement within 10 years.
It would also open eligibility to all families who make less than 80% of AMI, while prioritizing the lowest-income families.
The bill would reduce the amount voucher-holders have to pay from 30% of their income to 20% to account for rising costs of other essentials like groceries and child care.
Between the lines: The legislation would make it a federal offense for landlords to deny housing to families because they are using housing vouchers.
Already, Phoenix, Tempe and Tucson have enacted ordinances that prohibit landlords from discriminating based on a tenant's "source of income."
Zoom out: Ansari is also a co-sponsor of a bill introduced alongside other Arizona and Nevada lawmakers last month that would update HUD's voucher formula to provide more assistance in fast-growing cities like Phoenix and Las Vegas.
Reality check: Increases to social program spending are unlikely to find a friendly ear in the GOP-controlled Congress or White House.
The Trump administration has been looking for opportunities to cut federal spending — not expand it.
The bottom line:"I think it's really important right now for Democrats especially to demonstrate where we want to go when it comes to affordability and show the vision for the future," Ansari said of the bill.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Axios
42 minutes ago
- Axios
ABC suspends correspondent for calling Stephen Miller a "world-class hater"
ABC News Senior National Correspondent Terry Moran was suspended after he characterized top Trump aide Stephen Miller as "richly endowed with the capacity for hatred" in a since-deleted post, the network confirmed to Axios Sunday. The big picture: The incident is ammunition for the administration's attacks on and distrust of traditional media. The Trump administration has squeezed legacy media from several angles in its first few months, prompting legal battles over funding and First Amendment rights. Driving the news: An ABC News spokesperson confirmed in a statement to Axios that Moran " has been suspended pending further evaluation." "ABC News stands for objectivity and impartiality in its news coverage and does not condone subjective personal attacks on others. The post does not reflect the views of ABC News and violated our standards," the statement read. Catch up quick: Moran, who in April conducted an at-times testy interview with President Trump marking his first 100 days in office, shared a post to X shortly overnight Saturday calling both Miller, Trump's deputy chief of staff, and the president "world-class" haters. "The thing about Stephen Miller is not that he is the brains behind Trumpism," Moran's post started, according to a screenshot. He continued, saying that Miller's ability to translate Trump-world impulses into policy is not "what's interesting." "It's not brains. It's bile," he said. "Miller is a man who is richly endowed with the capacity for hatred. He's a world-class hater." Moran contended Miller's "hatreds are his spiritual nourishment." What he's saying: Miller, responding to Moran's post, argued that "[f]or decades, the privileged anchors and reporters narrating and gatekeeping our society have been radicals adopting a journalist's pose." Miller has been a driving force behind the president's controversial immigration crackdown and is one of his most-trusted aides. Zoom out: White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt described Moran's rhetoric as "unacceptable and unhinged" on Fox News' "Sunday Morning Futures," saying ABC confirmed it would be taking action.
New York Post
an hour ago
- New York Post
AMC Theatres announce shocking change that people aren't thrilled about: ‘That's already excessive'
Moviegoers at AMC Theatres are in for a rude awakening starting next month. A few commercials and coming attractions before a movie begins are expected — however, soon enough, AMC Theatres will be delaying the start times of movies even more. On July 1, AMC Theatres — the largest theatre chain in the U.S. and Europe — will be adding one additional commercial on top of the many that they already play after upcoming movie trailers and before the start of a movie. Advertisement Buckle up moviegoers — you're in for a long ride before your movie even begins, starting next month. Christopher Sadowski And people are not happy about this news. The news comes as part of a new deal with American cinema advertising company National CineMedia Inc., according to Bloomberg. Advertisement It's an opportunity for AMC to make some dough — as the movie theater chain will get a cut of the ad sales, as reported on by the outlet. 'While AMC was initially reluctant to bring this to our theaters, our competitors have fully participated for more than five years without any direct impact to their attendance,' AMC said in a statement, according to The Hollywood Reporter. 'This is a strong indication that this NCM pre-show initiative does not negatively influence moviegoing habits.' Advertisement The deal is a win-win for both AMC and NCM, as it serves as an opportunity for each company to earn back some of the revenue they lost during the pandemic, when all theatres were shut down. 'For the past five years, AMC has sought out crucial revenue that is not reliant on the increase of base ticket prices,' said an AMC rep in a statement to Deadline. 'We've done this through more and better moviegoing enhancements like our significant expansion of PLFs, a greater selection of food and beverage offerings, and the introduction of movie-going merchandise like popcorn buckets and other collectible concession vessels,' the statement explained. Although this news isn't the end of the world — and frankly, could be worse — people on X (formerly Twitter) are acting like it is. Advertisement 'I show up to every movie 30 minutes after the 'start time', and it is always exactly as the movie is starting. That's already excessive,' said one person. 'How could they possibly run more?' a grumpy X user wrote. 'Gee, great! So, more people will arrive 30 minutes after 'start' time and climb over people in the dark, at the beginning of a film, to avoid the trailers and additional ads! This is why I treasure my aisle seat. I will be arriving much later now,' quipped someone else. 'Glad my area only has Regals,' commented another unhappy person.
Newsweek
an hour ago
- Newsweek
Zelensky Addresses 'Complicated' Aftermath of Oval Office Blowup With Trump
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky in an interview that aired on Sunday revealed the difficulty that followed the high-profile blowup between himself and President Donald Trump in the Oval Office in late February. Zelensky, speaking with ABC News' Martha Raddatz in Ukraine, described the situation as "quite complicated" as he had to try and repair relations with his American counterpart. "It's important that I defend my position and I was trying to do that in the Oval Office," he said. Why It Matters Trump had said he would end the conflict in Ukraine within 24 hours of retaking office, but later he admitted that the situation was fairly complicated, at times saying that Ukraine is "more difficult, frankly, to deal with." Trump also said he worried Russian President Vladimir Putin may be trying to drag out peace negotiations while pressing on with the war that began in February 2022. The lack of progress has prompted Trump to start taking a more laid-back approach to the conflict, best encapsulated last week when he compared the warring nations to "young children fighting like a park." "You try to pull them apart and they don't want to be pulled apart," he said. "Sometimes you have to let them fight for a while." Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelensky speaks to the media in Kyiv on May 19. Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelensky speaks to the media in Kyiv on May 19. Sergei Supinsky/AFP via Getty Images What To Know Trump and Zelensky had a falling out on February 28 when the Ukrainian leader visited the White House to sign a deal that would grant the U.S. access to his country's vast mineral reserves in a move the U.S. assured would create strong economic ties and deepen the threat to Russia continuing to escalate the conflict. In the now-famous exchange, Zelensky asked about the value of deals when Putin had broken previously agreed upon ones, which in turn provoked an angry response from Trump and Vice President JD Vance. Trump declared that Zelensky had "no cards" to play in the conflict and needed the U.S. to have any chance of survival. Speaking with Raddatz on Sunday through a translator, Zelensky maintained the need to defend his position and to stand up for his people. "We all saw that Oval Office, chaotic, disastrous meeting. I know after that meeting, you tried to repair that relationship. Tell us what it was like in the aftermath," Raddatz said. "It's quite complicated. You could watch it live, and it was very clear and very straightforward," Zelensky said. "I used to remind everyone: Cameras don't lie. Everybody could see on their television screens. I think the result of that meeting, I was very honest and open when I said that a small country is fighting for its life against the giant with all that evil they brought with their army and weapons to our land." He added: "Six hundred and thirty-one children lost their lives. For some, those are numbers, but for me, it's important that I defend my position and I was trying to do that in the Oval Office." President Donald Trump and Vice President JD Vance meet with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky in the Oval Office at the White House on February 28 in Washington, D.C. President Donald Trump and Vice President JD Vance meet with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky in the Oval Office at the White House on February 28 in Washington, pair would not speak directly again until they came face-to-face two months later at the funeral of Pope Francis in late April. Photos from that meeting show the two presidents sitting in close and isolated conversation. Zelensky said Sunday that following that meeting, he would "like to believe that the relationship has changed for the better," but added, "I don't know for sure. I can't give you 100 percent guarantee." The Ukrainian president also said he would like to speak more with Trump, but that other people "communicate with the president more than me and they deliver different messages to him." However, continuing to work with the U.S. proves vital for the Ukrainian leader, who said he is "convinced that the president of the United States has all the powers and enough leverage to unite European leaders," whom he said are "all looking at President Trump as a leader for the free world, a free democratic world and they are waiting for him, so he has to do it. He must." Zelensky also addressed the potential end of U.S. military aid, saying once again, as he has so often in the past year, that "without it, there is a greater chance Russia will win and Ukraine will suffer much more loss of life, much more." Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelensky meets with President Donald Trump during Pope Francis' funeral at St. Peter's Basilica at the Vatican on April 26. Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelensky meets with President Donald Trump during Pope Francis' funeral at St. Peter's Basilica at the Vatican on April 26. Office of the President of Ukraine via Getty Images What People Are Saying John Foreman, former United Kingdom defense attache to Moscow and Kyiv, previously told Newsweek: "[Trump's] statement that the U.S. is backing away from being a mediator shows his instinct for self-preservation having failed to deliver peace as he promised. We shouldn't be surprised. Trump has consistently used carrots rather than sticks. It is clear he values a relationship with Russia, and an odd friendship with Putin, over Ukraine." Secretary of State Marco Rubio told U.S. lawmakers last month: "What the president is trying to do is end...a bloody, costly war that neither side can win," adding Putin "hasn't gotten a single concession, he hasn't got a single sanction lifted." What Happens Next As Russia and Ukraine continue to attack each other, the prospect of successful peace talks remain distant. Meanwhile, a bipartisan sanctions bill is already awaiting approval in the U.S. Congress, which lawmakers hope could add pressure to Putin.
