
Border wars: Syria's new authorities grapple with Lebanese smugglers
Hidden trails snake through the mountains in Lebanon's eastern Bekaa valley, the furrowed earthen paths veering off before entirely disappearing into the mountainside scrub. 'That's Syria,' said Haidar, a smuggler using a pseudonym, tracing with his finger the contours of a route that if followed for about half a mile would cross the borders of Syria and Lebanon with authorities being none the wiser.
In the remote Lebanese village of Qasr, borders are just a suggestion. The town sits a stone's throw from Syria and save for three soldiers manning an army checkpoint at the entry to the village, the presence of the Lebanese state is minimal.
The people of Qasr and the villages that straddle both sides of the nearly 248 mile-long (400km) Syria-Lebanon border were for decades in business together. Authorities in Assad's Syria profited from the flow of weapons, drugs and fuel over the border, and its ally in Lebanon, the Iran-backed Shia militia Hezbollah, relied on routes used by smugglers to receive weapons coming from Iran.
But after the Syrian president Bashar al-Assad was ousted by Syrian rebels on 8 December and a war-battered Hezbollah lost its grip over the Lebanese state, authorities in both countries have sought to reassert control over their borders and crack down on smuggling.
The attempt to seal the porous border has disrupted the decades long smuggling trade between Syria and Lebanon and has turned local tensions into deadly international military incidents.
On 16 March, three Syrian soldiers were killed in Lebanese territory, prompting the Syrian army to begin to pummel Qasr and surrounding villages with artillery. Smuggling tribes in the villages returned fire and the Lebanese army also responded to Syrian rockets, with a ceasefire agreed a day later.
In all, three Syrians and seven Lebanese were killed on both sides, while another 52 were wounded in Lebanon.
It was the second time in a month that clashes had erupted between Syria and Lebanon. Syrian authorities blamed Lebanon's Hezbollah for the skirmishes, claiming it had infiltrated Syrian territory, kidnapped three Syrian soldiers and killed them. Hezbollah denied any involvement.
Lebanese people painted a very different story, of a new Syrian army that did not yet know the lay of the land, and of a local dispute that escalated quickly.
A member of the Lebanese Jaafar tribe, an influential smuggling clan that controls many of the routes in the area, said: 'Three Syrian soldiers [were] walking, and stepped on Lebanese land by accident. They ran across a shepherd who got scared and called his relatives, who killed the soldiers immediately.'
He described how tensions have been running high between the people of Lebanese border villages and the new Syrian authorities. 'Smugglers are scared to go to Syria now, they don't feel there's security,' he said.
Many Lebanese living in towns on the Syrian side of the border for decades fled after the fall of Assad for fear of the new authorities. One 68-year-old farmer who was born and raised in Syria said his land had been taken from him in December, so he fled to Qasr.
Arms have poured into Lebanese border towns after Assad's troops abandoned their posts, leaving weapons ranging from rifles to light artillery by the roadside. The Jaafar family member said it was now common to find Kornets, a Russian anti-tank guided missile, in Qasr – and that they were quite cheap, too.
When Syrian artillery fire started on Qasr and the surrounding area, tribes such as the Jaafar family took up arms to defend the town – and arms they had aplenty. A video of an al-Arabiya correspondent inside Syria during the clashes captured the moment a rocket was shot from the Lebanese side, slightly injuring the reporter.
Many people in Qasr are members of Hezbollah – the group announced four of its fighters were killed in the clashes – although residents insisted the militia did not direct the battle, but rather fighters participated as members of the town.
Experts say the relationship between smugglers and Hezbollah is more of a partnership, rather than the tribes that engage in smuggling being under the Lebanese group's control.
Joseph Daher, the author of Hezbollah: The political economy of the party of God, said: 'Most of these clans are politically covered and have connections with Hezbollah. Hayat Tahrir al-Sham (HTS) [the Islamist authority that rules Syria] is trying to strengthen its controls at the border, especially targeting clans affiliated with Hezbollah.'
The Lebanese state has also been keen to strengthen its control over the Syria-Lebanese border, eager to show western powers it is preventing weapons from reaching Hezbollah. Before the fall of the Assad regime, the Lebanese group would receive weapons shipments via Syria through the Bekaa valley.
Despite the clashes, business is business. Smugglers say the flow of illicit goods has continued after the fall of Assad. 'Publicly, [HTS] is saying they want smuggling to stop, but they need our goods. Business doesn't have an identity,' said a second member of the Jaafar family. The new Syrian authorities have regularised and decreased the fees they charge smugglers, he said, as Syria desperately needs Lebanese fuel and diesel as western-led sanctions have throttled its ability to import them.
The only goods smugglers can no longer traffic are drugs. The factories that used to produce the popular amphetamine captagon were run by the now deposed Assad regime and smuggled through the Bekaa valley to be exported via Lebanon's ports. Syria's new authorities have cracked down on the narcotics trade.
Lebanon's smugglers and Syrian officials are still getting to know one another. Gone are the fourth armoured division soldiers under the control of Maher al-Assad, the brother of Syria's ousted president, which used to control the Syrian side of the smuggling routes.
The introduction is off to a rocky start. As the Jaafar clan member was speaking, bursts of machine-gun fire erupted, followed by the dull thuds of rocket-propelled grenades fired by the Syrian authorities at a neighbouring village.
'If the ceasefire continues then we won't attack them and they won't attack us. But it seems we are entering a cycle of violence and revenge,' he said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Telegraph
5 hours ago
- Telegraph
Islamophobia fears ‘help Iranian propaganda spread in Britain'
Iran has 'leveraged' fears of offending Islamic communities to establish an extensive propaganda network in Britain, a report has warned. Research by the US-based National Union for Democracy in Iran (Nufdi) found that the UK has become a 'flashpoint' for influence operations in Europe by the Iranian regime and its Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps (IRGC). It listed more than a dozen organisations which it claims are directly linked to Tehran and advance its agenda by lobbying organisations and MPs. The report comes after Dan Jarvis, the security minister, warned that Iran is becoming 'increasingly emboldened' and 'aggressive' in its actions in the UK. Nufdi campaigns for a democratic and secular Iran and holds an annual Iran conference in Washington DC. In the report, it warned that Tehran is exerting increasing influence in an 'attempt to influence the British populace to adopt an appeasement policy'. It said this included efforts to 'radicalise the pre-existing diaspora' and UK nationals and 'whitewash the actions' via organisations like cultural centres. 'These cultural centres enjoy the benefits of being protected by their religious/quasi-religious status and have become deeply rooted in several of the diaspora communities within the UK,' the group warned. 'The regime's influence within the cultural realm is particularly difficult to combat due to its leveraging minority Islamic communities and a perception of innocence, appearing as an institution fostering cooperation and community.' The report cited several examples of cultural centres in Britain hosting lectures by IRGC commanders. As well as cultural centres, Tehran's influence extended to the lobbying of politicians and 'a robust and deep-rooted educational network', it added. 'Whether it is... an inability of the Home Office to designate the IRGC as a terrorist organisation, or operating a vast network of propaganda centres masquerading as cultural centres, the IRI's [Islamic Republic of Iran] influence within the United Kingdom is vast… and highly effective,' the report concluded. Earlier this year, Mr Jarvis warned Parliament of an increasing threat from Iranian activities in the UK. He cited figures from MI5, which revealed that since the start of 2022, security services have had to respond to 20 Iran-backed plots against British citizens and residents. 'The regime has become increasingly emboldened, asserting itself more aggressively to advance their objectives and undermine ours,' he told MPs. 'This is evidenced by the fact that direct action against UK targets has substantially increased over recent years.' The Government has not proscribed the IRGC as a terrorist organisation, despite calls for it to do so, for fear of cutting off diplomatic ties with Iran. It has however, put the group on the enhanced tier of a new foreign agents registration scheme, meaning Iranian activities in the UK face greater scrutiny.


BreakingNews.ie
5 hours ago
- BreakingNews.ie
'Putin shouldn't have a veto': TD says triple lock debated must avoid misinformation
Fine Gael TD Catherine Callaghan has said the current debate over changes to Ireland's triple lock needs to be grounded in facts and not misinformation. Ms Callaghan is a member of the Oireachtas Committee on Defence and National Security. Advertisement Ms Callaghan, a TD for Carlow-Kilkenny and a former member of the Defence Forces who served in Lebanon, has said that under the current triple lock system, countries like Russia and leaders like Vladamir Putin have the power to veto Ireland's participation in peacekeeping. 'We don't believe that Putin or others should have a veto on whether our troops can be deployed on peacekeeping missions. 'Currently members of the UN Security Council bind Ireland's hands on peacekeeping missions, when these are decisions that should be made by our Government and the Dáil." Ms Callaghan pointed to the fact that no new peacekeeping missions have been approved by the UN Security Council since 2014. Advertisement "This has meant that Irish peacekeepers have in some instances been delayed from engaging in missions to disrupt human smuggling and trafficking and maritime drug seizure operations," she added. 'This shows the absolute need to reform the UN Security Council which Ireland will continue to push for, but with that unlikely in the immediate future, we need to act in our own interests as an independent country in accordance with International Law and the UN Charter. 'In recent days, I have heard opponents of the proposals currently being examined by the Oireachtas Committee on Defence and National Security claim the UN General Assembly can approve peacekeeping missions and there is no need for a green light from the UN Security Council. 'But this is simply not the reality of how the system has worked over the last seven decades. While the General Assembly can make recommendations about deployments, it cannot compel countries to act. Advertisement 'Only once in history has the General Assembly invoked a Resolution to recommend a peacekeeping operation - and that was nearly 70 years ago when it established the first UN Emergency Force in the Middle East in 1956." Ms Callaghan is a member of the Oireachtas Committee on Defence and National Security. Ms Callaghan added: 'The context back then was absolutely unique where it had the consent of the parties involved - Egypt, France, Israel, and the UK - and the recommendation was in line with the priorities of four of the permanent members of the Security Council. 'The reality for the last nearly 70 years has been that every Defence Forces peacekeeping deployment has only ever taken place on the basis of a Security Council mandate. This underscores the rationale for removing the Putin veto." Ireland Neutrality 'completely unaffected' by triple lock... Read More She said removing the triple lock has "nothing whatsoever to do with military neutrality". Advertisement 'We value our neutrality and we are remaining militarily neutral. Ireland was militarily neutral for decades before the advent of the term 'triple lock' around the time of the Nice and Lisbon Treaty debates and it will continue to be neutral if these changes are passed through the Oireachtas and become law.' In an interview with in April, Minister of State Neale Richmond said: "Ireland's triple lock mechanism for deploying troops abroad is an archaic tool that is hindering our ability to be a global force for good whilst surrendering our sovereign decision making to the veto powers of the five permanent members of the UN Security Council. "Given a UN mandate can be vetoed by any of the five permanent Security Council members, we are effectively giving the likes of Russia and China a veto of where and when we send our own troops."


Metro
6 hours ago
- Metro
Tommy Robinson kicked out of London restaurant because ‘staff didn't want to serve him'
Tommy Robinson's entourage is upset after being kicked out of a restaurant for making staff 'feel uncomfortable'. The right wing activist – real name Stephen Yaxley-Lennon – was out eating at the Hawksmoor restaurant near Regent Street, central London, before staff realised who he was. Footage taken by EDL member Guramit Singh Kalirai, who was dining with Robinson, shows the restaurant manager explaining 'staff felt uncomfortable'. Kalirai replied: 'Is it because of the colour of my skin?' The manager responded: 'No, no, no. We have a duty of care to our members of staff. We like to look after our people, as I'm sure you can understand. 'I'm very sorry. I hope it hasn't inconvenienced you.' The footage was posted to X, with Kalirai saying: 'Just been kicked out of Hawksmoor steak house for no reason. Literally just had our starters.' The manager could be seen handing Robinson a business card with the CEO of Hawksmoor's details on it 'if he has any questions', and told him the restaurant will cover the cost of the drinks. Metro has contacted the Hawksmoor for comment. On Thursday Robinson appeared at Westminster Magistrates where he denied two counts of harassment causing fear of violence in August 2024. Prosecutors said he harassed two news reporters, and sharing multiple posts about them on his social media. Robinson was released from prison last month after he was jailed for repeatedly lied about a Syrian refugee. But he had his sentence reduced, and was released from HMP Woodhill in Milton Keynes. check our news page.