logo
Experts Say Conservative Men Are Identifying As Moderates On Dating Apps

Experts Say Conservative Men Are Identifying As Moderates On Dating Apps

Buzz Feed10-07-2025
Hot Topic
🔥 Full coverage and conversation on Politics
Back in January, the American Enterprise Institute, a conservative public policy think tank, released a survey that determined 52% of single heterosexual women are less likely to date a Donald Trump supporter — with only 36% of single heterosexual men saying voting for Trump would be a dealbreaker.
And in the lead-up to Inauguration Day, Hily, a dating app with over 35 million worldwide users, released its own politics and dating study. After surveying 5,000 Gen Z and millennial Americans, Hily determined that 1 in 3 American women would decline a date over political differences. Similar to the AEI survey, Hily's study determined that only 1 in 10 American men would decline a date for the same reason.
These results could very well explain the suspicious trend of heterosexual men misrepresenting their political leanings on dating apps: Specifically, they put 'moderate' on their profiles or act vague about their politics to increase their chances of matching with women who deliberately put 'no conservatives' in their own profiles. These so-called 'moderates' connect with liberal women, only for them to discover that their matches voted for Donald Trump in the last election (a dealbreaker for many).
So why are people lying about their politics on dating apps in the first place? And how can daters spot the red flags behind these vague profiles before everyone's emotions take over? Here's what relationship experts have to say about this very 2025 dating problem.
How 'Moderate' Became A Red Flag
Ella,* a Los Angeles resident, said she's had nothing but frustration with 'moderates' on the apps. As she told HuffPost, Ella noticed that her 'large number of matches' with guys listed as 'moderate' on their Hinge dating profiles has grown significantly in recent months. But she now swipes left on all 'moderates': This is because more than once, after 'days and days of texting,' it turns out that these guys are 'really far-right, anti-feminist, etc,' she said.
Ella's theory is that conservative men might need to lie about their political views – or else they won't get any dates in a liberal city like LA.
Amanda*, creator of the ' Dating Is Dead ' Instagram account, recently ended a two-year relationship with a man who also listed 'moderate' on his profile.
'I think that he was conservative more than moderate,' she said. 'I feel like I was catfished in that sense.'
She said her now-ex-boyfriend began to show his true colors during the first 100 days of the second Trump administration: 'He was becoming more and more indoctrinated to the hard right.'
Now, Amanda is questioning whether her ex's far-right attitude was there all along and she was 'just so blinded by love' — or if 'he was hiding who he was.'
Since ending that relationship, Amanda said she is far more cautious around men who put 'moderate' in their dating profiles: 'I try and bring it up more gently than I did in the beginning,' she said, 'because there's a lot of dancing around who we voted for, so now I ask immediately.'
This approach may result in some abbreviated dates, but it could also mean dodging a major bullet before you've even finished drinks: 'I actually went on a date the other night that lasted seven minutes,' Amanda said. Her date, after admitting that he voted for Donald Trump, brushed off her concerns about the president's second administration, claiming that 'nothing in America is really going to change,' which was all Amanda needed to know about this guy's values.
Bolster Your Dating Boundaries
From the chipping away of reproductive freedom to the U.S. government's pronatalist campaign, women's rights are under attack in 2025. So discovering that the 'moderate' guy you've matched with might actually be looking for a tradwife can be unsettling, to say the least.
'For a lot of women — especially women of color, queer women, women with trauma histories — conservative beliefs don't just feel like a difference of opinion,' said Cheryl Groskopf, an LA-based anxiety, trauma and attachment therapist. 'They feel like a threat. And if you've ever been dismissed, gaslit or harmed by someone who hides behind 'traditional values,' then this kind of dishonesty can feel like a violation (because it is).'
'It's also just draining to constantly have to explain yourself,' continued Groskopf. 'Think of the energy it takes to spend the first 30 minutes of a first date defending your humanity.'
Amanda knows this sentiment well. She recounted how the seven-minute-date guy disregarded her concerns about women's bodily autonomy by pointing out that she lives in a blue state like New York. 'I was like, but it's not about me,' she said. 'It's about the girl in Mississippi or Texas who was, God forbid, sexually assaulted at 13 or who needs a D&C. [Men] have the same rights across all 50 states, and I don't. It is not really up for discussion. A gun has more rights than I do.'
Bottom line? 'Women need these boundaries to protect their energy, their bodies and their sense of safety,' Groskopf said. 'They can absolutely name up-front what they need to feel safe.'
Why Are Men Misrepresenting Themselves On The Apps?
The numbers don't lie: If 52% of single women are less likely to date a Trump supporter, then it makes sense that some of those Trump supporters are attempting to game the system.
'It may be because they are trying to appeal to a broader range of women, and want to select answers that they perceive will get them past the initial screening,' observes Marisa T. Cohen, PhD, LMFT, a relationship expert with Hily. (Cohen also provided the data from Hily's pre-Inauguration Day survey.)
'They also may perceive that they are being inaccurately judged as a result of their political views, so they are trying to present themselves in a way that they think will allow them to match with more people,' she added.
But these political mismatches sometimes occur simply because some people 'may judge their own views inaccurately,' Cohen said. 'They may think they are progressive compared to other people they are associated with, but don't necessarily hold progressive views.'
Groskopf also points to a 'real-time cultural shift': Women are now asking questions like, 'Does this person feel emotionally safe to me?'
Amanda echoes that, reiterating her need to know a man's political beliefs before getting involved. 'I would not feel safe in a room with a bunch of conservative men at this point,' she told HuffPost.
While Groskopf doesn't believe all men are 'trying to maliciously deceive' their potential dates, she also observes that they're not all being honest and authentic, either.
'Many of them have just never had to think about how their political beliefs affect someone else's sense of emotional or physical safety,' Groskopf said. 'They weren't taught to connect their values to safety, or to see 'moderate' as vague instead of neutral. But what he's missing is that for a lot of women, that kind of vagueness is the red flag.'
Trust Yourself — And Your Values
If a person's political views are a dealbreaker for you, then it's imperative to tackle vague, 'moderate' profiles with a clear strategy: That starts with establishing your values, Cohen said. 'Additionally, going beyond surface-level questions to get to know a person and their worldview is important.'
That being said, Cohen advises skepticism if a potential date 'consistently fails to expand on their own views.' For the sake of your emotional safety, Groskopf recommends asking simple questions like:
'What does 'moderate' mean to you?'
'How do your values show up in your day-to-day?'
'Where do you land on things that matter to me — like therapy, mental health, women's rights?'
'The way he responds will tell you a lot,' Groskopf said. 'Does he get curious? Defensive? Does he minimize your question? Does he give a clear answer or just talk in circles and try to sound chill? If he can't meet that moment with honesty, clarity, or even basic self-awareness — that is the red flag.'
Groskopf also cautions against continued obscurity: 'If he says things like 'I'm pretty middle of the road' or 'I just don't like extremes' — but can't tell you what he does believe or values,' then that's a red flag too.
Watch out for defensiveness or mockery as well: 'If he gets weird or low-key annoyed when you ask a totally normal question about values — or makes fun of people who care about things like social issues or emotional growth — that's your sign,' Groskopf said. 'A guy who's actually grounded doesn't get defensive over basic emotional curiosity.'
Women deserve to know if someone they're dating voted against their interests from the get-go. If a guy you match with says 'moderate' on his profile, you are entitled to know his definition of the word before your emotions potentially take over.
'For you to tell me that you're a moderate, but it's OK to have unmarked police cars and people without badges sweeping people up in the streets? That's outrageous,' Amanda said of dubious 'moderate' men.
'Your non-negotiables are your non-negotiables,' Cohen said. 'If learning about a person's political leanings matters to you, ask!'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Pelosi Says 'Release the Files' After Calling Epstein Fallout 'Distraction'
Pelosi Says 'Release the Files' After Calling Epstein Fallout 'Distraction'

Newsweek

time17 minutes ago

  • Newsweek

Pelosi Says 'Release the Files' After Calling Epstein Fallout 'Distraction'

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Democratic U.S. Representative Nancy Pelosi of California on Thursday called for the Trump administration to "release the files" on Jeffrey Epstein after saying the fallout surrounding the scandal is a "distraction" from the "major issues" before Congress. Pelosi, former House speaker, initially told NBC anchor Chris Jansing, in part: "We have major issues right here with things we're voting on today in the Congress" but that "instead, we're talking about him." "Whether it's Jeffrey Epstein or Alcatraz, it's all off the subject of what they're doing with this budget that is harmful to the kitchen table, meeting the kitchen-table needs of the American people." On Thursday afternoon, Pelosi posted on X, formerly Twitter, that "everyone on the Epstein list must be held accountable no matter who they are. Release the files." Why It Matters Epstein, a sex offender, died in a New York City jail in 2019 while awaiting sex trafficking charges. The disgraced financier had well-documented connections to powerful figures, and his death has long prompted numerous conspiracy theories. Rumors of a "client list" have long circulated online, and during President Donald Trump's successful bid for reelection in 2024, he suggested that if voters returned him to the White House, he would release a list of individuals associated with Epstein. Trump's FBI and Department of Justice last week released a memo that found "no incriminating 'client list'" in relation to Epstein, and Trump has urged his supporters to move on and celebrate the many wins he scored in the first six months of his second administration. Democratic U.S. Representative Nancy Pelosi of California looks on during a news conference on the steps of the U.S. Capitol after the Senate passed the One Big Beautiful Bill Act earlier in the day in... Democratic U.S. Representative Nancy Pelosi of California looks on during a news conference on the steps of the U.S. Capitol after the Senate passed the One Big Beautiful Bill Act earlier in the day in Washington, D.C., on July 2. More Jim Watson/AFP via Getty Images What To Know During Pelosi's interview with Jansing on Thursday, the California Democrat expressed her frustration with the "Epstein issue," saying: "This is a distraction. We have major issues right here with things we're voting on today in the Congress, again, in terms of the rescission that the president and the Senate have sent back over to us to cut all of these resources out of helping poor people throughout the world, to be America and play its leadership role in soft power to keep us safe, and to keep us healthy. "Instead, we're talking about him, about this thing and his own base has its own views of what the president should do. I'll leave it up to them to talk it out. But again, whether it's Jeffrey Epstein or Alcatraz, it's all off the subject of what they're doing with this budget that is harmful to the kitchen table, meeting the kitchen-table needs of the American people," she added. Jansing pressed the former speaker and Pelosi added that she also viewed the media noise around the Florida immigration detention center nicknamed "Alligator Alcatraz" as another distraction that's keeping Americans "off the subject of what is happening," including "changing the character and the culture of America." A few hours later, Pelosi posted to X: "For reasons known only to him, Donald Trump is now refusing to appoint a special prosecutor in the Epstein case after weeks of refusing to release the Epstein files." "This week, House Democrats voted unanimously to release the files. Republicans voted to keep them hidden," she continued. "With deep respect for the victims, their trauma and their privacy, everyone on the Epstein list must be held accountable no matter who they are. Release the files." Democrats through Representative Ro Khanna of California tried to put forth an amendment that would have allowed Congress to vote on whether the Epstein files—the documents comprising the federal investigation into his crimes and related activities—should be made public. Ultimately, Republican members of the House Rules Committee voted against the amendment, and many have interpreted this as voting against releasing the files overall. Khanna's amendment was in effect a procedural measure tacked on to the GENIUS Act, which relates to digital assets such as cryptocurrency. If the amendment had been passed, it would have forced Attorney General Pam Bondi to publish the Epstein documents on a "publicly accessible website." What People Are Saying Khanna wrote on X: "Rules voted 5-7 to block the full House from voting on my amendment to have a FULL release of the Epstein file. People are fed up. They are fed up. Thanks Rep. Ralph Norman. Need to put the American people before party!" White House spokesperson Harrison Fields was asked about the Epstein files, but told reporters on Friday: "Any attempt to sow division within this team is baseless and distracts from the real progress being made in restoring public safety and pursuing justice for all."

‘Breakfast Club' blows up over whether Democrats ‘lied' about Biden decline
‘Breakfast Club' blows up over whether Democrats ‘lied' about Biden decline

New York Post

timean hour ago

  • New York Post

‘Breakfast Club' blows up over whether Democrats ‘lied' about Biden decline

Radio host Charlamagne tha God clashed Thursday with former CNN commentator Angela Rye over whether former President Joe Biden suffers from dementia and if the alleged cover-up of his decline cost Democrats the election. Charlamagne asked his progressive guest what she thought about Democrats who 'all of a sudden have the courage to tell the truth,' referencing former Biden press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre's party switch and CNN anchor Jake Tapper's book 'Original Sin' which detailed how Biden's inner circle covered up his limitations in office. Advertisement 'Why all of a sudden do they have the courage to speak truth to power when they didn't do that two to three years ago?' he asked on 'The Breakfast Club.' 'I'm trying to figure out why you think it's 'all of a sudden,'' Rye replied. 'It definitely is all of a sudden. C'mon, Angela Rye!' Charlamagne shot back. Rye went on to suggest that exposé books are nothing new and Tapper's is just 'the latest' example. Advertisement But Charlamagne continued to press his guest, arguing that the scandal over Biden's health likely led to the party's election loss. 'Why tell us after it's too late? Why didn't they say these things two years ago when they could have alerted the American people and the American people could have been like, 'You know what? Something is wrong with him. Maybe y'all shouldn't run a different candidate.' Then we probably wouldn't be in this situation,' he insisted. 'I don't know if I believe that,' Rye replied. 'I think that the lie was sexier to people than the truth and they went with the lie,' she added, referring to Trump winning the November election. Advertisement 3 On 'The Breakfast Club,' Charlamagne tha God asked ex-CNN commentator Angela Rye if President Biden has dementia, and if the alleged cover-up was the demise for Democrats in the 2024 presidential election. AP 'Hold on,' Charlamagne pushed back. 'So the lie wasn't Joe Biden is okay?' Charlamagne recounted how Rye blew up at 'Breakfast Club' co-host DJ Envy in 2023 after he suggested Biden had dementia. Advertisement Rye explained she was offended because her grandmother was suffering from dementia. 'He still doesn't have dementia. He does not have dementia,' she said of Biden. 3 Rye went on to suggest that exposé books are nothing new and Tapper's is just 'the latest' example. The Breakfast Club Rye went on to defend Jean-Pierre and suggested she was treated poorly in the White House by colleagues because of her race. 'Now as for what Karine is doing and Jake, invite them on the show and ask them. I don't know. But what I can tell you is Karine had her own experience of being regularly challenged, her brilliance being challenged, by white men who she was supposed to be sharing-,' Rye said. 'She had to lie for that white man every – all the time,' Charlamagne cut in. Rye said she wasn't talking about Biden but about 'staff people as well' in the White House. 'When you are being challenged by your peers rather than covered because they don't want you in a role, that may jade you just a little bit. You might be a little frustrated by that. So, I mean, I get it,' she said. Advertisement 3 Charlamagne continued to call out Rye, claiming Biden's health led to the Democrats losing the election last November. Getty Images Jean-Pierre was one of his most outspoken allies who defended his mental and physical fitness for office going back to 2022. She announced in June that she was leaving the Democratic Party to become an independent. Advertisement She also revealed an upcoming book, 'Independent: A Look Inside a Broken White House, Outside the Party Lines.' Rye is one of several liberal media figures pushing the idea that President Donald Trump and the Republicans are planning to steal the 2026 midterm election. A spokesperson for Biden did not return Fox News Digital's request for comment.

Democratic lawmaker calls out party for being ‘scared' to offend immigration groups
Democratic lawmaker calls out party for being ‘scared' to offend immigration groups

New York Post

timean hour ago

  • New York Post

Democratic lawmaker calls out party for being ‘scared' to offend immigration groups

Sen. Elissa Slotkin, D-Mich., called out the Democratic Party in an interview on Thursday for being 'scared' to offend immigration groups as they navigate the issue. 'The Republicans are fomenting anti-immigrant hate as a policy and a strategy, and Democrats are so scared of offending either immigration groups or people to the left of them — maybe they're in a primary, they are concerned about saying: 'No, not everyone gets to be here. Not everyone has the right to live in the United States, and we, like every other country in the world, get to know who and what is coming across our borders,'' Slotkin told The New York Times in an interview. Slotkin argued that most Americans agree that immigrants are integral to the American economy, but they want immigrants to come here legally and through 'vetted channels.' 'That kind of clamping down with rules tends to make a lot of my Democratic colleagues really nervous,' she added. 'There's been a lot of ink spilled about advocacy groups that don't seem to represent a lot of voters. We saw that in real time in this last election, when no one had a bigger swing toward Trump than Latinos. Some of these groups were trotting around Washington saying they represent the immigrant community, and they clearly did not,' Slotkin said. 3 Sen. Elissa Slotkin took a shot at the Democratic Party for being 'scared' to call out immigration groups when it comes to the U.S. border crisis. AP Slotkin also said she thought Democrats had lost their 'alpha-energy.' The Michigan senator said 'alpha-energy' was about emotion. 'We respond to people's pain with a long list of wonky policies,' Slotkin continued. 3 In an interview with The New York Times, Slotkin said, 'The Republicans are fomenting anti-immigrant hate as a policy and a strategy, and Democrats are so scared of offending either immigration groups or people to the left of them.' diy13 – 'Alpha energy is synonymous with being bold. Call the tough play, take a risk, be bold. And don't be so damn scared of your own shadow.' Slotkin delivered the official response to President Donald Trump's address to a joint session of Congress in March. She criticized Trump's foreign policy and called for 'responsible' ways to make changes to the government. 3 Slotkin's take is that the majority of U.S. citizens believe immigrants are vital to the economy, though they do not want them to come to this country illegally. AP 'We all want an end to the war in Ukraine, but Reagan understood that true strength required America to combine our military and economic might with moral clarity,' Slotkin said after Trump's address. 'As a Cold War kid, I'm thankful it was Reagan and not Trump in office in the 1980s. Trump would have lost us the Cold War.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store