logo
Is it time to give our ancient trees the same protection as Stonehenge?

Is it time to give our ancient trees the same protection as Stonehenge?

Telegraph16-04-2025

On its website alongside its menu, Toby Carvery offers customers some advice on the intricacies of cutting. In a section entitled 'A Few Words on Carving', a long sharp, serrated blade is recommended in order to make the most precise cut, as well as using the entire length of the knife.
One presumes the tree contractors employed by the branch of the restaurant chain in Enfield, north London, did not pay similarly careful consideration when lopping down a 450-year-old ancient oak overlooking its car park. Instead, there has been an act of ecological vandalism which has provoked similar national outrage to 2023's felling of the Sycamore Gap tree.
The loss of the Toby Carvery oak, campaigners say, is perhaps even more disastrous compared to the 150-year-old Sycamore Gap tree, due to the vast array of species which such veteran trees support. A single ancient oak can harbour up to 2,300 species, meaning that an entire ecosystem has now been chainsawed into oblivion. That, and as pointed out by the writer Robert Macfarlane, this was a tree that pre-dated the Gunpowder Plot.
A 450-yo oak is felled without permission/consultation by @tobycarvery, who falsely claimed it was "dead".
A tree alive when The Gunpowder Plot was hatched, which supports a web of 2000+ species, is in pieces.
Legal protection for heritage trees needed. https://t.co/gUygaCbyDF
— Robert Macfarlane (@RobGMacfarlane) April 15, 2025
But it is also a case which highlights the lack of protection currently afforded to Britain's cherished ancient trees, and raises the question whether, to ensure their survival, these totems of the landscape should now be granted the equivalent legal rights to scheduled ancient monuments such as Stonehenge.
There is a bitter irony in the fact that the only 'listed' tree in the UK, meaning it is granted the same protection as heritage buildings, is already dead. The Grade-II listed stump of the Elfin Oak, which stands in Kensington Gardens, was carved with elves, fairies and woodland animals in the late 1920s by the artist Ivor Innes and is protected for its cultural value.
Otherwise, unless covered by a Tree Preservation Order (TPO) granted by a local authority or growing in a designated site such as a conservation area or nature reserve, Britain's ancient trees have no legal protection at all.
'Thousands of trees being cut without permission'
While the Sycamore Gap tree was felled without permission, Mitchells and Butlers (the company which owns Toby Carvery) believed it had a legal right to fell the tree as it stood on land leased from Enfield Council and was not covered with a TPO. In a statement, the firm said it commissioned 'specialist arboriculturist contractors' who advised that the tree posed a potential health and safety risk and so the decision was made to cut it down.
In response, Ergin Erbil, the leader of Enfield council, said on Wednesday that he was 'outraged the leaseholder has cut down this beautiful ancient oak tree without seeking any permissions or advice from Enfield council' and the local authority would be pursuing 'appropriate legal action'. The tree has been valued at £1 million, £300,000 more than the Sycamore Gap tree.
Legal experts have said the owners of the Toby Carvery could be forced to pay for the value of the tree under the Cavat (Capital Asset Value for Amenity Trees) system, if it is proven that they failed to take appropriate action before felling it.
Under the current system, even existing tree preservation orders can also still be overruled. The Cubbington Pear, for example, a 250-year old specimen once voted English Tree of the Year, was felled in 2020 to make way for HS2.
Meanwhile, the Darwin Oak, a 550-year-old specimen near Charles Darwin 's childhood home which was shortlisted in the 2024 Tree of the Year contest, remains under threat from a proposed Shrewsbury bypass. Despite requests from campaigners to grant a TPO, Shropshire Council says this would still not protect it from being felled under the proposed scheme.
Catherine Nuttgens, an independent urban forester, says the current system creates significant grey areas which leaves ancient trees at risk. She makes the point that it would be theoretically possible to grant listed status to the wrought iron props underneath the famous Major Oak in Sherwood Forest, but not the 1,000-year-old tree itself which they are designed to protect.
Often, as was apparently the case with the Toby Carvery oak, these inadequate legal protections can result in tree surgeons becoming judge, jury and executioner (a role which some are unqualified to carry out). 'Any trained arboriculturist knows about ancient trees,' says Nuttgens, who previously worked as a local authority tree officer and community forestry manager. 'Clearly whoever did this was not a tree expert, maybe a chainsaw expert instead?'
Liam McGough, who runs the north London-based Liam McGough Tree Services, agrees that greater legal protections should be afforded to ancient and veteran trees. The 40-year-old trained as a tree surgeon aged 16 and later worked on the Duke of Northumberland's estate before setting up his own business. He is a professional member of The Arboricultural Association, which acknowledges best practice, and alongside his business works with local authorities advising on tree protection.
The problem, he says, is that 'anybody can buy a chainsaw and call themselves a tree surgeon'. Despite established guidance on tree maintenance, there remain few legal requirements placed on those in the industry beyond basic health and safety rules. 'The term is so loosely used there are people walking around with shorts and trainers going and knocking on people's doors and asking if they want their trees cut,' says McGough.
While he insists his firm will always make an application to seek approval from a specific local authority when managing any urban trees, many others in the profession do not. 'There are thousands upon thousands of trees that are being cut without permission,' McGough says.
He has studied photographs of the remains of the Toby Carvery oak (whose stump is still standing after being belatedly granted a Tree Preservation Order by Enfield Council in the hope it will grow back) and says the condition of the wood demonstrates there was no need for the tree to be felled. 'It makes me angry,' he says. 'It's a huge loss to the area.'
Emblems of our national identity
There are in excess of 190,000 trees logged on the UK's Ancient Tree Inventory, which maps the oldest specimens in the country. As well as hosting an abundance of life, these ancient trees are also of vital cultural importance; acting as repositories of the nation's history and emblems of our national identity.
In 2023, for example, a more than 1,000-year-old yew tree was felled on private land near Battle in east Sussex. The tree was located just a mile from Senlac Hill (which is regarded as the site of the Battle of Hastings) meaning it would have bore witness to the Norman invasion in 1066. It is estimated, meanwhile, that there are at least 500 churchyards in England which have yew trees older than the buildings themselves.
Oak trees, in particular, represent some of our most long-lived and cherished species. After all, Britain is home to more ancient oaks than the rest of Europe combined. The trees were revered as far back as the ancient druids, while the Magna Carta was written with ink produced by the oak marble gall wasp. Among numerous venerable examples include the 1,000-year-old Queen Elizabeth Oak, which sits in the grounds of Cowdray Park in Sussex, and in whose shade Elizabeth I supposedly rested during a royal hunting party in 1591.
Martin Hugi, a senior conservation adviser at the Woodland Trust, has worked as an ancient tree verifier over the past two decades. In 2023, he also undertook an 'ancient tree pilgrimage' from Land's End to John O'Groats. Using the ancient tree inventory as a guide, he walked 1,000 miles and visited 1,085 trees en route.
'From a cultural point of view, these organisms are probably the oldest entities that we will ever meet and that just deserves our respect in its own right,' he says. 'I think when a lot of people actually meet an ancient tree, then it puts them in their place.'
There is perhaps slow progress in granting greater legal protections for ancient trees. Public consultation is currently being sought on a new tree protection bill in Northern Ireland which would strengthen legal rights for their like, and woodland more generally, by introducing a heritage tree designation and improving enforcement.
But across the rest of Britain, no such moves are underway, meaning trees still remain under threat. The scene in the grounds of the Enfield Toby Carvery demonstrates the folly of further delay. A taped-off cordon reminiscent of a crime scene, and a stump where 450-years of history has been hacked away in an instant.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Witch ‘thrown out by Druids after being accused of transphobia'
Witch ‘thrown out by Druids after being accused of transphobia'

Telegraph

time31-05-2025

  • Telegraph

Witch ‘thrown out by Druids after being accused of transphobia'

A witch has claimed she was thrown off a Druid training course amid allegations that she was 'transphobic' in a row over women's rights. Angela Howard claimed she joined the British Druid Order (BDO) in 2020 to find 'spiritual healing' after being sexually assaulted by a trans woman. Ms Howard, 48, said she was later 'knighted' as a 'warrior princess' at Stonehenge and began training as a student 'bard', which is a division of modern Druidry. But after the Supreme Court ruled that transgender women were not legally women in April, Howard claimed she was banned from continuing her training and had her BDO membership revoked because she supported the exclusion of trans women from single-sex spaces for women. Ms Howard also claimed she was 'defamed' and branded 'transphobic' by members of the religious advocacy group the Pagan Federation. She responded to a post on the federation's official Facebook page entitled: 'Statement of Support for Trans People from the Pagan Federation'. The post states: 'Trans women are women, Trans men are men, and all non-binary genders are valid. This is not up for debate with the Pagan Federation.' 'I cannot safely wear a witch's hat in public' According to The Times, Ms Howard said she responded to this statement by commenting that there were situations in which women needed single-sex spaces, citing changing rooms, women's refuges and prisons. She referred to her own experience of being sexually assaulted by a trans woman. She claimed her comments were later deleted, and that she was blocked from viewing the contents of the Facebook page after she criticised an article describing the court ruling as 'a triumph for bigotry'. Shortly afterwards, Ms Howard claimed she was expelled from the site after a member of the Pagan Federation support team said she had been 'more unequivocally transphobic' in her comments. Ms Howard has now lodged a written complaint with the British Druid Order. In it, she pointed out that women and girls were the 'largest and most consistently oppressed group worldwide'. She added: 'Even here in the UK, I cannot safely wear a witch's hat in public without receiving threatening or fearful looks. 'It is profoundly ironic, then, that within modern Paganism and Druidry (movements that should be committed to liberation, healing and truth) we are witnessing a kind of spiritual witch-hunt against those who speak up for the rights, safety and dignity of women and girls.' In a second complaint to the Pagan Federation, she accused the charity of breaching its own code of conduct and the Equality Act 2010. She claimed that she had been 'penalised' for expressing her gender-critical beliefs. The Pagan Federation said in a statement: 'We have a robust complaints procedure, which is designed to ensure fairness and accountability across all aspects of Pagan Federation activities. The process is accessible by both members and non-members alike. 'We have a policy of not commenting on complaints made under our procedures, which may be ongoing. This is to ensure the fairness of the process and to protect all parties involved.' A spokesman for the British Druid Order said it had received a complaint that was being reviewed and had no further comment to make.

The Argyle Street Gap – what does it say about Glasgow?
The Argyle Street Gap – what does it say about Glasgow?

The Herald Scotland

time26-05-2025

  • The Herald Scotland

The Argyle Street Gap – what does it say about Glasgow?

The site right on the corner, where the police station once stood, is a typical example. The station, an ugly concrete thing, was in use until 2018 but it was sold to developers who pulled it down and now plan to put up a six-storey block of flats, with 62 flats above and six retail units below. I've seen the designs and it's meh. Nothing about it reflects the look and feel of the city or is particularly Glasgow; it's the sort of building that could be anywhere and everywhere and is. But it gets worse, because at the front of the site is all that remains of the old hornbeam tree that once stood by the police station. There aren't a lot of trees in Anderston and Finnieston – this part of the Dear Green Place is not its greenest – but the hornbeam was one of the most noticeable and finest survivors. The best estimate is that it and me were about the same age (50 plus) and it did what trees do in cities: softened the edges, offered shade from the sun and shelter from the rain, and attracted the loyalty of the locals. If you doubt the loyalty we can feel to trees, remember the protests and arrests in Sheffield when the council started felling thousands of trees as part of its 'street improvement'. And remember Plymouth where there was opposition to the destruction of 100 trees in the city centre and the council sneaked in overnight and chopped them down anyway. And remember the horror and upset people felt when the Sycamore Gap tree on Hadrian's Wall was chain-sawed; that one was personal, that one really hurt. The reason we feel this way is that trees are often the only green in the place where we live and so start to take on a kind of personality. The Hadrian's Wall sycamore was one of the A-listers – star of posters, postcards and movies – which was why its destruction was particularly shocking, but the folk who live near the Finnieston hornbeam felt the same way about their tree. All that's left now though, after the developers cut it down the other day, is a stump and a gap on Argyle Street where it used to be – a gap that raises questions about what the city is doing to its trees. To be fair to the council, it has addressed the issue of trees to some extent and in 2024 adopted a strategy which aims to increase the number of trees in the city over the next ten years. They've also made a start here and there, planting some 20,000 trees including on the Cathkin Braes in Castlemilk, Tollcross Park and other places. The locations are good choices because we know it's the most deprived parts of the city that have the least trees and we know it's why we started to hear that most terrible of all newspaper cliches: leafy suburbs. Read more MARK SMITH The TV channel that saved us, and heralds the change to come Mark Smith: Eurovision 2025: the year they fixed their Israel problem But what's happened on Argyle Street, at the site of the old police station, highlights what else needs to change. I don't want to exaggerate the importance of one tree – it's outnumbered by all the others that have been planted in the city – but mature trees in particular matter. They help combat air pollution, they help reduce the impact of rain and floods, a real issue in Glasgow, and they help reduce the 'Urban Heat Island' effect: they cool the city down effectively. As the Finnieston hornbeam demonstrated, they also become part of the shape and feel of a community; we start to love them. But what tends to happen is that developers apply to cut down mature trees that are in their way and, as a sop, promise to plant saplings, which is exactly what's happened with the Finnieston development. The developers have said they might plant five saplings along Argyle Street but they've also said it's subject to agreement with the roads authority and final approval so I'll believe it when I see it. The saplings which developers plant also tend to be much smaller, easier-to-control species so even when they're fully grown, they are no replacement for much bigger, more mature trees. Why this happens is that mature trees are a pain in the butt for developers who just want to get their buildings up fast and cheap. The roots of mature trees can cause a problem with pipework and other infrastructure so it needs careful planning to build round them, which costs money. Easier and cheaper to chop the old trees down: problem solved and no extra cost. The tree before it was taken down (Image: Free) But Glasgow could learn a thing or two from Bristol for example where the planning policy directs that buildings should work around existing mature trees. A more enlightened planning policy would also require developers who've made the case for a tree to be removed to move it to another site, or allow time for cuttings to be taken. Some of the locals in Finnieston wanted to do this with their hornbeam, but it doesn't look like it happened. The developers and builders who are desperate to get rid of old trees should also think about this: yes, it might cost more and yes, mature trees will require more maintenance and attention. But retaining old trees can enhance the value of the end product. Basically, people will pay more to live in a pleasant place that's surrounded by mature trees. In other words, trees can boost your profit rather than dent it. It's all too late for the Finnieston hornbeam of course; all that's left of it is a stump in front of a pile of rubble. But there is still time for the council to look again at its tree strategy and consider not just new trees but the old ones too. There's nothing quite as sad, I think, as the sight of what's left of a tree that's taken 50, 100, or 150 years to grow. It's what made the destruction of the Hadrian's Wall sycamore so savage and so brutal, and on a corner of Argyle Street and Finnieston Street you can see and feel the same thing. Let's try and learn from it then. Let's try and do it differently next time.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store