
How many citizens have been swept up in the immigration crackdown? Democrats demand answers.
Increasingly frustrated that the aggressive tactics are sweeping up American citizens, Democratic members of Congress have been pressing for a full accounting of the citizens detained.
On Friday morning 49 Congress members, led by Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), Alex Padilla (D-Calif.), Mark Kelly (D-Ariz.), and Representatives Lou Correa (D-Santa Ana) and Dan Goldman (D-N.Y.), sent letters to the Department of Homeland Security Inspector General Joseph V. Cuffari and two other immigration oversight offices asking them to open an investigation into encounters with American citizens and 'determine whether DHS is violating Americans' civil rights.'
'ICE policy makes clear that, by law 'ICE cannot assert its civil immigration enforcement authority to arrest and/or detain a U.S. citizen,' the legislators wrote. 'However, in recent high-profile cases, ICE has erroneously arrested U.S. citizens, at times appearing to use violent physical force.'
'ICE has even deported U.S. citizens: in multiple cases, ICE has deported U.S. citizen children along with their undocumented parents, reportedly against the families' wishes. Particularly in Latino and Native American communities, Americans increasingly fear that their citizenship will not protect them from being swept up in DHS's immigration enforcement activities.'
For months Democratic members of Congress have been demanding the Trump Administration answer pointed questions, to little avail.
The letters were sent to Cuffari, Troup Hemenway, acting officer for Civil Rights and Civil Liberties, and Joseph Guy, director for the Office of Immigration Detention Ombudsman. The latter two of those offices have been hollowed out under the Trump Administration, which had attempted to abolish them completely.
'The administration owes the American people answers, particularly as Republicans in Congress just approved record funding for immigration enforcement, which threatens to put even more citizens at risk,' said Warren.
The Trump Administration has adamantly defended their actions.
'DHS enforcement operations are highly targeted and are not resulting in the arrest of U.S. citizens,' said department spokeswoman Tricia McLaughlin in response to The Times' inquiry about the number of Americans detained, arrested and deported under the administration.
'We do our due diligence. We know who we are targeting ahead of time,' she said. 'If and when we do encounter individuals subject to arrest, our law enforcement are trained to ask a series of well-determined questions to determine status and removability. '
In the case of Romero, the four-year old with stage-4 cancer, DHS pointed out at the time his mother had a final deportation order and said she chose to be deported with her children. Her lawyers contend the mother, who was arrested during a check-in with immigration officials in Louisiana, was never given a choice and was prohibited from talking to lawyers. They filed a lawsuit last month, along with another mother who also was deported with her 2-year-old citizen daughter.
Jennifer Ibañez Whitlock, a policy expert at the National Immigration Law Center, said Immigration and Customs Enforcement used to publish data related to citizens booked-in and arrested, but that was mandated through appropriations and is no longer required.
Currently available data shows that in fiscal year 2025 there were no citizens deported and seven arrested. There was 3,700 parents of citizens removed and 6,341 arrested. The data is aggregated and does not show the location, reason for enforcement, outcome or length of detention — as lawmakers are asking for.
Whitlock suspects the data is an undercount based on the number of cases she has seen in the media.
The immigration crackdown is expected to expand considerably. Congress approved a $170 billion budget for border and immigration enforcement earlier this summer, giving the agency the largest boost in generations. President Donald Trump wants 10,000 new U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers and 3,000 new Border Patrol agents to be hired.
Immigrant advocates fear with more capabilities, enforcement levels will explode and exacerbate encounters with citizens. Already they said, the White House has given agencies wider latitude than they had before.
'We are seeing the agency unleashed like never before,' said Jesse Franzblau, associate director of policy of National Immigrant Justice Center. 'ICE is just picking up people, whoever is nearby and there is a lot of racial profiling happening.'
He points to Julio Noriega, a 54-year-old U.S. citizen who was among those picked up in sweeps in early January in Chicago and placed in handcuffs.
Noriega had been looking for work when agents picked him up and took him to an ICE processing center before looking inside his wallet, according to court documents. The Center and the ACLU of Illinois attorneys said he was detained for 10 hours and then released without his arrest ever being documented. Lawyers argued DHS violated a 2022 settlement requiring agents have probable cause to believe that a person is in the country illegally before arresting them and then reporting it.
'We don't have any transparency about warrantless arrests, we don't have transparency about how many U.S. citizens are being swept up and being arrested, ' he said. The data on citizen detained, he said, isn't always being captured.
'We don't know how many U.S. citizens are being detained beyond the media accounts,' he said. 'It's incumbent on these agencies to produce this information. These are serious issues.'
The letter asks the oversight bodies to provide by Sept. 5 detailed information on stops, arrests, detentions and deportation of citizens including a breakdown by month, location, reason for enforcement action, outcome, and length of time in ICE custody.
'It should send chills down everyone's spine if just one U.S. citizen is detained without due process during an ICE raid,' said Padilla. 'This is not a question of rights of immigrants versus rights of Americans, it's about ensuring that due process is afforded and protected for everyone, which the Fifth Amendment guarantees.'
Debra Fleischman, the former Chief of Staff at U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement said verifying somebody's citizenship can sometimes be complicated, but officials should be explaining how that works.
'It's not necessarily automatically inappropriate to have arrested or held a U.S. citizen, but they certainly should not be deporting them,' she said.
'My guess is that they are encountering U.S citizens much more often than they have historically just because the scope of their interior enforcement activities are so much larger than they ever have been.'
Eduardo Casas, an attorney for Job Garcia, the doctoral student who was detained after filming a raid at a Home Depot in Hollywood said he has been asking immigration officials for information about citizens detained and arrested during the Los Angeles sweeps this summer, but has so far been rebuffed.
'They are not being transparent,' said Eduardo Casas, an attorney with the Mexican American Legal Defense and Education Fund. 'We know that citizens are being caught up in this broader enforcement paradigm that centers around mass deportation. The way they try to accomplish mass deportation is by pushing the boundaries of civil liberties in the same way that they've done for people like Job.'
Casas said he interviewed other citizens present during raids and a pattern emerged. People filming angered agents, who then arrested them and took them to detention centers.
'They'll take people as far as detention centers, and then say that you may be charged, and then they let them go,' he said. 'It's also not very always a very formal process.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

USA Today
23 minutes ago
- USA Today
Trump says homeless people in DC 'have to move out IMMEDIATELY'
Trump says he plans to make an announcement Aug. 11 about a D.C. crime initiative, even as violent crime is down significantly in the nation's capital. Last year marked the lowest level of violent crime in Washington, D.C., in more than 30 years, but President Donald Trump has raised concerns about public safety in the city, teasing a plan that would also target its homeless population. "I'm going to make our Capital safer and more beautiful than it ever was before," Trump said on Truth Social on Aug. 10. "The Homeless have to move out, IMMEDIATELY. We will give you places to stay, but FAR from the Capital." In a series of social media posts, Trump said he would unveil his initiative on Aug. 11, adding it would address the city's crime and the "Cleanliness and the General Physical Renovation and Condition of our once beautiful and well maintained Capital." The president threatened to "take Federal control" of Washington, D.C., in an Aug. 5 post complaining about crime. The post came after Edward Coristine, a 19-year-old former employee of the Department of Government Efficiency nicknamed "BigBalls," was assaulted in an attempted carjacking. "Crime in Washington, D.C., is totally out of control," Trump said on Aug. 5, adding: "If this continues, I am going to exert my powers, and FEDERALIZE this City." Days later, Trump ordered an increased federal law enforcement presence on D.C. streets, led by officers from U.S. Park Police and including officers from about a dozen other agencies. Cruel and unusual punishment?: In major decision, Supreme Court allows cities to ban homeless camps Violent crime declined by 35% in D.C. in 2024, according to data compiled by the D.C. Metropolitan Police. The 2024 numbers marked the lowest level of violent crime in "over 30 years," the U.S. Attorney's Office for the District of Columbia said in a news release. Homicides dropped by 32%, robberies were down 39% and armed carjackings were down 53%. Violent crime has declined so far in 2025, according to police data. Homicides and robberies are down 12% and 28%, respectively, while total violent crime is down 26% through Aug. 8 when compared with the same period in 2024. Homicides spiked in D.C. in 2023 to 274, up from 203 the year before, before dropping down to 187 in 2024, according to police data. That is the lowest level since the city had 166 homicides in 2019. There have been 99 homicides in 2025, compared to 112 during the same period last year. Trump has long denigrated Washington, D.C, which leans heavily Democratic. He also floated taking over governance of the district in February in comments to reporters, complaining about crime and homelessness. Contributing: Joey Garrison, USA TODAY


New York Post
23 minutes ago
- New York Post
NY Gov. Kathy Hochul slights Zohran Mamdani in live TV reality check, hints she may not endorse: ‘Many differences'
Gov. Kathy Hochul slighted mayoral hopeful Zohran Mamdani in a live TV interview Sunday — signaling she may not endorse him in the election even after he praised her 'courage.' 'We still have many differences,' Hochul said, keeping her distance from her fellow Democrat during a Fox News Sunday interview. 'I don't know how you whitewash that away.' Fox host Shannon Bream had read a statement from Mamdani effusively praising Hochul for sparring with President Trump and Republicans over redistricting fights that could dictate who controls Congress. Advertisement 4 Gov. Kathy Hochul hinted that she may not make an endorsement at all in the New York City mayoral election during an interview Sunday. Tomas E. Gaston Mamdani said Hochul showed 'courage' and was 'meeting the moment.' 'Is the feeling mutual? Is Mamdani a good choice' [for New York City mayor], Bream asked, sparking Hochul to bring up their 'many differences.' Advertisement 'He can agree with me and many people agree with me and I think it's not just Democrats who say, 'New Yorkers stand up for our rights.' We do that,' Hochul said. 'We're fighters. I'm a mom from Buffalo. I guess they're not used to taking on a mom from Buffalo.' Hochul, who is seeking re-election next year, has come out against Mamdani's proposals to hike taxes by $9 billion on millionaires and corporations in the city to fund his affordability agenda of subsidized child care, fare-free bus services, housing expansion and government-run grocery stores. 4 Hochul with Democratic mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani and Mayor Eric Adams at the Dominican Day Parade on Aug. 10, 2025. LP Media Advertisement Those taxes need sign off from the governor and state lawmakers, who also are up for re-election in 2026. Despite the apparent snub, Hochul did say she agrees with Mamdani's focus on tackling New York's high cost of living and making both the city and state more affordable for residents. 'There's many areas of disagreement,' she noted. 'But also there's areas of alignment including affordability. His election touched a nerve. And people said, 'you know what, we're just not getting ahead.'' 4 Mamdani praised Hochul for having 'courage' and 'meeting the moment' in her battle with Republicans over redistricting. LP Media She claimed that President Trump's policies, including imposing tariffs, have not helped. 'There's a sense that we need some change now,' Hochul said. Hochul then hinted she may sit out the race and not endorse Mamdani, who is running against two other Democrats running on independent party lines — Mayor Eric Adams and ex-Gov. Andrew Cuomo, whom she served with as lieutenant governor. She took over as governor when Cuomo resigned as governor amid sexual misconduct accusations that he denies. Advertisement 4 Adams and former Gov. Andrew Cuomo are running against Mamdani as independent candidates. LP Media 'I already worked with two different mayors. I'll continue to work with whomever the voters want me to and I'll make it work out. I'm not going to go to war with the 8 million residents of New York I also represent,' the governor said. 'My job is to calm things down,' Hochul said. 'Let's see what the election results are. But people have to recognize that the candidate for mayor [Mamdani] has also touched a nerve and we need to respond to that. I'm aligned with him that we need to find ways to make life more affordable for New Yorkers.' It wouldn't be the first time Hochul stayed on the sidelines during a high-profile mayoral showdown. In her native Buffalo in 2021, democratic socialist India Walton defeated then-sitting Mayor Byron Brown in the Democratic Party primary but Brown, a moderate, continued as a write-in candidate. Hochul stayed out of the race, and Brown won re-election in a landslide in November as the write-in candidate.


The Hill
an hour ago
- The Hill
Red states lead push for MAHA soda bans
Republican-led states are leading the charge to ban soda and candy from their food stamp programs, as Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s 'Make America Healthy Again' (MAHA) movement flips traditional partisanship on its head. Colorado is the only blue state to seek and have a soda ban waiver approved, and the only waiver state to propose expanding SNAP benefits in conjunction with limiting its scope. Both parties at times have expressed interest in eliminating soda from the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), but the Trump administration is the first to encourage states to do so. Recent attempts at soda regulation have mostly been concentrated in blue cities. Former New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg (D) infamously tried to ban the sale of supersized sugary drinks in 2013, prompting Republicans to decry his 'nanny state' tactics. With the healthy-eating push now under the MAHA branding, GOP states are jumping aboard. Kennedy doesn't run SNAP — that falls under the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA). But as the face of MAHA, Kennedy has been alongside Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins to promote soda and candy bans. In just the first six months of the new administration, 12 state waivers have been approved by USDA that restrict SNAP recipients from purchasing some combination of soft drinks, sugary beverages, energy drinks and candy 'We all believe in free choice, we live in a democracy … if you want to buy sugary soda, you ought to be able to do that. The U.S. taxpayer should not pay for it,' Kennedy said during a recent press conference. The states that have claimed waivers are Arkansas, Colorado, Florida, Idaho, Indiana, Iowa, Louisiana, Nebraska, Oklahoma, Texas, Utah and West Virginia. SNAP dollars can be used to buy any food or beverage from a grocery store except alcohol, nutritional supplements or hot food. The idea of policing the shopping carts of low-income Americans has never sat well with anti-hunger advocates, who've argued it's paternalistic and stigmatizing for low-income Americans. Additionally, while federal data show sugary drinks are the leading source of added sugars in the American diet, nutrition experts said there is limited evidence that shows SNAP soda bans lead to better health outcomes. There's even less evidence that banning candy and dessert foods from SNAP can positively impact a person's diet. 'Claiming that implementing these restrictions will absolutely lead to a curb in diet-related diseases, you cannot confidently say that. There is no evidence to support that statement,' said Joelle Johnson, the deputy director for Healthy Food Access at the Center for Science in the Public Interest, a group that advocates for stronger nutrition regulation. The SNAP waivers are for pilot programs only, so they won't immediately lead to long-term policy changes. They are a chance for states to conduct the research that's been missing — if they want to find out. Barry Popkin, a professor of nutrition at the University of North Carolina School of Global Public Health, said he thinks waivers are toothless ways for states to show their MAHA bonafides. 'None of these states are doing more than pleasing MAHA, doing what's easy. They can do this internally. They don't have to go to the politicians [and pass laws],' Popkin said, 'Waivers do nothing except allow a state to say you can't buy junk food.' Experts said historically, Republicans who have wanted to ban soda from SNAP also viewed it as a way to trim spending on the program. Some advocates continue to view the latest push with skepticism. One of the groups pushing hard for state SNAP waivers is the Foundation for Government Accountability, a conservative think tank based in Florida that's been working for over a decade to reshape the nation's public assistance programs and significantly cut spending. Johnson said she is worried about a slippery slope. If fewer items are eligible for SNAP, she's concerned GOP leaders will use that as an excuse to cut back on people's monthly benefits. Priya Fielding-Singh, director of policy and programs at the George Washington University's Global Food Institute, said there could be benefits in trying to focus SNAP purchases on healthy food. But it's hard to look at a soda-and-candy ban in isolation, she said. The Agriculture Department slashed about $1 billion in funding that let schools and food banks buy food directly from local farms and ranchers. The White House is proposing deep cuts to fruit and vegetable benefits under the WIC program (Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children). The GOP's new tax cut law is projected to cut $186 billion from SNAP in the next decade and disqualify millions from eligibility. 'It's hard to separate the soda ban from the larger political efforts to shrink SNAP overall. So are these bans about promoting health or are they about shrinking SNAP? And I think the distinction really matters,' Fielding-Singh said. She added that any moves to restrict what people can buy with SNAP should be paired with efforts to give people the 'means and access and resources to eat more healthfully.' But so far, none of the red state waivers does that. Gov. Jared Polis (D) in a statement on Colorado's waiver, called it 'a big step towards improving the health of Coloradans, and reducing obesity rates, diabetes, and tooth decay' that 'will help to ensure that more Coloradans participating in SNAP have access to healthy foods.' The Trump administration has not yet given them the green light on a separate waiver to cover hot foods from grocery stores like rotisserie chicken or soup. Democratic Govs. Laura Kelly (Kan.) and Katie Hobbs (Ariz.) each vetoed bills that called for their states to submit waivers to ban candy and soda. 'I support the idea that Kansans should eat healthier. However, changes to the SNAP food assistance program should be made at the federal level, not on a patchwork, state-by-state basis,' Kelly wrote in her veto message. She also noted the language in the bill would have mandated businesses to stop accepting food assistance benefits for 'healthy' items like protein bars and trail mix while continuing to allow Twix, Kit Kat, and Twizzlers. Kennedy this week said he expects more blue states to be filing waivers. 'I was at the governors' conference in Colorado last week, and I met with a whole string of Democratic governors and they all committed to filing SNAP waivers,' Kennedy said. Kennedy also said those governors also committed to put forward other 'MAHA legislation' but he acknowledged they may not want to be associated with the term because it's become 'kind of a partisan brand.' As she signed Colorado's waiver, Rollins said healthy eating should be bipartisan. 'This is not red or blue, Republican or Democrat,' Rollins said. 'We are discussing and working with every state, so really excited to continue to work with Gov. Polis.'