Analysis: 'The Double' is hard because it's supposed to be hard
Earlier and later start times! Greater collaboration between IndyCar and NASCAR leadership! Souped up planes, helicopters and golf karts!
Advertisement
All this misses the point of the most Herculean quest in motorsports: Racing the Indianapolis 500 and Coca-Cola 600 on the same day is supposed to be extremely hard to accomplish.
Its demanding appeal stems from overcoming an inherent nightmare of logistics. Making a 600-mile commute between the Midwest and Southeast enough times to earn Admirals Club access. While also turning thousands of laps in practicing and racing two wildly different cars at top speeds over 235 mph.
RELATED: Larson's 'Double' fallout; fresh playoff contenders emerge
'The Double' is underpinned by its degree of difficulty — starting with the fact it was a literal impossibility for decades.
Advertisement
The Coke 600 didn't exist until 1960 (49 years after the inaugural Indy 500). For its first 14 years, NASCAR's longest race ran once on the same day as the Indy 500, which was annually held on May 30 until 1974 (when Memorial Day permanently moved to Monday).
For the next 20 years, the signature races were held on the same day but often concurrently and with no window that allowed for racing in both.
Until Charlotte Motor Speedway added lights and moved the 600 to a nighttime finish in 1993.
In the second year that 'The Double' as we know it was possible (there were four drivers who ran the Indy 500 and Coke 600 on separate days in the same year from 1967-71), John Andretti made it a reality in 1994 (and with much less buffer than Larson was scheduled to have with no delays).
Advertisement
It's been a hit-or-miss opportunity that four more have tried since. From 2005-11, the race shifted to a 1 p.m. EDT start that essentially made completing 'The Double' impossible.
In the 14 years since moving to a noon EDT start in 2012, there have been three attempts — Kurt Busch in 2014 and Larson in 2024-25. Those are two NASCAR Cup Series champions who had a legitimate shot to win one or even both races.
That's a select list. This isn't open to anyone, nor is it an annual guarantee. Again, 'The Double' is hard because it should be.
After Larson's meteorological misfortune the past two years, it's logical to address how to minimize a 45-minute rain delay negating months of careful coordination and preparation.
Advertisement
There might be wiggle room on the start times of both races.
RELATED: Delaying start of Coca-Cola 600 was considered for Larson
Until 2005, the Indy 500 started at 11 a.m. during an era when the Indianapolis area didn't observe Daylight Savings Time as it does now. Surely it's possible to get the same crowds of 300,000-plus through the gates before noon now with modern technology.
Until Larson crashed Sunday on Lap 91 of the Indy 500, NASCAR was considering a delay of the Coke 600 from its 6:27 p.m. ET start.
But there are natural limits to how much 'easier' it can be to attempt 'The Double' — which is good.
Advertisement
As Trackhouse Racing co-owner Justin Marks alluded to after Ross Chastain's Coke 600 victory, there's an aspirational side to watching a versatile superstar such as Larson take on a challenge that can inspire the general populace to do the unthinkable.
Who's building Hoover Dam, digging out the Panama Canal or laying the Transatlantic cable anymore? When the country made an 11-figure investment in space exploration in the 1960s, it was as much about getting the youth of America interested in math and science as putting a man on the moon.
That's the limitless value of 'The Double.' If Larson somehow were to win both races, imagine trying to attach a price tag to the resultant exposure and sponsor interest that likely would follow for IndyCar and NASCAR.
People want to see the seemingly improbable happen, which is why 'The Double' needs to remain very hard to do — even if that compromises the frequency with which it occurs.
Advertisement
Greatness is harder to witness if it happens every year.
Nate Ryan has written about NASCAR since 1996 while working at the San Bernardino Sun, Richmond Times-Dispatch, USA TODAY and for the past 10 years at NBC Sports Digital. He is a contributor to the 'Hauler Talk' show on the NASCAR Podcast Network. He also has covered various other motorsports, including the IndyCar and IMSA series.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Fox Sports
an hour ago
- Fox Sports
2025 NASCAR Richmond qualifying: Order for Cook Out 400
NASCAR Cup Series 2025 NASCAR Richmond qualifying: Order for Cook Out 400 Published Aug. 14, 2025 8:27 a.m. ET share facebook x reddit link The NASCAR Cup Series heads to Richmond Raceway for Cook Out 400. Catch the race on Saturday on USA at 7:30 p.m. ET. Qualifying starts Saturday on USA. Check out the 2025 NASCAR Richmond qualifying order below. 2025 NASCAR Richmond Qualifying Order Group 1 NASCAR Cup Series: Go Bowling at the Glen Powered by Go Bowling Highlights | NASCAR on FOX Check out the best highlights from the NASCAR Cup Series: Go Bowling at the Glen Powered by Go Bowling at Watkins Glen International. Group 2 What did you think of this story? share Get more from the NASCAR Cup Series Follow your favorites to get information about games, news and more

NBC Sports
2 hours ago
- NBC Sports
How to watch Saturday's Cup race at Richmond: Start time, TV info and weather
With two races remaining in the regular season, Richmond Raceway will play host to its only Cup race this season Saturday night. The 16-driver playoff field essentially has three open spots with 13 winners essentially having locked into berths. Tyler Reddick (plus-117 points on the cutline) likely will secure a spot Saturday at the 0.75-mile oval regardless of his finish. Alex Bowman (plus-60) and Chris Buescher (34 points over Roush Fenway Keselowski Racing teammate Ryan Preece) are holding onto the final two provisional spots on points. Kyle Busch, Ty Gibbs and Brad Keselowski are among the drivers who will need a win at either Richmond or Daytona International Speedway to make the playoffs. Dustin Long, Richmond is the fourth of six short-track races this season. Chase Briscoe is the only driver with top-10 finishes in the first three short track races. Saturday will mark the first time in 67 years that Richmond is scheduled for only one race weekend with NASCAR's premier series. The short track had two annual races on the Cup schedule from 1959-2024 (one of its 2020 races was canceled because of the COVID-19 pandemic). Details for Saturday's Cup race at Richmond Raceway (All times Eastern) START: The race is scheduled to start shortly after 7:30 p.m.. PRERACE: The Cup garage will open at 4:30 p.m. ... The drivers meeting will be at 6:30 p.m. ... Drivers introductions will be at 6:55 p.m. DISTANCE: The race is 400 laps (300 miles) on the 0.75-mile oval in Richmond, Virginia. STAGES: Stage 1 ends at Lap 20. Stage 2 ends at Lap 230. ENTRY LIST: Click here for the 39 cars entered at Richmond Raceway. TV/RADIO: USA Network will broadcast the race starting with Countdown to Green at 7 p.m. ... Motor Racing Network and SiriusXM NASCAR Radio will have radio coverage. FORECAST: WeatherUnderground — Partly cloudy with a high of 88 degrees and light winds. It's expected to be 79 degrees with a 2% chance of rain around the start of the Cup race. LAST TIME: Austin Dillon won the Aug. 11, 2024 race in overtime, but the victory was stripped of playoff eligibility after NASCAR penalized Dillon for wrecking Joey Logano and Denny Hamlin on the final lap.


New York Times
3 hours ago
- New York Times
Austin Dillon's audacious Richmond wrecking ball: One year later, what's the legacy?
One year ago, Austin Dillon pulled one of the most jaw-dropping, did-that-just-happen moves NASCAR has ever seen. As he raced toward the finish line at Richmond Raceway, Dillon — in need of a victory in one of the season's final two races to make the Cup Series playoffs — crashed Joey Logano, pushing for the win. Then, as Denny Hamlin appeared poised to win the race instead, Dillon came down the track and wrecked Hamlin as well. AUSTIN DILLON TURNS JOEY LOGANO TO WIN AT RICHMOND! 👀 — FOX: NASCAR (@NASCARONFOX) August 12, 2024 The double-takeout move was allowed to stand in terms of the victory itself — Dillon is listed as the Richmond winner and got to keep the trophy — but several days later, he was stripped of the playoff benefits the win would have provided. One year later, as the Cup Series returns to Richmond for a Saturday night race, The Athletic's Jordan Bianchi and Jeff Gluck take a look at the legacy of that night, where things stand now, and what it all could mean going forward. What's your big takeaway from that night with a year of hindsight? Bianchi: Standing on pit road in the aftermath, the chain of events felt incredibly surreal. Here was Dillon pulling off this out-of-nowhere upset to clinch a playoff spot (or so we thought at the moment), and as he and his team celebrated, there was also the underlying question of whether he crossed a line to get that win and whether NASCAR should respond and, if so, how they would. Advertisement It was fascinating. You had all these varying emotions unfolding at once, from Dillon's elation to Logano's anger over being crashed, which he expressed by doing a burnout near Dillon's pit stall after the race (earning Logano a fine), to team owner Richard Childress' insistence that his driver (and grandson) did nothing wrong, to NASCAR officials recognizing they had a major problem on their hands with no straightforward resolution. And then hanging over all this was the playoff implications, as Dillon now was playoff-eligible with Richard Childress Racing set to reap millions of dollars in bonus money. Gluck: To me, it's, 'OK, now we know there's a line.' We might not know exactly where that line is, but at least we know a driver cannot win a race (or at least enjoy its most important benefit) by just bowling through competitors — and believe it or not, that wasn't clear before Richmond last year. NASCAR had let an awful lot of transgressions slide over the years before this — including Ty Gibbs blatantly taking out his Xfinity Series teammate Brandon Jones for the win at Martinsville in 2022. So while it's a shame for Dillon that the caution came out and forced the race into overtime — he was going to win the race straight up and grab a playoff berth in one of the defining moments of his career — the fact that his desperation led to multiple wrecks in the same sequence finally proved a bridge too far for NASCAR officials. Did NASCAR get the call correct? Bianchi: In retrospect, yes. At the moment, though, there was reason to think Dillon hadn't done anything different from what other drivers had done in similar situations. After all, NASCAR touts itself as being about rough-and-tumble racing, especially on a short track, and here was a driver who was exhibiting the exact same behavior that is so often used to promote the sport — and with a playoff berth on the line, thereby further justifying his actions in some eyes. Advertisement Looking back, however, it is easy to see why NASCAR reacted in the manner it did. Still, it would've been better if NASCAR had responded that night and not three days later. Gluck: My biggest quibble remains with the timing. NASCAR should have been able to identify Dillon crossed the line in the moment — it was incredibly obvious — and penalized him immediately by placing him at the back of the lead lap running order. Instead, officials deliberated until that Wednesday — three days after the race — before deciding Dillon would keep the victory but lose the playoff benefits. Officials also did not suspend him for a right-rear hook, which arguably should have been in play — that is a safety violation, after all. But NASCAR felt it sent a strong enough message by denying him the playoff benefits, so that's generally a good enough call. I just wish a ruling had happened in the moment. Given NASCAR's rulings from that race and in the year since, what are drivers allowed to do in order to win a race on the last lap? Bianchi: It's always going to be a moving line, but if there is one tenet to come from this, it's that while NASCAR will tolerate physical racing, especially for a win, there is a limit to just how far. And that limit is seemingly that a driver is allowed one egregious move, like intentionally slamming into a competitor to move them out of the way, but two such incidents are not tolerated. Had Dillon not crashed into Hamlin in addition to Logano, NASCAR likely would not have reacted as it did and might have allowed Dillon to keep his playoff eligibility. In fact, it's not a stretch to think NASCAR would've celebrated Dillon shoving Logano out of the way as a testament to what the sport is all about — 'good old short-track racing' — with no real fallout other than Logano having hurt feelings. Advertisement Gluck: We really still don't know. NASCAR doesn't want to put itself into a box by spelling out specific standards, and Elton Sawyer explained last year's ruling as being a consequence of the 'totality' of the incident and 'progression all the way through the turns.' When The Athletic did an anonymous survey of the playoff drivers last year, the competitors were totally split: Five said it was OK to wreck one person for the win but not two; four said no intentional wrecking for the win was allowed; another four said it was all circumstantial/judgment calls; three said it was OK to wreck a driver for the win as long as it wasn't a right-rear hook. This hasn't really been tested since, at least when it comes to going for a win, so we don't really know. My best guess is the answer that got the most votes in our poll — you can wreck one driver for the win, but not two — is correct. What is good and what is bad about NASCAR's current driving standards? Bianchi: The thing that separates NASCAR from other high-level racing series is contact is not only allowed but encouraged. This cannot go away, but there does need to be some limit on what is permissible before officials have to step in. Richmond was one such instance. Ultimately, NASCAR made the correct decision. And despite concerns then that the fabric of the sport could be changed by penalizing Dillon, this hasn't been the case. Contact is allowed, but not in a reckless manner. Gluck: NASCAR has improved at officiating these incidents in recent years. We now pretty much all know a right-rear intentional hook is going to result in a suspension (except at a road course). We have seen rough driving penalties issued mid-race. So those are positives, along with the fact NASCAR isn't going to suddenly be too hands-on with 'avoidable contact' type penalties from open-wheel racing. The negatives remain some of the inconsistency (why wasn't Austin Cindric suspended for a right-rear hook at Circuit of the Americas earlier this year?) and the timing (NASCAR should be able to immediately diagnose and penalize more of these incidents, like it did with Austin Hill at Indianapolis last month). That was Richard Childress Racing's most recent Cup victory and the only one in the last two seasons. When will RCR return to victory lane? Bianchi: It could happen Saturday night. Nothing that transpired a year ago changes anything regarding RCR's future prospects. Gluck: It would be a mistake to think RCR can't win any week — specifically with Kyle Busch, who is one of the best drivers ever at Richmond. Busch is tied with Bobby Allison for the best average finish ever at the track (for drivers with a minimum of 14 starts) and is tied for third on the all-time Richmond wins list (six). He leads all active drivers in top-10 finishes there (28). Advertisement So if RCR has that Dillon magic from last year, why can't Busch get it done on Saturday night? Even if not, he's also been great at superspeedways lately — so he could win Daytona, too. They'll win again at some point soon, you would have to think. (Top photo of Austin Dillon winning last year's Richmond race, with Denny Hamlin and Joey Logano's wrecks in the background: Logan Whitton / Getty Images) Spot the pattern. Connect the terms Find the hidden link between sports terms Play today's puzzle