logo
How Iran's Trump assassination plot would trigger full-scale invasion by the US and topple Ayatollah's evil regime

How Iran's Trump assassination plot would trigger full-scale invasion by the US and topple Ayatollah's evil regime

The Sun26-05-2025

FURIOUS Iran would face a devastating invasion if it followed through on threats to assassinate Donald Trump, a former US advisor has warned.
Dr Kenneth Katzman, a retired Middle East analyst for the US Congressional Research Service, even warned of a 'full-scale invasion' with special forces storming the streets of Tehran.
8
8
8
8
He spoke after Trump's former security advisor, John Bolton, said the US President is "at the top" of an 'assassination list' from the Middle East nation.
Bolton, who claimed he is also on the hit list, said it would be revenge for a US airstrike in 2020 in Iraq that killed military leader Qasem Soleimani, ordered by Trump.
But Dr Katzman warns Iran would face a response so dramatic it would overthrow its regime.
Analysts have previously warned such a conflict would be a devastating quagmire.
US historian Max Boot predicted would take up to 1.6million troops for the US to fully invade and occupy Iran.
The US forces would face a war that spill across the Middle East as they tried to battle Iran's wide-ranging proxy forces.
Other forecasts have predicted smaller attacks - such as the long mulled joint-strike with Israel on Iran's nuclear sites.
Dr Katzman told The Sun: 'If Trump were to be assassinated, there would be many targets in Tehran that would be attacked.
'Islamic Revolutionary Guard Guard Corps (IRGC) headquarters is in Tehran, the besieged headquarters, all the security forces I'm sure would be attacked.
'If they assassinated the US president you could even see, conceivably, US ground operations in Iran if that happens.
'It would be just so dramatic. You could even see US special forces operations in Iran and infantry operations in Iran, the marketplace is wide open.
'The objective of troops in Iran? To take the regime out.
He added: "If they assassinated a US president, a full-scale invasion is very much an option."
In November last year the Justice Department said it charged a man, Farhad Shakeri, 51, for his alleged role in a plot to assassinate Trump, tasked by the Iranian regime.
Iran, where the suspect is now believed to be, denies this.
Dr Katzman also warned that Bolton's comments may have been a cry for help over an "active plot"
He continued: 'I think he's trying to highlight that he feels threatened. Trump withdrew the security protection for some of these guys that served in the first term that I mentioned, including Bolton.
'So I think Bolton, by bringing this up again, is trying to signal that he feels he needs security, there is still a threat, still an active plot.'
'Iran knows full well that that's the kind of thing that could bring a massive US intervention, on enough scale that the regime is gone."
But Dr Katzman believes the extent of the retaliation will deter Iran from following through with any threats.
Instead, he believes the threats serve as leverage to intimidate the US.
He added: 'What's always puzzled me and other experts like me: what is Iran hoping to achieve here? Because the retaliation presumably would be so dramatic.
8
8
8
Trump on Iran 'hit list'
by James Moules, Foreign News Reporter
DONALD Trump is right "at the top" of Iran's chilling assassination hit list, a former White House official has claimed.
John Bolton, who served in Trump's first administration, made the ominous warning that Iran has an "assassination list" on Sky News' The World.
The ex-National Security Adviser warned: "I think Iran's terror network is really quite extensive in Europe and in the United States."
He claimed that a number of US government officials were being targeted in relation to the assassination of top Iranian military commander Qasem Soleimani in 2020.
Soleimani, who was designated as a terrorist by the United States, had been a highly powerful figure in the brutal Iranian regime.
He commanded the Quds Force, a branch of Iran's security forces that is responsible for operations outside Iranian territory.
Bolton claimed he is himself on Iran's hit list, although he made clear that Trump is the number one target.
"President Trump is at the top of their list of their targets," he said.
The Iranian regime would target people using "Eastern European criminal gangs and others", Bolton further claimed
'No one could quite figure out what the percentage is for Iran in actually going ahead with these types of operations.
'The retaliation is sure to be dramatic, but I think the sense is that Iran feels that these operations do give it a certain leverage and ability to intimidate, an ability to exert leverage.
'That's the way Iran sees it. I don't think anybody here necessarily sees it that way, but that's how Iran sees it.
'There have been no policy changes by the threat of Iranian assassination attempts in the United States.
'These threats have not caused any change in policy more favorable to the regime, so it's a mystery what Iran is really thinking with these plots.'
Dr Katzman served his role – specialising in Iran, the Persian Gulf States, Afghanistan, Iran back groups in Iran and South Asia – from 1991 to 2022.
His job was to provide reports and briefings to Members of Congress on US policy, analysing legislative proposals.
8

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Iran blasts Trump for ‘racist mentality' and hostility to Muslims over travel ban
Iran blasts Trump for ‘racist mentality' and hostility to Muslims over travel ban

The Guardian

time3 hours ago

  • The Guardian

Iran blasts Trump for ‘racist mentality' and hostility to Muslims over travel ban

Tehran has denounced the US travel ban on Iranians and citizens of 11 other mostly Middle Eastern and African countries, saying Washington's decision was a sign of a 'racist mentality'. Donald Trump signed an executive order on Wednesday reviving sweeping restrictions that echo the US president's first-term travel ban, justified on national security grounds after a firebomb attack at a pro-Israel rally in Colorado. Alireza Hashemi-Raja, the foreign ministry's director general for the affairs of Iranians abroad, called the measure – which takes effect on 9 June – 'a clear sign of the dominance of a supremacist and racist mentality among American policymakers'. The decision 'indicates the deep hostility of American decision-makers towards the Iranian and Muslim people', he added in a statement the ministry released on Saturday. Apart from Iran, the US ban targets nationals of Afghanistan, Myanmar, Chad, Congo-Brazzaville, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen. A partial ban was imposed on travellers from seven other countries. Hashemi-Raja said the policy 'violates fundamental principles of international law' and deprives 'hundreds of millions of people of the right to travel based solely on their nationality or religion'. The foreign ministry official said the ban was discriminatory and would 'entail international responsibility for the US government', without elaborating. Iran and the US severed diplomatic ties shortly after the 1979 Islamic Revolution, and relations have remained deeply strained since. The US is home to the largest Iranian community outside Iran. According to figures from Tehran's foreign ministry, in 2020 there were about 1.5 million Iranians in the US. Trump's executive order came days after Sunday's attack at the Colorado rally, in which authorities said more than a dozen people were hurt. The suspect is an Egyptian man who had overstayed a tourist visa.

Conference to recognise Palestinian state to weaken scope of its ambition, diplomats say
Conference to recognise Palestinian state to weaken scope of its ambition, diplomats say

The Guardian

time6 hours ago

  • The Guardian

Conference to recognise Palestinian state to weaken scope of its ambition, diplomats say

A planned conference in Saudi Arabia this month that supporters of Palestine had hoped would push western governments to recognise a Palestinian state has weakened its ambition and will instead hope to agree on steps towards recognition, diplomats have said. The change to the aims of the conference, due to be held between 17 and 20 June, marks a retreat from an earlier vision that it would mark a joint declaration of recognition of Palestine as a state by a large group of countries, including permanent UN security council members France and the UK. Emmanuel Macron, the French president and a co-sponsor of the event, has declared recognition of Palestine as 'a moral duty and political requirement', but French officials briefing their Israeli counterparts this week reassured them the conference will not be the moment for recognition. That is now seen as a prize that will emerge from other measures, including a permanent ceasefire in Gaza, the release of Israeli hostages, reform of the Palestinian Authority, economic reconstruction and a definitive end to Hamas's rule in Gaza. France and Saudi Arabia have set up eight working parties to prepare the necessary ingredients for a two-state solution, and Macron is hosting a conference of civil society under the banner of the Paris Peace Forum immediately before the three-day conference. The UK is overseeing the humanitarian working party and other working groups cover reconstruction, economic viability of a Palestinian state, promoting respect for international law, narratives for peace and 'peace day', an imagining of the benefits to both sides from a peaceful settlement. Israel and the US have attended run-up meetings to the conference but have not spoken, prompting speculation they may boycott the event. Israel has fought hard to prevent stateless Palestinians achieving self-determination. Polls show only a fifth of the Israel electorate favour a two-state solution and 56% of Jewish Israelis supported the 'transfer of Arab citizens of Israel to other countries'. Israel has also approved plans to build a further 22 settlements in the West Bank – the biggest expansion in decades. Israel's defence minister, Israel Katz, said it was 'a strategic move that prevents the establishment of a Palestinian state'. Macron's initiative has been described as 'disastrous' by the Israel's ambassador to France, Joshua Zarka. Recognition of a Palestinian state was previously seen as an outcome of a failed 1990s-era two-state plan. However, governments in Europe increasingly doubt Israel has any intention to ease its control over Palestinians and see recognition as a possible lever to force a change of thinking among Israeli officials. Ireland, Spain and Norway recognised a Palestinian state last year. Macron has insisted he would only recognise a Palestinian state without Hamas – the same stance as the UK. In an open letter to Macron, The Elders, a group of former senior UN diplomats, say recognition is 'an essential transformative step towards peace' that should be taken as a matter of principle, divorced from negotiations over the ultimate form of Palestinian statehood and how and when Hamas should be disarmed. Anne-Claire Legendre, the president's adviser on the Middle East, has said the conference 'must mark a transformative milestone for the effective implementation of the two-state solution. We must move from words to deeds, and we must move from the end of the war in Gaza to the end of the conflict.' She met Israeli officials this week to discuss the conference and Israel's often cloudy long-term vision for the region. She also met the Palestinian prime minister, Mohammad Mustafa. Israeli newspapers reported the travelling French officials as saying: 'The recognition of a Palestinian state remains on the table, but not as a product of the conference. This will remain a bilateral subject between states.' The British foreign secretary, David Lammy, who is expected to attend the conference, is under massive backbench pressure to do more to punish Israel and is, at minimum, being asked flesh out the conditions for the UK recognition of a Palestinian state. Hamish Falconer, the Middle East minister, told MPs this week the UK thinking was evolving. 'One reason that the traditional position of the UK government has been that the recognition of a Palestinian state should come at the end, or during, a two-state solution process was the hope that we would move towards a two-state solution,' he said. 'Many minds have been changed because of the rhetoric of the Israeli government – the clear statements by so many that they are no longer committed to a two-state solution.' But the British are looking for firm undertakings at the conference on the future government of Palestine, including the exclusion of Hamas from any future governance of Gaza, which is something Hamas itself has appeared to accept in the various plans drawn up by Arab states. A growing number of Conservative MPs have broken with their frontbench on the issue and now back recognition, including the former attorney general Sir Jeremy Wright. France hopes that a group of western states recognising a Palestinian state could be counter-balanced by Muslim states normalising relations with Israel. However, Saudi recognition of Israel seems impossible. The Saudi crown prince, Mohammed bin Salman, the other co-host, has asserted repeatedly that Israel is committing a genocide, a view that is shared widely by Saudi public opinion.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store