logo
Pricing birdsong: Farmers could earn cash for conservation as EU explores biodiversity ‘nature credits'

Pricing birdsong: Farmers could earn cash for conservation as EU explores biodiversity ‘nature credits'

Malay Mail11-05-2025
BRUSSELS, May 11 — Could farmers get money for protecting birds or plants? That's the hope of the European Union, which is seeking to monetise biodiversity by creating a market for 'nature credits'.
The European Commission last month launched a series of talks with financial, farming and green groups to ponder the idea, which has some environmentalists worried.
'You can make good money by razing a forest to the ground, but not by planting a new one and letting it grow old,' the EU's environment commissioner Jessika Roswall told a 'Global Solutions' conference in Berlin on Monday, adding the bloc wanted to change that.
The plan is still in its infancy and no concrete details have been put forward yet.
But the idea is to replicate the financial success of carbon credits, which launched two decades ago to help finance efforts to tackle global warming and have developed into an almost trillion-dollar global market.
Carbon credits allow a polluter to 'offset' their emissions by paying for 'avoided' emissions elsewhere.
Nature credits on the other hand would see businesses brush up their green credentials by paying for initiatives that restore or protect nature — something Roswall said cannot be financed by public coffers alone.
At a UN biodiversity summit in 2022, world nations agreed to a target of protecting 30 per cent of the planet's lands and oceans by 2030 and to provide US$200 billion (RM859 billion) a year in finance.
EU Commissioner for Environment, Water Resilience and a Competitive Circular Economy, Jessika Roswall. — AFP pic
Pricing nature
Under the EU plan, activities that protect or restore nature would be certified and the related certificate traded in a dedicated financial market.
But things get more complicated in practice.
'Putting a price tag on nature' is a 'more complex' affair than pricing carbon emissions, said an EU official.
How much CO2 is released into the atmosphere or sequestered by a specific activity is easily measurable, the official said.
The same can not be said of biodiversity, which is by definition diverse, with many varieties of animal and plants making it tricky to measure and identify value.
'Waking up to the song of birds, drinking water from a mountain spring, staring at the endless blue of the sea and of the ocean. How could you possibly put a price tag on any of this?' Roswall asked in Berlin.
'We do put a price tag on nature, every second, every day, but only by taking resources away from their natural environment,' she added.
In Europe, several pilot projects have been launched to test the concept, including in Finland, France and Estonia, where an initiative is seeking to reward forest owners for sustainably managing their plots.
The 27-nation EU is hoping these and other projects will provide farmers and foresters with an additional source of income.
'No coincidence'
It is not alone. Similar schemes were discussed at the UN COP16 nature talks in Colombia last year, and more than a dozen countries, including the United States and Germany already have a nascent market or a project underway.
Yet, striking a cautious note, pan-European farmers group Copa-Cogeca said it wanted to see a concrete proposal before commenting.
Environmental groups on the other hand are worried about a possible repeat of the many scandals that have dogged carbon credit markets, from tax fraud to the certification of projects that did nothing for the environment.
Nature credits could offer firms another opportunity for 'greenwashing' — pretending they are greener than they really are — and authorities an excuse to cut back public funding for biodiversity, some warn.
'Not even the commission knows what they want to do,' Ioannis Agapakis, a lawyer with ClientEarth, an environmental group, said of the European Commission.
Yet, it was 'no coincidence' — and 'a concern' — that the idea was being floated as the EU's executive body prepared to negotiate the future European budget, he added. — ETX Studio
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Closing the gap between vision and implementation in NIMP 2030
Closing the gap between vision and implementation in NIMP 2030

Focus Malaysia

time8 hours ago

  • Focus Malaysia

Closing the gap between vision and implementation in NIMP 2030

Letter to Editor MALAYSIA's National Industrial Master Plan (NIMP) 2030, launched recently, is undoubtedly a policy born of necessity and ambition. It recognises a fundamental truth: the linear 'take-make-dispose' model is economically and environmentally bankrupt for a resource-hungry nation. The vision – transforming Malaysia into a regional leader in sustainable, high-value manufacturing through circularity – is not just commendable; it's essential. However, since the launch, the gap between this laudable vision and the gritty reality of implementation reveals significant hurdles that demand urgent attention. Malaysia is heavily import-dependent for critical raw materials. Circular strategies (remanufacturing, recycling, resource efficiency) directly mitigate supply chain risks and price volatility. Moving beyond low-margin commodity exports towards high-value circular services (product-as-a-service, advanced recycling, reverse logistics) promises new revenue streams and jobs. Addressing rampant waste (especially plastic and e-waste), pollution, and carbon emissions is crucial for public health, ecosystem preservation, and meeting climate commitments. As major markets (EU, US, Japan) impose stricter circularity standards and carbon border adjustments (CBAM), Malaysian exports must adapt to remain competitive. The NIMP positions industries proactively. The plan's focus on key sectors like E&E, chemicals, aerospace, and medical devices, where circularity can yield significant material savings and innovation, is strategically sound. The emphasis on integrating SMEs into the circular value chain is also vital for inclusive growth. Despite its strong foundation, translating the NIMP's circular ambitions into tangible results faces formidable challenges. While targeting waste as a resource is key, Malaysia lacks the scale and sophistication of collection, sorting, and recycling infrastructure needed, particularly for complex waste streams like e-waste or composites. The plastic recycling rate stagnating around 24-28% highlights this gap. Building this infrastructure requires massive, coordinated public and private investment far beyond current commitments. Shifting entire industrial processes to circular models demands significant upfront capital. SMEs, the backbone of the economy, struggle to access affordable green financing. While NIMP mentions blended finance, concrete mechanisms to de-risk investments for banks and attract large-scale institutional capital are still nascent. The estimated RM100-150 bil funding gap for NIMP goals looms large. The success of Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) schemes – crucial for shifting waste management costs to producers – hinges on robust, consistent regulation and enforcement. Delays in finalising and implementing mandatory EPR frameworks for key sectors create uncertainty and allow laggards to persist with linear models. Policy alignment across federal, state, and local levels remains a persistent challenge. Circular products often face cost disadvantages against virgin materials due to distorted economics (e.g., fossil fuel subsidies). Government procurement policies favouring circular products need strengthening. More importantly, fostering genuine *consumer and B2B demand* for repaired, remanufactured, or recycled-content goods requires overcoming perceptions and building trust in quality and performance. Moving beyond basic recycling to high-value circularity (e.g., chemical recycling, advanced remanufacturing, biomaterials) requires significant R&D and technology adoption. Bridging the 'valley of death' between lab innovation and commercial scale demands targeted support, pilot facilities, and stronger industry-academia collaboration – areas needing acceleration under NIMP. The NIMP's initial stage has likely involved crucial groundwork – setting targets, establishing governance structures (like the NIMP Council), and initiating studies. The real test begins now. To avoid the circular economy becoming merely a buzzword within the master plan, Malaysia must finalise and implement mandatory, sector-specific EPR schemes with clear timelines and enforcement teeth. Streamline permitting for circular economy projects. And move beyond promises to operationalise innovative financing mechanisms (green bonds, guarantees, results-based finance) specifically tailored for circular SMEs and infrastructure projects. Leverage development banks and international green funds aggressively. We need to build infrastructure at scale. Prioritise public investment in integrated waste management and recycling parks, leveraging PPP models where feasible. Focus on closing loops for priority waste streams identified in NIMP. Implement stringent green public procurement rules. Launch awareness campaigns targeting businesses and consumers. Explore fiscal incentives for circular products and disincentives for linear ones. Fostering innovation ecosystems is the way forward. Establish dedicated circular economy innovation hubs with pilot lines. Provide grants and technical assistance for SMEs adopting circular tech. Strengthen linkages between universities, research institutes, and industry. It is important to ensure workforce reskilling programmes are integral to the circular shift, protecting jobs while creating new, higher-quality opportunities. Support SMEs in navigating the transition. Malaysia's NIMP 2030, with its core focus on the circular economy, is a visionary response to global and domestic challenges. It deserves recognition for setting a bold direction. However, vision alone is insufficient. The first year has exposed the sheer scale of the transformation required. The coming year is critical. It must move from planning to unambiguous action, tackling the financing gaps, infrastructure deficits, regulatory hurdles, and market barriers head-on. The circular transition is not merely an environmental add-on; it's the bedrock of future industrial resilience, competitiveness, and sustainable growth. Malaysia has the blueprint. Now, it needs the relentless execution, the political will, and the collaborative spirit to turn its circular vision into reality. The world is moving in this direction; Malaysia's window to lead, not just follow, in the region is open, but it won't stay open forever. The NIMP's success hinges on treating the next year not as a continuation of planning, but as the urgent launchpad for tangible, transformative change. The circular future is not just green; it must be golden for Malaysia. —Aug 17, 2025 The views expressed are solely of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Focus Malaysia. Professor Dato Dr Ahmad Ibrahim is an associate fellow at the Ungku Aziz Centre for Development Studies, Universiti Malaya. Main image: Unsplash

EU-US trade statement delayed over digital rules dispute, FT reports
EU-US trade statement delayed over digital rules dispute, FT reports

The Sun

time14 hours ago

  • The Sun

EU-US trade statement delayed over digital rules dispute, FT reports

BRUSSELS: The European Union is resisting US attempts to target its digital regulations as both sides finalise a delayed trade statement, according to the Financial Times. Disagreements over 'non-tariff barriers,' including EU digital rules, are stalling the joint declaration, EU officials told the newspaper. Reuters could not independently confirm the report, and the EU, White House, and State Department have yet to comment. The statement was initially expected shortly after the July deal announcement by EU President Ursula von der Leyen and US President Donald Trump. The July agreement imposed a 15% tariff on most EU goods, halving the initially proposed rate and preventing a wider trade war. Washington seeks concessions on the EU's Digital Services Act (DSA), which it claims restricts free speech and burdens US tech firms, the FT reported. The EU insists that relaxing the DSA, designed to combat illegal online content, is non-negotiable. The bloc had expected Trump to reduce EU car export tariffs from 27.5% to 15% by August 15, but this may now wait until the statement is finalised. - Reuters

Sanctioned Indian refiner Nayara transfers fuel cargo at sea
Sanctioned Indian refiner Nayara transfers fuel cargo at sea

Malaysian Reserve

time3 days ago

  • Malaysian Reserve

Sanctioned Indian refiner Nayara transfers fuel cargo at sea

ONE of the first cargoes shipped by Nayara Energy Ltd. after it was hit by EU sanctions has been transferred to another tanker at sea, evidence the Indian refiner is trying to keep exporting fuel. The Tempest Dream completed a ship-to-ship transfer on Thursday in the waters off Oman to move the gasoline shipment to Wu Tai, a larger tanker, according to a Bloomberg News review of ship-tracking data and satellite images. Tempest Dream then indicated that it would head back to Vadinar, Nayara's terminal in western India. The embattled refiner, which is 49%-owned by Russia's Rosneft PJSC, has found itself being shunned after it was sanctioned last month by the European Union. That's left it grappling with a lack of feedstock and has seen it cut run rates at its Vadinar refinery. Ship-to-ship transfers are a common tactic to mask the origins of cargoes, and may allow Nayara to keep exporting fuel. The waters off Oman are a popular place to do them. Tempest Dream was carrying around 283,000 barrels of gasoline before the transfer on Tuesday, according to Vortexa. It's now sitting higher in the water, Bloomberg and Kpler data show, indicating that it's shed the fuel. The Wu Tai, which is used for floating storage, is now holding more than 612,000 barrels, with room to take more. Fuel exports from Nayara that were already on water before the EU sanctioned the refiner on July 18 have also faced delays in finding takers. One cargo was diverted to China on Tuesday after finding a new buyer, four weeks after it was picked up from Vadinar. Tempest Dream, previously named Unite, was sanctioned by the UK for its involvement in the Russian oil trade, while Wu Tai was blacklisted by the UK and the EU for the same reason. Tempest Dream's owner is listed as Istanbul-based Tempest Maritime Services Trading on S&P's maritime database, while Wu Tai's owner is listed as Namas Maritime Inc., which is based in the Seychelles. The database did not provide contact numbers or email addresses for the companies. An email to Nayara seeking comment sent outside of business hours wasn't immediately answered. –BLOOMBERG

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store