
Russia signals it's ready to go to war with West to protect vital shadow fleet
'This is [an] Estonian warship,' says a voice speaking in English. 'Follow my instructions. Alter your course to 105 immediately.'
So begins the most nerve-wracking confrontation with a Russian shadow fleet vessel since the start of the war.
'We are met by helicopters,' says a voice speaking in Russian on board the Jaguar, a 20-year-old tanker en route back to Russia from the Indian port of Sikka, where it had likely deposited a sanctions-busting cargo of oil.
In the video taken from the bridge, Hindi-speaking crew members worriedly report that a 'military vessel' is also heading towards the stern of the ship.
The cause of the Jaguar's troubles lay in its lack of an international flag, a prerequisite for maritime navigation and the surest legal ground for a boarding operation.
Days earlier, it had taken down a Gabonese standard, shortly before the ship was sanctioned by the UK.
The clip published online by Margarita Simonyan, the chief of state-owned RT, formerly Russia Today, has been edited to make the timeline of events unclear.
But what is known is that the Jaguar refused the order of the Estonian navy – and ploughed on towards its destination, the Russian port Primorsk.
An Estonian patrol vessel, EML Raju, aborted its plan to board the far-larger craft and carry out an inspection.
Had it followed through, the situation might have spiralled because also visible in the clip is the arrival of a Russian Su-35 fighter jet – the first time Moscow has sent military forces to protect the rusty fleet it relies on to fund its war effort.
Elisabeth Braw, a senior fellow at the Atlantic Council, a Washington-based think tank, said: 'Russia has crossed the Rubicon now. It is showing that the shadow fleet is important enough that it's willing to publicly admit that it is linked to the government.'
During the May 13 confrontation, the Russian jet entered Estonian airspace for around a minute. It was met swiftly by Portuguese F-16s from the Nato air policing mission.
But the incident is rippling alarm across the West and inviting questions over just how far its relatively sparse naval forces can challenge the fleet of uninsured tankers that criss-cross its seas every day.
Gintautas Paluckas, the Lithuanian prime minister, said that while Russia's military protection of Baltic Sea tankers revealed nothing we 'couldn't or shouldn't have known', it showed that 'the risk of serious escalation is increasing with every step'.
At least half of the seaborne oil sold by Russia is carried on its shadow fleet, providing a huge chunk of the £740 billion that Moscow has earned from fossil fuel exports since February 2022.
The flow, however, has lately been disrupted by western sanctions.
Some 706 vessels have now been sanctioned across the EU, UK and US, according to research by shipping journal Lloyds List, which is around ten per cent of the total tanker fleet at sea. The share of Russian oil exported by the shadow fleet is falling, down to 53 per cent in April, according to the Centre for Research on Energy and Clean Air, a Helsinki-based think tank.
On April 11, Estonia detained the Kiwala, another shadow fleet vessel flying without a flag. On Christmas day, Finnish commandos boarded the Eagle-S, suspected of severing under-sea cables.
In response, the Kremlin is signalling that it is ready to fight for the smooth passage of its black gold.
Dmitry Peskov, its chief spokesman, said the deployment of an Su-35 showed Russia was ready to respond 'harshly' and warned that 'all measures' could be taken to prevent what he called piracy.
Nikolai Patrushev, a senior Putin aide, warned: 'Hotheads in London and Brussels need to understand this clearly.'
In mid-April, Russia's Baltic Fleet carried out a series of drills explicitly showcasing its ability to prevent the boarding of civilian ships. Eleven warships and a kilo-class submarine took part, alongside fighter jets.
The coastal states are 'winning' in their efforts to curtail the shadow fleet because they have 'clearly rattled Russia', according to Ms Braw. But Russia's military deployment is now 'causing concern, simply because they have no way of knowing how any incident will develop'.
Estonia's navy is formed from just eight ships. It was outmatched on May 13, Juri Saska, the former commander, told news outlet ERR. The boarding operation was called off because it was deemed 'unreasonable or unfeasible', he said, adding: 'The navy doesn't have the kind of equipped, armed vessels needed to carry out a forced operation like this.'
Sidharth Kaushal, a research fellow at the Royal United Services Institute, a London-based think tank, said Moscow lacks the naval strength to escort every one of its shadow fleet vessels. However, it is likely to intervene in situations where a new threshold is set.
Estonia's interdictions of the two Russian shadow fleet vessels have come in the waters of its Economic Exclusion Zone (EEZ), which stretches 200 miles off the coast and provides sovereign rights to exploration and maritime conversation. Any serious effort to interfere with passage through such waters would pose a serious problem for Moscow.
Hanno Pevkur, Estonia's defence minister, has called for all sanctioned ships to be barred from entering EEZ waters, as they are blocked from European ports. But this is considered a non-starter because it would unravel the international principle of freedom of navigation.
Kestutis Budrys, the Lithuanian foreign minister, believes that the West should at least tighten the system. He has also called for Nato to expand its Baltic Sentry programme from protecting undersea infrastructure to countering the shadow fleet.
Margus Tsahkna, the Estonian foreign minister, told The Telegraph: 'Controlling the shadow fleet is not just about maritime security – it's about striking the core of the fuel of Russia's military operations.'
If Russia wants to step up its military protection of the shadow fleet, it has several options, according to Mr Kaushal. Its vessels could turn on their firing radar, the last step before opening fire. They could seek to block boarding operations, or jam them electronically.
Western ships might also be detained on entering Russian waters. One Greek vessel was briefly held when it did so on a pre-approved route shortly after the Jaguar incident, although the circumstances there remain unclear.
Between flagless vessels, the entry of the Russian military and growing western resolve, the sea's cargo routes have rarely been so dangerous.
And Tom Sharpe, a former Royal Navy officer, thinks the problem is not going away any time soon. He said: 'This is such a difficult problem, given the size of the ocean, the number of warships we don't have, the number of dark fleet ships they do have, and the fact that we insist on playing by the rules.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
14 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Anti-Putin activist, 26, 'took his own life' after asylum bid was rejected as he 'feared being sent back to Russia'
An anti-Putin activist has been found dead in London after his asylum bid was rejected. After more than a year's wait for an appeal hearing, Alexander Frolov, 26, was found dead in Acton, west London, on July 28. His friends believe that he took his own life because of the mental pressure of being sent back to Russia. Originally arriving in the UK under a temporary visa as an agricultural worker in 2021, Alexander submitted his asylum application in December 2022. When Russia launched its invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, his friend Galina Shakirova said he was unable to return home as he 'refused to take part in killing people'. According to The i Paper, his asylum application was rejected in April 2024. Alexander had appealed the decision and was waiting for his hearing to be rescheduled when he died. Metropolitan Police are not believed to be investigating any suspicious circumstances into his death and an inquest will be held next week. He was described by the Russian Democratic Society as a 'dedicated opponent of Putin's regime'. They added he was a 'volunteer who gave his time to help others, and a constant presence at anti-war protests'. 'Alexander believed in the possibility of a free and democratic Russia and hoped to one day return to it,' the group said. His friend Galina, who met Alexander when they worked together as stewards at anti-war rally, called him 'kind, generous, quietly dependable'. She said: 'Imagine being an opposition activist who knows that returning home almost certainly means prison. You've spoken out publicly. You've worked with organisations labelled in Russia as 'undesirable' or 'extremist'. 'Then you ask for protection – hoping for safety, for a chance to survive. And instead, you're refused.' The Home Office said: 'It is our long-standing policy not to comment on individual cases.'


Reuters
44 minutes ago
- Reuters
Oil edges up on stalled Russia-Ukraine peace talks, strong US demand
NEW YORK/LONDON, Aug 21 (Reuters) - Oil prices edged up on Thursday as Russia and Ukraine blamed each other for a stalled peace process, and as earlier U.S. data showed signs of strong demand in the top oil consuming nation. Brent crude futures were up 56 cents, or about 0.8%, at $67.40 a barrel at 12:08 p.m. EDT (1608 GMT), having hit a two-week high earlier in the session. U.S. West Texas Intermediate crude futures were up 53 cents, or 0.9%, at $63.24 a barrel. Both contracts climbed over 1% in the prior session. The path to peace in Ukraine remained uncertain, turning oil traders cautious after a selloff over the past two weeks on hopes that U.S. President Donald Trump would soon negotiate a diplomatic end to Russia's war with its neighbor. Both Moscow and Kyiv have since blamed each other for stalling the peace process. Russia on Thursday launched a major air attack near Ukraine's border with the European Union, while Ukraine claimed to have hit a Russian oil refinery. "Some geopolitical risk premium is slowly being pumped back into the market," oil trading advisory firm Ritterbusch and Associates told clients on Thursday. The uncertainty in the peace talks means that the possibility of tighter sanctions on Russia has resurfaced, said Tamas Varga, an analyst at PVM Oil Associates. Oil prices were also supported by a larger-than-expected drawdown from U.S. crude stockpiles in the last week, indicating strong demand. U.S. crude stockpiles fell 6 million barrels in the week ended August 15, the U.S. Energy Information Administration reported on Wednesday, while analysts had expected a draw of 1.8 million barrels. Investors were also looking to the Jackson Hole economic conference in Wyoming for signals on a possible Fed interest rate cut next month. The annual gathering of central bankers begins on Thursday, with Fed Chair Jerome Powell scheduled to speak on Friday.


Telegraph
44 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Russia is the new dividing line on Britain's Right
The Right has a problem with Russia. With his usual succinctness and sagacity, Charles Moore last week gave expression to an anxiety that has been exercising many conservatives: 'If perverted liberalism leads to neo-Marxism, could not perverted patriotism lead to neo-fascism?' Could Moore be right? Nigel Farage is our equivalent of Oswald Mosley, who also trumpeted his patriotism – though Farage is a more serious and more successful politician than Mosley ever was. That makes him also much more dangerous. Farage has a long record of excusing or downplaying the threat posed by Putin. He actually defended the Trump administration's bullying of Zelensky in the Oval Office. We may be sceptical about the 'Coalition of the Willing', but at least Nato's European allies are now rearming on an unprecedented scale and presenting Putin with a united front. Would that be happening under PM Farage? Pull the other one, as he might say. With JD Vance and his British ally James Orr in mind, Moore mused: 'How did the national conservatism of Edmund Burke get mixed up with the Putinist opportunism of Viktor Orban's government in Hungary?' In response, Dr Orr protested indignantly that he, Vance and other National Conservatives were in no sense apologists for Putin. Yet he claims that more people are prosecuted for free speech offences in Britain than in Russia. I'm not sure the late Alexei Navalny would agree. Orr champions the 'principled realism' of the 'New Right', arguing that 'the time has come to rally behind politicians who will put Kent before Kyiv'. Let it first be said that this is an argument among people of goodwill, most of whom probably agree more than they disagree. British conservatives, whether 'Old' or 'New', are in favour of freedom (notably of speech and of the press), King and country, the rule of law and parliamentary democracy. Religious or not, they cherish the Judaeo-Christian foundations of our society and state. Abroad, conservatives tend to support other nations who broadly share our values, particularly if they are forced to defend themselves, at the risk of being accused by Orr of suffering from 'Ukraine Brain'. Finally, conservatives rely on history as a guide in war and peace, even if (as Orr claims) 'Right-wing Zoomers' sneer at them as victims of 'World War Two Brain'. Having played a minor part in the fall of the Berlin Wall, I plead guilty to Second World War, Cold War and Ukraine brain. This is the historical context of today's politics and diplomacy. Any attempt to play down the continuity and relevance of these conflicts is as foolish as it is unconservative. And dressing up an abdication of moral responsibility for Ukraine as 'principled realism' strikes me as at best wrong-headed, at worst a betrayal of our island story. Alas, that is exactly what is meant by 'putting Kent before Kyiv'. Defending Kent is not a matter of fortifying the Channel coastline. The latter-day Hitlers and Napoleons threaten our way of life without setting foot here. If we sacrifice other peoples to appease the monstrous ideology propagated by Putin, we will be incapable of defending ourselves. It is actually Kyiv that is defending Kent, not the other way round. The late Sir Roger Scruton, the patron saint of the National Conservative movement, understood all this better than his acolytes. Having devoted much of his life to helping dissidents in the former Soviet empire, he knew who the enemy was: the ex-communist secret policeman who is now trying to rebuild that empire. But Scruton's political romanticism has been co-opted by Putin's chief ally in Europe, Viktor Orban. His goulash authoritarianism has helped to sanitise Putin's dictatorship – a soft cop, hard cop routine. The nationalist Right in Europe and the Maga Right in America have danced to their tune, seeking to diminish Zelensky's status as the symbolic hero of the free world. They promote their allies with money and influence. Elon Musk's meddling in the German election failed to stop the anti-Russian conservative Friedrich Merz being elected, but the Trump loyalist Kristi Noem helped the hardline nationalist Karol Nawrocki to win the Polish presidency. Reform's intellectual praetorian guard is a motley band, ranging from the former academic and social media influencer Matt Goodwin to a new Millbank-based think tank, the Centre for a Better Britain (CBB), chaired by the aforementioned Orr. They have a blueprint: the Heritage Foundation's Project 2025, which has set Trump's agenda. Reform's in-house thinkers hope to play an analogous role in a Faragist future. They will doubtless dismiss any similarities between Trump's ersatz authoritarianism and the Putinist original. Yet Russia remains a problem for the Right, not least in Britain. In one corner, Kemi Badenoch and the Conservatives, including most centre-Right intellectuals, remain staunch allies of Ukraine. They reject Putin and all his works. Meanwhile Farage and his camp lean towards authoritarian solutions at home and an isolationist policy abroad. My guess is that the British public, given adequate time and a level playing field, will opt for Kemi's inclusive patriotism, which precludes any hint of proto-fascism, rather than Farage's exclusive nationalism, which does not. Will the field actually be level, though?