logo
Police are at my door. Do I need to answer? What to know if law enforcement knocks in Texas

Police are at my door. Do I need to answer? What to know if law enforcement knocks in Texas

Yahoo20-06-2025
Knock! Knock! Knock! There's a stranger at your doorstep. You rush to the peephole to see who's there.
It's the police. They ask you to open the door.
Your next move could be costly. Do you open the door, ask questions, or ignore them?
Following what prosecutors have described as the "political assassination" of Minnesota State Rep. Melissa Hortman and her husband — part of an attack that also injured Sen. John Hoffman and his wife — many Americans are now questioning their legal and practical options in response to the incident.
The suspect in the case, Vance Boelter, 57, was dressed in a police officer's attire, complete with a black tactical vest, and carried a flashlight, as an officer would, according to an affidavit filed in federal court and written by Special Agent Terry Getsch of the FBI. Boelter was also driving an SUV equipped with a fake "POLICE" license plate and "law enforcement-style emergency lights," the affidavit said.
"This is the police. Open the door," Boelter shouted outside at around 2 a.m. on June 14, according to Hoffman's family members, Getsch wrote in the affidavit.
Here's what to know about answering the door for law enforcement in Texas.
The Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution offers safeguards against unreasonable searches and seizures, granting your home the greatest degree of protection. As a result, law enforcement officers cannot enter your residence without valid legal authority.
If the police knock on your door, you're not obligated to answer or let them in. According to legalclarity.org, this tactic, known as a 'knock and talk,' is designed to begin a voluntary conversation, but your participation is entirely optional.
Law enforcement knocking on your door can be intimidating. Most people's first inclination is to answer the door for them. However, that doesn't mean you have to.
Here are five things to keep in mind if police officers knock on your door:
You don't have to open the door unless they have a warrant. If officers don't present a search or arrest warrant, you're not legally obligated to let them in.
Ask if they have a warrant — and see it. If they claim to have one, you can request to see it through a window or have them slide it under the door before opening up.
Don't step outside your home or invite them in unless you want to. Once you open the door or step outside, you may unintentionally waive some of your Fourth Amendment protections.
Stay calm and polite — but say little. You have the right to remain silent. You can simply say, 'I don't wish to speak without a lawyer,' and that's enough.
If they don't have a warrant, they can't enter unless there's an emergency. This includes things like hearing screams, seeing someone in danger, or suspecting a crime is actively happening inside.
According to the Texas Constitution Search & Seizures §9, the law says the people shall be secure in their persons, houses, papers and possessions, from all unreasonable seizures or searches, and no warrant to search any place, or to seize any person or thing, shall issue without describing them as near as may be, nor without probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation.
According to Texas law, there are situations of "exigent circumstances," also known as warrantless search and seizure in Texas.
Under the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the law authorizes officers to enter homes without a warrant in exigent circumstances.
Examples of this include:
Protection of life (first aid, extracting children who appear to be in danger, protecting an undercover officer or informant).
Protection of property (such as extinguishing a fire or stopping a burglary).
Preventing destruction of evidence.
Pursuing a fleeing felon ('hot pursuit').
According to the Texas District & County Attorneys Association, exigent circumstances can justify an officer's initial entry into a residence, especially when the goal is to help someone in danger or ensure public safety.
However, once the immediate emergency is under control, officers are no longer permitted to continue searching without legal authority.
A warrant or another specific exception must be in place to allow further examination of the premises, though officers may secure the location while obtaining one. Notably, the exigent circumstances rule does not create a blanket exception for murder scenes that would permit unrestricted searches; entry is only permitted to assist victims or locate an attacker.
-USA TODAY Network Amanda Lee Myers contributed to this report.
This article originally appeared on Austin American-Statesman: If police knock on your door, do you need to open? What Texas law says
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Valley View ISD calls for $65M bond election
Valley View ISD calls for $65M bond election

Yahoo

time22 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Valley View ISD calls for $65M bond election

Voters within the Valley View school district will have the opportunity to weigh in on a $65 million bond. VVISD trustees last week made the call to add the proposition on the Nov. 4 ballot, with projects designed to meet growing enrollment and counteract capacity issues by 40%. The maximum tax impact of the 2025 bond referendum would be an additional 28.35 cents per $100 of taxable property value. Based on the current population and property valuations, the average homeowner would see a tax increase of $49.11 per month. Taxpayers aged 65 or older, or disabled, who have filed the appropriate exemption, will see no increase to the school district portion of their property taxes on their primary residence. The proposal includes construction of a new high school, new spaces for Career and Technical Education, relocation of the baseball field, adding parking and fire lanes and land acquisition. The bond proposal was developed with input from a bond planning committee made up of approximately 30 community members, including parents, alumni, educators and local leaders. The committee met 10 times over the past year to study facility capacity, student enrollment trends, community survey data, potential project solutions and associated costs. The maximum tax impact of the 2025 bond referendum would be an additional 28.35 cents per $100 of taxable property value. Based on the current population and property valuations, the average homeowner would see a tax increase of $49.11 per month. Taxpayers aged 65 or older, or disabled, who have filed the appropriate exemption, will see no increase to the school district portion of their property taxes on their primary residence. Cooke County voters living within Valley View ISD boundaries are eligible to participate in the election. Voters are encouraged to verify their registration status by visiting prior to the registration deadline on Monday, Oct. 6. Early Voting begins Monday, Oct. 20, and Election Day is Tuesday, Nov. 4, 2025. For more information, visit Solve the daily Crossword

Xavier Hernandez death: El Paso DA gets investigation, likely to go to grand jury
Xavier Hernandez death: El Paso DA gets investigation, likely to go to grand jury

Yahoo

time22 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Xavier Hernandez death: El Paso DA gets investigation, likely to go to grand jury

An investigation into the death of Xavier Guadalupe Hernandez during an arrest on the side of a freeway is now in the hands of the El Paso District Attorney's Office. It will likely go to a grand jury to determine if criminal charges will be filed against police officers. Hernandez, 30, died in a controversial case recorded on an El Paso Police Department body camera video that raised criticism over how police handled what started as a call about a pedestrian on Interstate 10 and ended with Hernandez's death on July 13. More: El Paso medical examiner rules man who died in police struggle as a homicide El Paso District Attorney James Montoya, in an emailed statement on Wednesday, Aug. 20, said his office has now received the investigation conducted by El Paso police. "While the case is pending, we cannot offer any other comment about it specifically," Montoya stated. "However, it is the policy of the DA's Office to present all in-custody deaths and officer-involved shootings to a grand jury of El Pasoans for their review and determination of potential criminal liability." EPPD body camera video released this week showed Hernandez in an agitated state on the shoulder of the busy freeway in a situation that quickly escalated into a struggle as an officer repeatedly shocked him with a Taser. "Officer, what's your badge number?" Hernandez repeatedly yells in the video, which shows Hernandez stop breathing while handcuffed behind his back and held facedown on the asphalt by officers. An autopsy by the county medical examiner's office deemed Hernandez's death a homicide caused by "asphyxia due to chest compression during law enforcement subdual and restrain" with cocaine toxicity as a "significant" factor. DA: Grand jury to look at police deadly force cases Montoya, a Democrat, took office in January after defeating former Republican DA Bill Hicks in the November 2024 election. Montoya previously had an unsuccessful run for DA, losing to Yvonne Rosales in the 2020 Democratic primary. Rosales later ended up resigning from office amid accusations of incompetence and Hicks was appointed by Gov. Greg Abbott to fill in the remainder of her term. During the 2020 campaign, police brutality was a hot topic amid the George Floyd protests, Black Lives Matter movement and the COVID-19 pandemic. In 2020, Montoya said in an El Paso Times interview that incidents in which police use deadly force should be automatically investigated. "Whether that is a discharge of a firearm, some kind of chokehold, any type of deadly force, including a Taser, which I believe is deadly force, will be presented to an El Paso grand jury for their review for potential criminal charges," Montoya said in 2020. Daniel Borunda may be reached at dborunda@ and @BorundaDaniel on X. This article originally appeared on El Paso Times: El Paso police bodycam video death case likely to go to grand jury

Former Heat security officer admits in court to stealing jerseys worth millions, feds say
Former Heat security officer admits in court to stealing jerseys worth millions, feds say

Yahoo

time22 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Former Heat security officer admits in court to stealing jerseys worth millions, feds say

A former Miami Heat security officer has pleaded guilty in federal court to a charge in connection to stealing team memorabilia worth millions of dollars and selling the items to online brokers. Retired Miami police officer Marcos Tomas Perez appeared Tuesday at U.S. Superior Court for the Southern District of Florida and issued a guilty plea to transporting and transferring stolen goods in interstate commerce, after pleading not guilty to the felony count at an initial hearing earlier this month. Perez's attorney, Robert Buschel, told NBC6 in Florida after Tuesday's hearing that Perez is "depressed, naturally, but he accepts responsibility for his behavior and we're gonna work through this issue in his life." Perez, 62, faces up to 10 years in prison and a maximum fine of $250,000. He is scheduled to be sentenced on Oct. 31. Read more:Ex-Miami Heat employee accused of stealing jerseys worth millions — including LeBron James' "I hope that the judge will consider all factors in his life and his history as a good person," Buschel said. "He was an exemplary police officer in the city of Miami, he's been retired for close to 10 years. This was an unfortunate set of decisions that he made and he's going to accept responsibility for that." Buschel declined to comment any further when reached by The Times via email Wednesday. According to a news release by the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida and the Miami field office of the FBI, Perez has admitted to stealing hundreds of game-worn jerseys and other memorabilia worth millions of dollars belonging to the Heat and selling them to online brokers. One such item was a jersey that LeBron James wore in Game 7 of the 2013 NBA Finals, during which James and the Heat defeated the San Antonio Spurs 95-88 to win their second consecutive championship. After Perez allegedly sold the jersey for around $100,000, it was sold in an online auction for $3.7 million in 2023. According to court documents, other stolen items included jerseys signed by former Heat stars Dwyane Wade, Jimmy Butler, Chris Bosh, Alonzo Mourning and Shaquille O'Neal, as well as team jackets, game-worn sneakers and more. Get the best, most interesting and strangest stories of the day from the L.A. sports scene and beyond from our newsletter The Sports Report. This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store