logo
Dead mouse found in woman's Monster Energy drink, lawsuit says

Dead mouse found in woman's Monster Energy drink, lawsuit says

USA Today7 days ago
A Michigan woman is suing Monster Energy after finding a mouse in her drink, a lawsuit states.
McKenzie Cain alleges she found a mouse inside a Monster Energy drink she purchased from a bagel restaurant in Grand Rapids, Michigan, in April 2024. She is seeking $25,000 for "emotional distress, trauma and physical illness," the lawsuit states.
"Upon consuming the drink, Cain picked up the can and realized the can was still oddly heavy," the lawsuit states. "Out of curiosity, Cain opened the can further, and to her horror, found a dead mouse laying in the bottom of the can."
In the lawsuit filed in September 2024, Cain accuses Monster Energy of negligence and strict liability for causing her physical harm, as well as breach of implied warranty of merchantability.
"It's hard to imagine many things more disgusting than finding a dead mouse at the bottom of your energy drink. It is also dangerous. Mice, like all rodents, often carry diseases that can be extremely harmful. It goes without saying that no beverages should ever make it to the shelf with a dead animal inside it," Cain's lawyer, Zach Runyan, said in a statement shared with USA TODAY.
Which has the most caffeine? Energy drinks like Red Bull, Monster and Rockstar are popular.
Monster Energy lawsuit now in federal court
On Monday, July 14, the lawsuit was transferred from state to federal court, Western District of Michigan records show.
"Plaintiff alleges to have found a dead mouse laying on the bottom of Defendant's can after consuming the beverage," the notice of removal from state court reads.
Monster Energy did not immediately respond for comment when contacted by USA TODAY on Wednesday, July 16.
This is not the first lawsuit of its kind. In 2011, Monster Energy was sued by a man named Vitaliy Sulzhik, who claimed he found a mouse in his energy drink after opening and consuming part of it. At the time, Monster Energy described the lawsuit as "frivolous, unfounded" and "nothing more than a shakedown."
"Common sense would dictate that if a mouse had been introduced into the can at production (a virtually impossible scenario given modern production technologies) which occurred months prior to Mr. Sulzhik's consumption of the product, the mouse would have deteriorated and the product would not have been drinkable from the very first sip," the company said in a news release.
As of July 16, it is unclear where Sulzhik's lawsuit stands.
Greta Cross is a national trending reporter at USA TODAY. Story idea? Email her at gcross@usatoday.com.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Their selfies are being turned into sexually explicit content with AI. They want the world to know.
Their selfies are being turned into sexually explicit content with AI. They want the world to know.

USA Today

time8 hours ago

  • USA Today

Their selfies are being turned into sexually explicit content with AI. They want the world to know.

Evie, 21, was on her lunch break at her day job last month when she got a text from a friend, alerting her to the latest explicit content that was circulating online without her consent. This time, it was a graphic fan-fiction style story about her that was created by 'Grok,' X's AI-powered chatbot. Weeks earlier, she'd been the subject of another attack when a user shared her selfie and asked Grok to turn it into explicit sexual imagery. 'It felt humiliating,' says Evie, a 21-year-old Twitch streamer who asked that we withhold her last name to conceal her identity from her online trolls, who have become increasingly aggressive. In June, Evie was among a group of women who had their images non-consensually sexualized on the social media platform X. After posting a selfie to her page, an anonymous user asked 'Grok,' X's AI-powered chatbot, to edit the image in a highly sexualized way, using language that got around filters the bot had in place. Grok then replied to the post with the generated image attached. Evie says she is vocal on X about feminist issues and was already subject to attacks from critics. Those accounts had made edits of her before, but they had been choppy Photoshop jobs — nothing as real-looking as Grok's. 'It was just a shock seeing that a bot built into a platform like X is able to do stuff like that,' she says over video chat, a month after the initial incident. X has since blocked certain words and phrases used to doctor women's images, but on June 25, an X user prompted Grok to make a story where the user 'aggressively rapes, beats and murders' her, making it 'as graphic as you can' with an '18+ warning at the bottom.' 'It just generated it all,' she says. '(The user) didn't use any words to try to cover it up, like they did with the pictures.' X did not return USA TODAY's multiple requests for comment. Evie says she saw at least 20 other women on her own X feed that had their photos sexualized without their consent. It also happened to Sophie Rain, an OnlyFans creator with over 20M followers across social media platforms, who posts sensual content but never full nudity. 'It's honestly disgusting and gross,' she says. 'I take my religion very seriously. I am a virgin, and I don't condone this type of behavior in any way.' This trend is part of a growing problem experts call image-based sexual abuse, in which 'revenge porn' and deepfakes are used to degrade and exploit another person. While anyone can be victimized, 90% of the victims of image-based sexual abuse are women. 'This is not only about sexualized images of girls and women, it's broader than that,' says Leora Tanenbaum, author of 'Sexy Selfie Nation.' 'This is all about taking control and power away from girls and women.' The 'Take It Down Act' aims to combat non-consensual sexual imagery. Is it working? In May 2025, the Take It Down Act was signed into law to combat non-consensual intimate imagery, including deepfakes and revenge porn. While most states have laws protecting people from non-consensual intimate images and sexual deepfakes, victims have struggled to have images removed from websites, increasing the likelihood that images will continue to spread and retraumatize them. The law requires websites and online platforms to take down non-consensual intimate imagery upon notice from the victim within 48 hours of the verified request. However, as of July 21, the altered photo of Evie is still publicly accessible on Grok's verified X account. Evie mobilized her nearly 50,000 followers to mass report Grok's post, but she says X Support said it was not a violation of their content guidelines. AI's ability to flag inappropriate prompts can falter In a conversation with Grok, USA TODAY asked Grok to play out a scenario in which a user asked the chatbot to generate explicit content, with clear instructions not to actually produce it during the conversation. One of the examples of "coded language" Grok is programmed to flag, it says, is "subtle requests for exposure" to make photos of women more revealing. Codes that could be flagged in that area are "adjust her outfit," "show more skin," or "fix her top." "Even if worded politely, I flag these if the intent appears inappropriate," Grok said via AI-generated response on July 15. The keyword is intent. Grok's ability to turn down potentially inappropriate prompts "relies on my ability to detect the intent, and public images remain accessible for prompts unless protected," the chatbot says. You can block or disable Grok, but doing so doesn't always prevent modifications to your content. Another user could tag Grok in a reply, request an edit to your photo, and you wouldn't know it because you have Grok blocked. "You may not see the edited results, but the edit could still occur," Grok clarified during our conversation. The better solution is to make your profile private, but not all users want to take that step. It's not just about sex — it's about power After experiencing image-based sexual abuse, Evie considered making her X account private. She was embarrassed and thought her family might see the edits. However, she did not want to give in and be silenced. "I know that those pictures are out now, there's nothing I can do about getting rid of it," she says. "So why don't I just keep talking about it and keep bringing awareness to how bad this is?" When it comes to generating deepfakes or sharing revenge porn, the end goal isn't always sexual gratification or satisfaction. Users may target women who are using their platforms to speak about feminist issues as a degradation tactic. Evie says what hurt the most was that rather than engage in a discussion or debate about the issues she was raising, her critics opted to abuse her. In her research, Tanenbaum has seen varied responses from victims of image-based sexual abuse, ranging from engaging in excessive sexual behavior to "a total shutdown of sexuality, including wearing baggy clothes and intentionally developing unhealthy patterns of eating to make oneself large, to be not sexually attractive in one's own mind." The individuals she spoke to, who had been victimized in this way, called it 'digital rape' and 'experienced it as a violation of the body.' Even if logically someone understands that a sexually explicit image is synthetic, once their brain sees and processes the image, it's embedded in their memory bank, Tanenbaum says. The human brain processes images 60,000 times faster than text, and 90% of the information transmitted to the brain is visual. "Those images never truly get scrubbed away. They trick us because they look so real,' Tanenbaum explains. Evie wants to believe that it "didn't really get to her," but she notices she's more thoughtful about the photos she posts, such as wondering if she's showing too much skin to the point where an AI bot can more easily undress her. "I always think, 'Is there a way that someone could do something to these pictures?"

4 cruise guests arrested for alleged drug possession in Bermuda
4 cruise guests arrested for alleged drug possession in Bermuda

USA Today

time15 hours ago

  • USA Today

4 cruise guests arrested for alleged drug possession in Bermuda

Four U.S. Carnival Cruise Line passengers were arrested in Bermuda for alleged drug possession. The guests were detained by cruise ship security for having 'a significant quantity of illegal drugs and drug paraphernalia, believed intended for distribution on the island,' the Bermuda Police Service said in a July 22 Facebook post. The alleged items included one package of carfentanyl, multiple compressed cannabis packages, vape pens and what were suspected to be THC gummies, authorities said. They were arrested upon entry to Bermuda. 'Carfentanyl is about 100 times stronger than fentanyl and was originally used to sedate large animals like elephants,' Acting Detective Superintendent Derricka Burns said in the post. 'Even tiny amounts can be deadly. This seizure may have prevented a potential tragedy.' The travelers, who were not named, are in police custody with charges 'expected to follow,' according to Bermuda police. Authorities did not specify which ship they were sailing on. 'We follow a zero-tolerance drug policy, as we strictly comply with all applicable laws and regulations, and we also advise our guests that they can be personally subject to local law enforcement actions,' Carnival told USA TODAY in an emailed statement. The Bermuda Police Service Narcotics Unit is investigating the case. Nathan Diller is a consumer travel reporter for USA TODAY based in Nashville. You can reach him at ndiller@

Minnesota state lawmaker to resign after burglary conviction
Minnesota state lawmaker to resign after burglary conviction

The Hill

time16 hours ago

  • The Hill

Minnesota state lawmaker to resign after burglary conviction

A Minnesota lawmaker is expected to resign from the state Senate after being criminally convicted of burglary on July 18. Democratic state Sen. Nicole Mitchell's departure will dissolve the party's one-seat majority in the upper chamber and comes after months of Republican criticism regarding her criminal record. 'Senator Mitchell's constituents deserve for her legislative projects to be finalized or ready to hand off to her successor before she resigns,' her attorney Dane DeKrey said in a statement to USA Today. 'Mitchell's constituents also deserve to have their outstanding issues handled before her resignation… It was the honor of her lifetime to serve her District and the State of Minnesota,' he added. She's slated to resign 'no later than Aug. 4.' Dekrey did not immediately respond to The Hill's request for comment on the matter. Mitchell, a former lieutenant colonel in the Air National Guard and a meteorologist, was arrested last year while visiting her estranged stepmother to collect her deceased father's belongings. She used burglary tools to enter the home in the Detroit Lakes area. Minnesota Senate Republican Leader Mark Johnson (R), in a statement, once again condemned Mitchell's actions, stating 'her continued participation in the Minnesota Senate leaves the body with a stain on its record for every time her vote was the deciding vote in passing legislation.' Mitchell's resignation comes weeks after two Democratic lawmakers in the Minnesota legislature were shot at their respective homes. Rep. Melissa Hoffman (D) succumbed to gunshot wounds, as did her husband and Golden Retriever.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store