How real is Trump's U-turn on Ukraine?
For the first time since he returned to power, US President Donald Trump is now explicitly blaming Russia for the continuation of Europe's bloodiest conflict since World War II.
'We want to make sure Ukraine can do what it wants to do.' That statement from US President Donald Trump on July 14
marked a U-turn on his previous position on support for the Ukrainians , locked in a brutal, bloody war against Russian invaders, now in its fourth year.
In typical Trump fashion, the remarks made at a White House meeting with Nato secretary-general Mark Rutte were both imprecise and an exaggeration. It is still far from clear how much in terms of weapons and money Mr Trump is willing to contribute to Ukraine's war against Russia. And it's doubtful that the American President truly intends to give the Ukrainians a free hand to decide their future.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Straits Times
4 minutes ago
- Straits Times
Palau lawmakers reject US request to accept third country refugees
Find out what's new on ST website and app. SYDNEY - The national congress of Palau has said it "cannot accept" a United States proposal for the Pacific Islands nation to accept asylum seekers from third countries, as its president holds annual funding talks in Washington. Palau's national congress wrote to President Surangel Whipps Jr. earlier this month urging him to reject the request by the Trump Administration. A letter signed by Senate President Hokkon Boules and House of Delegates speaker Gibson Kanai, viewed by Reuters, said the congress strongly supports Palau's partnership with the United States, but "cannot accept this specific proposal". Palau, with a population of 17,000, has a compact of free association with the United States providing economic assistance in return for allowing the U.S. military access to its territory. "We advise against proceeding further on this matter only because of the practical issues that the introduction of refugees would raise in our society," said the letter, dated July 21. Whipps Jr. briefed Palau's national congress and council of chiefs about the request on July 18, the Palau president's office said in a statement at the time. The proposed agreement gave Palau the right to accept or decline each individual referred by the U.S., the office said. The U.S. Ambassador to Palau, Joel Ehrendreich told the meeting Palau would not be a processing centre like Nauru under Australia's offshore asylum policy, but would be considered a "safe third country", and financial assistance would be offered, Palau's Island Times reported. Whipps Jr. is in Washington for annual talks about economic assistance, his office said. "We anticipate there will be additional discussion held with local leadership," a spokeswoman told Reuters. Palau was one of the few states to avoid any U.S. tariffs in April. On July 15, the United States said a deportation flight from the U.S. carrying immigrants from different countries landed in Eswatini in southern Africa, a move that followed the U.S. Supreme Court lifting limits on the Trump Administration's policy to deport migrants to third countries. Palau is not a signatory to the 1951 U.N. Refugee Convention. A spokeswoman for the U.S. Embassy in Palau said it had no comment on the letter. Human rights advocates have raised due process and other concerns over Trump's immigration policies that his administration has cast as measures aimed at improving domestic security. REUTERS
Business Times
4 minutes ago
- Business Times
Europe reacts with mix of relief and concern to US trade deal
[BRUSSELS] European governments and companies reacted with both relief and concern on Monday (Jul 28) to the framework trade deal struck with US President Donald Trump, acknowledging what was seen as an unbalanced deal but one that avoided a deeper trade war. The agreement, announced on Sunday between two economies that account for almost a third of global trade, will see the US impose a 15 per cent import tariff on most European Union (EU) goods – half the threatened rate but much more than what Europeans hoped for. Many of the specifics of the deal were not immediately known, however. 'As we await full details of the new EU-US trade agreement, one thing is clear: this is a moment of relief but not of celebration,' Belgian Prime Minister Bart De Wever wrote in a post on X. 'Tariffs will increase in several areas and some key questions remain unresolved.' Trump said the deal, including an investment pledge topping the US$550 billion deal signed with Japan last week, would expand ties between the trans-Atlantic powers after years of what he called unfair treatment of US exporters. It will bring clarity for European makers of cars, planes and chemicals. But the EU had initially hoped for a zero-for-zero tariff deal. And the 15 per cent baseline tariff, while an improvement on the threatened rate of 30 per cent, compares with an average US import tariff rate of around 2.5 per cent last year before Trump's return to the White House. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up European Commission chief Von der Leyen, describing Trump as a tough negotiator, told reporters on Sunday that it was 'the best we could get'. European stocks opened up on Monday, with the STOXX 600 at a four-month high and all other major bourses also in the green. Tech and healthcare stocks led the way. 'The 15 per cent rate is better than the market was fearing,' said Jefferies economist Mohit Kumar. German Chancellor Friedrich Merz welcomed the deal, saying it averted a trade conflict that would have hit Germany's export-driven economy and its large auto sector hard. French government ministers said on Monday that the deal had some merits – such as exemptions they hoped to see for some key French business sectors such as spirits – but was nevertheless not balanced. Industry minister Marc Ferracci stressed more talks – potentially lasting weeks or months – would be needed before the deal could be formally concluded. 'This is not the end of the story,' he told RTL radio. European companies, meanwhile, were left wondering whether to cheer or lament the accord. 'Those who expect a hurricane are grateful for a storm,' said Wolfgang Große Entrup, head of the German Chemical Industry Association VCI. 'Further escalation has been avoided. Nevertheless, the price is high for both sides. European exports are losing competitiveness. US customers are paying the tariffs,' he said. Stellantis shares were up 3.5 per cent and car parts maker Valeo jumped 4.7 per cent while German pharma group Merck KGaA rose 2.9 per cent, in a sign of relief for those sectors. Among the many questions that remain to be answered, however, is how the EU's promise to invest hundreds of billions of dollars in the US and steeply increase energy purchases can be turned into reality. It was not immediately clear if specific pledges of increased investments were made or whether the details still must be hammered out. And while the EU pledged to make US$750 billion in strategic purchases over the next three years, including oil, liquefied natural gas (LNG) and nuclear fuel, the US will struggle to produce enough to meet that demand. While US LNG production capacity is due to almost double over the next four years it will still not be enough to ramp up supplies to Europe, and oil production is expected to be lower than previously forecast this year. Despite the lingering unknowns, analysts stressed the deal still helped decrease uncertainty. Oil prices rose on Monday, as did the euro. 'Now that there is more clarity, you would think that not only in the United States, but around the globe, there will be a little bit more willingness to look at investment, to look at expansions, and to look at where the opportunities are,' said Rodrigo Catril, senior currency strategist at National Australia Bank. REUTERS
Business Times
32 minutes ago
- Business Times
Thailand, Cambodia agree to truce after Trump, Anwar outreach
[PUTRAJAYA] Thai and Cambodian leaders agreed to halt hostilities in their deadliest border conflict in more than a decade, after a push by the US and regional powers for a diplomatic resolution. Thailand's Acting Prime Minister Phumtham Wechayachai and Cambodian Prime Minister Hun Manet held discussions on Monday (Jul 28) in Malaysia, hosted by Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim. Anwar facilitated the dialogue in his role as the chair of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations, with Washington and Beijing dispatching envoys. Anwar, speaking after the talks, said the sides agreed to a ceasefire as of midnight. The talks mark the first formal dialogue since fresh clashes erupted on July 24, with at least 36 people killed and more than 150,000 civilians displaced on both sides of their 800-kilometre border. Tensions escalated rapidly over the weekend, as heavy artillery fire and aerial strikes were reported, and both sides accused each other of targeting civilian areas. US President Donald Trump had said before the discussions that the Thai and Cambodian leaders had agreed to 'quickly work out a ceasefire.' After separate calls with Phumtham and Hun Manet on Saturday, Trump had threatened that Washington would not do a trade deal with either as long as the fighting continued. Before departing for the talks, Phumtham questioned Cambodia's sincerity in halting fighting as clashes continued into early Monday. The discussions were set to focus on ending the hostilities and maintaining Thailand's sovereignty, he told reporters. A NEWSLETTER FOR YOU Friday, 8.30 am Asean Business Business insights centering on South-east Asia's fast-growing economies. Sign Up Sign Up Thailand has insisted that any ceasefire must include troop withdrawals, an end to lethal force and an agreement to resolve conflict through bilateral mechanisms. Cambodia, by contrast, says it supports an unconditional end to hostilities. The current conflict traces its roots to long-standing disputes stemming from colonial-era maps and treaties that defined the two countries' boundaries. Relations had remained relatively stable since a 2011 clash that left dozens dead, but renewed tensions have triggered fears of escalated fighting. Trump threatened to block trade deals with both countries unless the violence stopped. 'We're not going to make a trade deal unless you settle the war,' Trump said on Sunday, adding that both leaders expressed willingness to negotiate after speaking with him directly. Secretary of State Marco Rubio said earlier that US officials are on the ground in Malaysia 'to assist these peace efforts.' China, the top trading partner for both South-east Asian nations and a major backer of Phnom Penh, is due to participate in the talks, the Cambodian leader said. 'Both President Trump and I remain engaged with our respective counterparts for each country and are monitoring the situation very closely,' Rubio said earlier in a statement. 'We want this conflict to end as soon as possible.' With Trump's Aug 1 tariff deadline looming, trade-reliant Thailand wants to avoid antagonizing the US president, especially as its officials have been holding talks to lower the steep 36% planned levy on its exports. Trump has claimed credit for helping halt border clashes earlier this year between India and Pakistan by leveraging trade measures. It's an assertion India has consistently denied but Pakistan has embraced. Thailand's trade talks with the US have included offering expanded access for American goods to narrow a US$46 billion trade surplus. Neighbouring Indonesia, the Philippines, and Vietnam have already secured trade deals with the US in recent weeks. 'President Trump's pressure tactic seems to be working as both the Thai and Cambodian governments are struggling economically,' said Tita Sanglee, associate fellow at the ISEAS-Yusof Ishak Institute in Singapore. 'Failure to lower Thailand's tariff rate will be politically costly.' But yielding to a ceasefire agreement when the Cambodian threat to take the territorial disputes to the International Court of Justice is still alive, won't likely be accepted by the Thai public or the military, she said. Cambodia has said it wants the court to help settle the disputed status of four border areas, after a skirmish broke out in May. Thailand doesn't recognise the court's jurisdiction. BLOOMBERG
