15 Ways Boomers Made Life Harder For Their Adult Children
They came of age in a world with pensions, affordable homes, and job stability. But many Baby Boomers made personal and political choices that, intentionally or not, left their adult children struggling to clean up the aftermath. From outdated financial habits to clinging tightly to control, these decisions ripple through Gen X, Millennials, and even Gen Z in ways few openly acknowledge.
If you're wondering why adulthood feels more chaotic and less secure than it should, these 15 surprising choices might explain more than you think.
Many Boomers hold onto large homes long after the kids move out, not for practicality—but for pride or nostalgia. That refusal clogs up the housing market, especially in cities where younger generations can't afford starter homes. It creates scarcity and inflates prices for everyone else.
This impacts not just affordability, but also wealth-building. When older generations refuse to pass the baton—or the property—everyone else gets stuck renting or moving away. Housing hoarding isn't just inconvenient; it's economically disruptive.
Boomers often say, 'You'll get your help when I'm gone,' as if delayed inheritance is a meaningful solution. But many adult kids are drowning in debt or raising families now, when financial relief would actually matter. It's a mindset rooted in legacy, not reality.
This withholding often comes with control—help is dangled but rarely given freely. And by the time it arrives, it's often too late to shift life trajectories. The gesture lands as symbolic rather than life-changing.
Despite benefiting from robust public programs, many Boomers vote for politicians who cut them for future generations. They got affordable education and accessible healthcare, but resist taxes that would extend those rights forward. It's political short-sightedness disguised as fiscal responsibility.
The result? Their children face higher tuition, thinner healthcare coverage, and a retirement landscape stripped of stability. The ladder got pulled up the moment they made it to the roof.
As noted by Newsweek, Boomers often carry the belief that mental health struggles are a private failure, not a legitimate issue. That stigma gets passed down, making it harder for their kids to seek help, name their trauma, or set emotional boundaries. It turns vulnerability into something shameful.
This avoidance leads to generational silence, repressed emotions, and unresolved family wounds. Emotional neglect can be just as damaging as any overt abuse—and it gets replicated until someone breaks the cycle.
Many Boomers never taught their kids about credit scores, debt, or how to negotiate a salary. Instead, they kept money hush-hush, treating it like a taboo or source of shame. That silence left their kids unprepared for a wildly different economy.
According to Investopedia, Millennials and Gen Z cite financial illiteracy as a major hurdle—and many trace it back to their upbringing. A lack of guidance doesn't teach independence—it breeds anxiety. Financial secrecy isn't protection; it's a disservice.
Boomers often view nonstop work as a virtue and equate exhaustion with success. But that mindset pushes their kids into cycles of overwork without rest, recognition, or fulfillment. The message is: if you're tired, you're doing it right.
This leads to chronic burnout, disconnection, and health consequences younger generations now face en masse. Hustle isn't inherently noble—especially when it masks emotional avoidance or status anxiety. Boomers handed down the grind, but not the safety net.
Many Boomers stayed in unhappy marriages 'for the kids,' but that choice often created emotionally chaotic childhoods. Or they divorced and refused to talk about it, leaving their kids confused and unsupported. Either way, silence bred shame.
According to Psychology Today, unresolved divorce trauma in childhood can lead to trust issues and intimacy struggles in adulthood. When parents pretend everything's fine, their children absorb the dysfunction instead of learning how to name it. Emotional honesty was not their strong suit.
They don't want to learn how Venmo works, but they'll criticize younger people for 'being on their phones too much.' This refusal to engage with modern tools becomes a burden their adult kids have to carry—handling everything from tech setup to online medical forms. It's digital learned helplessness.
Tech illiteracy today doesn't just mean inconvenience—it means dependence. It also reinforces harmful stereotypes about generational superiority. You can't reject the future while demanding full respect from it.
Many Boomer households were built on strict gender dynamics that were rarely questioned. That blueprint shaped how their kids now see emotional labor, household responsibilities, and career ambition. And even when the kids try to break the pattern, the expectations linger.
Younger generations inherit more than just values—they inherit default roles. And unlearning them often causes friction with the very people who taught them. It's not rebellion—it's liberation.
Boomers often assume they have automatic rights to their grandkids' lives—but balk at respecting parenting boundaries. They question decisions, ignore sleep schedules, and demand access without emotional accountability. That entitlement creates tension instead of trust.
It's rooted in generational ideas of family hierarchy and control. But modern parenting requires collaboration, not dominance. Respect isn't automatic—it's reciprocal.
Boomers hold on to decades' worth of furniture, paperwork, and 'heirlooms' no one asked for. Then they expect their kids to sort through it all when they're gone. It's a time bomb disguised as tradition.
What they call legacy often feels like guilt. Adult children are left emotionally overwhelmed and physically burdened by what they didn't choose. Love shouldn't come with a storage unit.
They avoid tough conversations about wills, care needs, or end-of-life planning—leaving their children to make impossible decisions during moments of crisis. It's not just emotional avoidance—it's logistical negligence. Love without preparation isn't protection.
When aging Boomers deny their mortality, their kids become caretakers without consent or clarity. It robs everyone of dignity. Planning ahead is an act of compassion, not defeat.
Boomers often scoff at therapy but still rely heavily on their kids for emotional unloading. They skip the hard inner work, then expect endless validation. This dynamic drains younger generations emotionally and creates one-way relationships.
Without boundaries, this becomes emotional parentification. The roles reverse, and adult kids become therapists. Healing can't happen when accountability is always outsourced.
'Because I said so' was their favorite mantra—and it still echoes today. Boomers often expect unconditional respect based solely on age, not behavior. But younger generations value authenticity and emotional intelligence over hierarchy.
This clash creates communication breakdowns that are often framed as 'entitlement.' But questioning power isn't rebellion—it's evolution. And real respect comes from mutual understanding, not fear.
They pine for a golden age of simplicity, hard work, and patriotism—but often forget the systemic privileges that made it possible. This nostalgia becomes weaponized when they dismiss today's struggles as 'whining.' It creates a wall of emotional invalidation.
By denying how much the world has changed, Boomers lose empathy for their own children's realities. Generational connection starts with truth—not selective memory. Romanticizing the past is easy when you benefited from it.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Newsweek
an hour ago
- Newsweek
Man Takes Labrador Puppy Out for Socialization—But There's Just One Problem
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Socialization is an important step in dog training, but one owner's idea for socializing didn't quite turn out as expected. Socializing a puppy during the dog's first few months helps set them up for success. It exposes them to different sights, sounds, smells, people and other animals. Those with inadequate socialization early in life often develop behavioral problems, Newsweek previously reported. Owners often bring their puppies with them to restaurants and stores for socializing, which is what TikTok user @jimmy_thelab did with his black Labrador puppy named Jimmy. He placed Jimmy in the shopping cart as he strolled down the aisles of the hardware store. The hope was that Jimmy took in the views, sights and sounds from around the store, but instead, Jimmy only looked at his owner. The pup didn't care about anyone else around. He kept his focus right on the owner, staring up at him with the big, bright puppy-dog eyes. Impossible to ignore that precious face, the owner stopped pushing the cart and reached his hand out to pet Jimmy's face. The pup happily accepted the love, as it was the only thing he wanted since being brought into the store. "He's honestly so chill," the owner told Newsweek via TikTok. "He has a look around at the start, but most of the time he just wants to be close to us. It's so sweet it melts me." This owner's method of socialization has taken Jimmy to other locations, including several trips to the pet store, a photo studio for a photo shoot and visits with Grandma. And yet, with all that exposure, the pup still can't lose sight of his owner. Screenshots from a June 10 TikTok video of a black Lab puppy staring at his owner while at the store. Screenshots from a June 10 TikTok video of a black Lab puppy staring at his owner while at the store. @jimmy_thelab/TikTok Viewer Reactions People instantly fell in love with Jimmy, as his eyes pulled on their heartstrings, and within two days, the TikTok video reached over half a million views and 133,000 likes. "You're his safe place. That's why he's looking at you," commented a viewer, while another echoed: "He's looking at his world." Commenting on what the pup was thinking, someone wrote: "Yeah, this place is cool and all, but you're way cooler." A fourth person asked: "How did you get any shopping done? I would've been crashing into things left and right. My focus would be on the goodest boy." But the owner did confirm he was crashing into everything. Do you have funny and adorable videos or pictures of your pet you want to share? Send them to life@ with some details about your best friend, and they could appear in our Pet of the Week lineup.


Newsweek
4 hours ago
- Newsweek
Air India Flight 171 Crash: Veteran Pilots on What Could Have Gone Wrong
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. The fiery crash of Air India Flight 171, a Boeing 787 Dreamliner carrying 242 people, shortly after takeoff from Ahmedabad airport in western India has stunned aviation experts and ignited scrutiny over possible mechanical or procedural causes with an aircraft known for its advanced technology and safety record. At least 290 people are believed dead in the crash, which marks the first fatal incident involving a Boeing 787 aircraft since the model entered service in 2011. There is one known survivor. Why It Matters Air India said the flight bound for London Gatwick Airport was carrying 242 passengers and crew, with 169 Indians, 53 Britons, seven Portuguese and one Canadian aboard. The Boeing 787-8 crashed into a residential area called Meghani Nagar five minutes after taking off at 1:38 p.m. This is the first crash of a Dreamliner, according to the Aviation Safety Network database. The Dreamliner is widely considered the "crown jewel" of Boeing's beleaguered commercial fleet, with more than 1,000 in service today. Boeing said it was "working to gather more information." The tail of Air India 171 sticks out of a building after it crashed in India's northwestern city of Ahmedabad in Gujarat state, Thursday, June 12, 2025. The tail of Air India 171 sticks out of a building after it crashed in India's northwestern city of Ahmedabad in Gujarat state, Thursday, June 12, 2025. associated press What To Know The jet barely reached 625 feet in altitude before descending rapidly and crashing into a nearby medical building. The disaster, which unfolded in clear weather conditions, raises significant questions about the aircraft's configuration, the airline's procedures, and the potential for unforeseen failure modes in one of the world's most advanced commercial jets. While the official investigation is still underway, early video and expert reviews have pointed to a few main theories. Dan Bubb, a longtime pilot and now airline historian at the University of Nevada - Las Vegas, told Newsweek what might have gone wrong. Flap Misconfiguration or Malfunction Multiple aviation analysts believe the aircraft's wing flaps were not correctly deployed at the time of takeoff. The flaps, which are essential for creating lift at low speeds, appeared to remain retracted, based on early video analysis. "It looked like the jet struggled to maintain lift," said Bubb in an interview with Newsweek. "Some pilots have speculated that the flaps may not have been set to the takeoff position. Historically, there have been crashes when flaps weren't properly configured." Alastair Rosenschein, a former British Airways pilot, told Sky News the footage suggested the flaps were not extended, and "the aircraft would not have been able to maintain flight" under those conditions. He also noted the landing gear remained down, further impairing the aircraft's aerodynamics. Captain Summeet Sabharwal, who was commanding the flight, had more than 8,200 hours of flying experience. Experts say that level of experience makes it less likely the flaps or gear configuration were overlooked due to a procedural mistake, but do not rule such catastrophic pilot error out entirely. "It may not have been set properly. If that is the case, that is definitely human error," said Bubb emphasizing that flap settings are a crucial part of the pre-takeoff checklist. "That's why pilots use checklists and double verification to ensure flap settings are correct before takeoff. It's an essential safety step, especially on heavy planes like the Dreamliner." People stand around debris at the site of an airplane that crashed in India's northwestern city of Ahmedabad in Gujarat state, Thursday, June 12, 2025. People stand around debris at the site of an airplane that crashed in India's northwestern city of Ahmedabad in Gujarat state, Thursday, June 12, 2025. AP Photo/Ajit Solanki Bird Strike and Double Engine Failure The theory that a bird strike caused a dual engine failure has also gained traction. The aircraft crashed shortly after liftoff, a critical portion of flight when bird activity near airports can pose serious risks. "Bird strikes can be very challenging," Bubb said. "Especially if an engine ingests birds and fails, as happened in the [2009] US Airways Hudson River landing." Dr. Jason Knight, a lecturer at the University of Portsmouth, told Sky that the most likely cause of a double engine failure at low altitude would be a bird strike. "Because the altitude was so low, the pilot would have had very little time to do an emergency landing," he said. Saurabh Bhatnagar, another former pilot speaking to NDTV in India, said the aircraft appeared to lose power "short of taking the gear up," which can happen "only in case the engine loses power or the aircraft stops developing lift." Ahmedabad airport is known for its bird strike hazard. According to The Telegraph, it had the second-highest number of reported bird strikes in India in 2023, despite operating significantly fewer flights than major hubs like Indira Gandhi International Airport in Delhi. Landing Gear Remained Deployed A recurring point in expert analysis is the plane's failure to retract its landing gear. Typically, pilots raise the gear within seconds of a positive rate of climb. In this case, the gear was still extended when the aircraft went down. "There are two things that are needed for an aircraft take-off. One is adequate airspeed and the other one is a rate of climb," said Paul Edwards, aviation security analyst and fellow at the Royal Aeronautical Society, in an interview with Sky. "And that had neither." Ahmedabad: Firefighting team at the spot after an Air India plane crashed moments after taking off from the Ahmedabad airport, Thursday, June 12, 2025. (PTI via AP) Ahmedabad: Firefighting team at the spot after an Air India plane crashed moments after taking off from the Ahmedabad airport, Thursday, June 12, 2025. (PTI via AP) AP "It could have been he [the pilot] just didn't have time, or it could be that perhaps he thought he could control it, go round again and land or even land straight ahead," Edwards added. "So that remains, if you like, a mystery." Dan Bubb explained that gear retraction and flap extension are both critical for lift and speed. "If the flaps malfunctioned, or if the pilot was unaware they hadn't extended, it becomes very difficult to control the aircraft safely," he said. Runway Length and Heat Radar data reviewed by Newsweek indicates the pilots may also not have used the full length of the runway. On a hot day in Ahmedabad, where temperatures reached 40°C (104°F), a heavy aircraft requires more distance to reach liftoff speed due to reduced air density. "If a plane tries to lift off too early without enough speed or lift, it could crash into a nearby obstacle or fail to get airborne," said Bubb. Unverified data suggests Flight 171 may have used as little as 1,900 meters of runway, below the 2,500 meters generally recommended under those conditions. Bubb acknowledged the challenge: "The Dreamliner is a heavy jet, used for long international flights, carrying many passengers and fuel, so it can struggle if something's off." Mechanical Failure and Boeing's Role The crash has renewed scrutiny on Boeing, which has faced multiple safety controversies in recent years. While the 787 has a strong safety record, it is also a highly complex aircraft reliant on computerized systems and advanced materials. A policeman and medics transfer bodies of victims onto an ambulance after Air India Flight 171 crashed in a residential area near the airport in Ahmedabad on June 12, 2025. A policeman and medics transfer bodies of victims onto an ambulance after Air India Flight 171 crashed in a residential area near the airport in Ahmedabad on June 12, 2025. SAM PANTHAKY/AFP via Getty "The SOS indicates something definitely went wrong," Bubb said. "If there was a mechanical defect, responsibility may extend beyond Boeing because airlines are responsible for maintaining their planes. Investigators will look closely at Air India's maintenance records." Robert A. Clifford, founder and senior partner of Clifford Law Offices in Chicago and lead counsel in the Boeing 737 MAX8 crash in Ethiopia, also weighed in. "Review of available video and eyewitness information indicate some form of power or flight control loss," Clifford told Newsweek in a statement. "The Indian government investigators should have flight data recorder and cockpit voice recorder information within a couple of days that will provide vital information to try to get to the bottom of this deadly tragedy." What Happens Next Air India's chairman, Natarajan Chandrasekaran, said that at the moment "our primary focus is on supporting all the affected people and their families." One of the two "black box" flight recorders has been recovered, while investigators are still searching for the other. No data from the recovered recorder has yet been shared.


Newsweek
7 hours ago
- Newsweek
Is Feminism Losing With Young Men? Large Majority Say Men Should Be on Top
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Young men are rejecting the ideals of feminism, according to a new report from the Movember Institute of Men's Health. In a survey of more than 3,000 men aged 16 to 25, the vast majority held beliefs centered around traditional gender roles. Roughly 77 percent said men should hold leadership positions, and 83 percent agreed that men should be providers, sparking questions about how men and women will continue to build relationships with each other in the modern age. Why It Matters While traditional gender roles have been the standard for years, more women are outpacing men when it comes to higher education, and economic necessity is no longer driving marriages. In 1995, young men and women were equally likely to hold a bachelor's degree at 25 percent each, according to Pew Research. As of last year, however, 47 percent of U.S. women ages 25 to 34 have a bachelor's degree, while only 37 percent of men did. These shifting dynamics have raised questions about the roles of men and women in the workforce, as well as in their homes and relationships, but young men appear to be holding onto traditional values despite falling behind economically. A 14-year-old boy looks at a iPhone screen on May 26, 2025 in Penzance, England. A 14-year-old boy looks at a iPhone screen on May 26, 2025 in Penzance, To Know The majority of young men believe men should be the ones in leadership positions and acting as providers, but they also have concerns over men displaying emotions. Roughly 77 percent in the survey said men who can't control their emotions are a threat to others, and 61 percent believed men should solve problems alone. However, all of these beliefs were much more common among young men who follow male influencers than among non-followers. The relationship between young men and feminism has shifted notably in recent years, with evidence suggesting increasing skepticism and ambivalence among Gen Z males. Researchers and educators have observed a pronounced gender divide on issues of equality and identity, reflecting broader social trends and political polarization. Surveys indicate that fewer young men today identify as feminists compared to young women and previous generations of men. Underlying this divide are perceptions that the advancements of feminism have not resolved, or may even have exacerbated, the challenges faced by boys and young men. Roughly 60 percent of all young men in the U.S. engage with mainstream masculinity influencers and content, which potentially leads to warped ideas of men and women and their own roles when it comes to masculinity. The "manosphere" notably includes social media influencers who often promote anti-feminist and misogynistic rhetoric. These communities can draw in young men who feel alienated or marginalized, providing them with a sense of identity and validation for grievances centered around romantic rejection, economic difficulty, and social isolation. Social media algorithms have amplified the reach of these spaces, making exposure to extreme ideological content more frequent and forming a part of young men's digital environments. Other polling from the Survey Center on American Life shows just 43 percent of Gen Z men identify as feminists compared to 61 percent of Gen Z women. This divide is compounded by the fact that nearly half of Gen Z men now say they face discrimination for being male, up significantly from previous years. In the Movember survey, young men, many of whom followed these types of male influencers, had high rates of worthlessness (26 percent), nervousness (27 percent) and sadness (27 percent). They were also likely to have negative views toward women, with 70 percent saying women "have it easier" than men and roughly 50 percent saying feminism is used to "keep men down." Repeating a typical manosphere influencer rhetoric, 31 percent of young men in the U.S. said, "High-value men get more matches." "This is a wake-up call," said Dr. Zac Seidler, Global Director of Men's Health Research at Movember, in the report. "We can't ignore the role online content plays in shaping how young men see themselves, others, and the world. They deserve to be part of the solution—not just the subject of the debate." What People Are Saying Brian Heilman, Senior Research Fellow at Movember, said in the report: "Young men are telling us they want clear, approachable conversations about what it means to be a man today. We need to have the courage to meet them where they are, engage in those conversations, and help them build healthy and sociable aspirations for their lives." Hallie Kritsas, a licensed mental health counselor with Thriveworks, told Newsweek: "Young men are rejecting feminism because of confusion, fear, and how they may feel threatened due to cultural implications if women want partnership versus something like patriarchy. Further, men are told both explicitly and subtly that being vulnerable or feminine makes them weak or less masculine. This can all lead to things like anxiety, depression, and relationship issues." What Happens Next The polarization around feminism and the growing influence of online anti-feminist circles have had tangible effects on relationships, political alignment, and discourse within schools and universities. "If men continue to reject this equality, we can assume that there will be more division," Kritsas said. "The hope is that men continue to lean into things like therapy and emotionally balanced relationships. And that we can normalize emotional depth and equality within relationships."