China is exhibiting ‘end-of-regime conduct,' expert warns of ‘perplexing' behavior
'At a time when China needs friends because it's not selling goods to the US, it is going out of its way to antagonize not just the Philippines, not just Taiwan, but also South Korea and Australia,' Chang, a senior fellow with the Gatestone Institute, said on 'Mornings with Maria' Monday.
Advertisement
'This shows that… this is end-of-regime conduct, because Xi Jinping, he can't appear to be giving in to the US,' he added.
On Friday, President Donald Trump told reporters from the White House lawn that he's spoken to Jinping 'many times' now, before responding to a question about what exactly the two leaders discussed: 'I'll let you know at the appropriate time. Let's see if we can make a deal.'
Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi said Friday that Beijing backs international rules when it comes to tariffs imposed by Trump and that the US levies show 'extreme egoism.'
5 Chinese President Xi Jinping speaks during an international meeting at The Great Hall of the People in Beijing on March 28, 2025.
Getty Images
Advertisement
5 President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping walk away from each other after their meeting at the G20 leaders summit in Osaka, Japan on June 29, 2019.
REUTERS
He explained that China would look for solidarity with other countries regarding the tariffs, noting that Beijing would uphold multilateralism to 'inject stability into the world.'
Beijing has publicly denied any ongoing negotiations with the Trump administration to bring down America's 145% tariff and China's 125% tariff.
'[Jinping] has configured the Chinese political system so that it is hostile. And also, because he's been making the claim that China has surpassed the US, he can't look dependent on trade with the US,' Chang explained. 'And he certainly can't look like he's talking to the US under pressure.'
Advertisement
'This is really very perplexing behavior, and it shows that something is very, very wrong in Beijing right now.'
5 Chinese honor guards march during the ceremonial welcome for Kenya's president in Beijing on April 24, 2025.
POOL/AFP via Getty Images
5 Chinese coast guard officers hold up a Chinese flag on a sandbar in Sandy Cay in April 2025.
CCTV
A recent report from Reuters claimed China's Ministry of Commerce taskforce is collecting lists of items that could be exempted from tariffs, from electronic goods to essentials, and is asking companies to submit their own requests.
Advertisement
Chang argues that China's regime under Jinping cannot admit it's not able to stand up to Washington.
'China, without any announcements, is not collecting tariffs on important goods. So for instance, some semiconductors, aviation products, industrial chemicals, medical devices, some medicines,' he listed.
5 Gatestone Institute senior fellow Gordon Chang speaks with Fox Business during an interview.
Fox Business
'This is going to expand,' Chang predicted. 'It means that China has made an important concession. But it's not saying it's making a concession, which is a fascinating insight into the Chinese political system right now, which has become both intransigent and inflexible.'
FOX Business' Landon Mion contributed to this report.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
15 minutes ago
- The Hill
China may have more engineers, but it still lacks a culture of innovation
China announced last month a $100 billion push into artificial intelligence, intensifying what is already a fierce race for global tech dominance. Policymakers in Washington are watching with concern, and rightly so. China graduates more than 1.38 million engineers each year, about seven times more than does the U.S. The numbers sound alarming and suggest we're falling behind. But that's not the full story. While engineering degrees are critical, they don't guarantee technological leadership. What really drives innovation is not how many people you train, but how you train them. And here, China faces a deeper, cultural problem that raw output can't solve. The Chinese education system is highly structured and built for scale. But it's also rigid, top-down and deeply rooted in deference to authority. In most classrooms, memorization takes precedence over questioning and the teacher's word is rarely challenged. Correcting a professor's mistake could cause them to 'lose face,' a cultural breach that most students won't risk. This environment produces excellent test-takers but not risk-takers. It produces technical workers who are strong on facts but weak on critical thinking. They can follow a formula, but they struggle to break new ground. This is a key reason China, despite its massive engineering workforce, has yet to deliver the kind of world-changing breakthroughs we've seen from the U.S., from the microprocessor to the iPhone to mRNA vaccines. These innovations didn't come from rote learning. They came from interdisciplinary research, unorthodox thinking and cultures that reward questioning everything. Even when it comes to research output, China's surge in published papers masks a more complex reality. While China now leads the world in scientific publishing volume, scholars like Ming Xia have pointed out that much of this work lacks the originality, rigor and theoretical depth typical of Western scholarship. Plagiarism and fabrication remain persistent problems, even at top institutions. At Tsinghua University, one professor felt compelled to reassure students that if they wrote something publishable, he wouldn't steal it and submit it under his own name. The root issue is systemic. Many Chinese academics were trained in the same system they now uphold, one that prizes metrics and obedience over ideas and inquiry. As a result, scholarship often becomes descriptive, not theoretical. It explains what exists but rarely asks why it matters or how to build something new from it. Contrast that with American higher education. Our universities aren't perfect — they can be chaotic, expensive and uneven, but they're designed to cultivate thinkers, not just technicians. Students are encouraged to disagree with their professors, to explore across disciplines and to challenge the conventional wisdom. The freedom to question isn't a side effect of our system. It's the whole point. Yes, China has closed gaps in recent years by acquiring Western technology through joint ventures, forced transfers and even cyber espionage. But copying isn't creating. Without a culture that fosters original thought, China may scale existing tech but it won't lead the next wave of innovation. That doesn't mean the U.S. can relax. We need to double down on what works, investing in universities, supporting fundamental research and attracting the best minds from around the world. At the same time, we must protect critical technologies and intellectual property from exploitation. Still, we should remember what gives America an edge: a culture that values curiosity, dissent and the freedom to think differently. That's the foundation of every breakthrough we've ever made. In the long run, engineering dominance isn't just about how many degrees a country prints. It's about whether those engineers are trained to challenge the status quo and imagine something better. If the U.S. keeps leaning into its strengths of diversity, openness and academic freedom, we won't just keep pace with China. We will continue to lead.
Time Magazine
16 minutes ago
- Time Magazine
Russia Makes Battlefield Advance Ahead of Trump-Putin Summit
Russian troops have advanced deeper into eastern Ukraine in a surprise attack ahead of upcoming ceasefire negotiations between U.S. President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin. Russian forces moved at least six miles deeper north into the Donetsk region of eastern Ukraine by Tuesday, according to Reuters. The move by Russia appeared designed to give it leverage over Kyiv in any potential land swap agreements in the upcoming peace talks in Alaska this week. 'We see that the Russian army is not preparing to end the war. On the contrary, they are making movements that indicate preparations for new offensive operations,' Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky said on Tuesday. The Russian military appeared to be moving near Dobropillia, a coal mining town, and is launching efforts to approach Kostyantynivka and Pokrovsk. Ukraine's military said on Tuesday that it had sent in reserves to block advances by small groups of Russian troops and was engaged in 'difficult' combat. Speaking last week ahead of his talks with Putin, Trump said that an eventual peace deal would likely include 'some swapping of territories to the betterment of both.' Putin has long called for Ukraine to give up territory captured by the Russian military in eastern Ukraine, including Crimea. Zelensky has fiercely rejected the idea of handing over Ukrainian territory to Russia, which is reportedly seeking to take over the eastern Donbas region and Crimea, the latter of which was illegally annexed by Russia more than a decade ago. 'Ukrainians will not gift their land to the occupier,' Zelensky said in response to Trump's suggestion of land swaps. European leaders have stood firmly by the Ukrainian president, criticizing the Trump Administration for facilitating negotiations without the presence of Ukraine and for considering granting Putin's demand for more land. 'We remain committed to the principle that international borders must not be changed by force,' a statement released on Saturday and signed by the leaders of France, Italy, the U.K., Germany, Poland, and Finland read. The White House is reportedly considering inviting Zelensky to the summit, though plans have not been finalized. The White House did not respond to TIME's request for comment about the matter on Monday. Trump vowed to help negotiate a peace deal between the Kremlin and Kyiv within the first 24 hours of his second presidential term, though he has faltered as Russian troops continue to launch strikes against Ukraine. Putin and Trump's Friday meeting in Alaska marks the first time the sitting presidents of Russia and the U.S. have met since 2021, and the first time these two in particular have met since 2019.
CNBC
19 minutes ago
- CNBC
No stock in history has had more influence over the S&P 500 than Nvidia. What could go wrong?
The boom in artificial intelligence since late 2022 has made Nvidia's market value the largest in the S & P 500. But some on Wall Street are skeptical now that its dominance will continue. Nvidia's market capitalization — its stock price multiplied by the number of shares outstanding — ended Monday at roughly $4.5 trillion, equal to about 8% of the S & P 500. That's the "biggest weight in the S & P 500 of any individual stock," in data going back to 1981 , according to Apollo Global Management's chief economist, Torsten Slok. This comes on the heels of Nvidia shares seeing massive gains, having soared 239% in 2023, more than 171% in 2024 and 36% in 2025, through Monday's close. In the past three months alone, as the market fought its way back from April's brief tariff despair, Nvidia is 56% higher. Nearly nine out of every 10 analysts who cover Jensen Huang's company on Wall Street rate it a buy, and Nvidia now sells for 59 times its trailing 12-month earnings, according to FactSet data. "There's a reason the stock is up here, which is Nvidia continues to provide most of the most critical equipment for AI and the demand for AI usage," said D.A. Davidson analyst Gil Luria, one of the more bearish voices on Nvidia. "So, inferencing continues to rise as the models become ever so potent." NVDA 3M mountain NVDA, 3-month But there are two areas that could go wrong for Nvidia, according to Luria, who rates Nvidia a neutral and whose $135 price target implies that the stock will slide about 26% over the next year. One red flag is China. "The back and forth between the U.S. government, the Chinese government and Nvidia is a risk to a very big part of Nvidia's market," Luria continued. "They only report low-double-digit sales into China. It's safe to assume that a lot of their other sales are indirectly to China, either to Chinese companies domiciled otherwise, or sales to resellers that ultimately arrive in China. So, it's a big part of their sales that is at risk from either further action by [the] U.S. or by further restrictions from China." This past weekend, the Financial Times reported that Nvidia and Advanced Micro Devices both agreed to give the U.S. government 15% share of revenues from chips sold in China in exchange for export licenses. Wells Fargo said Nvidia can grow more than 20% as a result of the agreement, which Luria described as uncertain at the same time as it "probably bodes well for their ability to sell the B30 [chips] either later this year or at some point next year. " Beyond the lack of clarity surrounding Nvidia's presence in the Chinese market, another bottleneck also poses a threat to the company's breakneck growth. "What most of their big customers are now talking about is that the chips aren't the bottleneck – it's the ability to have a data center on the power grid with HVAC equipment ready for chips that's holding them back," Luria added. That has already started to affect the company, the D.A. Davidson analyst pointed out. "The growth in electricity usage by data centers is so significant that we're going to start running into power limitations and electricity limitations. So, Nvidia's ability to grow may start being gated by factors that are out of their control," he added. Peter Boockvar, chief investment officer at One Point BFG Wealth Partners, told CNBC that, as the market leader, Nvidia may eventually face another challenge as a result of the AI boom: increasing competition. For instance, Amazon Web Services has been making efforts to rival Nvidia when it comes to AI infrastructure , saying earlier this year that it's looking to reduce training costs associated with AI and provide an alternative to Nvidia's GPUs. "While they are riding an incredible and massive CapEx spending wave on the GenAI model [and] data center buildout, selling semis is still a very competitive and cyclical business," Boockvar said. "Nvidia's around 75% gross [profit] margin is not a long-term sustainable level, especially as their current biggest customers are all looking to be eventual competitors."
