Factory to open in Plymouth building underwater gliders which use AI technology
The government says it will create high-value jobs and establish the city as a national centre for marine autonomy.
Helsing's Plymouth facility at Langage will serve as an advanced manufacturing centre and also function as a national hub for developing underwater defence.
They will be building SG-1 Fathom autonomous underwater gliders which are AI-powered systems designed for maritime surveillance and to help protect critical subsea infrastructure.
Rebecca Smith MP said: "This is brilliant news for Plymouth and the wider South Hams area. Helsing's decision to open the UK's first Resilience Factory, within the Plymouth and South Devon Freeport at Langage, will bring high-quality jobs, investment, and innovation to our community, securing Plymouth's position at the forefront of defence technology and marine autonomy.
'This is a real vote of confidence in our region's skills, capabilities and strategic importance. I will continue to champion this kind of investment that strengthens both our local economy and the UK's national resilience."
Fred Thomas, MP for Plymouth Moor View, said: 'I'm really excited by this announcement today, having supported conversations between Helsing and Plymouth City Council, and constantly lobbying the government to do more around marine autonomy.
'I said that Plymouth becoming the new national centre of marine autonomy was fantastic news for our city, and this news proves exactly how. It means investment and it means jobs, and they are coming this year.
'We have so many incredible businesses in this industry already, but the more investment we can attract from others the better.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
2 hours ago
- Reuters
Sunny Mining Launches Next-Generation AI Cloud Mining Platform
MANCHESTER, United Kingdom, August 16, 2025 (EZ Newswire) -- Sunny Mining, opens new tab today launched a new artificial intelligence-powered cloud mining platform designed to deliver a one-stop crypto mining experience requiring zero equipment or maintenance. The platform combines intelligent computing power scheduling with green energy systems, allowing users to begin mining bitcoin (BTC) and dogecoin (DOGE) with a single click after registering. Earnings are settled automatically each day. Founded in 2019 and headquartered in Manchester, Sunny Mining serves customers in 195 countries and currently contributes more than 383,000 PH/s of computing power globally. The platform uses AI-driven power allocation and operates entirely on renewable energy. Key Features of the Upgrade Flexible Mining Plans Sunny Mining offers multiple contract options: All plans provide real-time income forecasts and support daily automatic settlements and one-click withdrawal. How to Start Mining Free Trial Offer New users receive a $15 trial bonus, enabling them to activate mining plans at no cost. The promotion allows customers to test Sunny Mining's mining process and profit system risk-free before committing funds. Why Mining Matters Crypto mining secures blockchain networks and issues new coins, but traditional mining requires significant investment and technical knowledge. Sunny Mining simplifies the process through cloud computing, AI technology and robust security protocols, helping users earn sustainable daily crypto income with transparency. Looking Ahead Sunny Mining said it remains committed to innovation and user experience, and will continue enhancing mining efficiency while expanding safe, eco-friendly crypto-asset growth options worldwide. To experience Sunny Mining's new AI cloud mining platform and begin earning BTC and DOGE today, visit or download the Sunny Mining app at About Sunny Mining Sunny Mining is a cutting-edge intelligent cloud mining platform based in Manchester, England. We specialize in providing safe, convenient and eco-friendly cryptocurrency mining services to users worldwide. By leveraging AI computing power and green energy sources, Sunny Mining eliminates the need for personal mining hardware and lowers the barriers to entry for cryptocurrency enthusiasts and environmental advocates alike. Join our growing community and start your smart cloud mining journey with us today. For more information, visit opens new tab. Disclaimer The information provided in this press release is not a solicitation for investment, nor is it intended as investment advice, financial advice, or trading advice. Cryptocurrency mining and staking involve risk. There is potential for loss of funds. It is strongly recommended you practice due diligence, including consultation with a professional financial advisor, before investing in or trading cryptocurrency and securities. Media Contact Sunny Mininginfo@ ### SOURCE: Sunny Mining Copyright 2025 EZ Newswire See release on EZ Newswire
Daily Mail
8 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Aussies reach out for support to deal with new workplace issue
Workers are calling for support to adapt to the adoption of artificial intelligence, with most saying they have not been offered training despite its increasing use. The Australian Services Union says surveyed white-collar workers are willing to adapt to using the technology but have been left with little guidance on how to navigate the change. More than 80 per cent of workers reported not having been offered any AI training or consultation on its use at work, despite almost 50 per cent of workplaces introducing these tools. Less than 35 per cent of workplaces have a formal policy guiding the technology's use, according to the research findings. The union's national secretary Emeline Gaske says artificial intelligence offers huge productivity opportunities to drive new jobs but the benefits need to extend beyond company profits. 'Unions can't resist AI anymore than we could've resisted the internet,' Ms Gaske said. 'But it must come with an industry adjustment package that starts with workforce training.' The call for more support and consultation comes ahead of a productivity roundtable in Canberra from Tuesday, with AI likely to be extensively discussed. The three-day summit, led by Treasurer Jim Chalmers and other ministers, will focus on boosting productivity in the economy, building resilience and strengthening the budget. It could lead to investigating the use of AI to streamline environmental measures and boost housing approvals, according to reported Treasury advice leaked to ABC News. More than 30,000 vocational education teachers could be trained to use AI under a recently announced year-long trial involving US tech giant Microsoft and Australia's Future Skills Organisation. The organisation has similarly noted the rate of white-collar workers using AI is more than double the rate of those who have been trained to do so. Ms Gaske says workers need to share in the benefits of AI, such as through shorter working weeks to give workers time back from productivity improvements, and has called for further consultation. 'We have a willing and capable workforce but they need to be brought into the conversation,' she said. 'By investing in training, guaranteeing workers a say, and ensuring the gains are shared, we can boost productivity and improve the quality of jobs right across the economy.' One surveyed worker reported widespread fear of the technology. 'But if the right guidelines are in place I think it could be very useful,' they said.
The Guardian
9 hours ago
- The Guardian
We are gen Z – and AI is our future. Will that be good or bad?
Sumaiya Motara Freelance journalist based in Preston, where she works in broadcasting and local democracy reporting An older family member recently showed me a video on Facebook. I pressed play and saw Donald Trump accusing India of violating the ceasefire agreement with Pakistan. If it weren't so out of character, I would have been fooled too. After cross-referencing the video with news sources, it became clear to me that Trump had been a victim of AI false imaging. I explained this but my family member refused to believe me, insisting that it was real because it looked real. If I hadn't been there to dissuade them, they would have forwarded it to 30 people. On another occasion, a video surfaced on my TikTok homepage. It showed male migrants climbing off a boat, vlogging their arrival in the UK. 'This dangerous journey, we survived it,' says one. 'Now to the five-star Marriott hotel.' This video racked up almost 380,000 views in one month. The 22 videos posted from 9 to 13 June on this account, named migrantvlog, showed these men thanking Labour for 'free' buffets, feeling 'blessed' after being given £2,000 e-bikes for Deliveroo deliveries and burning the union flag. Even if a man's arm didn't disappear midway through a video or a plate vanish into thin air, I could tell the content was AI-generated because of the blurred background and strange, simulation-like characters. But could the thousands of other people watching? Unfortunately, it seemed not many of them could. Racist and anti-immigration posts dominated the comment section. I worry about this blurring of fact and fiction, and I see this unchecked capability of AI as incredibly dangerous. The Online Safety Act focuses on state-sponsored disinformation. But what happens when ordinary people spread videos like wildfire, believing them to be true? Last summer's riots were fuelled by inflammatory AI visuals, with only sources such as Full Fact working to cut through the noise. I fear for less media-literate people who succumb to AI-generated falsehoods, and the heat this adds to the pan. Rukanah Mogra Leicester-based journalist working in sports media and digital communications with Harborough Town FC The first time I dared use AI in my work, it was to help with a match report. I was on a tight deadline, tired, and my opening paragraph wasn't working. I fed some notes into an AI tool, and surprisingly it suggested a headline and intro that actually clicked. It saved me time and got me unstuck – a relief when the clock was ticking. But AI isn't a magic wand. It can clean up clunky sentences and help cut down wordiness but it can't chase sources, capture atmosphere or know when a story needs to shift direction. Those instinctive calls are still up to me. What's made AI especially useful is that it feels like a judgment-free editor. As a young freelance journalist, I don't always have access to regular editorial support. Sharing an early draft with a real-life editor can feel exposing, especially when you're still finding your voice. But ChatGPT doesn't judge. It lets me experiment, refine awkward phrasing and build confidence before I hit send. That said, I'm cautious. In journalism it's easy to lean on tools that promise speed. But if AI starts shaping how stories are told – or worse, which stories are told – we risk losing the creativity, challenge and friction that make reporting meaningful. For now AI is an assistant. But it's still up to us to set the direction. Author's note: I wrote the initial draft for the above piece myself, drawing on real experiences and my personal views. Then I used ChatGPT to help tighten the flow, suggest clearer phrasing and polish the style. I prompted the AI with requests such as: 'Rewrite this in a natural, eloquent Guardian-style voice.' While AI gave me useful suggestions and saved time, the core ideas, voice and structure remain mine. Frances Briggs Manchester-based science website editor AI is powerful. It's an impressive technological advancement and I'd be burying my head in the sand if I believed otherwise. But I'm worried. I'm worried my job won't exist in five years and I'm worried about its environmental impact. Attempting to understand the actual impact of AI is difficult; the key players are keeping their statistics close to their chests. What I can see is that things are pretty bad. A recent research paper has spat out some ugly numbers. (It joins other papers that reveal a similar story.) The team considered just one case study: OpenAI's ChatGPT-4o model. Its annual energy consumption is about the same as that of 35,000 residential households. That's approximately 450,000 KWh-1. Or 325 universities. Or 50 US inpatient hospitals. That's not all. There's also the cooling of these supercomputer's super-processors. Social media is swarming with terrifying numbers about the data-processing centres that power AI, and they're not far off. It takes approximately 2,500 Olympic-sized swimming pools of water to cool ChatGPT-4o's processing units, according to the latest estimates. AI agents such as the free products Perplexity or Claude don't actually seem to be consuming that much electricity. At most, the total global energy consumed yearly by AI is still less than 1%. But at the same time, data-processing centres in Ireland consumed 22% of the total electricity used by the whole country last year, more than urban housing. For context, there are 80 data-processing centres in Ireland. At present, there are more than 6,000 data-processing centres in the US alone. With the almost exponential uptake in AI since 2018, these numbers are likely to be completely different within a year. In spite of all these scary statistics, I have to hope that things are not as worrying as they seem. Researchers are already working to meet demands as they explore more effective, economic processing units using nanoscale materials and more. And when you compare the first language-learning models from seven years ago to those created today, they have iterated well beyond their previous inefficiencies. Energy-hungry processing centres will get less greedy – experts are just trying to figure out how. Saranka Maheswaran London-based student who pursues journalism alongside her studies 'You need to get out there, meet lots of people, and date, date, date!' is the cliche I hear most often when speaking to people about being in my 20s. After a few questionable dates and lots of juicy gossip sessions with friends, a new fear emerged. What if they're using AI to message me? Overly formal responses, or conversation starters that sounded just a bit too perfect, were what first made me question messages I'd received. I am not completely against AI, and don't think opposing it entirely is going to stop its development. But I do fear for our ability to make genuine connections with people. Pre-existing insecurities about how you speak, write or present yourself make a generation with AI to hand an easy prey. It may begin with a simple prompt, asking ChatGPT to make a message sound more friendly, but it can also grow into a menacing relationship in which you become reliant on the technology and lose confidence in your own voice. The 2025 iteration of the annual Singles in America study, produced in collaboration with the Kinsey Institute at Indiana University, found that one in four singles in the US have used AI in dating. Perhaps I am over cynical. But to those who are not so sure of how their personalities are coming across when dating or how they may be perceived in a message, they should have faith that if it is meant to be it will be – and if AI has a little too much say in how you communicate, you may just lose yourself. Iman Khan Final-year student at the University of Cambridge, specialising in social anthropology The advancement of AI in education has made me question the idea of any claimed impartiality or neutrality of knowledge. The age of AI brings with it the need to scrutinise any information that comes our way. This is truer than ever in our universities, where teaching and learning are increasingly assisted by AI. We cannot now isolate AI from education, but we must be ready to scrutinise the mechanisms and narratives that underpin the technology itself and shape its use. One of my first encounters with AI in education was a request to ChatGPT to suggest reading resources for my course. I had assumed that the tool would play the role of an advanced search engine. But I quickly saw how ChatGPT's tendency to hallucinate – to present false or misleading information as fact – makes it both a producer and disseminator of information, true or false. I originally saw this as only a small barrier to the great possibilities of AI, not least because I knew it would improve over time. However, it has also become increasingly clear to me that ChatGPT, Gemini and other AI chatbots contribute to the spread of false information. AI has rendered the relationship between humans and technology precarious. There is research to be done on the potential implications of AI for all the social sciences. We need to investigate how it is integrated into how we learn and how we live. I'd like to be involved in researching how we adapt to AI's role as not only a tool but as an active and contributing participant in society. Nimrah Tariq London-based graduate specialising in architecture In my first years at university, we were discouraged from utilising AI for our architecture essays and models, only using it to proofread our work. However, in my final year, it was introduced a lot more into our process for rendering and enhancing design work. Our studio tutor gave us a mini-seminar on how to create AI prompts so that we could have detailed descriptions to put into architectural websites such as Visoid. This allowed us to put any models or drawings that we created into an AI prompt, asking it to create a concept design that suited our proposal. It gave my original ideas more complexity and a wide range of designs to play around with. While this was useful during the conceptual phase of our work, if the prompts were not accurate the AI would fail to deliver, so we learned how to be more strategic. I specifically used it after rendering my work as a final touch to create seamless final images. During my first and second year, AI didn't have as much impact on the design process of my work; I mainly used existing buildings for design inspiration. However, AI introduced new forms of innovation, which accelerated the speed with which we can push the boundaries of our work. It also made the creative process more experimental, opening up a new way of designing and visualising. Now I have finished my degree, I'm intrigued to see how much more architecture can grow through using AI. Initially, I believed AI wasn't the most creative way to design; now, I see it as a tool to improve our designs. It cannot replace human creativity, but it can enhance it. Architectural practices always ask job applicants for skills in software that uses AI, and you can already see how it is being incorporated in designs and projects. It has always been important to keep up to date with the latest technological advancements in architecture – and AI has reaffirmed this. The panel was compiled by Sumaiya Motara and Saranka Maheswaran, interns on the Guardian's positive action scheme
