Breeze Airways flight diverts after 'unruly' passenger breaks restraints twice
Officers with Grand Junction police in Grand Junction, Colorado, about 244 miles west of Denver, responded to an incident at the Grand Junction Airport around 11 a.m. on Wednesday, Aug. 13, the department said in a Facebook post.
Upon arrival, officers found that an intoxicated 46-year-old passenger from Los Angeles, "became agitated" and yelled "racist slurs at airline staff" while aboard Breeze Airways Flight 704, which had left Norfolk, Virginia, around 9 a.m. on Aug. 13, according to information from local police and the FBI.
As flight attendants attempted to restrain the man while in the air, he managed to break free of the restraints twice, prompting an emergency landing at the airport, police said.
The passenger did not physically assault anyone on the aircraft, and no injuries were reported, according to police.
Neither the police department nor the FBI provided information about possible charges the man may face, but confirmed that the U.S. Attorney's Office would release further details regarding charges.
According to the Federal Aviation Administration, passengers who engage in unruly behavior can be sentenced to prison, fined up to $37,000 or be put on a no-fly list. In 2025, there have been over 1,000 cases of unruly passengers on board commercial planes, according to the FAA.
Following the incident, the passenger was taken into custody by the Grand Junction Police Department and transported to the Mesa County Detention Facility.
An investigation into the incident remains ongoing.
USA TODAY has emailed Breeze Airways for comment on Thursday, Aug. 14, but has not received a response.
Breeze Airways is a low-cost airline headquartered in Cottonwood Heights, Utah, and provides nonstop service between underserved routes at affordable rates, according to its website. The airline began operating commercially in 2021.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNBC
35 minutes ago
- CNBC
FBI Director Patel and foundation win defamation lawsuit against blogger, awarded $250,000
FBI Director Kash Patel and his foundation won a default judgment in their defamation lawsuit against a blogger who publicly accused Patel of being a "Kremlin asset," of trying to overthrow the U.S. government, and of planning the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol by supporters of President Donald Trump. Patel and the Kash Foundation were awarded a total of $250,000 in compensatory and punitive damages against the Substack blogger and podcaster Jim Stewartson in an order on Aug. 5 by Judge Andrew Gordon in U.S. District Court in Las Vegas. The order was first reported by the online news site Court Watch. Gordon issued the default judgment favor of the longtime Trump loyalist Patel after Stewartson did not respond in court filings to the lawsuit, which cited a series of social media posts and other comments by Stewartson. Patel had sought $10 million in damages on claims of defamation, injurious falsehood and business disparagement. The judge said punitive damages were warranted in the case "in part to deter Stewartson and others from engaging in defamation." "Factual criticism of, and opinions about, public figures are protected speech and must be tolerated," Gordon wrote. "But defamatory falsehoods made with actual malice are not protected, even if directed at public officials. "The complaint and the motion adequately demonstrate Stewartson acted with malice." Stewartson told CNBC in a text message on Friday, "I was never served with this lawsuit. I just found out about the judgement from trolls on Twitter last week." He said that Patel's lawsuit, and another pending defamation complaint against him by former Trump national security advisor Michael Flynn in Florida state court, are "intended to intimidate me because I have been accurately and diligently reporting on Patel and Flynn's involvement in the QAnon movement and their participation on January 6th for five years." "It is a preposterous, frivolous lawsuit and neither of them will receive a dime," Stewartson said. "In fact, I intend to pursue my own case against them for their years-long campaign of abuse of me and the legal system." The FBI said that Patel would have no comment on the decision. CNBC has requested comment from his lawyers. Patel's attorneys said in a court filing in March that after filing the suit in June 2023, Stewartson for months "dodged" accepting service of the complaint, which, as a rule, is required for a civil case to proceed. The attorneys said they finally completed service of the lawsuit in late October 2023, when a person at Stewartson's home in California accepted a copy of the complaint. Gordon wrote in his order that he "found good cause to grant" a request for the default from Patel's lawyers. But Gordon also said that the motion by Patel's lawyers "offers scant evidence of harm or damages to either plaintiff." He noted that an expert's report "states that Mr. Patel's 'image has been deeply hurt by the defamation accusing him of working against the government, corruption, and crime. Apart from the business already lost, this impacts future opportunities and relationships.'" "But the report offers no examples of 'business already lost' and how Mr. Patel's image was hurt by the defamatory statements themselves, as opposed to the myriad non-defamatory attacks Mr. Patel has suffered as a result of being a public figure," Gordon wrote. "To the contrary, after the defamatory statements, Mr. Patel was confirmed by the United States Senate as Director of the F.B.I." the judge wrote. "Clearly his reputation was not significantly sullied by the defamatory statements." Gordon said there was "almost no concrete evidence of harm or damages suffered by" Patel's foundation. "All of the defamatory statements were directed at Mr. Patel individually," the judge noted. But Gordon said that both compensatory and punitive damages were warranted in the case. "Stewartson's statements were defamatory and caused presumed damages," the judge wrote. "Falsely stating as fact that a public figure 'attempted to overthrow the government,' planned the January 6 insurrection, was a 'Kremlin asset,' and paid people to 'lie to [C]ongress' ... inflicts real injuries, personally and professionally," the judge wrote. The judge awarded Patel $100,000 in compensatory damages and the same amount in punitive damages. He awarded the foundation $25,000 in compensatory damages, and the same amount in punitive damages after accepting as a reasonable estimate a claim that at least seven donors had stopped giving to the group.
USA Today
2 hours ago
- USA Today
NCAA confirms Connor Stalions disguised, scouted MSU-CMU game in 2023
It is now official, Connor Stalions dressed up as a Central Michigan staffer for a game against Michigan State in 2023. The long believed disguised Stalions on the Chippewas' sidelines during a game against Michigan State was confirmed by the NCAA on Friday. The NCAA revealed their findings and punishment for the Michigan "sign stealing" investigation on Friday, with the note on the Stalions-Chippewas piece being included in the report. According to a post from Chris Vannini of The Athletic, the NCAA confirmed Stalions did attend the Michigan State-Central Michigan game on the Chippewas' sideline. Stalions was there to "in part to decipher Michigan State's signals, but also to help a Central Michigan staff member with play calling." This game between the Spartans and Chippewas took place as the season-opener for the 2023 season. Michigan State beat Central Michigan in the contest by the final score of 31-7. It was always believed that Stalions was in disguise for that game when his picture circulated social media. But now, we have official confirmation of that foul play occurring. Michigan State football is next set to play Central Michigan in 2027. It'll be interesting to see if this investigation will at all change that agreement or if things will simply just go away with this chapter in a weird story now closed. Contact/Follow us @The SpartansWire on X (formerly Twitter) and like our page on Facebook to follow ongoing coverage of Michigan State news, notes and opinion. You can also follow Robert Bondy on X @RobertBondy5.
NBC News
2 hours ago
- NBC News
Chicago man fatally shot while streaming on Facebook Live
A Chicago man was fatally shot as he was streaming on Facebook Live, his family says. Kevin Watson, 42, was in a parking lot in the 5000 block of West Madison in the South Austin on Wednesday when a vehicle approached after 6 p.m. and a person inside "produced a handgun and fired shots," the Chicago Police Department said. The Cook County Medical Examiner confirmed the victim's identity to ABC7 Chicago. Watson had been sitting in his car and started a Facebook Live moments before the shooting happened. The chilling footage has since racked up over 2.5 million views. About 11 minutes into the clip, he was seen reacting to someone passing near the front of his car. 'What's up bro?' he said, while putting his hands up in the air. 'What's up?' he said, again visibly shaken. Watson said 'Hell no' as he scrambled out of the car, and out of the camera's view. Someone was heard yelling outside followed by a gunshot and then the sound of a vehicle speeding away. Shortly after, a man was heard screaming 'Hey Tugg! Call the police!' and other voices were heard clamoring before police arrived. Watson was hit in the chest and transported to Mt. Sinai Hospital, where he was pronounced dead. The shooting is under investigation and no one is in custody, police said. Watson's sister, Shamika Watson, said she believes he was targeted for his chain necklace that said "Tugg" — his nickname. She told NBC News on Friday that she was with her brother just an hour before the shooting unfolded. After they parted ways Shamika Watson ran errands then returned to Madison Street, where her brother was known to hang out. She said she noticed a lot of cars in the parking lot where he usually was found, but ended up riding past the commotion. After she got home, she started to get calls from people on Facebook telling her to return to Madison Street because something happened to her brother while he was on Facebook Live. By the time she arrived, her brother was already in an ambulance. 'I saw red and yellow tape up and I knew automatically it wasn't nothing good,' Shamika said. The family gathered at Mount Sinai hospital where they spoke with homicide detectives and doctors told the family that he passed away. 'They had told us, we're sorry, we brought him back. They said he came to them dead on arrival, but somehow they brought him back but he lost so much blood, he just went,' Shamika said. She remembered her brother as her 'best friend,' a loving father to a 7-year-old son, and part of a close-knit family. 'He was outgoing. He loved to dress, was very outspoken, definitely a good father, uncle, brother. He was loved by so many people all over the world,' she recalled. He was well known in clubs and in the community, and he liked doing the Facebook lives to talk about his life and previously did a podcast, Shamika said. She believes her brother was targeted by someone he knew. 'My brother trusted too many people. In the video, that was bought to my attention by a couple of friends, he even said after they shot him, he said 'they backdoored me,' meaning the people in his crowd did it to him,' Shamika said. 'My brother kept himself up he loved to dress, he loved to look nice and a lot of people hated on him for that,' she continued. 'He had a nice car, and jewelry, so there was a lot of hate.' She said the 'Tugg' chain was off Watson's body and was found on the ground at the scene. It was taken by police because it had blood and fingerprints on it, she said. The family is asking for any witnesses to report what they saw to police. 'I just want the killer to be caught. Turn yourself in because we're not going to quit. That's our brother. We lost our mom back in '95, our dad is sick in a nursing home, and we're not going to stop for our brother,' Shamika said. 'We're just hoping that everybody does the right thing, because if it was their loved one laying on that ground, then they would want someone to come forward.'
