Market-based lifestyle has reduced relationships to mere transactions: RSS leader Hosabale
Mumbai, The e-commerce and market-driven lifestyle are weakening social bonds and altering the fundamentals of human relationships, Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh general secretary Dattatreya Hosabale has claimed. Market-based lifestyle has reduced relationships to mere transactions: RSS leader Hosabale
India has never been a land of rigid ideologies which obstruct independent thinking. "Bharat has never lived just for itself, it has always existed for the well-being of the world," Hosabale said on Tuesday.
He was speaking at a discussion here on the book 'Integral Humanism: A Distinct Paradigm of Development' by Ashok Modak, published by the Indian Council of Social Science Research.
"A market-based, government-oriented life is damaging for society. E-commerce is a glaring example. It has reduced relationships to mere transactions," the RSS leader said.
Explaining his concerns, Hosabale said, "If I want to get Modak's book in a village in Tamil Nadu, I can easily order it online. It seems convenient. I pay and they deliver. But is it really that simple?"
"Traditional marketplaces were rooted in long-standing relationships. A farmer would borrow from a trader who knew him and his family for years. Will Amazon ever understand or replicate that kind of trust? It is faceless. We are slowly losing the essence of such human connections," he said.
In the United States, "society has practically disappeared", Hosabale claimed, adding only individuals and the state are left in that country.
"This model of a welfare government and a market-centric life is not sustainable for a healthy society," the RSS leader added.
He also raised concerns about the modern world's approach to nature and lifestyle.
"We can not live without electricity, but we must think about how to generate it efficiently and integrate it into our lives in a way that respects the environment," Hosabale said.
Education should focus on imparting values and not just information, he said, adding that "new knowledge must be created to build a cohesive society."
Referring to Modak's arguments in the book, Hosabale said, "The western world view revolves around individual rights, survival of the fittest and exploitation of nature. But we discuss a different approach, one based on compassion, concern and compatibility. A human being is part of society, and society cannot exist without nature."
He also lauded Bhutan's 'Gross National Happiness model' as an alternative vision to economic indices. "Human and societal well-being are complementary. Both cannot exist without nature," he said.
"A society cannot live in the past alone. People may draw lessons and inspiration from history, but they must also look ahead to the future and live fully in the present. Bharat has never lived just for itself, it has always existed for the well-being of the world," he said.
About the notion that India has failed to produce ideologues in recent centuries, the RSS leader said, "We do not accept this claim made by the West. The western civilisation, particularly in Europe, has been the cradle of ideologies like communism, capitalism and feminism. In contrast, Bharat has contributed philosophy."
An ideology is a closed system which can not be changed, Hosabale said, adding that it comes in the way of independent thinking.
"Bharat's contribution lies in philosophy, which offers light and guidance but encourages each person to find their own path. Buddha, Mahavir and Swami Vivekananda were not ideologues, they were philosophers. Bharat has never been a land of rigid ideologies," he said.
This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Print
21 minutes ago
- The Print
Rajnath, Shivraj & Javadekar. How jail term during Emergency shaped leaders of today's BJP
Caught in that net were men linked to the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh and the Bharatiya Jana Sangh, the ideological predecessor of the now-Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP). At the time, many of them spent months, some well over a year, in jail. A few were students, whereas others were rising leaders. All carried the imprint of that period long after their release. On 25 June 1975, then-Prime Minister Indira Gandhi imposed the Emergency, followed by the detention of voices across the political spectrum without any trials. The Maintenance of Internal Security Act (MISA) became an instrument of control, granting the State sweeping powers to arrest and detain citizens without charges. New Delhi: It began with late-night arrests, blank editorial pages, and police vans stationed outside the homes of opposition leaders. Half a century later, some remain active in government and party roles. Others serve as governors or are on the margins of public life. Their recollection of jail, censorship, and resistance forms a crucial part of the institutional memory of the BJP and its claim to an anti-authoritarian legacy. Many of those arrested five decades ago now occupy some of the highest offices. Others have stepped aside, but their stories continue to echo in party narratives and commemorative events. As the Emergency completes 50 years, ThePrint revisits some of the then-jailed leaders, who, since then, have contributed to shaping the BJP, and how the experience of the Emergency years has stayed with them. L.K. Advani L.K. Advani, one of the most senior leaders arrested during the Emergency, spent over 19 months in Bengaluru Central Jail. A central figure in the Jan Sangh, he would later describe the Emergency as a moment when democratic values were under test, remembering who stood firm. Now 97 and retired, Advani remains a symbolic figure within the BJP, his jail term during the Emergency still referenced in party literature and public events. Also Read: BJP committed to RSS ideology, can't forget the mother who gave birth, says Nitin Gadkari Rajnath Singh In 1975, Rajnath Singh, a 24-year-old physics lecturer in Mirzapur and Akhil Bharatiya Vidyarthi Parishad (ABVP) organiser, was arrested under MISA. He spent 18 months in jail—a period he has repeatedly described as a defining chapter in his political and personal life. The arrest deeply affected his family. Rajnath Singh's mother, already unwell, suffered a brain haemorrhage after learning the Emergency would be extended and her son would remain in jail. She was hospitalised for nearly a month and eventually passed away. Rajnath Singh could not attend the funeral. Denied parole, he was in prison when his brothers performed the last rites. The only ritual he was allowed to perform inside the jail was shaving his head. Later, Rajnath Singh was granted parole on unrelated grounds but used the time to campaign against the Emergency. His activities led to his immediate re-arrest, even before the parole period had ended. Reflecting on the ordeal, Rajnath Singh says he 'witnessed firsthand what a real dictatorship looks like'. The Emergency was a time of suspension of civil liberties, jailing of opposition leaders en masse, and wielding power without accountability, he argues. On X, Rajnath Singh's post on the Emergency reads: 'Fifty years ago, a despicable attempt tried to strangle Indian democracy through the Emergency… The manner of imposition, ignoring the Constitution, is a great example of misuse of power and dictatorship … Today, democracy is alive in India. For this, all those who struggled, went to jail, and suffered torture during the Emergency have made a huge contribution.' Now-Minister of Defence Rajnath Singh invokes the Emergency not as history but as memory, or his lived experience that forged his conviction in the constitutional order and the long struggle needed to preserve it. Bandaru Dattatreya In Hyderabad, Bandaru Dattatreya was active in the RSS and ABVP when detained under MISA. He would spend 19 months in jail. In later interviews, he has spoken about the personal cost of those days—how his mother faced social isolation but told him to stay the course. Dattatreya, now Governor of Haryana, continues to describe the Emergency as a turning point in his political awakening. Murli Manohar Joshi Then-physicist and Jan Sangh leader Murli Manohar Joshi was arrested in Uttar Pradesh. For Joshi, the Emergency was not only a political rupture but also a philosophical one—it confirmed that Indian democracy needed stronger cultural and ideological foundations. He later served as Union Minister for Human Resource Development and remains a respected voice in the Sangh Parivar. Prakash Javadekar A young ABVP worker from Pune, Prakash Javadekar's experiences from the Emergency years include hearing about media censorship from his journalist father, going to jail with hardened criminals, and starting a handwritten weekly, called Nirbhay (Fearless), inside the prison with the inmates. He was jailed for 16 months under MISA. Javadekar, who later held key Union portfolios, often describes his jail time as 'personally transformative'. He also calls the Emergency a 'murder of democracy' and says Congress has never truly apologised for it. During his imprisonment, he underwent open heart surgery in a government hospital. 'But after that, I did not get parole … On 15 August 1976, I was back in jail. That was the cruelty they showed to all,' he tells ThePrint. Explaining how the weekly was received in jail, he says, 'We used to write 20 pages … it would be a wallpaper-like thing, and we used to put it on all the walls of the different barracks. People used to rush and read everything.' Moreover, he says his father, a journalist, witnessed firsthand how the government machinery crushed press freedom: 'He came and said: 'Now, the police officer has come into the office, and unless he gives clearance, we cannot print any news.' That was the worst press … never had the press been muzzled like that,' Javadekar explains. Ravi Shankar Prasad A young law student in Patna, Ravi Shankar Prasad, came from a family steeped in Jan Sangh politics. Arrested under MISA during student protests, he spent several months in detention. Those years would later inform his career as a lawyer and legislator. He went on to become the Union law minister and remains an active MP. Also Read: Modi govt's selective embrace of RSS ideologue Deendayal Upadhyaya's ideology in policymaking Shivraj Singh Chouhan At just 17, Shivraj Singh Chouhan attended high school when the Emergency turned him from a student to a political detainee. Aligned with the JP movement, he was arrested in April 1976 after police barged into his rented room in Bhopal. Shivraj was physically assaulted, accused of circulating protest leaflets, and threatened with torture. Handcuffed, he was brought before a magistrate who remanded him without substantial evidence. Shivraj spent over nine months in jail, missing his Class 11 board exams. While in jail, he witnessed fellow detainees endure brutal punishments, medical neglect, and chilling disciplinary tactics. One inmate died after being denied timely care. Shivraj's grandmother passed away during this period, but he was not allowed to attend her funeral. Shivraj has described the period as a formative awakening to the fragility of rights and the dangers of unchecked power. He would go on to serve four terms as chief minister of Madhya Pradesh and now holds a Union Cabinet post. Vijay Goel Vijay Goel, a Delhi University student and ABVP organiser, when Indira Gandhi declared the Emergency, was arrested for staging protests and distributing anti-regime leaflets. Jailed under MISA, Goel later became a Union minister and two-time MP. He describes the Emergency as his political baptism that shaped his beliefs and public life. Vinay Sahasrabuddhe As a student in Pune, Vinay Sahasrabuddhe participated in protests during the Emergency, and soon, police arrested him along with 16 others. He spent 45 days in jail after refusing to pay a fine for defying prohibitory orders. During this period, he says, he engaged in deep political dialogue, including with inmates of different ideologies, such as the Communists, and began to see democracy as something earned, not granted. Speaking to ThePrint, Sahasrabuddhe, who later became a Rajya Sabha MP and policy scholar, says, 'There was a constant feeling that we were under watch. When we offered satyagraha, the women police gave us enough time to talk before arresting us. Jail time made us realise that democracy is not a gift—it has to be fought for and protected.' 'Black Day' For the BJP, the Emergency is not just a historical event but part of its founding mythology as the party continues to mark 25 June as a 'black day', honouring those imprisoned and using the period as a reference point to target the Congress. 'The BJP has always remained at the forefront of protecting the Constitution and democracy. As the former Jan Sangh, we saw our leaders jailed—Nanaji Deshmukh, Ravi Shankar Prasad, Arun Jaitley, Rajnath Singh ji, and even Prime Minister Modi—all faced repression during the Emergency,' says BJP's national spokesperson Guru Prakash Paswan. 'We will always be present wherever the Constitution is under threat.' (Edited by Madhurita Goswami) Also Read: BJP made big promises in Delhi on disability rights. Now comes the real test
The Wire
24 minutes ago
- The Wire
The Emergency's True Legacy: How JP's Naivety Empowered the RSS
Fifty years ago, on June 25, 1975, when the Emergency was promulgated, Natwar Singh, a self-appointed Principal Acolyte of the Nehru-Gandhi clan, was India's deputy high commissioner in London. Indira Gandhi's decision to experiment with an authoritarian format left him (and many other liberal souls) flummoxed, and, consequently he sought answers from H.Y. Sharada Prasad, information adviser in the PMO and a born wise man. Natwar Singh lamented that while he could deal competently with India's traditional critics in Britain, he was at a loss when it came to responding to the numerous admirers of Jawaharlal Nehru and Indira Gandhi who could not understand the turn India had taken towards a soft Prasad must have had a ringside view of the developments that led to the June 25 denouement. He took nearly a month before responding, on July 20, gently telling Natwar Singh to make a distinction between 'the minutiae' and 'the essence.' And, as Sharada Prasad most clear-sightedly noted, the essence was that Jayaprakash Narayan's crusade against the government had crossed a red-line when he, wittingly or unwittingly, allowed Nanaji Deshmukh of the RSS to take over as commanding officer of the 'movement.'Sharada Prasad concluded his letter to Natwar Singh with a penetrating observation: '.. the entire operation was necessary to save our political structure. When we speak of our political structure or aims, the leftists speak only of socialism, the Anglo-US-European liberals only of pluralistic democracy, neither group gives much importance to secularism. Secularism is the base of Indian democracy. The cardinal mistake of JP and company was to hand over the controls to RSS and no man in his senses can ever say that an RSS-led opposition front can preserve a system based upon religious tolerance and equality.'How years later, the sarsanghchalak, Mohan Bhagwat, enjoys Z-plus security cover. He is allowed to do his pravachans in Vigyan Bhavan, and otherwise is serenaded as the second most powerful person in the country. Thanks to JP, the RSS, the very organisation that created the eco-system for Nathuram Ghose to fire those fatal shots at the Mahatma, has worked its way to a 'respectable' place in our national imagination. Not just respect, it now has clout, patronage and veto power in our national historian doing an audit 50 years later of this sage of the Emergency era is obliged to ask: how could a man like JP, so learned and so well steeped in an understanding of global forces and ideas battling it out on the boulevards in Europe, fail to foresee how his 'total revolution' cookie would crumble? He had no foot-soldiers, no cavalry, no artillery of his own, no tank divisions; he mistook a motley crowd of various 'vahinis' that had staged tableaus of streets protests and chaos in Patna and Ahmedabad as the vanguard of a revolution. The only outfit that had disciplined cadres was the RSS, and, inevitably, it acquired an operational stranglehold on the 'movement.'Not only did Jayaprakash Narayan choose to be oblivious of history abroad, he even jettisoned his own understanding of the Indian realities and the nature of the RSS's spots. He insisted that he had tried to 'decommunalise them by allowing them to join our movement for total revolution. Any impartial observer would agree that this has been a significant contribution of this movement to the ideal of religious tolerance or secularism as it is called. I have thus tried to strengthen the foundation of secularism by bringing Jana Sangh and the RSS into the secular fold of total revolution.' Those clever men in Nagpur have not since stopped laughing at the saint's touching naiveté.Even though Indira Gandhi and her Emergency were disposed of by the voters in the 1977 Lok Sabha polls, a lasting consequence was that the Janata crowd had developed a soft corner for the RSS. A trenchant critic like Madhu Limaye thought that the 'coming together of a large number of RSS workers and other supporters of the JP movement under the roof of Mrs. Indira Gandhi's jails had promoted better understanding among the RSS cadres and other people.' But when Limaye and others tried to bring the RSS and other pro-JP organizations under one roof, Nagpur's response was a resounding 'no deal.' The Jana Sangh segment of the Janata Party never surrendered its separate identity, its own allegiance and its mysterious loyalty to the RSS, even if this meant the premature collapse of the Morarji Desai government and the return to power of is no secret that Janata Party warlords found Jayaprakash Narayan utterly dispensable the moment they entered their ministerial offices atop Raisina Hill. And when the inevitable squabbles began and JP tried to instil some sense among the factional bosses, Prime Minister Morarji Desai ticked him off for wanting to poke his nose in the Janata Party's internal matters. So much for JP's moral authority. The prophet was without a country, doomed to be biggest loser in the Emergency the other hand, the RSS, has continued to build on its JP-induced respectability and can draw satisfaction at the distance the 'Hindutva' crowd has come. Its frontal outfits, especially the Jana Sangh and now the BJP, continue to pretend to be inspired and guided by the saintly 'Jayaprakash ji' while putting in practices and protocols that constitute the very anti-thesis of what he stood for. JP would, no doubt, be horrified to see the Hindutva forces' strident march on our national has already dealt a rough hand to Indira Gandhi for embarking on a dangerous road 50 years ago; what she did during those dark days could be rolled back by the masses. History will deal an equally rough, if not rougher, hand to Jayaprakash Narayan for rehabilitating the RSS as a normal political force. Fifty years later, Indira Gandhi's excesses pale in comparison to JP's cardinal sin. The RSS is the only winner of that battle five decades Khare was editor of The Tribune.
NDTV
an hour ago
- NDTV
"Aim Was To Preserve Dynastic Rule": Amit Shah On Emergency
New Delhi: The Emergency, imposed 50 years ago, by a despotic ruler, whose sole aim was to preserve her dynastic rule, was one of the darkest chapters in India's history, Union Home Minister Amit Shah said on Wednesday. Mr. Shah said the Emergency was not a national necessity but a reflection of the anti-democratic mentality of the Congress and just "one person", a reference to then prime minister Indira Gandhi. The Indira Gandhi government imposed the Emergency on June 25, 1975. The Modi government observes this day as 'Samvidhan Hatya Diwas'. "Emergency, imposed 50 years ago, by a despotic ruler, whose sole aim was to preserve her dynastic rule, was one of the darkest chapters in India's history," the home minister posted on X. Emergency, imposed 50 years ago, by a despotic ruler, whose sole aim was to preserve her dynastic rule, was one of the darkest chapters in India's history. I was a Bal Swayamsevak of RSS then and heard firsthand the excesses and injustices during the dark days of Emergency. The… — Amit Shah (@AmitShah) June 25, 2025 Mr. Shah, who was just 11 years old in 1975, said he was a 'Bal Swayamsevak' of the RSS then and heard firsthand the excesses and injustices during the dark days of the Emergency. He said the memories of that time, though blurry, as he was very young then, the suppression, the torture, the blatant assault on democratic values were still vivid in his memories. "I take immense pride in having been associated with a movement that stood up against this tyranny, and with a leader who fearlessly raised his voice to protect Bharat's democracy and its Constitution," he said. Paying tributes to those who suffered after the imposition of Emergency by the Indira Gandhi government, Mr. Shah said the day reminds everyone that when those in power become dictatorial, the people have the power to overthrow them. The home minister said the Emergency was the "Age of Injustice of Congress's hunger for power". "This day tells us that when power becomes dictatorial, the people have the power to overthrow it," he said in another post on 'X' in Hindi. "The Emergency was not a national necessity, but a reflection of the "anti-democratic mentality" of the Congress and one person," the minister said. He said freedom of the press was crushed, the hands of the judiciary were tied and social workers were put in jail. "The countrymen raised the slogan of 'sinhasan khali karo' (vacate the throne) and uprooted the dictatorial Congress. A heartfelt tribute to all the heroes who sacrificed their lives in this struggle," he said. Last year, Mr. Shah had announced that the Modi government would observe June 25 as the 'Samvidhaan Hatya Diwas' to commemorate the "massive contributions" of those who endured "inhuman pain" during the period. He had also said the observance of 'Samvidhaan Hatya Diwas' will help keep the eternal flame of individual freedom and the defence of democracy alive in every Indian, thus preventing "dictatorial forces" like the Congress from "repeating those horrors". A gazette notification to this effect noted that the Emergency was declared on June 25, 1975, following which there was "gross abuse of power by the government of the day and people of India were subjected to excesses and atrocities".
