logo
How Rachel Reeves could rake in billions from another inheritance tax grab

How Rachel Reeves could rake in billions from another inheritance tax grab

Telegraph5 days ago
Britain's most hated tax could be turbo-charged as Rachel Reeves mulls a further death duty raid to plug a £50bn fiscal black hole.
The Chancellor has already announced that she will make private pension wealth subject to inheritance tax of 40pc and cut allowances for farmers and businesses.
Now the Treasury is considering a lifetime cap on the value of gifts that someone can pass on before they die in order to reduce their eventual inheritance tax bill.
The rate of taper relief – the tax discount you get for living at least three years after giving a gift – is also believed to be under review.
These aren't the only levers the Chancellor could pull. Here are all the ways Ms Reeves could squeeze more money out of taxpayers after they die.
Changing the seven-year rule
Current inheritance tax rules mean unlimited amounts of money and assets can be given as gifts to friends and relatives without paying any eventual inheritance tax, as long as the transfer happens at least seven years before the person giving the gift dies.
Official data shows that a rising number of people are being caught out by the seven-year rule and incurring a tax bill as a result.
The number of estates paying inheritance tax on gifts doubled from 590 in 2011-12 to 1,080 in 2021-22, the latest year for which data is available, according to HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC) figures. The amount of tax paid on these gifts rose from £101m to £221m over the same period.
Wealth managers have reported an increase in clients giving chunks of their wealth to family members amid fears the rule would be extended to 10 years or scrapped altogether in a renewed drive from the Chancellor to raise revenue.
Extending the seven-year rule would be one of the simplest ways for the Chancellor to target inheritances, according to Tom Selby of wealth management firm AJ Bell.
He said: 'If Rachel Reeves wants to target inheritances again, the simplest way to do this would be to either reduce inheritance tax thresholds or extend the 'seven-year rule' that applies to lifetime gifts.
'Given the freezing of inheritance tax thresholds will naturally raise more cash for the Exchequer over time through fiscal drag, a shift in gifting rules – for example, extending the period for lifetime gifts beyond which 0pc inheritance tax is due from seven years to 10 years – might be a viewed as a politically more palatable option.'
Extending the allowance freeze
Ms Reeves may also be tempted to raise revenue by extending the freeze to tax-free allowances.
The main inheritance tax exemption – the 'nil-rate band' – has been frozen at £325,000 since 2009.
This had been due to expire in April 2028, but Ms Reeves pushed the date back to April 2030 in her Budget last year. The allowance would have hit £555,000 by 2029-30 if it had risen with inflation.
The freeze has amounted to a stealth raid on inheritances, as rising asset prices mean more people being pushed past the tax-free threshold.
According to the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR), changes to inheritance tax announced at the Budget last year – including bringing pensions into the inheritance tax net and extending the freeze on the nil-rate band for a further two years – will add £2.5bn to death duty receipts by 2029-30.
Tinkering with tapering relief
A so-called taper tax rate of between 8pc and 32pc is applied to gifts given between seven and three years before death. Money given less than three years before is taxed at the full inheritance tax rate of 40pc.
However, the Treasury is reportedly considering changing taper relief in order to raise revenue.
Sarah Coles, of investment platform Hargreaves Lansdown, said that Labour would introduce a 'cliff-edge' into the system if it chose to scrap taper relief altogether.
She added: 'This would mean a risk of a heftier tax bill on the estate, which would mean they have less to pass on to their family after their death.
'It would introduce a cliff-edge to the system, so that someone who made a gift in good faith and died one day short of seven years would be hit with a huge tax bill.'
Introducing a lifetime cap
The amount of money that can be given to friends and relatives as a gift that is potentially free from inheritance tax is currently unlimited.
But Ms Reeves is considering limiting the lifetime value of gifts that can be passed on before death.
Ian Dyall, of wealth manager Evelyn Partners, said this would be 'very controversial' given the most common form of gifting is between spouses.
He added: 'Many households could regard this as a rather intrusive tactic when they just want to pass on hard-earned wealth that has usually already been taxed in some form or other to one's own family.'
Analysis by financial advisors, Quilter, shows that retirees are giving around £2,500 to loved ones each year, mostly to help with the cost of living and education.
A cap low enough to target these families could disproportionately impact Britain's middle classes, according to Rachel Griffin, of Quilter.
She added: 'Introducing a lifetime cap would be a significant departure from current policy. The UK has never had such a limit, and if it were set too low it could affect a large number of middle-class estates, particularly in areas where property wealth alone can easily breach frozen thresholds.
'Tracking a lifetime cap could prove administratively complex, requiring HMRC to hold long-term records of gifts across decades and potentially leading to disputes where records are incomplete.
'There is also the risk of unintended behavioural shifts. A cap might encourage people to make large gifts earlier in life to use up their allowance, potentially moving significant assets out of their control before they are financially ready.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Visa factory nation: How Australia's addiction to cheap migrant workers could be backfiring
Visa factory nation: How Australia's addiction to cheap migrant workers could be backfiring

Daily Mail​

time29 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Visa factory nation: How Australia's addiction to cheap migrant workers could be backfiring

Australia's productivity is going backwards, and economists say record low-skilled migration is to blame. A staggering 457,560 permanent and long-term migrants arrived in Australia last financial year, including international students often stuck in low-wage jobs such as Uber Eats delivery. The influx has swelled the labour pool and fuelled a productivity crisis, with output per worker now going backwards. MacroBusiness economist David Llewellyn-Smith says businesses are ditching technology because they can rely on cheaper migrant staff. 'Because you're importing cheap, foreign labour, most of it low-skilled, businesses tend to actually disinvest – they'd have no need to invest in automating processes when they're just getting cheaper labour all the time,' he told Daily Mail Australia. 'These days, it's hard to find an automated car wash because they've gone back to manual labour and now you pay a lot more to get less because you have cheap, foreign labour running car washes with people, so we've dis-automated. 'That's an analogy for you about many different things in the economy.' Productivity fell 1 per cent in the year to March, and the RBA has slashed its growth forecast to just 0.7 per cent a year for the next two years. That's a far cry from the 2.1 per cent annual surge during the internet boom of the 1990s and 2000s. While AI has the potential to boost productivity levels like the internet did, the Reserve Bank warned expensive software was discouraging businesses from investing in the new technology. Former Treasury secretary Ken Henry last month told the National Press Club in Canberra that poor productivity since the 2000s had cost Australian workers $500,000 in potential pay rises. But his successor as Treasury boss, Martin Parkinson, said productivity would be boosted if migrants with degrees could have their qualifications properly recognised in Australia. 'This is a political and economic no-brainer. Everyone here, citizen, resident or new migrant, should have the opportunity to contribute to their maximum ability.' Trade unions have traditionally been opposed to high immigration levels because the bigger supply of labour suppresses wages. But in a dramatic shift, ACTU assistant secretary Liam O'Brien said cutting red tape while keeping high standards would unlock a stronger future for the country. 'Tackling the unnecessary barriers to skills recognition while maintaining our existing high standards for skills will unlock a better future for all workers here in Australia.' The debate comes as Treasurer Jim Chalmers holds a three-day Economic Reform Roundtable this week at Parliament House in Canberra with business and union leaders - to try and address the nations falling productivity. 'I have realistic expectations about the next few days, but I'm optimistic as well,' he said. 'I'm optimistic that there is an appetite for reform, there is ambition when it comes to dealing with the three major challenges in our economy. 'Productivity, first of all, but also economic resilience and Budget sustainability as well. So, I'm realistic, but I'm optimistic that we can make some progress together. 'I don't believe that we will solve every challenge in our economy in three days.'

Brexit solution to UK economy misery shunned, Nicola Sturgeon in focus
Brexit solution to UK economy misery shunned, Nicola Sturgeon in focus

The Herald Scotland

time42 minutes ago

  • The Herald Scotland

Brexit solution to UK economy misery shunned, Nicola Sturgeon in focus

All sorts of potential moves have been floated in the media, with inheritance tax among the topics in focus last week. UK economic challenges have fuelled speculation that Labour will have to raise taxes and/or rein in spending to meet its fiscal rules, which are not that different from the strictures of the Tories. The National Institute of Economic and Social Research declared earlier this month: 'The Government is not on track to meet its 'stability rule', with our forecast suggesting a current deficit of £41.2 billion in the fiscal year 2029-30.' It remains somewhat baffling that Labour, given its lead in the polls ahead of the summer 2024 general election, felt it had to tie its hands so tightly with such fiscal rules. Surely the case could have been made for loosening the purse strings, to a sensible degree, and attempting to boost growth and thereby provide a fillip to tax revenues. Chancellor Rachel Reeves, writing in The Guardian last week, described the talk about tax increases as 'speculation'. She talked about the Labour Government's aim of boosting the productive capacity of the economy by allocating investment for infrastructure projects and reforming planning rules. Ms Reeves declared: 'If renewal is our mission and productivity is our challenge, then investment and reform are our tools.' It seems that 'productivity' is the buzzword of the moment. You hear it all over the corporate world, in myriad sectors, and on occasions it seems management of companies are trying to drive their measure of 'productivity' in ways which are counter-productive and lose sight of the bigger picture. At least the talk of infrastructure investment makes sense in the context of productivity. That said, when it comes to productivity, Labour might want to think about doing something meaningful to stop the Brexit damage if it wants to deliver a meaningful boost here. Sadly, its red lines of refusing to take the UK back into the European Union or single market mean that Ms Reeves and her Labour colleagues cannot take advantage of the huge economic benefits a return to the bloc would bring. Such a return would certainly ease the pressure on the public finances. Read more Office for Budget Responsibility chairman Richard Hughes said in spring 2023 of Brexit's effect: 'We think that in the long run it reduces our overall output by around 4% compared with had we remained in the EU.' Labour, however, continues to turn its back on the big win, for fear it seems of upsetting pro-Brexit types who polls show are diminishing in number. This becomes ever more frustrating as the UK economic misery continues, with no sign of anything that is going to provide a significant boost to growth or living standards. There was mixed news on the economy north of the Border last week in a closely watched survey. Scotland's private sector economy slipped back into reverse in July but was relatively resilient on the employment front in a UK context, according to the latest growth tracker survey from Royal Bank of Scotland. The survey showed a fall in the overall output of private sector services and manufacturing after two consecutive months of growth. Read more Scotland was placed 11th out of the 12 UK nations and regions in July in terms of the month on month change in its business activity. Seven English regions achieved rises in business activity, with London posting the strongest increase. The other five nations and regions covered by the survey saw declines. Scotland was second out of the 12 UK nations and regions in the employment league table behind Northern Ireland, which was the only one to see an overall rise in private sector staffing. The decline in employment in Scotland was slight compared with the falls recorded in the other 10 nations and regions of the UK to post drops in staffing. Meanwhile, the survey showed the first increase in outstanding business in Scotland for more than a year, something which was viewed by Royal Bank as a positive sign in terms of the employment outlook. Drops in outstanding business occurred in the other 11 nations and regions, which the bank declared was a "sign of underutilised capacity" across the rest of the UK. Nicola Sturgeon was firmly in focus last week in the wake of publication of her memoir, Frankly. There was much in the way of negativity about the former first minister in the reaction to the book, fuelled in large part by politicking and emotion it seemed. My column in The Herald on Friday observed: 'Perhaps the best overall assessment of Ms Sturgeon's time in charge is to be gleaned from examining the foreign direct investment numbers over the period in which she was first minister.' Ms Sturgeon was first minister from November 2014 to March 2023. The column noted that accountancy firm EY, publishing figures for 2024 earlier in the summer, highlighted the fact that Scotland has been second only to London in terms of the number of FDI projects won in every year since 2015. The column concluded: 'Those who would claim that Ms Sturgeon achieved nothing, or was somehow detrimental to business and the economy, should reflect on this, once the emotion subsides a bit.'

Judge restrains Beto O'Rourke's group from sending funds to Democrats outside Texas
Judge restrains Beto O'Rourke's group from sending funds to Democrats outside Texas

The Guardian

time3 hours ago

  • The Guardian

Judge restrains Beto O'Rourke's group from sending funds to Democrats outside Texas

A Texas judge has expanded a restraining order against former congressman Beto O'Rourke and his political organization over its fundraising for Democratic state lawmakers who left Texas to prevent a legislative session on congressional redistricting. Tarrant county judge Megan Fahey, a member of the conservative Federalist Society and past president of the Fort Worth Republican Women's Club, said in a four-page order published on Saturday that O'Rourke and his political group, Powered by People, are barred from sending money out of Texas. Fahey found that 'harm is imminent to the State, and if the Court does not issue this order, the State will be irreparably injured' because 'defendants' fundraising conduct constitutes false, misleading, or deceptive acts under the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices Act'. Fahey said that financial institutions and political fundraising platforms, including ActBlue, the main online platform for Democrats, are 'immediately restrained from removing any property or funds that belong to, or are being held for', O'Rourke or Powered by People 'from the State of Texas'. The order came in response to a complaint from Ken Paxton, the far-right Republican attorney general who is seeking to unseat Republican senator John Cornyn, and also attempting to revoke the charter of O'Rourke's group. On Saturday, O'Rourke said his group had donated more than $1m to Texas Democrats since the start of the redistricting session prompted their out-of-state walk-out. He said the group received 'more than 55,000 donations' and the money benefited the Texas legislative Black caucus, the Texas house Democratic caucus, and the Mexican American legislative caucus. Many Texas Democrats have been in Chicago under the protective wing of governor JB Pritzker since early August, each accruing fines of $500 a-day for failing to attend a session called by the Republican Texas governor, Greg Abbott, that would probably add five seats to the Republican slate in Congress after next year's midterm elections. California's governor, Gavin Newsom, has responded in kind, unveiling a plan last week to redraw voting lines in his state that could add five safe Democratic seats in Congress, if Texas proceeds. Currently, only one in five seats in the House of Representatives are considered competitive. The California plan came as Texas Democrats are reportedly preparing to make their way home to launch a new chapter in the redistricting war after a series of nationwide protests on Saturday called 'Fight the Trump Takeover National Day of Action.' 'We were playing chess and they were playing tic-tac-toe,' Texas sate representative Jolanda Jones told Austin's KVUE. 'We were able to stop them, so their numbers didn't matter. I think it was a gangster move. It was boss, and I'm proud of us.' With members of the Democratic delegation expected to attended a second special legislative session in Austin on Monday, meeting the numbers required, the Texas redistricting measure is expected to pass. Paxton celebrated the judge's decision, saying that in Texas, 'lawless actions have consequences, and Beto's finding that out the hard way.' Paxton said in a statement that O'Rourke's 'fraudulent attempt to pad the pockets of the rogue cowards abandoning Texas has been stopped' and that 'the cabal of Democrats who have colluded together to scam Texans and derail our Legislature will face the full force of the law, starting with Robert Francis O'Rourke.' O'Rourke, who ran a brief campaign for the Democratic party presidential nomination in 2020, filed his own lawsuit against Paxton earlier this month that requested a block on an investigation into his group and alleged that Paxton was engaged in a 'fishing expedition, constitutional rights be damned'. O'Rourke said at a protest in Austin on Saturday that Democrats were 'not going to bend the knee. We're going to stand and fight wherever we have to – from the state house to the court house, from Texas to California.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store