The best places to park your short-term investments
As you sift among the various options for your short-term investments, keep these key items on your dashboard: yield, guarantees, liquidity and your individual situation.
The short-term investments that promise the highest yields often come with at least some risk and/or constraints on your daily access to funds. It may be that you're just looking for the highest safe yield and don't care that much about liquidity. Or maybe having ready access to your funds is the name of the game.
Also think through whether you value an ironclad guarantee or are willing to go without in exchange for a potentially higher yield. Some cash instruments are fully FDIC-insured, while others are not. On the short list of FDIC-insured investments are checking and savings accounts, CDs, money market accounts (not to be confused with money market mutual funds), and online savings accounts.
Certificates of deposit
CDs will typically offer the most compelling yields of all cash instruments, and they're also FDIC-insured.
Yet there are a couple of caveats. One is that minimum deposits for the highest-yielding CDs might be $25,000 or even higher. There's also a trade-off on the liquidity front: You'll usually pay a penalty if you need to crack into your holdings before the maturity date. The longer the term of the CD, the bigger the penalty for cashing out early.
Online savings accounts
If you want daily liquidity, a decent yield, and FDIC protection, your best bet will tend to be a high-yield savings account through an online bank or a savings account through a credit union. The former offers FDIC protection, up to the limits, whereas credit union accounts are insured by another entity, the National Credit Union Administration.
Money market mutual funds
Money market mutual funds also offer daily liquidity and the convenience of having those funds live side by side with your long-term investments. But money market fund yields are still generally below those of online savings accounts today. Additionally, money market mutual funds aren't FDIC-insured, though in practice most funds have done an excellent job of maintaining stable net asset values.
Don't confuse money market mutual funds with brokerage sweep accounts, though both are offered by investment providers. Interest rates on brokerage sweep accounts, which hold investors' cash that hasn't yet been invested, have ticked up a bit recently but are still well below other cash options.
Stable-value funds
Stable-value funds are another example of an investment that offers an often-decent yield in exchange for not checking the liquidity and guarantee boxes.
Stable-value funds are only accessible inside of company retirement plans. They invest in bonds, so they're not FDIC-insured; to protect investors' principal, they employ insurance wrappers to help maintain a stable net asset value. Just bear in mind that stable-value funds carry drawbacks. Because you can only own such a fund within a 401(k), you'll pay taxes and penalties to withdraw your money before retirement unless you meet certain criteria. So don't think of a stable-value fund as an emergency fund unless you're already retired or close to it.
Honorable mention: I Bonds
In contrast with the preceding investment types, I bonds are the only safe investment vehicles that will guarantee to make investors whole with respect to inflation. I bonds are Treasury bonds that pay a fixed rate of interest as well as another layer of interest that varies with the current inflation rate, as measured by the Consumer Price Index.
As attractive as that is, it comes with a few asterisks. If you redeem an I bond within five years of buying it, you'll forfeit three months' worth of interest. Purchase constraints are another drawback for large investors.
___
This article was provided to The Associated Press by Morningstar. For more personal finance content, go to https://www.morningstar.com/personal-finance
Christine Benz is the director of personal finance and retirement planning at Morningstar.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
6 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Investing in metals: Will silver surpass its 2011 all-time high?
A growing chorus of influential market voices believes it's not a matter of if, but when silver will hit its all-time high of $50 (€44) an ounce — a level not seen since April 2011. The precious metal surged to nearly $37 (€32) this week, a new 13-year high, securing a remarkable 10% gain in the first 10 days of June alone, in a rally that has caught global investor attention. The $50 threshold is now increasingly seen as a logical target, with both technical and macroeconomic conditions aligning in silver's favour. Could this be just the beginning of silver's strongest bull run in over a decade? The case for silver's resurgence is being championed by several market analysts and institutional voices on Wall Street, who have argued that a combination of structural and cyclical factors is propelling the metal's rally momentum. Otavio Costa, macro strategist at Crescat Capital, recently pointed out that silver has historically followed gold's performance. 'We are likely in the early stages of a new secular bull market for the metal,' Costa recently wrote in a post on social media X, noting that silver typically lags gold in the early stages of a precious metals rally before outperforming later on. The gold-to-silver ratio — an indicator of how many ounces of silver are required to buy one ounce of gold — has fallen sharply, breaking from historically elevated levels near 100. 'This move is likely just the beginning,' Costa observed, as investment starts flowing from gold into silver, and eventually into early-stage mining equities. 'A test of the all-time highs near $50 is within scope as positioning and momentum are not yet stretched,' said Bank of America's technical analyst Paul Ciana in a recent note. Rashad Hajiyev, macro investor and commentator, suggested that silver's June breakout could conservatively point to $60 (€52). "2010 and 2020 breakouts resulted in 150% and 60% gains, respectively, over eight months and one month," he wrote. "With gold prices headed towards $3,600 and the average gold-to-silver ratio at 60, $60 silver is a legitimate target.' Investor interest in silver's monetary role has resurged in recent months, driven by growing concerns over the US administration's ability to manage the escalating federal debt. Confidence in traditional US safe-haven assets has weakened, with both US Treasury bonds and the dollar losing ground in 2025 — an atypical development during a period of global economic uncertainty, when these instruments would typically attract demand. Gold has been the first mover to reflect mounting concerns over US fiscal sustainability, gaining more than 25% year-to-date and outperforming all major asset classes in 2025. Silver may be next to follow, attracting investors seeking hard assets that cannot be debased by an expanding supply of money. What's different this time is the acceleration in industrial demand for silver, especially from the clean energy sector. Related Gold's record rally stalls on hopes of easing global trade tensions Is Trump destroying the dollar - and what does it mean for the euro? As the Silver Institute highlighted, silver is one of the world's best electrical conductors, making it indispensable in the production of solar panels, electric vehicles (EVs), and microelectronics. Notably, the solar sector's demand for silver has soared, doubling from 12% of total demand in 2022 to 25% in 2024. Sprott projects that by 2030, annual silver demand for solar applications could rise to 370 million ounces, up from 220 million today. According to Katusa Research, the current market environment exhibits all three of what it calls 'Buffett's critical silver signals': a deepening supply deficit, stagnant production, and plummeting above-ground stockpiles. These indicators, they argue, historically precede explosive silver rallies. A reversal of the economic and geopolitical anxieties that gripped markets in 2025 could dampen silver's appeal as a monetary hedge. Should the Trump administration signal credible efforts to rein in its ballooning budget deficit, the sell-off in Treasuries might stabilise — or even reverse — restoring investor confidence in the dollar and reducing the urgency to seek alternatives like gold or silver. Still, structural demand for silver, particularly from the electric vehicle and solar industries, is likely to persist. This could provide a foundation for continued price support, albeit at a more moderate pace than if US economic dominance remained under heightened scrutiny. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Forbes
36 minutes ago
- Forbes
3 Game-Changing AI Investment Strategies For Big Tech Investors To Save Millions
Game-Changing AI Investment Strategies In recent years, a number of high-profile AI startups—backed by leading AI investors—have faced significant setbacks, with some incurring losses in the hundreds of millions of dollars even after promising early traction and ambitious valuations. These developments serve as a cautionary signal to the global AI investment community: in a landscape defined by rapid innovation and media-fueled excitement, conventional due diligence practices are no longer sufficient. The AI sector, in particular, has become increasingly vulnerable to hype, with some startups overstating their technological capabilities—often relying on hundreds of human inputs behind the scenes while promoting their solutions as fully autonomous AI systems. As the old adage goes, "Anyone can sell snake oil, but not everyone is selling the real deal." Distinguishing genuine innovation from inflated claims is more critical than ever for investors seeking sustainable, long-term value in the AI space. For major AI investors—including big tech, institutional funds, and venture capital firms—this moment represents both a warning and an opportunity. The complexity of AI evaluation demands a strategic shift that marries visionary insight with technical rigor and collaborative diligence. The recent rise and fall of prominent startups underscores the necessity of a more disciplined, forward-looking approach—one that transitions from reactive to proactive investing. Outlined below are three forward-looking strategies designed to help investors engage more effectively with the opportunities and challenges shaping the evolving AI landscape. Strategy #1: Mitigating FOMO with Parallel Investment in Third-Party AI Expertise In a sector where the pace of innovation often outstrips investors' ability to evaluate it, a parallel investing model is becoming increasingly indispensable. This approach involves not only allocating capital to AI startups, but also systematically engaging independent AI experts and auditors to conduct ongoing, objective evaluations of a startup's core technology. While endorsements from marquee investors may signal credibility, they should never substitute for direct, evidence-based due diligence. These assessments should span critical AI disciplines such as natural language processing (NLP), machine learning operations (MLOps), model performance and product-level validation. Avoiding FOMO-Driven Decisions in AI Investing: The fear of missing out (FOMO) often drives investors to chase high-profile deals—particularly when influential names are involved—at the expense of rigorous evaluation. A disciplined, expertise-led parallel investment strategy mitigates this risk by prioritizing independent technical assessments that validate a startup's long-term potential beyond the pitch deck. A comparable model can be found in the approach of Entrepreneur First (EF), a global accelerator that pioneered 'talent investing'—backing exceptional individuals even before a team or business idea exists. By focusing on the raw potential of technical founders and guiding them through co-founder matching and company creation, EF has helped launch more than 600 startups, collectively valued at over $11 billion as of 2025. In the same spirit, the strategy proposed here advocates for investing not only in companies but also in third-party AI expertise—ensuring continued, unbiased due diligence throughout the investment lifecycle. Strategy #2: Establish a Dedicated Syndicate Investor Communication Channel While founder transparency is essential, equally important is structured, collaborative communication among investors—particularly in fast-moving sectors like AI, where innovation can outpace traditional diligence. Establishing dedicated syndicate communication channels—through regular briefings, shared due diligence, and expert panels—helps reduce information asymmetry, enable cross-validation of claims, and improve capital allocation. A coordinated framework also strengthens oversight, facilitates resource sharing, and supports early risk identification, potentially saving millions in misallocated funding. A relevant example of investors' appetite for greater transparency is the rise of Arfur Rock—an anonymous X (formerly Twitter) account dubbed the 'Gossip Girl of Silicon Valley.' The account shares insider updates on startup funding and performance metrics, gaining traction by revealing information typically shielded by NDAs or SEC regulations. Though informal, Arfur Rock underscores a broader need for visibility and information-sharing in venture capital. A private, structured communication network among syndicate investors could go even further—offering vetted, actionable insights that support more aligned, evidence-driven investment decisions. Strategy #3: Prioritize Technical Transparency and Engage Directly with AI Engineers Artificial intelligence is inherently complex and often opaque, making it difficult for non-technical investors to assess. In a hype-driven market, distinguishing genuine innovation from polished narratives requires more than pitch decks—it demands transparency around technical documentation, model performance metrics, and real-world deployment data. To truly evaluate a startup's capabilities and scalability, investors must go beyond the founders and engage directly with engineers, product teams, and early customers. A relevant example is Nvidia's ascent in the AI hardware space. Its market leadership was built on disciplined R&D investment and transparent, iterative product development. Investors who engaged closely with Nvidia's technical teams gained deep insight into its innovation pipeline—demonstrating how technical fluency and direct engagement can lead to more informed, high-conviction investments. Closing Reflections: A Mandate for Strategic Discipline in AI Investing As artificial intelligence rapidly evolves—reshaping industries and redefining competitive advantage—the imperative for disciplined, transparent investing has never been greater. In this high-stakes landscape, where promise and peril coexist, capital alone is insufficient. Big tech investors, institutional funds, family offices, and venture capital firms must meet the challenge with a deeper commitment grounded in technical fluency, collaborative intelligence, and sustained due diligence. Navigating the future of AI will require more than conviction; it demands clarity, rigor, and the discipline to see beyond the hype. Ultimately, the next era of AI will not be defined solely by those who dream the boldest, but by those who invest with discernment. In a market driven by exponential potential and persistent volatility, only disciplined capital—anchored in insight and accountability—will truly endure.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
US Fed set to hold rates steady in the face of Trump pressure
The US central bank is expected to keep interest rates unchanged for a fourth straight policy meeting this week, despite President Donald Trump's push for rate cuts, as officials contend with uncertainty sparked by the Republican's tariffs. While the independent Federal Reserve has started lowering rates from recent highs, officials have held the level steady this year as Trump's tariffs began rippling through the world's biggest economy. The Fed has kept interest rates between 4.25 percent and 4.50 percent since December, while it monitors the health of the jobs market and inflation. "The hope is to stay below the radar screen at this meeting," KPMG chief economist Diane Swonk told AFP. "Uncertainty is still very high." "Until they know sufficiently, and convincingly that inflation is not going to pick up" either in response to tariffs or related threats, "they just can't move," she said. Since returning to the presidency, Trump has slapped a 10 percent tariff on most US trading partners. Higher rates on dozens of economies are due to take effect in July, unless an existing pause is extended. Trump has also engaged in a tit-for-tat tariff war with China and imposed levies on imports of steel, aluminum and automobiles, rattling financial markets and tanking consumer sentiment. But economists expect it will take three to four months for tariff effects to show up in consumer prices. Although hiring has cooled slightly and there was some shrinking of the labor force according to government data, the unemployment rate has stayed unchanged. Inflation has been muted too, even as analysts noted signs of smaller business margins -- meaning companies are bearing the brunt of tariffs for now. At the end of the Fed's two-day meeting Wednesday, analysts will be parsing through its economic projections for changes to growth and unemployment expectations -- and for signs of the number of rate cuts to come. The Fed faces growing pressure from Trump -- citing benign inflation data -- to lower rates more quickly, a move the president argues will help the country "pay much less interest on debt coming due." On Wednesday, Trump urged Fed Chair Jerome Powell to slash interest rates by a full percentage point, and on Thursday, he called Powell a "numbskull" for not doing so. He said Powell could raise rates again if inflation picked up then. But Powell has defended US central bank independence over interest rates when engaging with Trump. - 'Cautious patience' - For their part, Fed policymakers have signaled "little urgency" to adjust rates, said EY chief economist Gregory Daco. He believes they are unwilling to get ahead of the net effects from Trump's trade, tax, immigration and regulation policy changes. Powell "will likely strike a tone of cautious patience, reiterating that policy remains data dependent," Daco said. While economists have warned that Trump's tariffs would fuel inflation and weigh on economic growth, supporters of Trump's policies argue the president's plans for tax cuts next year will boost the economy. On the Fed's path ahead, HSBC Global Research said: "Weak labor market data could lead to larger cuts, while elevated inflation would tend to imply the opposite." For now, analysts expect the central bank to slash rates two more times this year, beginning in September. The Fed is likely to be eyeing data over the summer for inflationary pressures from tariffs, said Ryan Sweet, chief US economist at Oxford Economics. "They want to make sure that they're reading the tea leaves correctly," he said. Swonk warned the US economy is in a different place than during the Covid-19 pandemic, which could change how consumers react to price increases. During the pandemic, government stimulus payments helped households cushion the blow from higher costs, allowing them to keep spending. It is unclear if consumers, a key driver of the economy, will keep their dollars flowing this time, meaning demand could collapse and complicate the Fed's calculus. "If this had been a world without tariffs, the Fed would be cutting right now. There's no question," Swonk said. bys/jgc
