logo
Democrats bash Trump over Texas redistricting: ‘Act of desperation' to ‘cling to power'

Democrats bash Trump over Texas redistricting: ‘Act of desperation' to ‘cling to power'

The Hilla day ago
House Democrats are hammering President Trump and his GOP allies for pushing to alter Texas's congressional lines ahead of the midterms, accusing the Republicans of rigging the system to stay in power.
'It's painfully clear why Republicans are doing this: They know they are going to lose the majority next year,' Rep. Suzan DelBene (D-Wash.), the head of the House Democrats' campaign arm, told reporters Tuesday on Capitol Hill. 'Republicans know they can't win on their failed agenda, so they've hatched a scheme to rig the Texas map to try to save their microscopic majority.'
In a rare mid-decade redistricting effort, Texas state lawmakers are expected to consider new congressional lines during a special session of the Texas legislature, which was called by GOP Gov. Greg Abbott. The effort to redraw the Texas map has come at the request of President Trump, who wants to pad the GOP's thin House majority to ensure that Republicans keep control of the lower chamber during his final two years of his second term.
In a call to Texas Republicans on Tuesday morning, the president urged lawmakers to draw the districts in such a way that Republicans will be able to flip five Democratic seats to the GOP, according to Punchbowl News.
Democrats have bashed the effort, noting that Texas is still reeling from the massive floods that hit the Hill Country region of the state on the July 4 weekend. The floods killed scores of people, including young girls attending a popular summer camp. Democrats say Republicans should be focused on efforts to recover from that crisis, and examine the possible causes, including recent cuts to the National Weather Service championed by Trump.
'Instead of addressing the serious crisis that has affected tens-of-thousands of lives in unthinkable ways, Donald Trump, House Republicans here in Washington and Gov. Abbott are conspiring to rig the Texas congressional map as part of an effort to disenfranchise millions of people in Texas,' House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.) said.
'In this country, public servants should earn the votes of the people that they hope to represent,' he added. 'What Republicans are trying to do in Texas is have politicians choose their voters.'
Jeffries declined to say if he supports having blue states, like New York and California, pursue their own mid-district redistricting efforts to counter the efforts of Texas and North Carolina. He deferred to the governors of those states.
But he also left the door open to that strategy, and suggested there might be developments on that front coming soon.
'Stay tuned,' Jeffries said.
The justification for drawing the new lines has done little to appease the Democratic critics.
In a recent letter to Abbott and Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, Trump's Justice Department said a new map was needed to remedy four existing districts it deems unconstitutional because they were drawn with racial considerations in mind. Harmeet Dhillon, assistant attorney general of the DOJ's Civil Rights Division, urged state Republicans 'to rectify these race-based considerations.'
Texas Democrats say Dhillon's reasoning is ludicrous, since state Republicans had drawn the existing map just four years ago.
'The absurdity of the justification for this redistricting is that a Republican-controlled legislature, led by President Trump's campaign manager in the Senate, signed by his loyal follower Gov. Abbott — that that Republican redistricting plan discriminated against white people in Texas,' Rep. Lloyd Doggett (D-Texas.) said.
'Not a big problem that we've ever had down there in my lifetime.'
Rep. Jasmine Crockett (D-Texas), a member of the Congressional Black Caucus (CBC), said Texas has a long history of pushing discriminatory policies in order to undermine the power of minorities, even as they represent a majority of the population. The new redistricting effort, she said, is just the latest iteration of that campaign.
'They are specifically deciding to splinter the communities of common interest as well as just blatantly say: We're going to dilute the minority voices,' Crockett said.
It's not the first time in recent years that Republicans have leveraged power on the state level to tilt the congressional map in their favor, even when it disenfranchised millions of voters. In 2022, Republicans who controlled North Carolina's state house adopted new districts all but ensuring the GOP would pick up seats in Congress. The map was shot down by the state Supreme Court when it was controlled by Democrats. But after Republicans took power on the court, they reversed the earlier decision and allowed the map to take effect.
As a result, Republicans picked up three Democratic seats in the 2024 elections, swinging an evenly divided delegation — featuring seven Republicans and seven Democrats — sharply in the favor of Republicans, who now hold a 10-4 advantage in a state where party affiliation is roughly split.
'They know that we would be in the majority today if North Carolina hadn't egregiously redistricted and eliminated three Democratic seats,' said Rep. Katherine Clark (Mass.), the Democratic whip.
'This is a voter suppression effort,' she added. 'This is an effort to take away voices when Texans need the help of fellow Americans.'
DelBene warned that the Republicans' redistricting might backfire on the GOP, diluting the comfortable advantage of some Republican incumbents to the advantage of Democrats hoping to pick those seats up.
'Republicans should be careful what they wish for,' she said.
Jeffries seconded that warning.
'I have no expectation that they're going to show any political courage. Texas Republicans are likely to continue to act like political punks and bend the knee to Donald Trump's extreme agenda,' he said. 'In doing so, they will jeopardize their own electoral careers.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Alina Habba, Trump pick for NJ's US Attorney, gets big law enforcement backing — but faces opposition from Dem senators
Alina Habba, Trump pick for NJ's US Attorney, gets big law enforcement backing — but faces opposition from Dem senators

New York Post

time22 minutes ago

  • New York Post

Alina Habba, Trump pick for NJ's US Attorney, gets big law enforcement backing — but faces opposition from Dem senators

WASHINGTON — President Trump's pick for New Jersey's US attorney has nabbed endorsements from top law enforcement leaders nationwide — but still faces roadblocks from the Garden State's Democratic senators for final confirmation as her interim status is set to expire in less than two weeks. Alina Habba, a New Jersey native who has been serving as its top prosecutor, has garnered the enthusiastic support of the National Troopers Coalition, National Association of Police Organizations and National Police Defense Foundation since being nominated in March. 'I can think of no one better suited than USA Habba as her passion to help people and her work ethic has rarely been seen by anyone I have encountered in the US Attorney position,' raved Special Agent Ricky Patel, the head of Homeland Security Investigations in Newark, in a June 27 endorsement letter. 5 Alina Habba has the backing of national law enforcement leaders but faces roadblocks from Garden State Democratic senators for final confirmation as New Jersey's US attorney. AP The National Association of Police Organizations, which represents over 250,000 sworn law enforcement officers across the country, has also commended Habba for her 'efforts to go after and prosecute gang and drug crime,' according to a letter sent to the Senate Judiciary Committee's top Republican and Democrat on July 14. The president of NAPO cited 'the recent takedown of twenty-four violent gang members for their roles in a drug trafficking organization that distributed large quantities of fentanyl, heroin, and crack cocaine in Newark' as evidence of her effective leadership and 'successful work in making New Jersey safer.' The board of the National Troopers Coalition also threw its weight behind Habba, 41, in a July 11 open letter, applauding the attorney for her 'tremendous willingness to work with the 'boots on the ground' law enforcement officers across the State of New Jersey' and 'initiative and commitment to combating the plagues to our communities including gang violence, illegal drugs, and violent crimes.' 5 The National Association of Police Organizations, which represents over 250,000 sworn law enforcement officers across the country, has also commended Habba for her 'efforts to go after and prosecute gang and drug crime.' Luiz C. Ribeiro for New York Post In a controversial move, Habba earlier this year ended up charging a Democratic lawmaker, Rep. LaMonica McIver (D-NJ), for assaulting federal officers and arrested Newark's Dem mayor Ras Baraka as the two protested the Trump admin's immigration crackdown at a detention facility. The former Trump lawyer, who also defended the president as part of a defamation case brought by writer E. Jean Carroll, was nominated to a full, four-year term on July 1. However, her federally mandated 120-day interim term began on March 24 and will expire July 22. 5 The former Trump lawyer defended the president as part of a defamation case brought by writer E. Jean Carroll. Stephen Yang for the New York Post That allows little time for either the Senate Judiciary Committee to advance her confirmation and Republicans to force a full vote in the upper chamber. New Jersey federal judges could also permanently appoint her, though Habba would likely face an uphill battle in a blue state — like John Sarcone III, whose bid to lead the upstate New York US attorney's office was rejected by a judicial board Monday. At the same time, Habba's approval process could be bottlenecked by either of New Jersey's Democratic Sens. Cory Booker and Andy Kim, both of whom have expressed dissatisfaction with Trump's nominee. 5 Habba's approval process could be bottlenecked by either of New Jersey's Democratic Sens. Cory Booker and Andy Kim, both of whom have expressed dissatisfaction with Trump's nominee. AP 'The people of New Jersey deserve a US Attorney that has deep experience with law enforcement, a reputation and an approach that puts partisanship to the side, and who will work to keep our communities safe and impartially pursue justice,' the two senators wrote in a joint statement released the day after Habba's nomination. 'In her short tenure as an interim US Attorney, she has degraded the office and pursued frivolous and politically motivated prosecutions,' the pair fumed. 'It's clear that Alina Habba does not meet the standard to serve the people of New Jersey.' Senators often meet with their home state's US attorney nominees, particularly during the appointment process. As yet, neither New Jersey senator has met with Habba. 5 Booker has already indicated he intends to withhold his blue slip to ice Habba's confirmation, Courthouse News reported Tuesday. Getty Images for Student Borrower Protection Center The so-called 'blue slip' policy could also give Booker and Kim the de facto ability to block Habba's confirmation. Booker has already indicated he intends to withhold his blue slip to ice Habba's confirmation, Courthouse News reported Tuesday. This senatorial power, which is rarely invoked out of courtesy for the presidency, was recently used by Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-NY) to impede Senate confirmation for Jay Clayton, Trump's nominee for Manhattan US attorney. Clayton was later installed by Trump on an interim basis — despite Schumer's efforts to block his approval. Reps for Kim and Booker did not respond to requests for comment.

Poll: Most voters disapprove of Trump admin's handling of Epstein files
Poll: Most voters disapprove of Trump admin's handling of Epstein files

Axios

time22 minutes ago

  • Axios

Poll: Most voters disapprove of Trump admin's handling of Epstein files

Almost two-thirds of U.S. voters disapprove of the Trump administration's handling of the Epstein files and the vast majority of Americans believe it should release all files in the case, according to two new polls. Why it matters: President Trump has made clear that he wants people to move on from the Epstein case, after his administration's conclusion that there's no evidence to suggest the disgraced financier was murdered or kept a " client list." However, a Quinnipiac University poll published on Wednesday found 63% of voters don't approve of the administration's handling of the case and just 17% approve. Zoom in: Republicans appear split, with 40% approving and 35% disapproving in the survey of 1,290 survey of self-identified registered voters that took place nationwide from July 10-14. 83% of Democrats disapproved, as did 71% of independents. The big picture: The poll that has a margin of error of +/- 2.7 percentage points comes on the heels of two others indicating many people's dissatisfaction with the administration over the Epstein files. Details: A poll of 1,680 U.S. citizens released Tuesday that was conducted by YouGov-Economist poll conducted July 11-14 found 79% of Americans believe all case documents should be released. And 67% say they think the government is "covering up evidence it has about Epstein." The margin of error for the overall sample in that poll is about 3.5%. Meanwhile, a CNN poll out Tuesday showed 50% of the 1,057 U.S. adults surveyed from July 10-13 were dissatisfied with the amount of information the federal government has released about the Epstein case.

House breaks record for longest vote on rule for crypto bills
House breaks record for longest vote on rule for crypto bills

The Hill

time22 minutes ago

  • The Hill

House breaks record for longest vote on rule for crypto bills

The House set a new record for the longest vote in the history of the chamber Wednesday night, surpassing seven hours and 24 minutes on a vote to advance a trio of cryptocurrency bills as Republican leaders worked behind the scenes to get a handful of GOP holdouts on board. The chamber officially broke the record at 8:43 p.m. as the vote on a rule — which governs debate for legislation — remained open. The previous record had been set roughly two weeks earlier, when a vote on the rule for the GOP's 'big, beautiful bill' stalled for more than seven hours. As of 9:30 p.m., the vote on the rule for the cryptocurrency bills remained open at a 208-221 tally, short of the majority vote needed for adoption. Ten Republicans were recorded as 'no' votes. The chamber remained in a standstill Wednesday as Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) attempted to corral the various factions in his conference to adopt a rule governing debate on the three crypto bills, in addition to a measure to fund the Pentagon in the new fiscal year. The floor froze on Tuesday after 12 hard-line House Republicans torpedoed a rule. After two hard-line Republicans, Reps. Chip Roy (Texas) and Marjorie Taylor Greene (Ga.), and House Financial Services Vice Chair Bill Huizenga (R-Mich.) all cast 'no' votes, Johnson scrambled to salvage the rule vote. Huizenga eventually flipped his vote in support, but the hard-line opponents grew throughout the day. The vote remained open for hours as the Speaker met with members of the House Freedom Caucus, the House Financial Services Committee, and the House Agriculture Committee, attempting to reconcile their differences on the crypto bills. A key point of contention for hard-line Republicans is the lack of a provision in the GENIUS Act that would block the creation of a central bank digital currency (CBDC). The GENIUS Act, one of the three bills up for consideration by the House, is poised to become law as it next heads to President Trump's desk. While a second crypto bill, the Anti-CBDC Surveillance State Act, would bar the Federal Reserve from issuing a CBDC, it faces an uncertain path forward in the Senate. After 12 hard-line Republicans voted down an initial procedural vote Tuesday, Trump struck a deal with the lawmakers, in which anti-CBDC provisions would be added to a third crypto bill — the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act. Notably, the market structure bill also faces a complicated future, as the Senate prepares to put forward its own version of the legislation. However, the move appears to have frustrated members of the House Financial Services Committee, creating an impasse.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store