logo
Govt considering amendments to Atomic Energy Act, nuclear liability law

Govt considering amendments to Atomic Energy Act, nuclear liability law

Hindustan Times19-05-2025

New Delhi, Government is considering amendments to the laws governing the nuclear power domain, including the sectoral regulator, to allow participation of private sector as India eyes to produce 100 GW atomic energy by 2047.
Government sources said amendments were being considered to the Atomic Energy Act to allow private sector participation and the Civil Liability for Nuclear Damage Act to limit the liability on suppliers of equipment to build atomic energy plants.
The government is also considering regulatory reforms and is evaluating the model of Indian National Space Promotion and Authorization Center which acts as the promoter and regulator for the space sector that was opened up for private participation in 2020.
Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman announced opening up of the nuclear power sector which has been restricted to public sector companies. The Nuclear Power Corporation of India Limited operates atomic power plants across the country that contribute 8.7 GWe to the country's energy mix.
Sitharaman also announced the Nuclear Energy Mission for research and development of Small Modular Reactors with an outlay of ₹20,000 crore and to operationalise five indigenously developed SMRs by 2033.
The Department of Atomic Energy officials has recently said that the Nuclear Energy Mission aims to leverage private sector participation, streamline regulatory frameworks, and scale up nuclear power production to meet India's increasing energy demands.
Foreign nuclear power firms had evinced interest in setting up atomic power plants in India after it secured a waiver from the Nuclear Suppliers Group to engage in global nuclear trade. The NSG waiver came after the landmark India-US civil nuclear deal of 2008.
However, the Civil Liability for Nuclear Damage Act of 2010 proved to be an impediment for private sector participation. The private sector termed certain provisions of the law were unacceptable and contradicted the international Convention for Supplementary Compensation for Nuclear Damage .
The government expects the private sector to pitch in with investments to achieve the target of producing 100 GWe nuclear power by 2047.
The officials said that around 50 per cent of the 100 GW target is expected to come from Public-Private Partnerships .
A parliamentary panel has also recommended establishing a robust financial model that includes government incentives, Viability Gap Funding , and sovereign guarantees to attract both domestic and foreign investments.
The Committee had suggested that expediting legislative amendments to the Atomic Energy Act and Civil Liability for Nuclear Damage Act to encourage private investment in nuclear power generation.
India plans to set up private sector SMRs of 220 MW Bharat Small Reactors for captive use. NPCIL had recently invited Request for Proposals from Indian industries for setting up 220 MW BSRs for captive use.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

New normal amid a new cold war
New normal amid a new cold war

New Indian Express

time16 minutes ago

  • New Indian Express

New normal amid a new cold war

The effect of Donald Trump's return to the White House is being felt in capitals all over the world. At the recently-concluded Shangri-La Dialogue in Singapore, the spectre of a new cold war rose once again to dominate discussions. In his ASEAN chairman's statement, Malaysian Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim categorically asserted the return of a cold war to systemic interstate relations. The reference does not augur well for the ASEAN, which has been trying to build resilience within while maintaining a degree of balance between the US and China. The second important aspect of this year's dialogue has been the tough stand India has placed on its recent military stand-off with Pakistan following the devastating terror attack at Pahalgam. The subsequent Indian political and military action against Pakistan has highlighted what the political leadership is calling the 'new normal', signalling that tolerance has its limits. Both these indicated a changed environment at the Shangri-La Dialogue, especially as they implied certain defining shifts. First, the very definition of the term 'cold war' and how this period will be different from the earlier cold war. Second, the Trump administration's impact on the wider Indo-Pacific and what it expects from the region vis-á-vis the US-China rivalry. Third, the choices for ASEAN states, particularly in light of the extending US-China rivalry. And finally, how this affects the role India plays within multilateral forums and how India's definition of the new normal affects the region. First, the reference to a new cold war is not new. Even during the first Trump term, a National Security Strategy paper released by the administration in November 2017 clearly reiterated that the foremost threats to American interests and leadership in the global order were from China and Russia, articulating the tensions at systemic levels.

Riju Ravindran NCLT: Riju Ravindran Challenges GLAS Trust's Authority in Byju's Insolvency Case, ET LegalWorld
Riju Ravindran NCLT: Riju Ravindran Challenges GLAS Trust's Authority in Byju's Insolvency Case, ET LegalWorld

Time of India

time25 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Riju Ravindran NCLT: Riju Ravindran Challenges GLAS Trust's Authority in Byju's Insolvency Case, ET LegalWorld

Riju Ravindran, co-founder and former promoter of Think and Learn, which owns debt-ridden edtech firm Byju's, has moved insolvency tribunal NCLT for removal of GLAS Trust as the financial creditor and from its Committee of Creditors. In his petition, Ravindran has alleged that GLAS Trust has "fraudulently represented itself to be a financial creditor" and has requested the National Company Law Tribunal to direct it to "prove its authority to represent the creditors before it". Advt Advt Join the community of 2M+ industry professionals Subscribe to our newsletter to get latest insights & analysis. Download ETLegalWorld App Get Realtime updates Save your favourite articles GLAS Trust, which is representing Byju's US-based creditor, has the authority to represent merely 17.38 per cent of the voting rights of the consortium of term loan providers, he to Ravindran, GLAS can take actions on behalf of lenders only if the action is authorised by lenders holding more than 50 per cent of the term Trust Company LLC, a US-based firm, is the trustee for lenders to which Byju's owes USD 1.2 has requested NCLT to "direct removal of GLAS Trust Company LLC from CoC of Think and Learn forthwith and to, consequently, set aside and declare all decisions taken by the GLAS Trust Company LLC, as a member, as nullity."The matter is scheduled for hearing before the Bengaluru bench of NCLT on an interim measure, Ravindran has also directed NCLT to "stay CIRP of Think and Learn, till the time GLAS proves it has the requisite authority of the qualified lenders under the Credit and Guaranty Agreement dated 24.11.2021 for taking any action under the said agreement."Ravindran has filed this application in the main petition filed by the cricket body BCCI, on whose plea Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) was initiated against the edtech further alleged that GLAS has "fraudulently represented" itself to be a financial creditor before NCLT and obtained several orders based on it."This fundamental fraud has been perpetrated upon this tribunal by GLAS by illegally claiming that it has the authority to represent lenders under the Credit and Guaranty Agreement dated 24.11.2021 without possessing the requisite mandate from 51 per cent of qualified lenders," it entire edifice of representation crumbles upon examination of the contractual disqualification mechanism that has been validly exercised by the company, resulting in the disqualification of 61.43 per cent of the term loan holders."This disqualification has reduced GLAS' actual authority to represent merely 17.38 per cent of the term loan, rendering every action taken by GLAS in these proceedings as ultra vires and void ab initio," it further alleged GLAS, fully cognizant of its lack of authority, has 'orchestrated' an elaborate conspiracy involving Ernst & Young (EY) and successive Resolution Professionals to manipulate the CIRP process and perpetuate its illegal control over Alpha Inc, a wholly-owned US subsidiary of Think and Learn, had availed a loan facility amounting to approximately USD 1.2 billion under a Credit and Guaranty Agreement on November 24, 2021 from a group of lenders. The agreement was for a period of five years with a maturity dated in November 2026 for the term loan under the GLAS issued a notice of default and sought to accelerate the term loan on March 2023 within 15 months of the Credit Agreement and 3.5 years prior to the maturity realising that certain lenders had stepped into the shoes of the initial investors in violation of the specific terms of the Credit Agreement, Think and Learn exercised its rights under the agreement to protect itself by issuing letter of disqualification on June 5, 2023, to Redwood to the petition, GLAS claims to be the administrative and collateral agent for the lenders under the Credit Trust, which had also filed insolvency plea, claimed that 72.2 per cent of the lenders consented to filing of the same."It is submitted that out of these 72.20 per cent, 61.43 per cent are disqualified lenders. Therefore, from the lenders who consented (or voted "yes"), only about 10.77 per cent are not disqualified lenders. The percentage of disqualified lenders who consented in proportion to non-disqualified lenders is 6.61 per cent. This would, perforce, mean that GLAS has the authority to represent only 17.38 per cent of the term loan," he said.

Can Russia fight NATO countries alone? If war happens, which countries will support Russia?
Can Russia fight NATO countries alone? If war happens, which countries will support Russia?

India.com

time40 minutes ago

  • India.com

Can Russia fight NATO countries alone? If war happens, which countries will support Russia?

US President Trumps vs Russian President Russia vs NATO: Amid the raging Russia-Ukraine war and the massive Ukrainian attack on the defence assets of Russia, tensions between the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation and Russia are growing by leaps and bounds. For those unversed, Russia recently faced a massive attack after Ukraine's Security Service (SBU) struck at least 41 aircraft, which it claimed were used to bomb Ukrainian cities. As a response to attack, Russia is expected to take a much-stronger action against Ukraine, which may lead to a NATO-Russia conflict in the near future. However, the question is, can Russia fight all of the NATO countries alone? After Ukraine attacked Russia in its drone attack, several countries of Europe including UK are already preparing for war. US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth also noted that he was confident that members of the NATO alliance would sign up to Donald Trump's demand for a major boost in defence spending (possibly indicating of a war scenario). If Russia goes to war against US-led NATO, only countries like Belarus and China are expected to help it. Can Russia defeat NATO alone? As per media reports, Russia has the largest nuclear arsenal (5,580 warheads), along with 1.5 million soldiers, 12,500 tanks, and 6,500 artillery units. However, NATO, for a comparison, has over 3.5 million troops, along with 6,000 nuclear weapons distributed among 31 countries. Therefore, analysts believe that Russia may not be able to defeat NATO alone, and that too in a scenario where it has been engaged in the Ukraine war for almost three years. US President on Russia-Ukraine war progression In a significant development on the progression of the Russia-Ukraine war, the White House informed that US President Donald Trump remains optimistic about the progress being seen amid the ongoing conflict between Russia and Ukraine and urged his counterparts from Russia and Ukraine to talk directly with one another, as per a report by news agency ANI. Leavitt noted during press briefing that Russia handed over a peace plan to the Ukrainian side and the two nations agreed on the exchange of prisoners from each other's nations. She said that Trump is a realist and knows that the two nations have been engaged in the conflict due to former US President Joe Biden's 'weakness and incompetence.' (With inputs from agencies)

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store