
Prince Harry's security row is ‘all about the money' – he wants to ‘cut his own costs & try to win back status'
Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
SOURCES claim Prince Harry's long-running battle over security is "all about the money" as he wants to cut down on bodyguard costs.
The 40-year-old yesterday lost a three-year, multimillion-pound fight after his round-the-clock royal protection was axed in the wake of Megxit.
9
Prince Harry lost his appeal over the downgrading of his personal security
Credit: AFP
9
The royal is reportedly splashing out millions on bodyguards
Credit: Getty
9
Sources claimed the row is "all about the money" for the royal couple
Credit: AFP
The Duke of Sussex had declared "my life is at stake", bizarrely claiming to be the victim of an establishment stitch-up and said he 'can't see a world' in which he would bring his wife and kids here.
However The Sun understands that Harry wished he could win the case to cut his security costs and try and get back his status as an International Protected Person.
He spends millions on bodyguards and a source said: 'It's all about the money'.
Harry claimed stripping him of his security was a plot to force him and his wife Meghan back to Britain.
Earlier this month, the prince returned to the UK for his two-day hearing at the Court of Appeal in London.
But Sir Geoffrey Vos, Lord Justice Bean and Lord Justice Edis yesterday ruled against him in a humiliating blow.
The loss - his second unsuccessful appeal against the decision - could be the final nail in the coffin for his security row, although Harry could still take his fight to the Supreme Court.
It also means he faces paying the legal costs for both sides, which is estimated to amount to more than £1.5million.
Prince Harry's biggest bombshells:
Harry and Meghan were stripped of their round-the-clock protection when they stepped back from royal duties in 2020.
He was allowed security when he stayed at royal residences or attended royal events but had to fend for himself if he wanted to see friends in a bespoke arrangement.
Harry wanted to fund his own Met Police armed bodyguards but officials refused - with insiders insisting cops are not "guns for hire".
The Met said in its 2023 statement: 'To allow an individual to pay for protective security would create a precedent in which other wealthy individuals could argue that they too should be permitted to pay for such services.'
Page Six reported in 2023 that Meghan and Harry pay two million dollars a year on security.
Since Megxit, Meghan and Harry have unfurled a number of podcasts and TV deals.
These include the recent productions With Love, Meghan and Polo - part of a $100m Netflix deal.
Meghan also recently launched a new podcast called Female Founders after her Archetypes series on Spotify.
But their $20m podcast partnership with the music giant ended in 2023.
A Palace spokesman said of the long-running security battle: 'All of these issues have been examined repeatedly and meticulously by the courts, with the same conclusion reached on each occasion.'
It comes after Harry lashed out in a TV interview last night, despite claiming to want 'reconciliation' with his family.
The father-of-two also revealed that King Charles refuses to speak to him "because of this security stuff".
He said of yesterday's court decision: 'The other side have won in keeping me unsafe.
9
Prince Harry lashed out at the royal family in an interview after the loss
Credit: BBC
9
rince Harry and Meghan Markle pictured promoting their Archewell podcasts
Credit: pixel8000
9
Meghan and Harry have unfurled a wave of podcasts and productions
Credit: Netflix
9
Prince Harry in a trailer for his first Netflix series without Meghan Markle
Credit: Netflix
'I can't see a world in which I will be bringing my wife and children back at this point.'
He told the BBC that verdict was 'a good old-fashioned establishment stitch up', and blamed the Royal Household for influencing the decision to reduce his security.
Harry also chillingly suggested it would be the Firm's fault if anything happened to him or wife Meghan Markle.
The Duke was asked why the taxpayer pay for police security.
He answered: "First off, private security can only do so much, I can't go into details but most will be able to work that out.
"One of the major things is that they don't have jurisdiction in a foreign country, they don't have any jurisdiction.
"Police protection is effective protection, which is what my grandmother made very clear that we needed.
"If you know that other people that are being protected, people that have made a choice for public office, then why would you be comfortable or happy with someone in my position that has given 30 to 35 years service to his country, two tours of Afghanistan and the threats and risks to my life… I was born into this position. I was born into those risks and they've only increased over time along with my marriage to Meghan."
Referring to his incendiary memoir Spare published more than two years ago, he added: 'Of course some members of my family will never forgive me for writing a book. They will never forgive me for lots of things.
'There's no point in continuing to fight any more. Life is precious. I don't know how much longer my father has. He won't speak to me because of this security stuff. But it would be nice to reconcile.'
9
Meghan Markle seen on her Archetypes Spotify podcast
Credit: Not known, clear with picture desk
9
Meghan has recently launched a new podcast called Female Founders
Credit: Meghan, Duchess of Sussex/Instagram

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Scottish Sun
an hour ago
- Scottish Sun
Crafty Ukrainian soldiers develop Mad Max-style truck with huge spikes to defend against deadly Russian drones
The truck was seen yesterday north of front line city Donetsk THORN IN VLAD'S SIDE Crafty Ukrainian soldiers develop Mad Max-style truck with huge spikes to defend against deadly Russian drones Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) CRAFTY Ukrainian soldiers have developed a vehicle fitted with huge spikes to defend against Russian drones. The Mad Max-style truck has been equipped with the cage contraption to block the enemy's deadly devices. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up 5 Ukrainian soldiers have developed a vehicle fitted with huge spikes to defend against Russian drones Credit: Getty 5 The truck is equipped with a cage contraption to block the enemy's deadly devices Credit: AP 5 The truck was seen north of front line city Donetsk Credit: Reuters This makeshift armour is fitted to what looks to be a US-made Humvee. It was seen yesterday north of front line city Donetsk, where fierce fighting between President Volodymyr Zelensky's Ukrainian military and invading Russian troops continues. It is now almost completely deserted, with most residents fleeing the onslaught from Vladimir Putin's war machine. Meanwhile, a giant paint plant in Yaroslavl, Russia — making special coatings for protection of military equipment — was pictured engulfed in flames yesterday following an attack by Ukraine. Russia has also been bulking up its vehicles with the protective add-ons, so much so in some cases that it is impossible to tell what the vehicle even is. Last month, combat footage showed what observers identified as a Russian tank shielded by a large cage, significant amounts of netting, and some other material. President Trump floated the idea of a territorial exchange as part of a potential deal, a proposal Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky has firmly rejected. He said: "There is nothing to talk about. This violates our Constitution. "This is our territory, the territory of the people of Ukraine." 5 A paint plant in Yaroslavl, Russia - making special coatings for protection of military equipment - pictured engulfed in flames Credit: East2West 5 President Trump has floated the idea of a territorial exchange as part of a potential deal, a proposal President Zelensky has rejected Credit: Getty


Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Prince Andrew 'barks foul-mouthed question at builders' as speed humps are installed near his palatial home
Prince Andrew confronted builders installing speed bumps outside his palatial home with a foul-mouthed rant, it has been reported. The disgraced Duke of York, 65, allegedly barked 'what the f*** are you doing now?' at workers putting in the sleeping policemen across the 4,800-acre Windsor Great Park estate. It is understood he was riding his horse when the conversation took place and was around one mile from Royal Lodge, where he has lived for the past 20 years. An insider told The Sun: 'The worker was just going about his job when Andrew, on one of his regular rides round the estate, came along and looked down from up high and said 'what the f*** are you doing now?' 'Andrew likes to drive his car out of Royal Lodge quite fast and is obviously a bit peeved as one of the speed humps is even right by the gate out of the park. 'No one likes speed humps but he will hardly feel them in his massive anyway.' It comes after Andrew was heavily criticised in the book penned by Andrew Lownie and serialised by the Mail, called Entitled: The Rise and Fall of the House of York. He has since been spotted driving a black Land Rover Defender around near Windsor with his ex-wife of 10 years, Sarah Ferguson. Windsor Great Park, however, is shut off to the general public with security gates preventing traffic from entering the estate from the road. Only employees, official visitors and residents such as Prince Andrew are allowed inside. The disgraced Duke's alleged rant at the builders is the latest in a string of incidents he has become embroiled in on the estate. In January 2022, claims emerged that he had shouted at a female gardener over 'wrongly cut trees' just days after he was served with a writ from Virginia Roberts. The gardener in question was allegedly flustered and upset by the outburst from the Duke. A royal insider said it was 'unfair', especially as it was 'only a few saplings'. Meanwhile, in 2016 it was reported that Prince Andrew had rammed the park gates closed with his £80,000 Range Rover to avoid a one-mile detour home. It is understood that a report was made to police but no further action was taken. On Tuesday, the Daily Mail reported new research that shows two-thirds of Brits support stripping Andrew of his remaining royal titles. According to YouGov polling, 67 per cent of the population would back a move by the Royal Family to remove any remaining vestiges of his former position. The most well-known title held by the late Queen's second son is the Duke of York, a title given to him on his wedding day to Sarah Ferguson in 1986. Prince Andrew's scandalous and faux pas-ridden life has been outlined in extracts from Mr Lownie's bombshell new biography. One of the most explosive claims is that Prince Andrew and his nephew Prince Harry had a violent altercation in 2013 - something which the Sussexes have denied. It was alleged that the altercation took place during a family gathering in 2013 over 'something Andrew said behind Harry's back '. Author Mr Lownie claimed 'Harry got the better of Andrew by all accounts', with Harry leaving his uncle 'with a bloody nose' before their brawl was broken up. Later Andrew is said to have told Harry his marriage to Meghan Markle would not last more than a month and accused his nephew of going 'bonkers' and not doing any due diligence into her past. On Saturday night, representatives for the Duke of Sussex denied the fight ever happened, adding that Andrew never made the alleged comments about Harry. A spokesman for the Duke of Sussex told the Daily Mail: 'I can confirm Prince Harry and Prince Andrew have never had a physical fight, nor did Prince Andrew ever make the comments he is alleged to have made about the Duchess of Sussex to Prince Harry.' In the explosive new biography, it is also alleged that Prince Andrew was dubbed 'sex obsessed' and a 'perverted animal' by convicted paedophile Jeffrey Epstein. There was even a long-standing rumour of an affair with a household staff member when he was still married to the Duchess of York. One nanny is said to have left because he made unwelcome advances. However, a family friend also described the prince as 'not very socially adept' and a 'bedroom bore' when it comes to women. 'He's about as subtle as a hand grenade,' said another. As a young man Andrew was said to be juvenile and fond of sly pranks - and sources said he has not changed much as an adult. One friend described him as a 'nightmare to sit next to at dinner', making ghastly jokes about whether the ladies are wearing knickers and 'lavatorial' jokes. At the same time he has a strong sense of of his own position as a senior member of the Royal Family, demanding people call him 'Your Royal Highness' and 'Sir' and insisting people stand up when he comes into the room. Some aides have been reduced to tears, while another was moved to different duties because Andrew 'disliked a mole on the man's face'. Former prime minister Boris Johnson was said to have remarked after being forced to dine with Andrew: 'I'm the last person to be a republican but, f***, if I ever have to spend another lunch like that, I soon will be.'


The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Man arrested after police firearm discharged inside Sydney airport terminal
A man has been arrested after an incident at Sydney Airport this morning that involved a police firearm being discharged inside the terminal. An AFP spokesperson said the agency has launched an investigation into the incident and a crime scene has been established. There was no ongoing threat to the public. An airport spokesperson said there were no injuries, and said the facility was operating as normal after the incident was resolved. 'Sydney Airport is currently assisting Australian Federal Police following an incident earlier this morning,' the spokesperson said. 'No injuries occurred as a result of the incident. An arrest has been made and the airport is operating normally.' More details to come.