I've been testing iOS 26 for a month — 5 tips you need to know now that the public beta is here
The iOS 26 public beta is now available, giving eager iPhone users the chance to see what new capabilities are coming to their phones ahead of a full release this fall.
If you don't mind the hiccups and mishaps that can come from using any pre-release software, it's a great chance to get a sense of what's changing and maybe even give Apple some feedback on what features need fine-tuning.
It's also a chance that Apple only started providing users fairly recently.
Go back a decade or so, and the only way to try out iOS versions before their final release in the fall was to be an iPhone developer. Apple may have previewed its software releases during its annual developer conference, but the actual testing was kept out of the public view.
That changed with iOS 9, where Apple rolled out a public beta for the very first time. I remember, because I downloaded that beta way back when... just like I've tested out every public beta for every iOS release since that time.
As such, I've learned a few things about using beta software that could come in handy if you decide to give iOS 26 a try now that Apple has made good on its promise to deliver a public beta this month. Keep these five tips in mind to make the testing experience go as smoothly as possible.
Don't use your actual iPhone if possible
Apple's public betas are generally pretty stable, and they've already been in the hands of developers for a few weeks. So you're not exactly installing untried software on your iPhone when you download an iOS public beta.
That said, the usual risks with beta software still apply. If you've got an app on your iPhone that you rely on for your everyday use, and it doesn't work smoothly with the beta software, you're not going to be terribly happy with the experience. Betas are also notorious for draining your battery faster than software that's been tried and tested. That's why I advise anyone who's trying out a beta to install it on a backup phone if they have one available.
For instance, I've been running the iOS 26 developer beta since Apple released it amid WWDC 2025, and it's not installed on the iPhone I use as my daily device. Instead, I've got it on a few other iPhones I have around for testing purposes. I haven't run into any showstopping issues on those devices, but it's reduced my stress greatly not having to worry about a potential issue causing havoc on my regular phone.
I'm fully aware that as a phone reviewer, I likely have more unused iPhones lying around than the typical person. In fact, given how the best phone deals encourage you to trade in your current device to get the best price on a handset, you may not have any old iPhone available at all to serve as your test device. That doesn't necessarily take you out of the running to test iOS 26 when the public beta rolls around, though.
If the only phone you have available is the one currently in your pocket, my advice would be to wait until Apple releases a subsequent update to the first public beta. That way, you can make sure that other people aren't running into major issues that might trip up your iPhone use.
But some of you may still decide to throw caution to the wind and install the public beta on your one and only iPhone. That's fine — just make sure you don't skip over my next piece of advice.
Before you do anything, back up your iPhone
Any time you upgrade your phone's software, you should first make an archived backup. But that's especially true when you're about to put a beta release on your device. Having a recent backup stored within easy reach buys you a bit of insurance, as you can revert to the older version of the iOS should the beta prove unstable.
We've got instructions on how to back up your iPhone, but basically, if you're backing up to a Mac running macOS Catalina or later, simply plug in your iPhone to the computer, select your device from a Finder window and click Back Up Now. For iCloud backups, fire up the Settings app, tap on your name and select iCloud. From there, tap on iCloud Back Up and select Back Up Now on the subsequent screen.
If you need to go back to the old version of iOS after installing a beta, you have to erase and restore your iPhone, using an archived backup. And since you want to go back to the currently shipping version of iOS and not the beta, you need to make sure that backup is from the last release — iOS 18 in the case of reverting from the iOS 26 beta. That's why I suggest backing up to a computer so that you can have some control over the backup process.
Spend some time familiarizing yourself with Liquid Glass
All right, so you've made the backup, you've installed the beta and you're ready to explore what's new. What new feature should you try out first?
In the case of iOS 26, I'd recommend setting aside time to familiarize yourself with the interface.
Like the other Apple software releases this year, iOS 26 features a new Liquid Glass interface. And while it's not completely reinventing the look of the iPhone software, things will look different enough to the point where you'll want to poke around before trying any particular feature.
Look at the icons and the toolbars. Notice how translucent menus are. Play around with icon shading to see which one works best for you. And above all, visit the Control Center by swiping down from the right-hand corner of your iPhone screen. The translucent panels tend to more legible with darker wallpapers, so you may find yourself wanting to follow the lead of my colleague John Velasco, who went into Settings and enabled a Reduce Transparency option in the Accessibility menu.
Certain apps have more condensed toolbars, too. For example, iOS 26 Safari defaults to a new Compact tab design that features just a back button, menu and search bar and more button for accessing things like bookmarks, tabs and sharing options. If you want a more expanded look, the Bottom tab design gives you more immediate access to those options like you had in iOS 18.
Safari isn't the only app with streamlined controls. You'll find them in apps like Phone, and if you have a Apple Intelligence-capable device, the screenshot controls are different to accommodate new Visual Intelligence features.
Spending a little time looking around the Liquid Glass interface will help you acclimate to iOS's new look and may cut down on the frustation of getting used to a new look.
Identify the features you want to try out
After you've had a chance to look at the new interface, pick an app or two to explore in greater depth in the iOS 26 beta. I'd prioritize spending time with the apps you use the most ahead of anything else.
For instance, if you're always using the Messages app, explore the changes Apple's introducing in the iOS 26 version from polls to new chat backgrounds to options for filtering out unknown senders. If it's Photos you turn to more often than not, you've got a new interface to explore there, too, not to mention the ability to turn photos into spatial photos with the tap of a button.
And don't go into this exploration without a good guide. Apple has an iOS 26 preview page where you can get a list of the major new features in each app. And Tom's Guide has published some guides, too, based on our experience with the iOS 26 developer beta. Those guides include:
iOS 26 Messages
iOS 26 Visual Intelligence
iOS 26 Maps
iOS 26 Car Play
iOS 26 Camera
iOS 26 Photos
iOS 26 Wallet
iOS 26 Shortcuts
Give Apple feedback
Apple puts out these public beta not just to get people familiar with new features ahead of the software's final release. It's also looking for feedback. And that's something you can provide.
There's a Feedback app specifically included in the beta. If you don't see its purple icon with an exclamation point inside a dialog balloon, just tap the search bar and start typing Feedback into the search field.
Apple's already made design tweaks in iOS 26, thanks to feedback in the developer beta. And if you've got an iPhone capable of running Apple Intelligence, feedback can help train the AI tools as well.
Here's an example: I was playing around with Visual Intelligence, using the new ability to pull dates from screenshots to create calendar entries. Apple Intelligence was creating an entry with the right time but wrong date, so I tapped the thumbs down feedback button that appears next to Apple Intelligence features in beta and selected Wrong Date from the list of menu options provided. Subsequent efforts to use that feature in Visual Intelligence worked much better.
Not all the feedback you give will have that immediate an impact. But letting Apple know what's working and what's not in the iOS 26 beta will lead to a more polished experience — not just for you, but for everyone using the software.
More from Tom's Guide
Apple reportedly has more iOS 26 features in the works — here's what's coming to your iPhone
iOS 26 brings big changes to your iPhone lock screen — what to expect
iPhone 17 rumors — what we know so far
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
24 minutes ago
- Yahoo
AI in food – 'secret sauce' solution sought for productivity
AI is expected to improve food manufacturers' productivity and efficiency but as with the development of any new technology there is an element of apprehension. Much of the anxiety seemingly comes down to a lack of understanding of the technology itself, how it works and the myriad of AI systems that could be employed for different applications and problem-solving. And then there's the question of labour, tech-skilled labour rather than the manual kind. Think about the evolution of phone technology – moving from analogue to digital devices and hefty back-of-the car handsets to those that now fit in a pocket – electric vehicles and their slow development due to a lack of infrastructure and the introduction of hybrid models as a half-way-house to address bottlenecks. Food manufacturers are adopting AI but reservations might come down to investing too much too quickly when the tech is advancing at pace, capital on hand and assessing the return on investment. Abhinav Agrawal, the co-lead of AI and data monetisation at consultancy AlixPartners, argues food manufacturers also face a bottleneck in that they 'are not exactly the desired location for data scientists, AI programmers and developers' to attract the desired talent pool. 'I don't recommend our clients make big bets right now,' Agrawal tells Just Food. 'One of our clients launched a $55-60m AI initiative about two years ago but there's no measurable ROI right now. There's no success that we can point to that $60m was worth investing. 'Instead, launch $5m projects and see. Maybe two of them fail but three of them produce a ROI and you gain a little more experience in which type of skills you need to hire. 'Then you launch another five, or maybe next time you can launch ten, so in the end you may end up spending $60m over three years, for instance.' 'Strategic advantage' It's a bit of a juggling act for food manufacturers. There's almost an obligation to invest in AI now or risk being left behind and losing a competitive edge. Or as Tom Clayton, the CEO of Sheffield-based IntelliAM, puts it, gaining a 'strategic advantage'. Clayton, the head of the tech company specialising in AI software and machine learning for manufacturers, believes productivity improvements through the tech are a way to address the increasing demand for food as global populations rise. 'In the food and beverage world, where you're talking about high volumes and low margins, it's really interesting because, if you can make an extra 100,000 SKUs a day, that's direct profit to the business. Similarly, if you can avoid wastage, you're moving costs from the bottom line. 'We're talking considerable amounts of money. Essentially, the driver of these organisations is to be able to improve capacity of the plants by being more intelligent and doing more with less.' AI not yet 'transformational' to profits There's an obvious buzz around AI, not just in the food industry but outside as the benefits (or otherwise) of the technology are debated across media. Clayton says there's been an 'immense increase' in interest over the last two years as boardrooms wake up to the fact the tech might give them an advantage. 'In any new technology convergence, there's always people who want to embrace it immediately. As your competitors do it, you've got to do it. Unfortunately, I think there's going to be a bit of first-mover advantage over the AI element,' he adds. Agrawal presents an example of how AI can work its magic in improving productivity and efficiency in terms of a salty snacks manufacturer for which AlixPartners acted as an adviser – assessing the size and shape of corn used in the production process to ensure quality and consistency. The production line's operating efficiency rate went up from the 80s percentage range into the 90s from employing an AI system, he says, adding each percentage point increase 'translated into a couple of million dollars of bottom-line impact'. However, Agrawal suggests the tech is not yet 'transformational' when it equates to output and profitability. 'For me, transformative means you're going after 30-40-50% plant P&L improvement, that type of thing. I would not say it is possible right now. It is in maybe the 20s with these technologies,' he argues. 'But I do think that in a year or so, the technology can improve, that it can produce like an 30-40-50% improvement.' Labour leverage Nevertheless, AI can translate into savings on the labour front, Agrawal says, proposing 'what was not possible even five years ago is possible now'. A bakery manufacturer in the US needed a lot of temporary, hourly paid staff to help run its 30 or so production plants, with managers having to assess shift arrangements and working patterns on a daily and weekly basis, he says. 'Our algorithms recommended how much labour they needed by the day, by zone and by type, and whatever. We tracked it for six months and those predictions saved them on average 20%,' Agrawal explains. For those food and CPG manufacturers already 'leveraging' AI tech, Chris Ashley, the vice president of strategy at Peak, a unit of software company UiPath, says the 'advantages compound over time'. He believes the 'more sophisticated they become, the more they can leverage these systems'. Ashley adds: 'They will accrue more working capital efficiency, more operating margin, more productivity and that will just continue to compound over time. We think this needs to be a topic of conversation in every boardroom currently on how to educate the teams. 'I think the impacts can be transformational. The augmentation of these teams with AI-driven systems is driving more productivity and driving more economic upside for the business, which means more jobs.' Level playing field Meanwhile, Clayton at IntelliAM says AI helps improve the reliability and life of production components by identifying problems before they arise, reducing maintenance times and the potential for lines going out of action. AI does that by 'ingesting millions of data points from the brains of the machines in a factory and contextualising' them to 'understand tolerance settings to get maximum throughput speed settings, reduce bottlenecks, to understand the blend of different ingredients from different suppliers to achieve quality improvements, and to reduce waste streams', he explains. IntelliAM advised an unnamed dairy producer trying to make the best use of hygiene requirements between the production of different SKUs on the same line. 'If you're running ten SKUs a day, that might save an hour's production a day and an hour's production turns into hundreds of thousands of bottles of milk,' Clayton suggests. AI is impacting snacks much more than proteins or meat Abhinav Agrawal, AlixPartners However, it's not a level playing field in terms of benefits when it comes to assessing the AI productivity impact on different food categories, Agrawal proposes. In areas like meat and pastries, for instance, AI-driven robots don't yet have the 'delicate' touch to avoid damage, although developments are being made there. 'My experience is that for the protein manufacturer, the ROI from AI so far is still there but it is modest compared to snacks and things like that, largely because there are some regulations around humans doing certain inspections. 'In a nutshell, AI is impacting both sides but it is impacting snacks and those things much more than the proteins or meat and those types of products.' 'Secret sauce' Food manufacturers that Just Food approached to comment for this article were generally disinclined to chat or did not respond – Tyson Foods, Nestlé, Mondelez International and Kellanova fell into the former camp, for instance. It's a 'sensitive' topic, Agrawal says, because some food manufacturers are now using custom solutions rather than the 'out-of-the-box software' in the past – their 'secret sauce'. Cargill was, however, more willing by identifying its 'patent-pending' computer vision technology CarVe, which measures red meat yields. It was rolled out at the company's beef facility in Friona, Texas, in 2024 and additional plants will be added in a 'phased rollout'. Through cameras, CarVe uses AI-inputted models to assess human cutting and trimming techniques to ensure consistent quality and to reduce waste. 'Those gains, together with steadier throughput and better use of labour and materials, strengthen overall plant economics and help us stay cost-competitive for customers,' Jarrod Gillig, senior vice president for food at Cargill's North America beef unit, says. 'Our philosophy with CarVe is to test, learn, refine then scale. We pilot first, capture lessons quickly and scale once the business case is clear. This approach lets us invest wisely, stay nimble and roll out proven innovations across our facilities when they're ready to deliver value for producers and consumers.' Cargill's comments were echoed by Roger Gaemperle, the head of industry strategy and marketing in EMEA markets at US-headquartered automation and tech firm Rockwell Automation. 'There is a lot of potential or high impact on margin' through increased yield output when AI assisted robots can replace the human role in meat processing, which is often not 'nice work' conducted in a cold environment, Gaemperle says. 'If you really want to optimise the margin and also productivity or the output, I think these are the systems that producers need to look at. And, over the next few years, the systems will get smarter and smarter,' he envisages. Another AI benefit is the reduction of waste in raw materials, Gaemperle adds, using the example of milk powder production and the need to have a consistent milk fat percentage to ensure equal quality by production unit. It's becoming transformational because of the speed of the algorithms and computing power Roger Gaemperle, Rockwell Automation More generally, Gaemperle adds: 'It's really becoming transformational because of the speed now with the algorithms and computing power. That's really what has opened up many new opportunities that were not feasible in the past. 'Look at it holistically, the whole production process, and identify first where there are potential opportunities, and then prioritise those opportunities. If the return on the investment can be proven first with one line, then additional use cases can be implemented over time.' Implications for jobs It would be amiss here not to address one of the biggest concerns over the implications of AI technologies across industries – jobs. Opinions varied for this article but the underlying theme to emerge was new types of jobs will be created. 'If you take a modern food and beverage organisation, whilst there is arguably a high degree of automation, there is still a hell of a lot of human interaction and judgement. AI will replace all that,' Clayton opines. However, he throws in the caveat: 'There's an argument that jobs will change, that there will be a transfer of skills because of AI. But there will be better jobs, it's not about job reduction. 'People are intrinsically part of the solution because a) you need the automation engineers to support obtaining the data to create the insights in the first place and then b) they need to look at the people on the output to react to these or manipulate data, like data scientists.' Agrawal suggests the food industry will eventually replicate the semiconductor sector, where companies such as Nvidia and TSMC are using AI to the 'fullest'. 'What I see as the biggest change in four or five years is that we will not need as much human labour in manufacturing. I don't think it'll lead to mass unemployment because there'll be other manufacturing opportunities,' Agrawal suggests. For Ashley at Peak, boardroom education has a key role to play. 'Those jobs might look different going forwards in terms of individuals that can map decision logic and map processes and help architect AI systems. The nature of those jobs and the skills required may shift slightly but I think there is huge upside economically and for every workforce in the AI era,' he argues. 'I think that for the manufacturing industry it basically means that there's incredible opportunity to deploy pilots and capabilities that you can test very quickly to see if they drive business uplifts but it also means there's an education challenge in boardrooms. 'I think it is a watershed moment but it is evolving continuously and businesses need to lean into that and try and figure out how to harness it as best as possible.' "AI in food – 'secret sauce' solution sought for productivity" was originally created and published by Just Food, a GlobalData owned brand. The information on this site has been included in good faith for general informational purposes only. It is not intended to amount to advice on which you should rely, and we give no representation, warranty or guarantee, whether express or implied as to its accuracy or completeness. You must obtain professional or specialist advice before taking, or refraining from, any action on the basis of the content on our site. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
24 minutes ago
- Yahoo
You've probably been duped by AI on a dating app – but not the way you think
As I was hanging out with a couple of friends recently, one of them mentioned that he had used an artificial intelligence program to punch up his online dating profile. I didn't respond. The other guy we were with is so much an AI fanboy that it's hard to get through a conversation without him describing how much simpler the technology has made his life. Still, the idea of trusting machines to bridge the gender divide and unlock secrets generations of humans have sought seemed sketchy to me. I've heard all the hype. I've been told, repeatedly, about how AI will change our lives in wonderful and unimaginable ways. Even so, are we really ready to move toward a future where we rely on AI to fill our social calendars? Computer-assisted canoodling comes with risks Sharpening a business résumé with computer assistance is one thing. Since olden times, lots of books have been devoted to that subject, so enlisting AI's help is a logical progression there. Dating is − or at least should be − different. It is, after all, among the most interpersonal experiences human beings can have. Do we really want microprocessors more involved in matters of the heart than they already are? No question, if you are using a dating site, an algorithm already helps pick your matches. That decreases the likelihood of those Hallmark Channel pairings with people of very different backgrounds meeting by chance and falling in love. Maybe that's no great loss. The odds of mismatched couples staying together anywhere but in those fictitious and perpetually snowy Hallmark villages may be on the low side, anyway. Still, is it wise − or even ethical − to use AI to make a dating profile more attractive to potential matches? Opinion: 'Happy Gilmore 2' works because it has something for the woke and Trump crowds Using an old photo or a "glamour" portrait with a dating profile is a familiar trick. But AI has the ability to take photo doctoring to a whole new level. Rather than just sending would-be suitors images of what we looked like in our prime, AI can manufacture super-buff versions of ourselves that we might not recognize in a mirror. If relationships never advance past the online flirting stage, that's fine. If potential romantic partners finally meet face-to-face, that's when those AI-generated illusions will be shattered. Some might argue keeping virtual relationships going a while gives less physically attractive people more opportunities to demonstrate their good qualities, before being dismissed based on their appearance. I would counter that relationships grounded in deception probably aren't headed anywhere good. Opinion alerts: Get columns from your favorite columnists + expert analysis on top issues, delivered straight to your device through the USA TODAY app. Don't have the app? Download it for free from your app store. Using AI to provide more clever answers to dating profile questions isn't much better than digitally altering photos. If your dating profile gives people the impression you are smarter, funnier or more self assured than you really are, you will be found out eventually. I think most people would agree that creating AI-generated profiles that are purely fake to scam people is wrong. Yet AI-assisted dating profiles are at least a step − and maybe several steps − in that direction. Opinion: AI knows we shouldn't trust it for everything. I know because I asked it. Will AI have to teach us the facts of life someday? Overall, AI's intrusion into the dating world is a disturbing trend. If people become so reliant on technology to handle the most intimate details of their personal lives, it won't be long before a "date" might be two people sitting across from each other in a restaurant, parroting what their smartphones are telling them to say to each other. Some of us worry about AI eventually overthrowing human civilization. Research already suggests that AI programs would resort to blackmail to protect themselves from deactivation or replacement. The end for our species might not be as dramatic as Skynet commissioning an army of Terminators to wipe us out. At the rate we're going, maybe all AI would need to do is provide enough bad dating advice so we're no longer able to procreate. Blake Fontenay is USA TODAY's commentary editor. You can read diverse opinions from our USA TODAY columnists and other writers on the Opinion front page, on X, formerly Twitter, @usatodayopinion and in our Opinion newsletter. This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Can AI help me get a date? That's the wrong question | Opinion Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
24 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Analysts Say Tesla's (TSLA) Real Value May Lie in the Story, Not the Numbers
Tesla, Inc. (NASDAQ:TSLA) is one of the On July 31, Wolfe Research analyst Emmanuel Rosner reiterated a 'Peerperform' rating on the stock without a price target. According to the firm, near-term Street estimates for the stock appear high, particularly for 2025 and 2026. Free cash flow is also likely to remain under pressure even though the company's energy business could be a vital factor. 'TSLA shares are down 21% YTD, below the broader S&P up 8% and RIVN down 2%, with Ford up 9% and GM down 2%. Near-term, Street estimates still appear high, especially for 2025 and 2026. And FCF is likely to remain under pressure, with strong growth in the company's burgeoning Energy business a key swing factor. That said, this name trades more around the narrative than the numbers. ' Pixabay/Public Domain Nevertheless, the firm tactically sees an improving narrative. 'Tesla has several catalysts coming w/r/t FSD and robotaxi, including an expansion of their AV service into several new US markets (San Francisco, Nevada, Arizona, Florida, etc). The company plans to unlock hands-free / eyes-off autonomy for FSD owners in select US locations by YE25. Supervised FSD in China and Europe is expected to launch over the next ~12 months. And Optimus is expected to enter scale production in 2026.' Tesla, Inc. (NASDAQ:TSLA) is an automotive and clean energy company that leverages advanced artificial intelligence in its autonomous driving technology and robotics initiatives. While we acknowledge the potential of TSLA as an investment, we believe certain AI stocks offer greater upside potential and carry less downside risk. If you're looking for an extremely undervalued AI stock that also stands to benefit significantly from Trump-era tariffs and the onshoring trend, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. READ NEXT: and Disclosure: None.
