Illinois criminal justice advocates tout ‘Clean Slate' legislation as ‘economic boon'
SPRINGFIELD — Criminal justice reform advocates say legislation to seal criminal records for certain nonviolent crimes, which passed Friday in the House, would unlock economic opportunity for thousands of Illinoisans.
The so-called Clean Slate Act has failed twice before, but activists see renewed fiscal messaging as the key to reinvigorating the campaign. This time, the bill's sponsor points to a 'diverse coalition of stakeholders' and backing from business groups as signs Illinois could become the 13th state to enact similar legislation.
'This is something I've worked on for six long years, and now we have law enforcement and the business community — folks like the Illinois Retail Merchants Association, the Illinois Manufacturers Association — all on board,' Rep. Jehan Gordon-Booth, D-Peoria, said in an interview. 'Not as a neutral party, but they are proponents. They want to see this bill passed.'
Like earlier proposals, Senate Bill 1784 would require law enforcement agencies to automatically seal records for nonviolent criminal convictions twice a year — Jan. 1 and July 1. The records would no longer be public, although law enforcement and state's attorneys would retain access.
Gordon-Booth has sponsored Clean Slate legislation twice before — once in 2021 and again in 2023 — but neither bill progressed past committee.
Just a few days before the 2025 legislative session concluded, she filed it again. Within two days, it passed the House mostly along partisan lines, and is headed for debate on the Senate floor.
The session ends at midnight Saturday, although the bill could still pass after that deadline.
People convicted of certain violent offenses — including sex crimes against minors, DUI, reckless driving and violent offenses that require sex offender registration — would be ineligible to have their records sealed.
'I want to make this very, very clear: Serious criminal records are not eligible for automated sealing,' Gordon-Booth said during floor debate.
Gordon-Booth argued that conviction records trap formerly incarcerated individuals in a state of perpetual punishment, eclipsing access to employment, housing and educational opportunities. She said Clean Slate would remove these barriers, helping system-impacted people reintegrate into society instead of recidivating.
Paul Rothschild, managing director of operations for the Illinois Coalition to End Permanent Punishment — a group that advocates for the rights of people with criminal records — said he agrees. He said the justice system fails to follow through on its own promise: Once someone has served their time, they are entitled to a second chance.
'We believe that people should be accountable for the crimes that they commit. But we also believe there is an implied covenant that when they finish, they're supposed to be returned to the world made whole, and that covenant is not being kept by society. They're being forever subjugated in that lower caste, that lower class,' Rothschild said.
More than 3 million Illinoisans have arrest or conviction records, and an estimated 921,000 people are eligible for 'sealing relief' — but only about 10% actually petition to have their records cleared, according to statistics from Live Free Illinois, a grassroots organization aimed at reforming the state criminal justice system and part of the Clean Slate Illinois steering committee, which coordinates the campaign's messaging and advocacy efforts.
The bill would automate the process for individuals with nonviolent convictions to have their records sealed once they have served their sentences, completed probation, and remained crime-free.
Many eligible individuals are deterred by steep fines, complex paperwork and long waiting periods, Gordon-Booth said. The 'burdensome' process has contributed to massive court backlogs, according to Clean Slate Illinois.
'It's going to automate the process, so this way we don't have to go through that whole trying to get the paperwork, trying to go through all the rigmarole,' said Chauncy Stockdale, who was formerly incarcerated and is now a member of the Live Free Illinois Fellowship, a reentry program that supports returning citizens.
The measure passed the House 81-28, with five Republicans joining Democrats in support of the measure. No Democrats voted against the bill.
During debate on the House floor, Minority Floor Leader Rep. Patrick Windhorst, R-Metropolis, voiced concerns about the tentative $18 million price tag, and whether the state is capable of fully funding the policy in the years ahead, leaving counties to cover the cost.
'If this isn't funded, we're either going to be sending a large unfunded mandate to our counties, or we're making a promise to 2.1 million people that will not be fulfilled without any funding,' he said.
Gordon-Booth detailed a three year 'implementation ramp,' which would give the state time to identify funding sources for the local circuit clerks. She also said the Illinois State Police would absorb the initial costs and emphasized the state's commitment to supporting circuit clerks in the rollout phase.
'It is our full intention to provide clerks with all that they need to implement this,' she said. 'We are not going to send an unfunded mandate to our local governments.'
On April 10, nearly 300 members, supporters and advocates from Live Free Illinois chapters gathered in front of the Abraham Lincoln monument in Springfield for Advocacy Day, calling on lawmakers to introduce the Clean Slate Act.
Live Free Illinois — a faith-based nonprofit focused on ending gun violence and mass incarceration — organizes Black congregations to push for systemic change. The organization is involved in the broad-based Clean Slate steering committee, which also includes the Fully Free Campaign, the Illinois Coalition to End Permanent Punishments, and Impact for Equity.
The day before, Muslim leaders also advocated for Clean Slate legislation at Illinois Muslim Action Day.
Beyond criminal justice reform, advocates pushed a new messaging angle this year to usher the legislation across the finish line: Clean Slate could boost Illinois' economy.
As of April, Illinois has one of the highest unemployment rates in the country, at 4.8% — above the national average of 4.2%, according to the data from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics.
Jerika Richardson, senior vice president for equitable justice and strategic initiatives at the National Urban League, said the act would open doors for thousands of people who have been barred from work because of background checks.
'There are so many employers and businesses across this country who are struggling to find the workers that they need, and part of the reason is because these records are barriers,' Richardson said. 'If Illinois passes the Clean Slate Act, you won't have to worry about businesses going to another state or leaving the country.'
An amendment to the Illinois Human Rights Act, signed by Gov. JB Pritzker in 2021, expanded legal protections for state workers by prohibiting discrimination based on criminal convictions, in addition to arrest records. Yet many say they continue to face employment hurdles despite the law.
People with conviction histories earn an average of 25% less than those with clean records — a gap the National Urban League says costs the state billions of dollars in lost wages. According to a news release from the National Urban League, the Clean Slate Act could generate more than $4.7 billion in lost wages for Illinois, easing economic disparities and addressing labor shortages.
Gordon-Booth echoed Richardson's point, adding that her office frequently hears from constituents who are missing out on life-changing chances.
'I get calls from people saying, 'I had an opportunity to get my dream job, and it fell through because of something that I did when I was 18 or 19.' And we're talking about folks that are in their 30s,' Gordon-Booth said. 'They have not gone through the process of hiring a lawyer, going through the court-mandated process, and folks are losing out.'
Reilly Cook is a graduate student in journalism with Northwestern University's Medill School of Journalism, Media, Integrated Marketing Communications, and a fellow in its Medill Illinois News Bureau working in partnership with Capitol News Illinois.
Capitol News Illinois is a nonprofit, nonpartisan news service that distributes state government coverage to hundreds of news outlets statewide. It is funded primarily by the Illinois Press Foundation and the Robert R. McCormick Foundation.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
35 minutes ago
- Yahoo
House Dems' campaign chair says her party's 'on offense' in 2026 battle to win back majority from GOP
With the early moves heating up in the 2026 battle for the House majority, the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee's (DCCC) chair argues President Donald Trump and the Republican majorities in the House and Senate are "doing incredible damage to working families and to our country." And with the GOP defending a razor-thin majority in the House in next year's midterm elections, Rep. Suzan DelBene, the DCCC chair, noted, "We only need three more seats." "We have 35 districts in play across the country where we have opportunities," DelBene said in a Fox News Digital interview last week in the nation's capital, pointing to the Republican-held seats the DCCC is targeting. "We are on offense. We are fighting for the American people and for the important issues they care about, and Democrats are united in doing that." House Democrats Predict Republicans Will Pay Price For Passing Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill' While the party in power after a presidential election — currently the GOP — typically faces political headwinds and loses House seats in the following midterms, the 2026 map appears to favor Republicans."The battlefield is really laying out to our advantage. There are 14 Democrats who won seats also carried by Donald Trump. There are only three Republicans in seats that were carried by [former Vice President] Kamala Harris. So, that tells me we're going to be on offense," Rep. Richard Hudson of North Carolina, the National Republican Congressional Committee (NRCC) chair, told Fox News Digital at the start of the 2026 cycle. Read On The Fox News App What The House Gop Campaign Committee Chair Told Fox News About Trump's Role In The Midterms DelBene countered that "the reason we have opportunities is because people are outraged, because they do want to see someone come into office who is going to fight for their communities and not just be blindly loyal to a president." And pointing to the small bite House Democrats took out of the GOP's majority in the 2024 elections, she added that "those are the types of candidates that won in our districts last cycle. It's a reason we actually gained seats in 2024 and is absolutely the reason why we're going to take back the majority in 2026." But Hudson noted he has a powerful ally as he works to keep control of the House. "The president understands that he's got to keep the House majority in the midterm so that he has a four-year runway instead of a two-year runway to get his agenda enacted," Hudson said. "He's been extremely helpful to us, and we appreciate it." And the Democrats are facing a polling dilemma because the party's ratings have been sinking to historic lows in a number of national surveys so far this year. The Democrats' ratings in a Fox News poll stood at 41% favorable and 56% unfavorable in a survey conducted April 18-21. Head Here To Check Out The Latest Fox News Polls That's an all-time low for the Democrats in Fox News polling. And for the first time in a decade, the party's standing was lower than that of the GOP, which stood at 44% favorable and 54% unfavorable. The figures were reversed last summer, when Fox News last asked the party favorability question in one of its surveys. But there is a silver lining for the Democrats. The Fox News poll indicated that if the 2026 midterm elections were held today, 49% of voters would back a generic Democrat in their congressional district, with 42% supporting the generic Republican candidate. The Democrats also have another problem — the possibility of primary challenges against longtime and older House lawmakers in safe blue districts. Recently elected Democratic National Committee (DNC) Vice Chair David Hogg last month pledged to spend millions of dollars through his outside political group to support primary challenges against what he termed "asleep at the wheel" House Democrats who he argued have not been effective in pushing back against Trump. The move by the 25-year-old Hogg, a survivor of the shooting seven years ago at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in South Florida, to spend money against fellow Democrats ignited a firestorm within the party. In response, DelBene said, "Democrats across the country are united in taking back the House." Asked by Fox News if the move by Hogg would force the DCCC and allied super PACs to divert money and resources from competitive districts in order to defend incumbents in safe blue districts from primary challenges, DelBene responded, "I think everyone knows how important it is that we take back the House, and folks are focused in helping make sure that we do that in districts all across the country." But the dispute is giving the GOP ammunition. In response to the intra-Democratic Party feud, NRCC spokesman Mike Marinella argued, "No Democrat is safe. A political earthquake is underway, and the old guard is scrambling."Original article source: House Dems' campaign chair says her party's 'on offense' in 2026 battle to win back majority from GOP
Yahoo
35 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Long-awaited raise for Texas judges in limbo over legislative pension clash
Long-awaited pay raises for Texas judges are stuck in a legislative limbo as the clock winds down and lawmakers battle over the future of their own retirement plans. Senate Bill 293 would give judges their first raise in over a decade, increasing base pay 25% to $175,000 a year from $140,000, addressing what both chambers and parties have deemed an emergency in the state. But now they are at odds over a change the House made to the bill that would keep lawmakers' retirement plans flat, while the Senate wants to see their pensions increase alongside judicial pay. Despite several hurried meetings Saturday among representatives and senators involved in this issue, they did not put forward a report harmonizing the disagreement by the midnight deadline, narrowing the chances that raises are approved before the session ends Monday. While lawmakers earn just $7,200 a year for their part-time legislative service, those who serve more than eight years are eligible for a pension when they turn 60 (or when they turn 50 if they've served 12 years.) Rather than basing that payout on their meager legislative salary, it's tied to the base salary for a district judge, a benefit that allows some of the longest-standing lawmakers to earn annual retirement payments of $140,000 a year. The House amendment said these pensions would remain tied to the current judicial salary of $140,000, rather than increasing their retirement benefits alongside judicial pay. 'I do not believe, speaking for me, that this is the right way to consider increases to our legislative retirement,' said bill sponsor Rep. Jeff Leach, a Plano Republican. The Senate disagreed. On Friday night, less than 72 hours before the end of an unusually smooth legislative session, Sen. José Menéndez, a San Antonio Democrat, called a point of order, saying the legislative pension amendment was not germane to the bill and should be removed. Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick upheld Menéndez's challenge, a shocking procedural development for the upper chamber. While bills sometimes fall victim to a point of order in the House, senators rarely bring these procedural challenges. When the House gaveled in on Saturday afternoon, it became clear members had no intention of backing down on their amendment as the Senate had requested. House Speaker Dustin Burrows said under House rules they were 'not authorized' to remove just one amendment, and there is 'certainly no rule or precedent' that allows the Senate to amend House amendments. 'To your knowledge has anything like this ever been done before?,' Rep. Joe Moody, an El Paso Democrat asked. 'Not to my knowledge, no,' Burrows responded, noting that the traditional way these sorts of disputes are resolved is in conference committee, where a group of members from both chambers negotiate the final disagreements over a bill. Sen. Sarah Eckhardt, a Democrat from Austin, told The Texas Tribune on Saturday that the senators felt Leach and bill author Sen. Joan Huffman had agreed to the decoupling without the full support and knowledge of the chambers. She said they 'have to get to a yes' on this, but she is 'pro-public servant' and wants public officials to be appropriately compensated. Lawmakers often try to plan their legislative tenure based on these pension timelines — eight years of service gets you vested in the retirement system, and they earn more each additional year they serve. Some are worried that removing the judicial pay connection will make it harder to argue for an increase to the pension program going forward. Meanwhile, judges are panicking about their pay raises. Judges earn less in Texas than almost any other state, and this 25% raise will still leave them far behind where they would be in the private sector. 'Most law students … going into the first year at a law firm are making more than the starting salary of our judges,' Leach said Saturday. There are still paths to pay raises for judges, but it would likely require the Senate adopting the House version, or both chambers suspending the rules, which takes a three-fifths vote in the Senate and a two-thirds vote in the House Lawmakers said they've been deluged with calls from judges urging them to resolve this snag, with some judges telling them they'd only stayed on the bench because of the promise of raises on the horizon. On Saturday, Supreme Court of Texas Chief Justice Jimmy Blacklock sent a letter to all lawmakers, proposing amended language that kicks the can to next session. 'At this critical juncture, if either legislative chamber insists on its favored solution to the legislator-pension question, I fear we will end the session without any increase in judicial pay,' Blacklock wrote. 'If that happens, it is not the judges themselves but our Texas justice system — which should be the envy of the world — that will suffer most, along with the thousands of Texans who seek justice in our courts every day.' First round of TribFest speakers announced! Pulitzer Prize-winning columnist Maureen Dowd; U.S. Rep. Tony Gonzales, R-San Antonio; Fort Worth Mayor Mattie Parker; U.S. Sen. Adam Schiff, D-California; and U.S. Rep. Jasmine Crockett, D-Dallas are taking the stage Nov. 13–15 in Austin. Get your tickets today!


Politico
35 minutes ago
- Politico
The conversation begins
Presented by With help from Eli Okun and Bethany Irvine Good Sunday morning. This is Zack Stanton, struggling to believe it's already June. Get in touch. WHAT TRUMP IS POSTING: Last night, President Donald Trump shared a post on Truth Social from an account with 986 followers alleging that Joe Biden was 'executed in 2020,' and replaced with 'clones' and 'robotic engineered soulless mindless entities.' WHAT ERNST IS POSTING: At a town hall Friday, Sen. Joni Ernst (R-Iowa) was answering a question about cuts to Medicaid in the House GOP-passed reconciliation bill when an audience member interrupted her to shout that 'people will die' if because of the changes. Ernst replied that 'we all are going to die' — creating the sort of viral clip that travelled beyond the reaches of the internet to land on the front page of the Des Moines Register. (Watch the exchange, in case you missed it.) Now comes a sarcastic 'apology' video from Ernst. 'I made an incorrect assumption that everyone in the auditorium understood that yes, we are all going to perish from this earth,' Ernst said in a video she shared yesterday on Instagram — and which appears to have been filmed in a cemetery. 'So I apologize. And I'm really, really glad that I did not have to bring up the subject of the Tooth Fairy as well. But for those that would like to see eternal and everlasting life, I encourage you to embrace my lord and savior, Jesus Christ.' More from the Des Moines Register's Stephen Gruber-Miller Speaking of Medicaid … DRIVING THE DAY THE CONVERSATION: When it comes to the ways of Washington, Mehmet Oz is still a novice. That's a position at once new and familiar: Prior to entering politics, he was a famous doctor on TV and, before that, a celebrated heart surgeon in Manhattan. To put a fine point on it: It's been a long time since he's been a rookie in his chosen career. The thrill of the new: 'It is exhilarating to learn new things, especially if you think you can help,' Oz tells Playbook's Dasha Burns in the debut episode of 'The Conversation,' POLITICO's new Sunday show you can watch now on YouTube. Oz thinks he can help: That's partly why he took the job as administrator of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. 'No one wants to come work in government and do nothing,' he tells Dasha. 'Why would you take that job?' As in medicine, so too in government: Good intentions don't always lead to good outcomes. 'Sometimes, stuff breaks when you try to make a difference,' says Oz. 'I've told the team this multiple times: If we get everything right, we didn't take enough chances.' The stakes are incredibly high. Oz's remit puts him in charge of programs that provide health care for about half of all Americans. Were Medicare or Medicaid to 'break,' it could affect millions of lives. That's the fear voiced by critics of the reconciliation bill, which makes major changes to Medicaid. Opponents of the legislation cite the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office estimate that 7.6 million people will go uninsured if the policy is enacted. It's not just Democrats: Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Mo.) torched the Medicaid provisions of the bill in a high-profile NYT op-ed a few weeks back. 'If Congress cuts funding for Medicaid benefits, Missouri workers and their children will lose their health care,' he wrote. 'And hospitals will close. It's that simple.' Oz has heard Hawley's critique. 'We're not cutting Medicaid,' Oz insists. 'There is no proposal I've seen … that doesn't increase spending on Medicaid. … We want to take care of folks who are not owning a big part of the economic pie of America. That stated, you have to make the system viable. I'm trying to protect — I'm trying to save Medicaid.' Singing from the same hymnal: 'There are no Medicaid cuts in the 'big beautiful bill,' we're not cutting Medicaid. What we're doing is strengthening the program,' Speaker Mike Johnson said this morning on NBC's 'Meet the Press.' 'We're reducing fraud, waste and abuse … What we're doing here is an important and frankly heroic thing, to preserve the program so that it doesn't become insolvent.' One such change: Oz sees new work requirements as a crucial step in that quest. 'I don't have to get a job. I just have to try to get a job,' Oz says. 'I can volunteer, or some other charitable endeavor. I go get an education or I can take care of someone in the household that needs me — a child. If you're willing to do any of those things, you can keep your health insurance.' Watch the full episode on YouTube: The criticism: On 'Meet the Press,' Sen. Raphael Warnock (D-Ga.) pushed back on that framing. 'I recently released a study in Georgia that shows that this work-reporting requirement — because that's what we're talking about: not work requirement, [a] work-reporting requirement — is very good at kicking people off of their health care,' Warnock said. 'It's not good at incentivizing work at all. There's something wrong here about this kind of view of poor people, of working-class people that somehow they don't want to go to work. We have seen this failed experiment in Georgia.' As some advocates raise concerns about the administrative effort that will result from the requirement — the paperwork, the processing, the verification — and the likelihood that will mean some Medicaid recipients will lose coverage at least for a time, Oz says CMS has the resources right now to handle that new workload. How Oz sees it: 'This is where I do think we have an obligation, all of us in government, to do a better job,' Oz says. 'If the reason not to do something that we all think we should do is we don't think we're capable or competent to do it, that's a problem.' As for the criticism directed his way … Oz says he can take it. 'At this point in my life, I'm mostly a thick skin with some hair on top.' Like and subscribe to 'The Conversation' on YouTube … or listen to the podcast SUNDAY BEST … — OMB Director Russ Vought on impoundment, on CNN's 'State of the Union': 'We're certainly not taking impoundment off the table. We're not in love with the law. It's a law that came after 200 years of precedent and history at the lowest moment of the executive branch. But even the very Impoundment Control Act — notice it's not called the Impoundment Elimination Act.' — World Food Programme Executive Director Cindy McCain on the Trump administration's false claims that no one has died from their foreign aid cuts, on ABC's 'This Week': 'I'm not going to even pretend to understand what's going on inside the U.S. government at this particular point. I know what I see on the ground, not just in Gaza but around the world. There's places like Sudan, the DRC Congo, other places — South Sudan, etc. — they're in just as much trouble as [Gaza]. We need to get aid in, in Gaza, and we need to get it in now to avoid this catastrophe.' — National Economic Council Director Kevin Hassett on trade deal negotiations, on 'This Week': 'I expected that we were going to probably see one perhaps as early as last week. And I think that one of the things that's happened is that the trade team has been focused 100 percent like a laser beam on the China matter to make sure that there are no supply disruptions, because these licenses are coming a little slower than we would like. And so we've been focused like a laser beam on that last week, and the presidents, we expect, will discuss the matter this week. Once that thing's resolved, then we're going to take deals into the Oval that [USTR] Jamieson Greer and [Commerce Secretary] Howard Lutnick had negotiated.' — Lutnick on the court ruling against Trump's tariffs, on 'Fox News Sunday': 'The president is going to win like he always does, but rest assured, tariffs are not going away. He has so many other authorities that even in the weird and unusual circumstance where this was taken away, we just bring on another or another or another. Congress has given this authority to the president, and he's going to use it.' — Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent on scheduling a conversation between Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping, on CBS' 'Face the Nation': 'I believe we'll see something very soon.' TOP-EDS: A roundup of the week's must-read opinion pieces. 9 THINGS FOR YOUR RADAR 1. HOUSTON, WE HAVE A PROBLEM: Trump announced that he'll yank Jared Isaacman's nomination as NASA administrator, right before he was set to be confirmed by the Senate, as Semafor's Burgess Everett and Shelby Talcott scooped. The entrepreneur and Elon Musk ally was doomed by a loyalty test, as Trump decided to ax the nomination after finding out Isaacman had previously donated to Democrats, NYT's Jonathan Swan and colleagues report. 2. THE REMAKING OF GOVERNMENT: It's not just the big consultants. The Trump administration is now looking at lower-profile technology services contracts with the federal government for potential cuts, WSJ's Chip Cutter scooped. The GSA has asked Dell, CDW and other firms to make a case for why their contracts should be retained, as the administration eyes IT and other tech products for potential savings. The bureau: Director Kash Patel has begun to put his stamp on the FBI, from forced ousters and demotions to an intensive focus on immigration to polygraph tests to find leakers, NYT's Adam Goldman reports. The changes have unleashed 'fear and uncertainty' among employees that Patel and Deputy Director Dan Bongino are politicizing and weaponizing the FBI. And they 'have obliterated decades of experience in national security and criminal matters.' The FBI didn't comment, but Bongino was defiant and unapologetic on X. The cuts: Across the country, huge federal cuts have eroded state and local public health departments, so 'Americans are losing a vast array of people and programs dedicated to keeping them healthy,' AP's Laura Ungar and Michelle Smith report. 'Together, public health leaders said, the cuts are reducing the entire system to a shadow of what it once was, threatening to undermine even routine work.' HHS' heavy cuts to the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health may force the end of safety trainings for fishermen, loggers and other risky jobs as early as next month, Reuters' Leah Douglas reports. And Trump's budget request would decimate a landmark ecological program, NYT's Rebecca Dzombak reports. 3. WALL STREET GETS A WIN: 'Trump administration prepares to ease big bank rules,' by POLITICO's Michael Stratford: 'Trump-appointed regulators are nearing completion of a proposal that would relax rules on how much of a capital cushion the nation's largest banks must have to absorb potential losses and remain solvent during periods of economic stress. … [It] could be released in the coming months.' 4. IMMIGRATION FILES: The Trump administration's new effort to force undocumented immigrants to register with the government has started to yield criminal charges for people who fail to do so, WaPo's Jeremy Roebuck and Marianne LeVine scooped. But the novel use of a little-known 1940 statute to throw immigrants in jail has faced outright skepticism from some federal judges, who chided prosecutors for going after people who had little chance to even know they had to register. The threat to legal immigrants: As Trump's crackdown has extended beyond undocumented people, more than half a million Haitians, Cubans, Venezuelans and others who entered legally are suddenly vulnerable to deportation after last week's Supreme Court green light, NYT's Hamed Aleaziz writes. The government already has their personal info, and some could quickly be subject to expedited removal outside of immigration courts. Terrified Haitians are trying to figure out what's next, with some hiding at home and others considering Canada, NYT's Sarah Mervosh and Mark Bonamo report. 5. MIDDLE EAST LATEST: Hamas responded to the latest U.S. proposal for a ceasefire and hostage release with Israel, but a deal still looks distant as special envoy Steve Witkoff decried the militant group's answer as 'totally unacceptable,' per Bloomberg. The situation on the ground continued to worsen as an Israeli tank started shooting at Palestinian crowds at a food aid distribution site, with Gaza officials saying dozens were killed, per NBC. … Witkoff also gave Iran an initial framework proposal for a nuclear deal, via Oman, even as a new report revealed that Tehran has massively stepped up its uranium supply, per the NYT. 6. CHILLING EFFECT: 'Trump's law firm sanctions, harshly rejected in court, still have impact,' by WaPo's Mark Berman: 'Lawyers say both the sanctions and the negotiated deals have had a chilling effect, with some firms declining to work on issues counter to the administration's goals, including on immigration.' 7. FOR YOUR RADAR: 'Discrimination cases unravel as Trump scraps core civil rights tenet,' by WaPo's Julian Mark and Laura Meckler: 'The review includes cases and reform agreements forged after years-long investigations that the administration says lacked justification. Civil rights experts estimate that dozens of discrimination cases involving banks, landlords, private employers and school districts could face similar action. … At the center of this effort is 'disparate impact analysis,' which holds that neutral policies can have discriminatory outcomes even if there was no intent to discriminate.' 8. OAN'S RED LINE: 'MAGA outlet's Pentagon correspondent criticized Hegseth. And then she was fired, she says,' by CNN's Brian Stelter: 'A self-proclaimed 'MAGA girl,' [Gabrielle] Cuccia positioned herself as a proudly conservative voice among the normally nonpartisan Pentagon press corps. But she grew perturbed by [Defense Secretary Pete] Hegseth's actions against the press.' Two days after criticizing him on Substack, 'I was asked to turn in my Pentagon badge to my bureau chief,' she said. OAN didn't respond for comment. 9. IN THE WILDERNESS: Could South Carolina lose its brief hold on the early slot in Democrats' presidential primary calendar? From Columbia, POLITICO's Brakkton Booker reports that its association with Biden — who gave South Carolina top billing after it saved his 2020 campaign — could open the door for New Hampshire, Nevada or other Southern states. One potential contender, Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz, told California Dems yesterday that the party must 'find some goddamn guts to fight for working people,' saying Democrats share some blame for Republican control of D.C., POLITICO's Blake Jones reports from Anaheim. TALK OF THE TOWN AB Hernandez, a transgender high school athlete whose presence at a state competition led to Donald Trump threatening California's federal funding, won and shared multiple gold medals. IN MEMORIAM — 'Stanley Fischer, Who Spread the Macroeconomic Gospel, Dies at 81,' by Bloomberg's Laurence Arnold and Alisa Odenheimer: He 'served as vice chairman of the US Federal Reserve from 2014 to 2017 following eight years as governor of the Bank of Israel.' PLAYBOOK METRO SECTION — 'Army says Trump's military parade could cause $16 million in damage to Washington streets,' by NBC's Courtney Kube and colleagues: 'The Army is preparing for the potential harm to Washington streets with several measures it hopes will avert damage. These include using 1-inch-thick steel plates, some as long as 20 feet, at places along the parade route where the tanks must turn and where those turns could cause the most damage to the streets.' WEEKEND WEDDING — Christopher LaCivita Jr., public affairs director and lobbyist at Checkmate Government Relations, and Sheridan Conner, an occupational therapist, got married Saturday in Powhatan County, Virginia. They met at Virginia Tech in 2019. Pic … SPOTTED: Chris and Catherine LaCivita, Terry and Marci Nelson, Skyler and Claire Zunk, Ben and Clare Cassidy, Victoria LaCivita, Chris Gustafson, Ches McDowell, A.J. Fabrizio and Travis Smith. WELCOME TO THE WORLD — Sean McMinn, data/graphics editor at POLITICO, and Nicole McMinn, a biomedical engineer at Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, welcomed Rosemary on Thursday. HAPPY BIRTHDAY: Rep. Lucy McBath (D-Ga.) … Addisu Demissie … FT's Ed Luce … CBS' Olivia Gazis … AP's Bill Barrow … Richard Sant of Lockheed Martin … Karen Tramontano … Leslie Harris … Google's Sasha Moss … U.S. Commission on Civil Rights' Irena Vidulović … The Spectator's Amber Athey … former Rep. Gregg Harper (R-Miss.) … Sean Kennedy of the National Restaurant Association … Advoc8's Jeremy Rose … Matt Winkler … Melissa Hockstad … Jim Innocenzi … Danielle O'Byrne … Diane Zeleny … Christopher Minakowski … Percipient Strategies' Tyler Ross … Terrance Green … Jose Nunez … Heath Knakmuhs of the U.S. Chamber … Kay Coles James … Teamsters' Kate Yeager … Mark Green … Elizabeth Rojas Levi of ERL Group … Constance Boozer ... Elizabeth Glidden … Alex Seitz-Wald … POLITICO's Rahul Sharma Rampa … Alex Stoddard … Dan Bartlett of Walmart Did someone forward this email to you? Sign up here. Send Playbookers tips to playbook@ or text us on Signal here. Playbook couldn't happen without our editor Zack Stanton, deputy Garrett Ross and Playbook Podcast producer Callan Tansill-Suddath.