logo
Walt Disney is being turned into a robot — and his granddaughter is ‘pissed off': ‘I started crying'

Walt Disney is being turned into a robot — and his granddaughter is ‘pissed off': ‘I started crying'

New York Post2 days ago

Disney World is the happiest place on Earth — but one member of the Disney family isn't smiling about a new park innovation.
Joanna Miller, granddaughter of the late Walt Disney, blasted Walt Disney Co. for creating an audio-animatronic version of her beloved grandfather to honor Disneyland Resort's 70th anniversary in July.
In a scathing Facebook post, Miller blasted the new park addition as 'dehumanizing' and said that the 'robotic grampa' went against the wishes of the family patriarch, who died when she was 10.
3 (L-R) Jennifer Goff, Tammy Miller, Joanna Miller, Walter Miller and Chris Miller speak onstage during The Walt Disney Family Museum's 2nd Annual Gala at Disney Grand Californian Hotel & Spa at The Disneyland Resort on November 1, 2016 in Anaheim, California.
Joe Scarnici
'People are not replaceable. You could never get the casualness of his talking,' she wrote in the post.
The Walt Disney recreation would live in the opera house on Main Street, U.S.A. for a new show, 'Walt Disney — A Magical Life,' which hopes to give parkgoers an idea of 'what it would have been like to be in Walt's presence.'
Miller is one of the few who have actually seen the immortal animatronic, as Disney is notoriously secretive about its developments.
'I think I started crying,' Miller recalled of her reaction. 'It didn't look like him, to me.'
Most of the current animatronics are either representative of the company's film characters or real-life political figures for the Hall of Presidents; most do not speak or move much. The incoming Walt Disney animatronic promises to be the most lifelike one yet, pulling dialogue from his speeches and more deliberate, subtle movements.
3 Walt Disney died when Joanna was 10 years old.
Getty Images
Miller, who lives an extremely private life, doesn't regret calling out the company. She does fear that speaking out against Walt Disney Co. might cause the entertainment company to retaliate by taking away her access to the park, a perk agreed upon when Miller's late father, Ron W. Miller, stepped down as Disney CEO in 1984.
'You just start to get pissed off. And you get tired of being quiet. So I spoke up on Facebook. Like that was going to do anything? The fact that it got back to the company is pretty funny,' she told the Los Angeles Times.
Soon, Miller was face-to-face with current Disney CEO Bob Iger to discuss the animatronic.
Miller makes it clear she isn't representing her five siblings or other family members — but, as she emphasized in a letter to Iger, 'I do speak for my grandfather and my mother.'
Not long after sharing her concerns on Facebook, she was invited to view the figure in person and sit down with Iger and members of Walt Disney Imagineering, the behind-the-scenes team that brings the parks' immersive experiences to life.
'He was very kind,' Miller said of the CEO. 'He let me do my spiel.'
Miller's main argument is that her grandfather did not want an animatronic version of himself. Her mother, Diane, founded San Francisco's Walt Disney Family Museum and rejected a robotic version of Walt.
'In all our research, we never found any documentation of Walt saying that,' Imagineer Jeff Shaver-Moskowitz said back in April. 'We know that it's anecdotal and we can't speak to what was told to people in private.'
3 Miller's main argument is that her grandfather did not want an animatronic version of himself.
Getty Images
That's one of the biggest challenges Miller is up against. The people she says best understood Walt Disney's wishes — her parents and trusted collaborators like former Imagineering head Marty Sklar — have all passed away. Unless others step forward, she's the last direct link to that legacy.
Still, Miller isn't naive about the situation. In her view, the family's biggest misstep was selling the rights to Walt Disney's name, image, and likeness back in 1981 — a $46.2 million stock deal that effectively severed their control.
As a result, the family has little to no influence over how Walt is portrayed in the parks. Imagineering, however, maintains that it consulted the Walt Disney Family Museum and current board-member descendants during the development of the animatronic tribute.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Disney Has Another Huge Hit at the Box Office. Is It Finally Time to Buy?
Disney Has Another Huge Hit at the Box Office. Is It Finally Time to Buy?

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Disney Has Another Huge Hit at the Box Office. Is It Finally Time to Buy?

Walt Disney released a strong second-quarter report last month. Its newest film release, the live-action "Lilo and Stitch," just broke the record for the highest-grossing four-day Memorial Day opening weekend, It has five of the top-10 highest-grossing films domestically this year. 10 stocks we like better than Walt Disney › Walt Disney (NYSE: DIS) might be the top name in entertainment, but that doesn't automatically mean its stock is always in good shape. It's taken a pounding over the past few years as the company goes from one problem to the next, and it's down 44% from its all-time highs. Are things starting to stabilize? The company reported solid results for the 2025 fiscal second quarter (ended March 29), and its newest film release, the live-action Lilo and Stitch, had a fantastic opening weekend. Is now the time to buy on the rebound? Disney is a huge media and entertainment giant with many working pieces. Today, it divides its business into three segments: entertainment, sports, and experiences. Entertainment covers its content, including streaming, film releases, and network TV. Sports is its sports-related content, and experiences covers parks, as well as other experiences like cruises and resorts. When everything goes well, Disney is an unmatched powerhouse. But with so many moving parts, the whole gets weighed down by any disruption. Fortunately, in the most recently reported quarter, there was success all around. Total revenue was up 7% year over year, with increases in all three segments. Operating income more than doubled to $3.1 billion, driven by increases in streaming, which had been holding back profits for too long. Streaming subscriptions increased by 2.5 million from the previous quarter, and Disney+ is now firmly profitable and growing. Even linear networks, the traditional TV channels that are on the decline, managed a small operating profit increase in the quarter, and the weakest segment was sports, which reported a drop in operating income. Disney is still figuring out the sports piece as it transitions from a cable focus to a streaming one, and it recently said that it's offering ESPN as a full, direct-to-consumer offering starting this fall. It was just announced that Disney is acquiring popular sports show Inside the NBA, and it's aiming to keep its go-to status and attract paid viewers to the new venture. Disney felt some pressure with the Hollywood strikes two years ago, pushing back film production and delaying some releases. It bounced back last year, ending 2024 with the highest-grossing film worldwide, Inside Out 2, as well as the No. 3 spot, Moana 2, and the No. 6 spot, Mufasa: The Lion King. It's doing incredibly so far in 2025, with exactly half of the top 10 highest-grossing films domestically. The most recent release, Lilo and Stitch, came out on Memorial Day weekend and is already the second-highest-grossing film of the year, with $279 million in domestic box office sales. It shattered records to take in the highest four-day Memorial Day weekend sales ever, and it's already picked up more than $600 million in sales worldwide. Like Lilo and Stitch, many of the recent hits and upcoming releases depend on the well-worn Disney model of creating franchises and churning out content based on beloved characters. Every single one of its top 10 releases so far this year is a remake or sequel of sorts. Disney has another six films set to come out this year, of which only one is a new franchise. The other five include the third installment in the Avatar movies, and the first two Avatar movies hold the No. 1 and No. 3 spots for highest-grossing films ever. Incidentally, the No. 2 spot, Avengers: Endgame, belongs to a Disney franchise, too. Disney has many films already slated for release in 2026 and further out, including the fourth Avatar film, the next Frozen film, etc. These are almost guaranteed to be huge box office hits, and the creative teams spin these franchises into more content for streaming, as well as for use in products and theme parks. Disney is in a good place today, with a profitable streaming business, hit films, and an upcoming sports launch. It just announced a new round of layoffs, and although that could contain a warning, the market usually greets layoffs enthusiastically, since a leaner organization typically leads to a stronger bottom line. I wouldn't put too many eggs into Disney's basket yet, but where it's holding today, Disney looks like it's staged for a comeback, and its stock should reflect that. Before you buy stock in Walt Disney, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Walt Disney wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $656,825!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $865,550!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 994% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 172% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join . See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 2, 2025 Jennifer Saibil has positions in Walt Disney. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Walt Disney. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Disney Has Another Huge Hit at the Box Office. Is It Finally Time to Buy? was originally published by The Motley Fool

Rosenthal: Blame the bullpen for the A's struggles, but also blame their situation
Rosenthal: Blame the bullpen for the A's struggles, but also blame their situation

New York Times

timean hour ago

  • New York Times

Rosenthal: Blame the bullpen for the A's struggles, but also blame their situation

On May 13, the Athletics won the opener of a three-game series at Dodger Stadium 11-1. The next night, in a game started by Cy Young contender Yoshinobu Yamamoto, they trailed the Los Angeles Dodgers in the eighth inning 4-3. And then, seemingly out of nowhere, they collapsed. Not just that night. For the next three weeks. Advertisement The Dodgers' five-run eighth sent the A's into a 1-20 nosedive resulting almost entirely from the failures of their bullpen. That's the baseball explanation, at least. But for owner John Fisher's vagabond franchise, wandering from Oakland to West Sacramento to the supposed promised land of Las Vegas, it's not the entire story. Not when the A's are 9-22 at Sutter Health Park, the second-worst home record in the majors, ahead of only the Colorado Rockies' 6-22 mark. And not when they're stuck at their minor-league facility through at least 2027, unlike the Tampa Bay Rays, who are playing in a minor-league park only because of a natural disaster, and only this season. 'It's certainly daunting when you zoom out and look at it,' said the A's All-Star closer, Mason Miller. 'But a blessing of being a ballplayer is you get to show up today. Today is what matters. Nothing tomorrow is guaranteed. That, at least, is how I approach it.' It is the right and only way to approach it. But that doesn't make playing at Sutter Health Park easier. The clubhouses are located in the outfield, instead of being connected to the dugout. And even after approximately $11 million in renovations, the A's reality is undeniable — they are playing in a Triple-A facility, and sharing it with the San Francisco Giants' top affiliate, the Sacramento River Cats. The Rays, 20-19 at home after a 9-16 start, found a way to adjust to their own unusual conditions at Steinbrenner Field, the spring training home of the New York Yankees. The A's, for whatever reasons, have been less successful. Their $67 million free agent, right-hander Luis Severino, is the symbol of the team's difficult transition. Severino's ERA is 6.99 at home, 0.87 on the road. 'The circumstances are what they are. We can't change those,' said A's manager Mark Kotsay, a former major-league outfielder. 'We have to find a way to embrace and make this our home like we did in Oakland. Advertisement 'It's two different ballparks, but I can remember as a visiting player coming to Oakland always feeling uncomfortable, always feeling, 'Wow, I don't have a cage to hit in, I don't have this, I don't have that.' But on the home side, you use that as an advantage.' Miller noted the wind at Sutter Health can be problematic, changing the trajectories of fly balls at different points of the day. The A's lead the majors with 96 home runs allowed, 55 at home. But as Miller said, 'The other team is pitching in the same environment. We don't really have an excuse to fall back on.' Especially when the recent failures of the bullpen extend to the road, where the A's have lost 11 straight games. Through May 13, the A's 'pen ranked 27th in the majors with a 5.04 ERA and 24th with a .750 opponents' OPS — not good. But their numbers in the 19 games before the past two were astonishingly bad. An ERA of 8.19 (Colorado was next worst at 5.27). An opponents' OPS of .966 (Colorado was next worst at .852). The last two nights, Kotsay has used openers, trying to build the confidence of struggling relievers by inserting them at the start of a game rather than in a late-inning, high-leverage situation. The A's grew concerned about their middle-inning relief early in the season, realizing if they fell behind, they would struggle to keep games close. Injuries to veteran relievers José Leclerc and T.J. McFarland left the 'pen with too little experience. And the back-end types who enjoyed early success — Grant Holman and Justin Sterner, Tyler Ferguson and Miller — all began to slump, seemingly at once. Holman and Sterner are in their first full seasons, Ferguson and Miller their second. 'It's not easy to come as a minor-league reliever and have immediate impact or success in the big leagues, and continued success,' Kotsay said. 'You look at a lot of the relievers, they obviously go up and down early in their careers before they establish themselves. Relying on those types of arms is tough.' Miller, 26, is the most established and accomplished of the group, but his 10.38 ERA in May included a blown save at home against Philadelphia on May 24, when he allowed a game-tying, ninth-inning homer by Max Kepler. The A's went on to lose in 11 innings 9-6. MAX KEPLER! — Philadelphia Phillies (@Phillies) May 25, 2025 'At least from a bullpen perspective, when we do have a chance to win a game, we're squeezing a little bit too tight,' Miller said. 'Everybody knows about the streak of games we've lost. It's, 'Hey, let end it tonight.' We've played a lot of good teams, too. And our mistakes have been magnified, for sure.' Advertisement One person with the club was only half-joking Wednesday that the only way for the A's to win a game right now might be by a score of 20-18. But with first baseman Nick Kurtz and third baseman Miguel Andújar on the injured list, even the A's offense, featuring the American League Rookie of the Month for May, shortstop Jacob Wilson, is diminished. To think, the A's on May 5 were 20-16, one game behind Seattle in the AL West. Wilson and first baseman Tyler Soderstrom, two former first-round picks, were thriving. The team's top pitching prospect, Gunnar Hoglund, had just made his major-league debut. Kurtz's debut would come at the end of the month. The relatively fast start, following last year's 32-32 record after the All-Star Game, provides a measure of reassurance — 'Out of the gates, we played well,' Kotsay said. 'That wasn't that long ago, really.' McFarland, who produced eight straight scoreless appearances before suffering a left adductor strain, is on a rehabilitation assignment. But Leclerc, a $10 million free-agent addition, is not expected to return from a lat strain until the second half. Nothing sabotages a team like a bad bullpen. And the A's, facing the prospect of at least 243 'home' games over three seasons at Sutter Health Park, were always going to be in something of a precarious state. The Rays can rationalize their situation, knowing they will play only one season in Tampa. The A's needed to succeed at home early to build confidence and reduce the chances of their conditions becoming a distraction. Instead, they lost their first four games at Sutter Health and six of their first seven. Not to mention 13 of their last 15. The A's position-player group is the third-youngest in the league. Their pitching staff is the 12th youngest. A number of players surely are happy to be in the majors, even if they're playing in a minor-league park. They won't complain publicly, at least not yet. Neither will Kotsay and his coaches. No one wants to come off as entitled. Still, Kotsay is in the most difficult position of any manager, and not just because his bullpen is a mess. Advertisement The first year at Sutter Health figured to be tolerable for the players and staff, as long as the team showed improvement. The second year projected as perhaps the most difficult, with the move to Las Vegas still a good bit away. And in the third year, if indeed that is the last year, the team could have adopted the same mindset as the Rays — deal with it, and we'll be out of here soon. The A's meltdown makes everything more challenging. If the meltdown was solely the product of bad baseball, that would be one thing. But it's also the product of a team put in a terrible position by its owner and league, a team being asked to play at a disadvantage and act as if everything is normal. 'We're just continually trying to show up and work each day and get back to that team we were at the start of the year,' Miller said. 'It's not like we didn't show that it was possible.' Oh, it's possible. But the margin of error was always going to be thin. If the A's fail to regain their equilibrium, no one should be surprised if their frustrations mount. And maybe even boil over. (Photo of Mason Miller, A's manager Mark Kotsay and other A's players: Thearon W. Henderson / Getty Images)

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store