Ousted Novo Nordisk CEO pays for investors' inflated hopes
The sudden departure of
Novo Nordisk
chief executive Lars Fruergaard Jørgensen comes not amid scandal or strategic calamity, but a less fashionable misstep: disappointing the stock market.
Once Europe's most valuable firm, Novo's shares have halved since last summer.
Investor expectations, it seems, are harder to manage than blood sugar.
Jørgensen was the architect of Novo's transformation from a diabetes stalwart into a world leader in obesity drugs.
READ MORE
Sales of
Wegovy
, its blockbuster weight-loss injection, soared. So did the company's valuation: by June 2024, Novo was worth over $600 billion and traded on 56 times earnings.
Such altitude brings thinner air. Any stumble, and gravity does the rest. And stumble it did.
Competition from
Eli Lilly
intensified. Cheaper, compounded versions of GLP-1 drugs proliferated in the United States. Clinical trials for Novo's next generation of treatments disappointed heady expectations.
None of these are fatal, but they are enough to turn a growth fairytale into a more familiar pharmaceutical plotline: one of pricing pressures, pipeline uncertainty, and restive shareholders.
Jørgensen was surprised by his ousting, as were analysts and investors. There was no hint of change during Novo's earnings call just a week earlier.
Whatever his mistakes, it is hard to pin Novo's malaise solely on his leadership. When euphoria untethers a stock, a bloodletting often follows.
That Jørgensen became the fall guy may say more about investor nerves than executive negligence.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
an hour ago
- Irish Times
EPA projections require a frank reassessment of Irish climate policies
Judging by the EPA's latest greenhouse gas projections , Ireland's climate policies are in urgent need of an overhaul . The projections issued annually relate to likely carbon emissions across the Irish economy up to 2030, but also for following decades up to 2050. It is clear existing policies are failing to deliver significant emission reductions or are being overtaken by increases in energy demand or economic growth. At best, Ireland might achieve a 16 per cent reduction in agricultural emissions compared with the 51 per cent that is required under law, which is reasonably aligned with our Paris Agreement commitments. This would be with full implementation of measures in the Government's climate action plan. READ MORE But even that 16 per cent is not guaranteed: the EPA reports that emissions under an 'existing measures' scenario might even increase by 2030 above their 2018 levels. That must not be allowed to happen. Why is Ireland failing in climate policy , you might wonder. Don't we have a gold standard climate law? While it's true that our 2021 Climate Act is well designed from a governance point of view, any law – even a good one – is no substitute for political will. That the political will has waned is obvious from a reading of the Programme for Government and the choice of rural independents as coalition partners. But other decisions and non-decisions, delays and prevarications suggest that the Government has little interest or commitment to acting on the recommendations of its climate experts , and prefers to bend to the will of major exporters and a highly self-serving reading of public opinion. Though the policy framework has been considerably improved, it seems to take an age to implement what should be straightforward decisions (and I'm not even speaking of major infrastructure projects). [ Q&A: What should we do about multiple climate risks threatening Ireland? Opens in new window ] The Departments of Finance and Public Expenditure still dictate the pace of investment, and administrative delays in making decisions of any kind are common. Public bodies are notoriously cautious and risk-averse, but that mindset means that we are not getting the decisive actions that the public was promised to clean up our energy system and put Ireland on a path to climate neutrality – ideally, before 2050. The director general of the EPA, Laura Burke, remarked last week at a conference in Dublin Castle that 'additional measures and accelerated implementation' are required if we are to even get close to the 2030 targets. She stated that 'scaling up' efforts will be necessary across the board. But what does that actually mean? For you and me, scaling up our efforts might mean an additional journey by bike or a meat-free dinner once a week, or installing solar panels (if you're privileged enough to own a roof). Worthy actions taken voluntarily make us feel better but they won't put a significant dent in Ireland's emissions. Systemic change requires a different set of levers – the use of regulations, mandates, incentives, subsidies and enforcement. The truth is that our public representatives and policy experts seem unwilling to discuss the big decisions that will be needed to dramatically transform our energy system and land use and prefer to rely on policies and measures that the EPA now acknowledges will not be sufficient. [ The 'foot may be coming off the action pedal': Climate plan fails to build on ambition Opens in new window ] For instance, the Dáil hardly ever debates climate policy though the actual words are mentioned frequently. When the numbers are going in the right direction (eg, chemical nitrogen use) everyone wants to claim the credit (good policy, good farmers, etc). When the numbers are going in the wrong direction (chemical nitrogen figures have increased in 2024 again, which will be confirmed by EPA inventories in coming weeks), no one accepts responsibility. When the pressure mounts to make a decision, policymakers revert to default and recommend another report or a new consultation. And meanwhile we are blowing through the first carbon budget by between 8 and 12 million tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent, which adds up to the total annual emissions of countries like Armenia or Nicaragua. And whenever a negative news story comes out about emissions or climate science, the Government is quick to report Ireland's stellar progress in renewable electricity, even though this, too, is but a small flicker (excuse the pun) of what we will actually need to deliver by 2050. The kind of bold interventions we now need would restrict the energy consumption of large energy users like data centres , restrict urban private car use, and deploy effective, catchment-based limits on nitrogen, ammonia and greenhouse gas pollution from agricultural sources . [ Tech giants' indirect emissions rose 150% in three years amid AI growth, UN says Opens in new window ] Imaginative and brave measures to accelerate the roll-out of renewables and to ensure that their environmental impact is properly assessed and mitigated will be essential. We are facing into a global climate emergency , with global temperature increases now heading well north of 1.5 degrees and the prospect of dangerous climate breakdown occurring within our lifetimes. Clearly the newly established Joint Oireachtas Committee on Climate, Environment and Energy doesn't view it as much of an emergency: following lengthy delays in setting up the Oireachtas committees, it has met just twice since the general election in late November 2024, and only to elect a chair and vice chair. Yes, scaling is hard to do, so we had better do what we know already works and what we are good at delivering. If the magic beans (small-scale nuclear reactors, feed additives, biomethane) don't deliver, then we have to consider more radical pruning. Everything should be on the table, including livestock herd reductions, transport hubs in every town and village, mandatory afforestation in suitable areas and urgent State investment in making heat pumps, solar panels, sustainable building materials and shared mobility services affordable and accessible to all as a priority over the demands of incumbent energy, water and land-hungry industries. And no one needs to be left behind. Sadhbh O'Neill is a climate and environmental researcher and activist
Irish Times
an hour ago
- Irish Times
How the ‘like' button was used by social media companies to turbocharge their business models
The 'like' button and its palette of variations is used about 160 million times a day globally and it is now the most widely used symbol of affirmation in the digital world. The story of how and why it quickly established this status in the noughties, how social platforms have exploited it to turbo boost their business models since and its future in the world of artificial intelligence is the subject of a fascinating new book, Like: The Button that Changed the World . Bob Goodson, co-author of the book with Martin Reeves, played an important role in the button's development. While he says that, as with most innovative breakthroughs, no one person can claim to have developed the like button single-handedly, he was one half of a two-person team at the then start-up online directory Yelp that developed the first button that allowed users to stay on the same page after clicking. Yelp, which is now a $1 billion business, was also the first to put multiple emotional buttons on a web page. Then as now, the big issue was engagement. READ MORE 'In the early years of the web, about 5 per cent of people created content and 95 per cent simply consumed it and that was a real problem for platforms who wanted to grow,' he tells The Irish Times. 'Putting content on the web in its early days was a really geeky thing to do. They were technical issues, there was dial up, joining forums, it was very male-dominated and women didn't feel safe on the internet. This was before the nice graphical interfaces were introduced and it was all text-based. Yelp and others were thinking about ways of bringing the barrier down and introducing 'likes' proved a real winner.' Today, Goodson runs a Silicon Valley-based firm, Quid, whose AI models are used by many of the top Fortune 50 companies, while Reeves is chairman of Boston Consulting Group's business strategy think-tank BCG Henderson Institute. Their book explores the psychology of likes and finds evolutionary motives. Likes boost survival chances by contributing to the friendship, communication and hierarchy that maximises social learning. We have evolved to get a buzz from liking and that applies to both giving and receiving. A positive reaction to a social-media post causes a frisson of excitement and a feel-good surge and this is the psychological territory that the like button taps into. Interestingly, it doesn't work in reverse. Pioneers who tried 'don't like' buttons soon dropped them as they found users hated them. The thumb symbol is another enduring feature of the like button and many of the variations also incorporate elements of the hand. 'We think there's something very powerful about the hand. Monks in the 14th century used to draw hands with pointing fingers in the margins of manuscripts, called manicules. People have been interested in interacting with text like this for as long as it has been written down,' Goodson notes. Liking is a form of content creation. When you click a like you are putting your mark down forever. If you are not careful, it could cost you your job — Bob Goodson Facebook 's adoption of the like button was the key development for the 'like economy' and provided a huge boost to its fortunes from 2009 onwards. Others quickly followed. As analytics became more and more powerful, like data has become a digital gold mine, allowing platforms to customise content to users and sell that user data to those wanting to reach them. The like button greases the wheels of this model and the algorithms here are the secret sauce, guarded carefully. As the authors put it: 'Your use of a platform can reveal behaviour you don't even reflect on or recognise about yourself. The timing of your activity on the site, for example, can say a lot about the typical rhythm of your day, and the emotional valence of your postings can serve as a kind of mood ring you didn't know you were wearing. Like poker players highly adept at spotting tells, the social-media platforms you use pick up on signals you're not conscious of transmitting.' Secrecy is a recurring theme. 'It's a neat trick on the part of the platforms, giving their product away for free to users without being too explicit about the fact that, in fact, those users are the product.' Not that consumers seem to be too bothered. Arguably having goods and services pitched at you isn't a problem if the algorithm is serving up things that you've told it you are actually interested in – whether you've done that consciously or unconsciously. More worryingly is the effect of likes and/or the lack of them, on the more vulnerable. Children are a particular area of concern in regard to issues such as self-esteem, Goodson acknowledges. 'Social media is a powerfully addictive thing because of the game the platforms are playing for attention, and they will use whatever works. It has created an experience that requires a lot of self-discipline and awareness to keep it healthy. There's a growing belief that children are not ready for it. We're now seeing regulation in this area, such as in Australia, which is prohibiting under-16s from using platforms. My expectation is that trend will continue and that there will need to be stronger protections and regulations for younger people.' Likes are not a trivial matter for those of any age, however, as many public figures have found to their extreme cost. 'Liking is a form of content creation. When you click a like you are putting your mark down forever. If you are not careful, it could cost you your job.' Likes are also playing an important role in the ongoing development of AI, albeit in a different way. 'There are like buttons in the chat apps. They use thumbs up and thumbs down because it won't offend the model. They want you to interact with it because it will improve performance of the large language model. It's just as important. We also think the like data that the platforms hold are very important data sets to train the models. It could be a real competitive advantage for Meta and X .' Reeves and Goodson have produced a thoughtful, well researched and easily accessible book on this subject, exploring the deep significance of what appears to be simple and intuitive feature that we take for granted, but one that in fact has a profound influence on our lives. It gets a thumbs up. Like: The Button That Changed the World, by Martin Reeves and Bob Goodson, is published by Harvard Business Review Press
Irish Times
an hour ago
- Irish Times
Department of Transport officials warned Minister Seán Canney not to attend Tesla event
Department of Transport officials warned Minister of State Seán Canney not to attend a Tesla event earlier this year marking the car manufacturer's 10,000th sale in Ireland. The Zero Emission Vehicles Ireland (ZEVIreland) office in the department told Mr Canney Ministers should not meet 'individual car manufacturers'. Instead, Tesla representatives met ZEVI officials in the department's offices on February 25th. The EV Industry Insights Forum event at the Tesla centre in Cork was due to have been held on February 25th, but was later moved to March 14th. READ MORE The invitation to Mr Canney, Independent TD and Minister of State at the Department of Transport, came from Melanie Naughton, Tesla country manager for Ireland, in February, shortly after he was appointed. Ms Naughton wrote to him on February 6th congratulating him on his appointment and inviting him to the event. The invitation came two weeks after Tesla chief executive Elon Musk made a gesture that some interpreted as a fascist salute at a rally celebrating President Donald Trump's second inauguration in January. Mr Musk last month left his role in the US department of government efficiency, which he had joined with the aim of slashing federal government funding. The invitation occurred two weeks before the 'Tesla takedown' movement began in the United States targeting garages selling Tesla cars. In her letter to Mr Canney, Ms Naughton said the milestone event would 'bring insights from industry leaders and innovators' to discuss progress to date and about accelerating the transition to electric vehicles. 'We would be delighted if you could give a short speech on your departmental priorities and ambitions for the electric vehicle sector as we celebrate this milestone,' she wrote. 'Tesla is committed to supporting Ireland's transition to sustainable energy and looks forward to collaborating with the Government to achieve our shared goals.' Documents released under the Freedom of Information Act show the invitation was sent by Mr Canney's office to the ZEVIreland section of the Department of Transport. In response, ZEVIreland advised that no Minister should meet 'individual car manufacturers'. The minutes of the meeting suggest there was an overview of Tesla Ireland and discussions related to vehicle demand and charging infrastructure. ZEVI provided a short overview of its national road EV charging plan and the national road grant scheme. Mr Canney's office did not respond to a request for comment on the matter.
