
A new contract: how Pakistan can end politics of poverty
Let's be honest: we don't need another diagnostic. We already know the patient is bleeding. What Pakistan needs now is a surgical plan—practical, bold, and morally sound.
For too long, we've accepted poverty as collateral damage in the pursuit of elite consensus and IMF appeasement. But poverty is not an economic inevitability. It's a political choice; we have the tools. The question is: do we dare use them?
It begins at the source: revenue. Not just collecting more—but collecting fairly and intelligently. Three big fissures need closing. First, agricultural income: time to stop pretending. We must tax progressively above subsistence thresholds, synchronized across provinces.
Digitize land records, use satellite imagery to estimate yields, and enforce returns based on real output. Second, the retail-wholesale sector — our country's backbone — remains untaxed. Use utility, mobile, and point-of-sale data for automatic registration, offer simplified compliance pathways, and blacklist evaders.
Third, exemptions: eliminate the alphabet soup of favours. Every tax break must have a limited time-frame or a sunset clause. Any system people don't understand breeds mistrust. The tax code should not be a maze for the honest and a playground for the connected.
But it's not just about how much we collect—it's about how we spend. We must flip the budget. Instead of rewarding glossy overpasses, we reward outcomes. Tie provincial transfers to performance on health, literacy, nutrition. Double down on girl-focused primary education—stipends, not just schoolbags. Fund preventive healthcare—immunisation, clean water, maternal support. And if we must borrow, let it be for people, not concrete. That debt pays dividends for decades.
The deeper issue is how we define development. We remain stuck in an outdated metric. GDP was never designed to measure human welfare. Nobel laureates like Joseph Stiglitz and Amartya Sen have long argued that a country's economic output is not the same as its people's well-being.
Pakistan needs to budget with a dashboard: track HDI by district, inequality via the Gini index, and deprivation through the Multidimensional Poverty Index. Real reform starts when budgets ask, 'How many children ate today?' instead of 'How many bridges did we build?'
There's no way forward without confronting what we're doing to our youth. We call it a 'youth bulge,' but without investment, it's more like a ticking bomb. What we need is a national skills guarantee—every Pakistani under 30 should have access to one of three paths: vocational training, digital certification, or an apprenticeship.
No excuses. Every district should have youth entrepreneurship hubs—public-private incubators to build solutions in climate tech, fintech, creative services. We should have a Youth Civic Corps that mobilises thousands for literacy drives, urban greening, disaster response. This isn't idealism—it's strategic insurance. If we don't create opportunity, we'll be dealing with unrest.
Meanwhile, we must build on what works. The Benazir Income Support Programme remains the country's most robust safety net. But it's frozen in its original form. We need to evolve it. Link payments to real outcomes: school attendance, vaccination, skills completion.
Digitally integrate it with NADRA, Sehat Sahulat, Ehsaas, and microcredit channels to build a universal social registry. Add tiers: long-term unconditional support for widows, persons with disabilities, and the elderly. Conditional, time-bound transfers for those who can and want to move up. The goal is not permanent welfare—it's dignity with an off-ramp.
But even as we talk reform, let's address the elephant in the drawing room—protocol. We're trying to build a welfare state while financing a spectacle of privilege. Convoys, VIP perks, public security as personal entitlement. Every rupee spent on ceremonial power is one less rupee for public good. Strip it back. Limit police convoys to verified high-risk individuals.
Publish the protocol budget of every ministry. Cap perks. All the big-wigs in the state apparatus can fly economy—if they want comfort, they can top up from their own pockets. This isn't about symbolism. It's about credibility.
Yet all this will still fall flat without trust. No reform survives without it. The state must show it sees its citizens. Start small but start strong. If you paid for a government service like passport or ID card, and it doesn't arrive within time, it's free. If the passport office has no power, escalate, the portal allows you to complain to next HQ. Create real-time redressal.
Provide free legal aid to women, bonded labourers, minorities. A welfare state does not begin with charity—it begins with predictability. With justice.
Everything we're proposing here isn't just economic. It's deeply moral. Thomas Piketty, in his work on capital and inequality, showed how unregulated wealth accumulation creates systemic instability. The longer you let inequality fester, the more corrosive it becomes—to social cohesion, to democracy, to the very idea of merit. It's not about punishing the rich—it's about protecting the country, the republic.
Richard Wilkinson and Kate Pickett's landmark work 'The Spirit Level' makes a shocking case: unequal societies are not just unfair—they are dysfunctional. They do worse across everything that matters: crime, education, trust, health, productivity.
Pakistan must understand that inequality is not just a side effect. It is the engine of dysfunction. When one class is hoarding plots in gated suburbs while another queues up for food rations, it's not just a fiscal problem—it's a fracture in the national soul. We can either have elite consensus or we can have inclusive development. But we can't have both.
What we need is a new contract. A contract that says: if you work hard, you can feed your family. If you pay your taxes, your kids go to school. If you obey the law, the law protects you. That's not utopia. That's Republic 101.
The elite will not sign that contract willingly. But history shows that when the middle class and the marginalised demand it together — it becomes inevitable.
Pakistan does not lack resources. It lacks resolve. It does not lack intelligence. It lacks intent. Let this be the decade we chose differently. Let this be the decade we turned the page. Let this be the decade we ended the politics of poverty—and began the practice of justice.
Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Express Tribune
2 hours ago
- Express Tribune
Minister hails CPEC as China ties soar
Minister for Planning Ahsan Iqbal has declared that China-Pakistan bilateral ties have "soared beyond the skies" following the successful joint launch of the fourth Earth Observation Satellite. The minister made these remarks as he addressed a news conference at the Pakistani Embassy in Beijing the other day. He outlined major developments in China-Pakistan cooperation across infrastructure, economy, technology, and strategic planning. The minister's visit also focused on preparations for Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif's upcoming visit to China for the SCO Summit in September, and the anticipated 14th JCC meeting.


Express Tribune
2 hours ago
- Express Tribune
Govt clears Quetta flights for Shia pilgrims
The federal government has authorised direct flights from Quetta to facilitate pilgrims travelling to Iran and Iraq for Arbaeen, Defence Minister Khawaja Muhammad Asif announced in the National Assembly on Tuesday. During the session — chaired by Speaker Ayaz Sadiq — the house unanimously passed two resolutions marking Youm-e-Istehsal, condemning atrocities in the Indian illegally occupied Jammu and Kashmir. Meanwhile, opposition members continued their protest over the conviction of senior party leaders in May 9 cases. Some federal ministers responded by mocking the PTI-led protest movement, while the law minister reiterated the government's offer for dialogue. In a policy statement, Defence Minister Asif highlighted the security threats faced by pilgrims along the 800-kilometre overland route from Quettaparticularly the risk of terrorist attacks in Balochistan. "To mitigate these risks, the federal government has authorised direct flights from Quetta for Arbaeen pilgrims," he said, adding that one flight had already commenced, with additional daily services planned to meet demand. Asif said all licensed private airlines had been invited to operate on the route, and permission was also granted for chartered flights to maximise capacity. He noted that Iran had approved an additional flight for Pakistani pilgrims following discussions during the Iranian president's recent visit. "The government is committed to ensuring safe, comfortable, and timely transportation for all Arbaeen pilgrims," the minister added. Resolution on Kashmir The house unanimously adopted two resolutions, condemning India's actions in IIOJK on Youm-e-Istehsal-e-Kashmir, marking the sixth anniversary of India's revocation of Articles 370 and 35A. The resolutions were moved by Pakistan Peoples Party's (PPP) Shazia Marri and Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz's Amir Muqam. However, the proceedings were marred by opposition protests, which accused the government of stifling dissent. Minister for Parliamentary Affairs Dr Tariq Fazal Chaudhry criticised the PTI's protest, stating, "Today is for Kashmir, but you are observing Youm-e-Istehsal-e-Imran." He accused PTI of exploiting the session for political gains, prompting opposition uproar. PTI protest PTI's Aamir Dogar accused the government of "political victimisation," claiming that 10 National Assembly members were "picked up" but the speaker did not take any action. Demanding justice, he said that the PTI founder was in jail for refusing to budge. Speaker Sadiq countered, saying that he had issued the production orders. The speaker also apprised the house of PTI MNA Sheikh Waqas Akram's unexplained absence for 40 days, saying that under Article 64 his seat could be declared vacant. PML-N's Nosheen Iftikhar moved a motion to declare Akram's seat vacant, however, Deputy Speaker Ghulam Mustafa Shah stressed the need for seeing whether the motion followed the rules.


Business Recorder
3 hours ago
- Business Recorder
Beyond the equity cliff
In 2025, interest in venture capital (VC) in Pakistan reached a new high — at least online. Google Trends recorded a fresh peak in search activity. But investor capital did not follow. While global VC funding grew by 6 percent last year, Pakistan moved in the opposite direction. Total VC inflows fell by 70 percent to just USD 22.5 million. This followed an already weak 2023, when funding had barely crossed USD 76 million. By contrast, regional peers raised significantly more: India attracted USD 13.7 billion (up 43 percent year-on-year), while even Bangladesh, despite a pullback, secured USD 41 million. Most of the global VC rebound remained concentrated in the United States. According to Dealroom, US-based startups accounted for nearly 57 percent of total VC funding in 2024. That shift matters. With most of that capital retained within American borders, the US-backed wellspring of VC funding for Pakistani startups has run dry. Amid this capital drought, only a handful of funds appear to have the bandwidth to support promising ventures. Several investors have quietly withdrawn from deals — suggesting not just selective hesitation, but a deeper structural malaise. This is often overlooked by critics eager to dismiss 'startup culture' as a fleeting trend. Are investors reacting to persistent inflation and regional instability? Or have they simply found better risk-adjusted returns elsewhere? Since the pandemic, broader country risk has receded across much of South Asia. India has seen rating upgrades. Bangladesh has stabilized under an IMF programme. Even Sri Lanka has begun to rebuild investor trust following its exit from sovereign default. Pakistan remains the outlier. Despite a modest compression in its risk premium, investor confidence has yet to recover. Policy inconsistency, weak reform momentum, and macroeconomic fragility continue to weigh heavily on sentiment. Meanwhile, as local interest rates trend toward single digits, startups in other markets are increasingly opting for debt rather than equity. The challenge: Pakistan lacks dedicated venture debt or private credit funds. That absence stifles innovation—particularly in sectors such as agribusiness, where volatility and asset-light models deter conventional lending. With banks largely unwilling to lend without hard collateral, early-stage firms often resort to alternative structures such as revenue-based or royalty financing—models that tie repayments to topline revenue, allowing working capital support without equity dilution. Other regions are adapting. In the MENA region, alternative financing is becoming mainstream. According to Clear World's MENA Early-Stage Data Handbook, valuations, and deal sizes continue to rise, even as equity dilution in Series A rounds appears to be declining. A growing share of deals now includes credit facilities alongside equity. Pakistan has yet to make that leap. The result is a widening mismatch. While the broader private sector sits on idle capital, that liquidity is not flowing to high-risk, early-stage businesses. The startup economy finds itself squeezed between shrinking global VC and a domestic financial system that has not evolved to underwrite innovation. Founders cannot rely on traditional banks. Institutional investors capable of backing new ventures operate with limited capacity — and often, even more limited appetite — for risk. Pakistan's startup ecosystem cannot remain tethered to US-driven venture flows. If early-stage businesses are to endure economic turbulence and eventually scale, the domestic financial architecture must evolve. That means regulatory clarity, credit instruments suited to early-stage risk, and a funding environment that enables ambition without demanding immediate ownership. Absent these reforms, Pakistan risks losing the embedded value of its emerging sectors—either through attrition or through relocation to jurisdictions where non-dilutive capital is more accessible and less punitive. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025