South Korean posts resurface fabricated BBC commentary after Yoon's impeachment
formally removed former president Yoon Suk Yeol from office over his short-lived imposition of martial law, points from a purported BBC "commentary" accusing judges of being corrupt and sympathetic to the North resurfaced online. , and the outlet confirmed to AFP it is fabricated.
"The British broadcaster BBC's commentary on South Korea," reads a Korean-language graphic shared April 9, 2025 on Facebook.
It goes on to claim the BBC called South Korea "a crazy country that eats its own flesh" and a "strange nation that kills itself".
It says the country's "judges and prosecutors are the main culprits of legal disorder" and accuses a Supreme Court justice of selling out the country for five billion won ($3.5 million USD).
"South Korea is a country ruined by biased beliefs and Juche ideology of its judges," reads the graphic's final point.
Juche, meaning self-reliance in Korean, refers to the state ideology developed by North Korea's late founding leader Kim Il Sung.
same day, a right-wing YouTuber with 970,000 subscribers echoed similar claims in a video titled: "British BBC commentary: South Korea on path to failure due to legal disorder".
Image
Screenshot of the false Facebook post captured April 18, 2025
Image
Screenshot of the YouTube video taken April 24, 2025
The posts surfaced after South Korea's Constitutional Court unanimously upheld the impeachment of Yoon, whose failed attempt to suspend civilian rule in December 2024 led to political turmoil (archived link).
Yoon claimed he acted to safeguard the country's liberal democracy from "anti-state elements" and "threats posed by North Korea".
In a separate, ongoing criminal trial, Yoon has denied insurrection charges, for which he could face life in prison or even the death penalty if convicted (archived link).
Similar claims that the BBC criticised the country's judges elsewhere on Facebook and X, South Korean online forums Naver Cafe and Naver Blog, and the websites of NBN News Agency, Public Broadcasting System and Seoul Administration News. The commentary has 2020.
Comments show some users were misled.
"The BBC commentary lays bare the full reality of our country. It's humiliating," one said. Another wrote: "The BBC really knows accurately."
But keyword searches on Google, as well as live and archived versions of the BBC's official website, found similar reports or commentaries.
"We can say with some certainty that we didn't publish this content," told AFP in an April 23, email.
Woongbee Lee, head of BBC Korean, also told AFP the claims had "no real basis".
"We confirmed that neither the Seoul bureau nor the Asia desk had ever published such reports or commentaries," he said April 21.
Moreover, the tone of the fabricated commentary does not align with earlier BBC coverage of Yoon's declaration of martial law and subsequent impeachment.
In an April 4 explainer, the broadcaster described the court's decision to remove Yoon as a "victory for South Korea's democracy". It characterised his martial law bid as an "authoritarian power grab" (archived link).
A report published December 4, 2024 referred to South Korea as a "stable, prosperous democracy," adding: "Yet Yoon claimed he was introducing military rule to save the country from dark forces" (archived link).
AFP has debunked other claims stemming from Yoon's declaration of martial law here.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
France 24
2 hours ago
- France 24
Trump says US personnel moved as Iran tensions mount
Trump also reiterated that he would not allow Iran to have a nuclear weapon, amid mounting speculation that Israel could strike Tehran's facilities. Iran threatened Wednesday to target US military bases in the region if conflict breaks out. A US official had earlier said that staff levels at the embassy in Iraq were being reduced over security concerns, while there were reports that personnel were also being moved from Kuwait and Bahrain. "Well they are being moved out because it could be a dangerous place," Trump told reporters in Washington when asked about the reports of personnel being moved. "We've given notice to move out and we'll see what happens." Trump then added: "They can't have a nuclear weapon, very simple. We're not going to allow that." Tehran and Washington have held five rounds of talks since April to thrash out a new nuclear deal to replace the 2015 accord that Trump abandoned during his first term in 2018. The two sides were due to meet again in coming days. Trump had until recently expressed optimism about the talks, but said in an interview published Wednesday that he was "less confident" about reaching a nuclear deal. Since returning to office in January, Trump has revived his "maximum pressure" campaign on Tehran, backing nuclear diplomacy but warning of military action if it fails. The US president says he has pressed Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to hold off striking Iran's nuclear facilities to give the talks a chance, but has increasingly signaled that he is losing patience. Iran however warned it would respond to any attack. "All its bases are within our reach, we have access to them, and without hesitation we will target all of them in the host countries," Iran's Defence Minister Aziz Nasirzadeh said in response to US threats of military action if the talks fail. 'Suffer more losses' "God willing, things won't reach that point, and the talks will succeed," the minister said, adding that the US side "will suffer more losses" if it came to conflict. The United States has multiple bases in the Middle East, with the largest located in Qatar. In January 2020, Iran fired missiles at bases in Iraq housing American troops in retaliation for the US strike that killed top Iranian general Qassem Soleimani days before at the Baghdad airport. Dozens of US soldiers suffered traumatic brain injuries. Amid the escalating tensions, the UK Maritime Trade Operations, run by the British navy, also advised ships to transit the Gulf with caution. Iran and the United States have recently been locked in a diplomatic standoff over Iran's uranium enrichment, with Tehran defending it as a "non-negotiable" right and Washington calling it a "red line." Iran currently enriches uranium to 60 percent, far above the 3.67-percent limit set in the 2015 deal and close though still short of the 90 percent needed for a nuclear warhead. Western countries have long accused Iran of seeking to acquire atomic weapons, while Tehran insists its nuclear program is for peaceful purposes. Last week, Iran's supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei said enrichment is "key" to Iran's nuclear program and that Washington "cannot have a say" on the issue. During an interview with the New York Post's podcast "Pod Force One," which was recorded on Monday, Trump said he was losing hope a deal could be reached. "I don't know. I did think so, and I'm getting more and more -- less confident about it. They seem to be delaying and I think that's a shame. I am less confident now than I would have been a couple of months ago," he said. Iran has said it will present a counter-proposal to the latest draft from Washington, which it had criticised for failing to offer relief from sanctions -- a key demand for Tehran, which has been reeling under their weight for years. burs-dk/jgc © 2025 AFP
France 24
2 hours ago
- France 24
WADA calls on US to stop 'dangerous' Enhanced Games
Speaking in Lausanne in an address to a meeting of summer Olympic officials, Banka said the inaugural edition of the Enhanced Games in Las Vegas -- where athletes will be free to use performance-enhancing drugs -- "must be stopped." "We all must stand up and condemn those who put greed and ego before the well-being of athletes and the values of fair competition," Banka said. "As the 2028 Olympic Games in Los Angeles approach, we cannot allow what should be a celebration of honest sporting endeavor to be overshadowed by this cynical attempt to undermine clean sport. "WADA is now urging the authorities in the US to seek ways to prevent the Enhanced Games from going ahead as planned. For the sake of athletes' health and the purity of sport, it must be stopped." In separate remarks following the address, Banka urged US authorities to consider legal action to prevent the Enhanced Games from taking place. "Every effort should be made by the authorities in the US to prevent this dangerous event from going ahead as planned," Banka said. "This should be explored from the legal perspective. For example, I would question whether it is legal for licensed doctors to give these potent drugs to healthy athletes. "It goes completely against the rules and values of their profession...I think there is a strong role to be played by the US Anti-Doping Agency (USADA)". USADA has been a strident critic of WADA in recent years following controversy over the global doping watchdog's handling of positive drug tests from 23 Chinese swimmers in 2021. Responding to Banka's remarks on Wednesday, USADA chief executive Travis Tygart accused the WADA president of "attempting to leverage this sideshow to distract from fixing WADA and to stoke anti-American rhetoric." "As we have repeatedly said, for all of the obvious reasons, the Enhanced Games or any other open competition is a bad idea," Tygart said in comments emailed to AFP, urging Banka to accept an invitation to a US Senate hearing next week where the 2021 case involving Chinese swimmers is to be discussed. The first Enhanced Games will be staged in Las Vegas in May 2026, with athletes participating in three sports -- athletics, swimming and weightlifting. Athletes will be allowed to use drugs banned across international sport such as steroids and human growth hormones, with winners of each event receiving $250,000, and a bonus of $1 million for any athlete who breaks a world record. © 2025 AFP
France 24
2 hours ago
- France 24
Majority on Brazil court in favor of tougher social media rules
The South American country's highest court is seeking to determine to what extent companies such as X, TikTok, Instagram and Facebook are responsible for removing illegal content, and how they can be sanctioned if they do not. The judges' final ruling will create a precedent that will affect tens of millions of social media users in Brazil. At issue is a clause in the country's so-called Civil Framework for the Internet, a law in effect since 2014, that says platforms are only responsible for harm caused by a post if they ignore a judge's order to remove it. By Wednesday, six of the court's 11 judges had ruled in favor of higher accountability, meaning sites should monitor content and remove problematic posts on their own initiative, without court intervention. One judge has voted against tougher regulation, and three have yet to express an opinion. Alexandre de Moraes, one of 11 judges of the court, has repeatedly clashed with X owner Elon Musk and various right-wing personalities over social media posts. The review is taking place in parallel with the Supreme Court trial of far-right former president Jair Bolsonaro, who is alleged to have collaborated on a coup plot to remain in power after his 2022 election defeat. Prosecutors say Bolsonaro's followers used social media to lie about the reliability of the electoral system and plot the downfall of successor Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva. Last year, Moraes blocked X for 40 days for failing to comply with a series of court orders against online disinformation. He had previously ordered X to suspend the accounts of several Bolsonaro supporters. Musk and other critics say Moraes is stifling free speech, and US President Donald Trump's administration is weighing sanctions against the judge, whom Bolsonaro accuses of judicial "persecution." Lula, who emerged the victor in a tightly-fought election against Bolsonaro in 2022, is advocating for "accelerating regulation" of online platforms. © 2025 AFP
