Hillary Clinton admits she would nominate Trump for Nobel Peace Prize if he helps end war in Ukraine
Trump's failed Democratic opponent told the 'Raging Moderates' podcast that she would willingly nominate him for the illustrious prize if he can bring an end to the war in Ukraine without allowing President Vladimir Putin to take territory from its neighbor.
'Honestly, if he could bring about the end to this terrible war, if he could end it without putting Ukraine in a position where it had to concede its territory to the aggressor, could really stand up to Putin — something we haven't seen, but maybe this is the opportunity — if President Trump were the architect of that, I'd nominate him for a Nobel Peace Prize,' Clinton told podcast interviewer Jessica Tarlov in an interview released Friday.
3 if President Trump were the architect' of ending the war 'I'd nominate him for a Nobel Peace Prize,' Hillary Clinton said.
Raging Moderates Podcast
3 Clinton hopes that Trump 'could really stand up to Putin.'
Getty Images
3 A girl stands with activists in front of the U.S. embassy ahead of the meeting between Trump and Vladimir Putin to raise awareness about the plight of thousands of POWs and Russia's attacks, in Kyiv on August 15, 2025.
REUTERS
'Because my goal here is to not allow capitulation to Putin,' she added.
The unexpected offer emerged as Trump was already en route to Alaska for the landmark talks with his Russian counterpart, where he hopes to bring about an end to the three-year conflict in Ukraine.
He has expressed a desire to be nominated for a Nobel Peace Prize in the past, following in the footsteps of his predecessor Barack Obama.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
18 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Zelensky returns to site of stunning Oval Office shouting match
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky returns to the Oval Office on Monday for the first time since a spectacularly tense exchange with Donald Trump saw their talks cut short and question marks raised over future US support. At the February 28 meeting, Trump and Vice President JD Vance berated Zelensky on live television, accusing him of being ungrateful for US aid provided since Russia's invasion three years prior, and pressing for quick negotiations to end the war. The hostile confrontation marked a turning point in Kyiv-Washington relations, which had been warm under former president Joe Biden, and raised fears that Trump would cut off US military support. The scene quickly devolved at the end of a long question-and-answer session with the press. Vance accused Zelensky of being "disrespectful" and displaying ingratitude for Trump's diplomatic efforts, after the Ukrainian leader expressed skepticism that Russian President Vladimir Putin could be trusted given his repeated violations of earlier agreements. As Zelensky defended his position in his non-native English, Trump was enraged by the Ukrainian leader's suggestion that while the United States was currently far from the fighting, "you will feel it in the future" if they appeased Putin. "You don't know that. You don't know that. Don't tell us what we're going to feel. We're trying to solve a problem. Don't tell us what we're going to feel," railed Trump, before adding: "You're not in a good position. You don't have the cards right now." As tempers flared, Vance demanded Zelensky thank the United States for the billions provided to Kyiv in military aid. "Have you said 'thank you' once?" he asked. When Zelensky attempted to respond, he was silenced by Trump. "No, no. You've done a lot of talking. Your country is in big trouble," said Trump, cutting Zelensky off. The Ukrainian leader left the White House shortly after, without signing a mineral rights deal that was a key reason for his visit. In the ensuing days, the United States temporarily cut off military aid and intelligence sharing with Ukraine, heightening European fears that Trump would side with Putin in trying to end the conflict. - Shifting tides - Much water has since flowed under the bridge, however. Trump, who has in the past expressed his admiration for Putin, began to lose patience with the Russian leader, as Moscow kept up its military offensive even as US special envoy Steve Witkoff engaged in feverish diplomacy to achieve a ceasefire. In April, Trump met with Zelensky at the Vatican, and accused Putin of "tapping me along" without delivering on promises. Days later, Ukraine and the United States finally signed a minerals deal, which Trump had earlier referred to as compensation for US aid. The two leaders also met face-to-face in June on the sidelines of the NATO summit at The Hague. On Friday, Trump met with Putin in Alaska to discuss the Ukrainian conflict, promising to run any proposals by both Ukraine and its European allies before agreeing to a deal. Shortly after the Putin summit, Trump invited Zelensky to the Oval Office. Perhaps wary of the contours of the previous diplomatic dust-up, Zelensky quickly said he was "grateful for the invitation." European leaders will join Zelensky in Washington on Monday, seeking above all else to prevent another Oval Office meltdown -- but also to coordinate on the path toward peace negotiations, especially on how to prevent any future Russian invasion. On the latter front, the Trump administration says it is now open to providing Ukraine security guarantees, a shift hailed Sunday by Ukrainian and European leaders. Zelensky is expected to first meet one-on-one with Trump, before they are joined by European leaders, including UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer, French President Emmanuel Macron, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte and EU chief Ursula von der Leyen, a European government source said. According to US broadcaster CNN, Zelensky's former sparring partner -- Vice President Vance -- will also be present. aha/des
New York Post
19 minutes ago
- New York Post
Trump knows the dangers of addiction — he must reject Big Weed's push to reclassify marijuana
You know it's a bad idea if Joe Biden was for it. That's the case with the mad push for marijuana reform, which Biden promised in a cynical grab for young voters in his State of the Union address last year. But now President Trump is reported to be open to fulfilling Biden's promise to reclassify marijuana as a less dangerous Schedule III drug, which would benefit the $33 billion industry by giving them tax deductions and expanding their market. According to The Wall Street Journal, Trump told donors he was considering the 'de-scheduling' of marijuana at a $1 million-a-plate fundraiser at his Bedminster golf club in New Jersey this month that was attended by Kim Rivers, the chief executive of one of the largest marijuana companies, Trulieve. Advertisement Trulieve and its ilk pretend that marijuana reforms are for altruistic medical reasons rather than about growing their profits. Medical marijuana was the bait-and-switch trap when states started legalizing pot more than a decade ago. Now recreational use has exploded to the point where it has overtaken alcohol, and there's still no sound science on the benefits of medical marijuana. 'Complicated subject' Advertisement The president confirmed last week to reporters at the White House that his administration is 'looking at reclassification' and intends to make a decision soon. 'Some people like it. Some people hate it,' he said. 'Some people hate the whole concept of marijuana because if it does bad for the children, it does bad for people that are older than children. 'It's a very complicated subject base,' he said. 'I've heard great things having to do with medical and bad things having to do with just about everything else.' Advertisement Trump is a teetotaler. He credits his late older brother Fred Trump Jr., with his decision not to drink or take drugs. Fred struggled with alcoholism, and died in 1981, aged 42, as a consequence of his disease. 'He was a very handsome guy,' Trump told me on 'Pod Force One.' 'He had an unbelievable personality, but the booze got to him . . . He'd always say, 'Don't drink, don't smoke.' Now in those days, there were no drugs, or I guess there were, but you didn't know about it. But he would have added drugs in there. He said, 'Don't ever smoke and don't ever drink.' 'He was a great guy, you know, he was terrific. Could have done anything. He could fly airplanes unbelievably well,' Trump added. 'He had a great talent for that, but alcohol was a killer for him.' Advertisement Trump learned from his brother's mistakes: 'I never had a drink of alcohol. I don't smoke, and I'm a hard worker. Well, he worked, but he just had the curse, you know, and it was tough.' Marijuana is a disaster. It's infinitely worse than alcohol on every metric, especially mental health. The scientific evidence is incontrovertible that marijuana triggers psychosis in susceptible people. For example, a large-scale Danish study published in the American Journal of Psychiatry in 2017 found that up to 30% of young men's schizophrenia could have been prevented if they had not used pot. Get Miranda's latest take Sign up for Devine Online, the newsletter from Miranda Devine Thanks for signing up! Enter your email address Please provide a valid email address. By clicking above you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Want even more news? Check out more newsletters Even one psychotic episode triggered by marijuana use was associated with a 47% chance of a person developing schizophrenia or bipolar disorder, with the highest risk for those aged 16-to-25, according to the study of 6.9 million Danes between 1972 and 2021. Another longitudinal study of 50,000 Swedes that began in 1987 found that marijuana users were twice as likely as non-users to develop psychotic disorders such as schizophrenia. Heavy users had a six times greater risk. A more potent problem And it was a far less potent drug than it is now. Marijuana of 40 years ago had about a 5% concentration of THC, the intoxicating component of cannabis, but today's industrial products such as gummies, vapes and pre-rolled joints can be as high as 99% THC. Advertisement The stench of pot wafting through blue cities like New York is a hallmark of chaos and disorder. It's the opposite of President Trump's law and order image. So it is hard to believe he would bow to Big Weed and normalize this insidious drug further. Unlike his predecessor, Trump understands on a personal level the perils of addiction. Advertisement You'd think with the drug problems that have afflicted the lives of both his adult children, Hunter and Ashley, Biden might have had more sense, but pandering to Big Weed was a running theme of his presidency, with executive orders and performative pardons for federal marijuana possession (not one person was in jail for possession alone). Thankfully, wise heads inside the Drug Enforcement Administration dragged the chain long enough to stop Biden's plan to reclassify marijuana. The drug lobby has redoubled efforts under Trump, but the signs don't look good for them with the confirmation last month of the new DEA administrator, Terrance Cole. Much to the disappointment of pot advocates, marijuana was nowhere to be seen on his list of 'strategic priorities' announced after he took office, which included combating drug trafficking, Mexican cartels, fentanyl and drug-fueled violence. Advertisement Even better, in a post on LinkedIn last year, he wrote: 'Everybody knows my stance on marijuana after 30 plus years in law enforcement, so don't even ask!' He added anti-drug hashtags #justsayno, #disorders, #notlegal4distribution, #healthissues, #thinblueline and #backtheblue. Every week, Post columnist Miranda Devine sits down for exclusive and candid conversations with the most influential disruptors in Washington. Subscribe here! Cole, who worked at the DEA for 21 years, has made no secret of his concerns about marijuana. sharing a link last year to an article titled 'NOT 'Just Weed': Four Times More Dangerous in Three Decades' that found that higher THC levels are 'linked to increased problems with memory and learning, distorted perception, difficulty in thinking and problem-solving, and loss of coordination.' Cole's attitude is a good sign. 3 states 'just say no' Advertisement So is the fact that three states — Florida, North Dakota and South Dakota — last November rejected marijuana legalization measures on the ballot: reversing the trend of the past decade in which 24 states have now approved the drug for recreational use and 40 for medical use, which of course is just the Trojan horse. In Florida, Big Weed, mainly Trulieve, spent a reported $153 million lobbying for legalization and still lost, despite outspending opponents almost five to one. It was the third time in four years that poor old North and South Dakotans rejected the ballot measure. But Big Weed just won't take no for an answer, believing that it will eventually wear voters down. Another good sign is that even The New York Times is starting to tell the truth about marijuana, reporting that 18 million people — nearly a third of adult users — reporting symptoms of 'cannabis use disorder.' The Times points out that only two states cap the levels of THC, with lobbyists busy preventing any new state health restrictions. Let's hope that the Trump administration puts the brakes on the headlong rush to legalize this dangerous drug.
Fox News
20 minutes ago
- Fox News
The Federal Reserve board has done a 'lousy' job, says former Trump economic advisor
Former Trump economic advisor Stephen Moore touts President Trump's economic wins and says that Jerome Powell has to go on 'Sunday Night in America.'
