logo
Labor Defends Consultant Cuts as It Takes Aim at Coalition's Public Service Slashes

Labor Defends Consultant Cuts as It Takes Aim at Coalition's Public Service Slashes

Epoch Times16-05-2025

While Labor targeted Coalition's plan to cut 41,000 public servants as a point of contention, it has also defended its own move to slash 54,000 private consultants.
Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and Treasurer Jim Chalmers argue Labor is targeting waste, not essential services.
Albanese added that Labor's cuts were about value for money.
'We are cutting on wasteful spending,' he said. 'A public service officer works for a reasonable wage—$200,000 for a senior role—but a consultant for the same role works half the time, getting paid double the amount under the Coalition.'
He said the Coalition's reliance on consultants had real consequences.
'The consultant culture led to 42,000 veterans being denied their entitlements—men and women who had served our nation in uniform, some of whom passed away before they got the entitlements they had earned,' he said.
Related Stories
3/3/2025
3/27/2025
'We are backing Australians. Peter Dutton is sacking Australians.'
Impact on Vital Agencies
Albanese warned the Coalition's cuts would gut key public services, including Services Australia, the Australian Defence Force, the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade, and the National Emergency Management Agency.
He questioned what would happen to critical agencies if 41,000 public service jobs were lost.
'What happens with ASIO, with Operation Sovereign Borders, with the Australian Signals Directorate?' he asked.
'These security and defence agencies represent more than 20,000 of the 68,000 public servants currently in Canberra; 41,000 of them are going to be sacked. That will have a devastating impact on Australian services.'
Billions in Savings Defended
Chalmers said Labor had already saved billions by cutting back on consultants, and would continue reducing waste.
'We are making billions of dollars of savings, investing in the capacity of the Australian Public Service, while winding back outrageous levels of spending on contractors and consultants,' he said.
He dismissed claims that the figures were 'creative accounting.'
'When we came to office, the public service was hollowed out. Too much spending on contractors and consultants,' he said.
Chalmers accused Dutton of borrowing policies from overseas.
'He wants the Americanisation of health, the public service, and education,' he said.
'He draws his inspiration from U.S. politics and slogans. We believe in the capacity of the Australian Public Service.'
Coalition: No Forced Job Losses
Opposition Leader Peter Dutton has downplayed the fallout from the proposed cuts, saying that no jobs would be lost outside Canberra.
'We've been very clear about that,' Dutton said, adding that some of the 41,000 positions could come from existing vacancies.
Nationals Leader David Littleproud said many of the positions were already vacant and would simply not be filled.
The Coalition confirmed frontline and national security roles would be protected, and there would be no forced redundancies.
The projected $7 billion in savings is to be delivered over five years through voluntary exits, unfilled vacancies, and a freeze on new hiring.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Chambers USA 2025 Recognizes Dorsey Lawyers and Practices
Chambers USA 2025 Recognizes Dorsey Lawyers and Practices

Business Wire

timean hour ago

  • Business Wire

Chambers USA 2025 Recognizes Dorsey Lawyers and Practices

MINNEAPOLIS--(BUSINESS WIRE)--International law firm Dorsey & Whitney LLP announced today that 39 of its practices and 91 of its lawyers across 11 of its U.S. offices were ranked by Chambers and Partners in its annual survey, Chambers USA: America's Leading Lawyers for Business 2025. Dorsey's Cannabis Law, Corporate/M&A, ERISA Litigation, International Trade: Export Controls & Economics Sanctions, Mining & Metals, and Native American Law practices were ranked on the national level. Share In addition to the practices ranked at the state level, the Firm's Cannabis Law, Corporate/M&A, ERISA Litigation, International Trade: Export Controls & Economics Sanctions, Mining & Metals, and Native American Law practices were ranked on the national level. Dorsey Attorney Rankings Chambers ranked the following individual Dorsey lawyers in its latest guide: National Kimberley Anderson – Mining & Metals Christopher Doerksen – Mining & Metals Skip Durocher – Native American Law Andrew Holly – ERISA Litigation Justin Huff – International Trade: CFIUS Experts Wells Parker – Mining & Metals Michael Pignato – Native American Law: Finance Sativa Rasmussen – Cannabis Law: Western United States Richard Silberberg – International Arbitration: Arbitrators Mary Streitz – Native American Law Lawrence Ward – International Trade: CFIUS Experts; International Trade: Export Controls & Economic Sanctions Anchorage Michael Mills – Corporate/M&A Bankruptcy/Restructuring Bonnie Paskvan – Corporate/M&A Native American Law Boise Richard Hall – Natural Resources & Environment Steve Hardesty – Corporate/Commercial Nick Taylor – Corporate/Commercial Elijah Watkins – Litigation: General Commercial Denver Charlene Krogh – Intellectual Property Lee Osman – Intellectual Property Greg Tamkin – Intellectual Property Des Moines Josh Hughes – Labor & Employment William Miller – Labor & Employment; Litigation: General Commercial Kirk Schuler – Litigation: General Commercial Minneapolis Theresa Bevilacqua – Litigation: General Commercial Brian Burke – Corporate/M&A Ross D'Emanuele – Healthcare Beth Forsythe – Litigation: White-Collar Crime & Government Investigations Michelle Grant – Litigation: General Commercial Cam Hoang – Capital Markets: Debt & Equity Kathryn Johnson – Construction Jocelyn Knoll – Construction James Langdon – Litigation: General Commercial Jay Lindgren – Real Estate: Zoning/Land Use Michael Lindsay – Antitrust Edward Magarian – Litigation: White-Collar Crime & Government Investigation John Marsalek – Corporate/M&A John Marti – Litigation: White-Collar Crime & Government Investigation David Meyer – Real Estate Ryan Mick – Labor & Employment Marcus Mollison – Real Estate Robert Olson – Real Estate F. Matthew Ralph – Antitrust Melissa Raphan – Labor & Employment Robert Rosenbaum – Corporate/M&A Eric Ruzicka – Construction J. Mike Sevilla – Immigration Zev Simpser – Energy & Natural Resources Jaime Stilson – Antitrust Alyson Van Dyk – Real Estate Jonathan Van Horn – Corporate/M&A RJ Zayed – Litigation: White-Collar Crime & Government Investigation Missoula Steve Bell – Litigation: General Commercial Courtney Ellis – Corporate/M&A Erin McCrady – Corporate/M&A Dan Semmens – Corporate/M&A New York Bruce Ewing – Intellectual Property: Trademark, Copyright & Trade Secrets Nicholas Pappas – Labor & Employment Phoenix Norman James – Environment Rob Kort – Healthcare Law Brian Moll – Corporate/M&A Dawn Meidinger – Environment Ryan Rosensteel – Real Estate Salt Lake City Alan Bell – Corporate/M&A Bryon Benevento – Litigation: General Commercial Matthew Bethards – Intellectual Property Mark Burghardt – Natural Resources & Environment Nathan Canova – Public Finance Matthew Durham – Labor & Employment Brett Foster – Intellectual Property L. Grant Foster – Intellectual Property Richard Hall – Natural Resources & Environment Megan Houdeshel – Natural Resources & Environment Catherine Lake – Intellectual Property Milo Steven Marsden – Litigation: General Commercial Chris Martinez – Litigation: General Commercial David Marx – Corporate/M&A Mark Miller – Intellectual Property Wells Parker – Natural Resources & Environment Bryan Pratt – Intellectual Property Marcus Simon – Intellectual Property Layne Smith – Corporate/M&A Nolan Taylor – Corporate/M&A Gage Zobell – Natural Resources & Environment Seattle Kerry Lee Andken – Intellectual Property Ieva Aubin – Immigration Marisa Bavand – Construction Michael Droke – Labor & Employment Kimton Eng – Intellectual Property Kendall Fisher – Tax Geoff Godfrey – Intellectual Property Mike Grace – Construction Shawn Larsen-Bright – Litigation: General Commercial Washington, DC Margot Laporte – Litigation: White-Collar Crime & Government Investigations Dorsey Practice Rankings Chambers ranked the following Dorsey practices in its latest guide: Nationwide Cannabis Law Corporate/M&A: Highly Regarded Mining & Metals ERISA Litigation International Trade: Export Controls & Economic Sanctions: Highly Regarded Native American Law Anchorage Corporate/M&A Real Estate Native American Law Boise Corporate/Commercial Denver Intellectual Property Des Moines Litigation: General Commercial Labor & Employment Minneapolis Antitrust Capital Markets: Debt & Equity Construction Corporate/M&A Energy & Natural Resources Immigration Intellectual Property Labor & Employment Litigation: General Commercial Litigation: White-Collar Crime & Government Investigations Real Estate Missoula Corporate/M&A Litigation: General Commercial Natural Resources & Environment New York Corporate/M&A: Highly Regarded Intellectual Property: Trademark, Copyright & Trade Secrets Phoenix Real Estate Salt Lake City Corporate/M&A Intellectual Property Litigation: General Commercial Natural Resources & Environment Seattle Construction Corporate/M&A Intellectual Property Litigation: General Commercial Tax Chambers surveys and interviews clients and lawyers across the United States to determine which firms and attorneys are considered leaders in their field. Rankings assess key qualities in the legal field, including technical legal ability, professional conduct, client service, commercial astuteness, diligence, and commitment. About Dorsey & Whitney LLP Clients have relied on Dorsey as a valued business partner since 1912. With locations across the United States and in Canada, Europe, and the Asia-Pacific region, Dorsey provides results-oriented, grounded counsel for its clients' legal and business needs. Dorsey represents a number of the world's most successful companies from a wide range of industries, including banking & financial institutions; development & infrastructure; energy & natural resources; food, beverage & agribusiness; healthcare & life sciences; and technology.

TotalEnergies in landmark greenwashing trial in France
TotalEnergies in landmark greenwashing trial in France

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

TotalEnergies in landmark greenwashing trial in France

Environmental groups took TotalEnergies to court Thursday in a landmark Paris trial, accusing the French oil and gas giant of misleading consumers with ads that overstate its climate commitments and fossil fuel transition. It is the first such case in France targeting a major energy company and could set a legal precedent for corporate environmental advertising, which is starting to face tighter regulations in the European Union. The civil case stems from a March 2022 lawsuit by three environmental groups accusing TotalEnergies of "misleading commercial practices" for saying it could reach carbon neutrality while continuing oil and gas production. The plaintiffs took that legal route as "greenwashing", or the act of claiming to be more environmentally responsible than in reality, is not specifically covered under French law. Starting in May 2021, TotalEnergies advertised its goal of "carbon neutrality by 2050" and touted gas as "the fossil fuel with the lowest greenhouse gas emissions". At the time, the company had changed its name from Total to TotalEnergies to emphasise its investments in wind turbines and solar panels for electricity production. The plaintiffs allege that TotalEnergies made around 40 "false advertisements" in their lawsuit. "For the average consumer, it is impossible to understand that TotalEnergies is actually expanding fossil fuel production," said Clementine Baldon, a lawyer for the NGOs. The company's strategy "will not help the energy transition", Baldon told the court. "It delays it, even prevents it, and it contributes to putting the objectives of the Paris accord at risk," she added, referring to the international agreement aimed at curbing climate change. TotalEnergies maintains it has not engaged in misleading commercial practices. Moreover, it insists that the messages are part of its institutional communications regulated by financial authorities and not consumer law. It has also argued the NGOs are misusing consumer protection rules to challenge its corporate strategy, and that no consumer organisation is party to the case. The NGOs said the Paris court will rule on the legality of ads presenting natural gas as essential to the energy transition. Climate experts say methane leaks from the gas industry have a powerful warming effect on the atmosphere. - Correcting ads - Environmental groups in recent years have turned to the courts to establish case law on companies misleading consumers by appearing more eco-friendly than they are. In Europe, courts ruled against Dutch airline KLM in 2024 and Germany's Lufthansa in March over misleading consumers about their efforts to reduce the environmental impact of flying. In Spain, utility Iberdrola failed to secure a conviction against Spanish oil and gas company Repsol over similar allegations of "false" environmental claims. A greenwashing case against Australian oil and gas producer Santos, challenging its claim to be a "clean fuels" company, has been ongoing since 2021. Other fossil fuel companies, under pressure from advertising regulators or legal complains, have had to scrap or correct ad campaigns. Shell, for example, received a warning in the UK and had to stop promoting "carbon-neutral" gasoline in several countries, including Germany, the Netherlands and Canada. New European laws now ban vague, generic environmental claims such as "green" or "100 percent natural" product, and aim to require brands to more strictly substantiate environmental claims on labels and in advertising. TotalEnergies has said it plans to show that its messages "about its name change, strategy and role in the energy transition are reliable and based on objective, verifiable data". nal/ak/lth/rl

Judge blocks Trump administration Job Corps centers' suspension
Judge blocks Trump administration Job Corps centers' suspension

The Hill

time2 hours ago

  • The Hill

Judge blocks Trump administration Job Corps centers' suspension

A federal judge on Wednesday blocked the Trump administration from suspending operations at Job Corps centers across the country. U.S. District Judge Andrew Carter, an Obama appointee, temporarily halted the government from taking further steps to eliminate the program, which offers free education and vocational training in addition to housing for disadvantaged young people ages 16 to 24. In late May, the Department of Labor announced it would end operations at the centers, citing a 'a startling number of serious incident reports and our in-depth fiscal analysis.' 'We remain committed to ensuring all participants are supported through this transition and connected with the resources they need to succeed as we evaluate the program's possibilities,' Labor Secretary Lori Chavez-DeRemer said in a statement at the time. However, the plaintiffs in the lawsuit against the Trump administration, including the National Job Corps Association, said suspending the program is illegal. 'It contravenes the statutory provisions governing Job Corps and DOL's own regulations concerning the program, and it is fundamentally irrational,' the plaintiffs wrote, according to court documents. 'Shuttering Job Corps will have disastrous, irreparable consequences, including displacing tens of thousands of vulnerable young people, destroying companies that have long operated Job Corps centers in reliance on the Government's support for the program, and forcing mass layoffs of workers who support the program,' they added. Congressional leaders have echoed the same sentiments. Sen. Tammy Baldwin (D-Wis.) said the move to suspend operations at the centers is a step in the 'wrong direction' adding that it would exacerbate her state's workforce shortage, lock students out of good-paying jobs and hurt Wisconsin's economy. Senate Appropriations Committee Chair Susan Collins (R-Maine) agreed. 'Congress appropriated funding for Job Corps, and the Trump Administration can't just decide to not spend it because they want to make room for tax cuts for billionaires,' Baldwin said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store