logo
Trump is canceling protections for thousands of migrants. But some remain unscathed.

Trump is canceling protections for thousands of migrants. But some remain unscathed.

Washington Post22-05-2025
The Trump administration has hailed El Salvador as one of the safest lands in the hemisphere, bestowing a nation that was once the murder capital of the world with a 'gold star' rating that indicates it is just as secure for Americans as Canada.
But as President Donald Trump cancels protections for hundreds of thousands of unauthorized immigrants — including those from nations such as Venezuela that the State Department considers far more dangerous — officials have remained mum on whether Salvadorans should see their special humanitarian status revoked, too.
The silence from U.S. and Salvadoran officials on a central foreign-policy issue comes as analysts worry that Trump is increasingly using humanitarian protections to reward his allies and punish his enemies. In recent days, Trump officials have expedited refugee status to people from a White ethnic minority in South Africa and declared that Afghans should return home because the Taliban-controlled nation has made 'notable improvements' to the economy and public safety.
On Monday, the Supreme Court ruled that the Trump administration can cancel temporary protections for up to 350,000 Venezuelans while a legal fight over rescinding protected status plays out in the lower courts.
'There's no way to justify what is happening,' said Jose Palma, an immigrant from El Salvador and coordinator of the National TPS Alliance, which advocates for people with temporary protected status. 'I don't understand the logic.'
The U.S. government has long linked humanitarian aid to its political and foreign policy goals, but Congress created temporary protected status in 1990 amid frustrations that presidents had failed to protect people from being deported to countries in crisis. The law created a process for the government to examine country conditions and grant undocumented immigrants and others permission to live and work in the U.S. for up to 18 months if their countries are engulfed in a war or natural disaster.
In January, Trump signed an executive order directing officials to limit the protection on the grounds that the temporary relief from deportation has in many cases been allowed to drag on far after the initial crisis. The number of immigrants who qualified for temporary protected status significantly expanded under President Joe Biden, and well over 1 million people from 17 countries had been eligible to apply for it as of last year. Many come from some of the world's most violent countries and would otherwise have no legal status in the United States.
Temporary status can be renewed repeatedly, and immigrants and their relatives back home who rely on the remittances they send are anxious each time a decision must be made. In addition to Venezuelans, the Department of Homeland Security has announced that it will terminate protections for 11,700 Afghans in July and for more than 200,000 from Haiti in August. DHS is also reviewing conditions in South Sudan, where DHS attempted to deport people to this month.
Until now, El Salvador has been one of Trump's prime examples of a nation whose migrants had been granted relief for too long.
Undocumented Salvadorans were granted temporary protected status in 2001 after a pair of massive earthquakes struck their homeland and made it too dangerous for them to return. Since then, officials have renewed the status more than 10 times.
During his first term, Trump infamously denigrated El Salvador as a 's--thole' country in a private Oval Office meeting with lawmakers to discuss protecting immigrants from certain countries. He later denied having used the slur. Trump officials argued that the reasoning for granting Salvadorans a special status had passed. Though murder rates remained high, the hospitals, homes and schools destroyed by the earthquakes had been rebuilt, and the Salvadoran economy was 'steadily improving.'
Nayib Bukele, then the mayor of the capital city of El Salvador, had long worried that ending TPS would be a 'catastrophe' for the Central American nation. He said the nation was unprepared to potentially absorb more than 200,000 immigrants and thousands of their U.S.-born children. After Trump officials announced in 2018 that they would end the protections the next year, Bukele urged Salvadorans in the U.S. to flood Congress with complaints to sway the midterm elections.
Bukele emphasized that TPS holders were not criminals, but valued members of society. Anyone with a serious criminal history is ineligible for the protections.
'We're talking about hardworking people with university studies, with mortgages, business owners,' he said in October 2019, according to El Faro, an investigative news organization. 'They're the type of migrants any country wants.'
Trump was blocked from officially ending temporary protected status for Salvadorans during his first term as lawsuits made their way through the courts. But Bukele, who was elected president in 2019, ultimately secured an agreement with the Trump administration to extend it. In negotiations with Trump officials, he agreed to accept asylum seekers from other countries such as Nicaragua and Cuba who had passed through El Salvador on their way north and were later deported across the U.S. southern border. Bukele acknowledged at a news conference that the deal was a quid pro quo.
But throughout Trump's first term, Salvadoran immigrants and the MS-13 gang were a frequent target. He repeatedly attacked the gang and vowed to kick them out of the United States. By contrast, Trump and several of his future Cabinet members expressed their broad support for allowing unauthorized Venezuelan immigrants to stay.
On Jan. 19, 2021, the last full day of his first term, Trump granted Venezuelans protection from being deported, though he did not give them temporary protected status. He gave them 'deferred enforced departure,' an arcane term that promises to let people stay temporarily, based on the 'autocratic government of Nicolás Maduro,' which he said had 'consistently violated the sovereign freedoms' of Venezuelans.
Trump wrote that the Maduro government was responsible for the 'worst humanitarian crisis in the Western Hemisphere in recent memory,' including 'a catastrophic economic crisis and shortages of basic goods and medicine' that forced millions to flee the country.
In the following years, Biden allowed in hundreds of thousands of Venezuelans, legally and illegally, and granted them more concrete protection through temporary protected status. Venezuelans soon displaced Salvadorans as the top group with that status.
Trump officials who were then in Congress implored the Biden administration to renew their status. Ousted national security adviser Michael Waltz, then a Florida congressman, thanked Biden in 2022 for granting Venezuelans TPS and urged him to allow more to apply for it, citing the country's 'grave conditions.'
Secretary of State Marco Rubio wrote Biden officials that same year, as a senator from Florida, stating that deporting Venezuelans would amount to a 'very real death sentence.' Florida is home to the largest Venezuelan community in the United States.
That support flipped as the 2024 presidential campaign approached. Trump targeted Venezuelans as they arrived as part of a record number of border apprehensions. His rhetoric intensified after a Venezuelan man was arrested in connection with the killing of Georgia nursing student Laken Riley last year. And he spoke of the Tren de Aragua gang as if it were widespread, though experts say the transnational Venezuelan group has not established a firm presence in the United States.
Shortly after taking office in January, Trump designated members of both Tren de Aragua and MS-13 as foreign terrorist organizations so they could be swiftly deported.
Homeland Security Secretary Kristi L. Noem announced in early February that she was rescinding TPS for 350,000 Venezuelans. The next day, Bukele said he offered to house dangerous gang members for the U.S. government in a notorious prison.
In El Salvador, many feared Trump would cancel temporary protections for Salvadoran immigrants in the United States. The impact would be 'apocalyptic,' the former president of the Central Bank in El Salvador told the EFE news service. Money that Salvadoran immigrants send home accounts for a quarter of the nation's GDP and without it, the official warned, the nation could plunge into a recession.
But El Salvador's TPS went untouched.
Instead, in March, Trump signed a secret decree invoking the Alien Enemies Act to deport alleged gang members from Venezuela without a hearing, and the next day airplanes carrying more than 200 immigrant detainees mostly from Venezuela took off for El Salvador.
Bukele's officers dragged them off planes, shaved their heads and incarcerated them despite a federal judge's order in the U.S. ordering Trump to turn the flights around. 'Oopsie ... too late,' Bukele posted on X, adding a laughing emoji.
Analysts said it is possible that Bukele struck a deal with the Trump administration to avoid canceling TPS, in addition to the several million dollars officials said they are paying Bukele to house the detainees.
'It suits the Trump administration's interests to have very good relations with the Bukele government,' said Thomas Warrick, a senior fellow at the Atlantic Council and a former DHS deputy assistant secretary for counterterrorism policy. 'I don't know that there's a deal, but they're certainly trying to be good to Bukele's government.'
The Department of Homeland Security, the White House and Bukele officials did not respond to requests for comment.
If Bukele remains worried about what will happen to TPS in the future, he did not mention it last month during his visit to the White House. The two leaders lavished praise on each other, with Trump calling Bukele 'one hell of a president.' Bukele has called himself the 'world's coolest dictator' and ran for a second term even though the constitution prohibits it. He has also jailed tens of thousands of alleged gang members, resulting in a plummeting crime rate that has won praise among Salvadorans. But human rights workers say the jails are rife with abuse.
The more than 200,000 Salvadorans with temporary protections remain in the U.S. at the will of the Trump administration. Their status expires in September 2026.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Defamation case against Fox News highlights role of its hosts in promoting 2020 election falsehoods
Defamation case against Fox News highlights role of its hosts in promoting 2020 election falsehoods

Yahoo

time20 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Defamation case against Fox News highlights role of its hosts in promoting 2020 election falsehoods

NEW YORK (AP) — Court papers in a voting technology company's $2.7 billion defamation lawsuit against Fox News point to Maria Bartiromo, Lou Dobbs and Jeanine Pirro as leaders in spreading false stories about election fraud in the weeks after Democrat Joe Biden's victory over President Donald Trump in 2020. Arguments for summary judgment by Smartmatic were filed in lightly redacted form this week at the New York Supreme Court. It's like a bad rerun for Fox: Similar revelations about its conduct following the 2020 election came in a lawsuit by another company falsely accused of doctoring votes, Dominion Voting Systems. Fox agreed to pay Dominion $787 million in a 2023 settlement after the judge found it was 'CRYSTAL CLEAR' that none of the claims against the voting system company were true. In short: Fox let Donald Trump aides spread conspiracy theories despite knowing they were false because it was what their viewers wanted to hear. Fox was trying to hold on to viewers who were angry at the network for saying Biden had won the election. Fox said it was covering a newsworthy story. It accuses the London-based company, which had only Los Angeles County as a client for the 2020 election, of exaggerating its claims of damages in the hope of receiving a financial windfall. Pirro now working in the second Trump administration The focus on Pirro is noteworthy because the former Fox personality now serves in Trump's second administration as U.S. attorney in Washington, D.C. Smartmatic, relying on emails and text messages revealed as part of the case, said Pirro was using her position as a Fox host in 2020 to help Trump and persuade him to pardon her ex-husband, Albert Pirro, who was convicted of conspiracy and tax evasion. Trump pardoned him before leaving office in 2021. In a text to then-Republican National Committee chairwoman Ronna McDaniel in September 2020, Pirro said, 'I'm the No. 1 watched show on news cable all weekend. I work so hard for the President and the party,' Smartmatic said in court papers. One of her own producers, Jerry Andrews, called Pirro a 'reckless maniac,' Smartmatic said. He texted after one of her shows in November that it was 'rife (with) conspiracy theories and bs and is yet another example of why this woman should never be on live television." The court papers said Pirro also suggested 'evidence' of supposed fraud to Trump lawyer Sidney Powell that she could use on a television appearance — material that also was spread by Bartiromo. Bartiromo still works at Fox, and in 2020 had shows on both the news channel and Fox Business Network. The court papers uncovered messages showing her desire to help Trump: 'I am very worried. Please please please overturn this. Bring the evidence, I know you can,' she texted to Powell. Dobbs, whose business show was canceled by Fox in February 2021, texted to Powell four days after the election, saying 'I'm going to do what I can to help stop what is now a coup d'etat in (its) final days — perhaps moments," a reference to Biden's victory. Dobbs died in 2024. A central figure in Fox's 'pivot' Smartmatic portrayed Pirro as a central figure in Fox's 'pivot' to deemphasize Biden's victory because it angered Trump fans. Instead, the network found that ratings jumped whenever claims of election fraud were discussed, it said. As in the Dominion case, the discovery process helped Smartmatic find messages and statements that seem embarrassing in retrospect. For example, in early December, Fox's Jesse Watters texted colleague Greg Gutfeld that 'Think of how incredible our ratings would be if Fox went ALL in on STOP THE STEAL.' Fox, in a response to the newly-revealed court papers, pointed to an ongoing corruption case involving Smartmatic and its executives, including a claim by federal prosecutors that it used money from the sale of voting machines to set up a 'slush fund' for bribing foreign officials. 'The evidence shows that Smartmatic's business and reputation were badly suffering long before any claims by President Trump's lawyers on Fox News and that Smartmatic grossly inflated its damage claims to generate headlines and chill free speech,' Fox said. 'Now, in the aftermath of Smartmatic's executives getting indicted for bribery charges, we are eager and ready to continue defending our press freedoms.' Smartmatic has already settled similar defamation claims against Newsmax and One America News Network in relation to their post-2020 election coverage. ___ David Bauder writes about the intersection of media and entertainment for the AP. Follow him at and

Virginia candidates spared over possible debates. Here's what they finally agreed to.
Virginia candidates spared over possible debates. Here's what they finally agreed to.

Yahoo

time20 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Virginia candidates spared over possible debates. Here's what they finally agreed to.

The gloves tend to come off quickly in political debates. But while candidates running for office in Virginia's statewide races have yet to square up this year, they aren't holding back. Several have traded early jabs over debate participation, including which events they will or won't attend. When Abigail Spanberger, the Democratic nominee for governor, declined to participate in a debate hosted by CNN, her opponent's campaign called the decision 'absurd' and 'proof (Spanberger's) terrified of facing voters in an unscripted setting.' Winsome Earle-Sears, the Republican candidate, had previously declined to participate in AARP Virginia's 'People's Debate,' held every gubernatorial election since 2006 and scheduled this year at Virginia State University. Spanberger's campaign made note of that too. 'After months of negotiations, Winsome Earle-Sears refused to participate' in the traditional debate, while Spanberger accepted the invitation a month prior, one press release read. Last month, the Democratic candidate for attorney general, Jay Jones, declined to participate in a debate hosted by the news station WJLA-TV in Northern Virginia. His Republican opponent's campaign called that decision a failure. 'It's the right call — I wouldn't want to defend his record either,' said a spokesperson for Attorney General Jason Miyares's campaign. Jones's campaign at the time said they had already agreed to participate in the Virginia State Bar debate. The squabbling has made it difficult to pin down if and when candidates running for governor, lieutenant governor and attorney general will face off. But now candidates in two races say they've finally reached agreements for debates this fall. Spanberger and Earle-Sears are slated to debate Oct. 9 at Norfolk State University, moderated by WAVY-TV. Miyares and Jones will participate in the Virginia State Bar debate in Richmond Oct. 16. Choosing to debate at all can be risky, particularly for frontrunners, said Karen Hult, a professor of political science at Virginia Tech. Candidates lose control over what they're asked and how their message is framed by viewers. And for Democrats, that risk might be painfully fresh. 'Everyone running for governor in Virginia has to be remembering what happened to the one-time frontrunner for the governorship in 2021, and that was former Gov. Terry McAuliffe, who had, one could argue, a disastrous debate appearance,' Hult said. 'What he had to say about public schooling in response to a question in many ways helped Gov. Youngkin not only get the momentum, keep momentum and then ultimately win the governorship.' In Hampton Roads, a recent poll from Old Dominion University found that nearly 48% of respondents said they planned to vote Spanberger compared with 27% who said they favored Earle-Sears. Statewide, a poll from Roanoke College found Spanberger ahead by seven points, a narrower lead than in previous months. When it came to a gubernatorial debate, Spanberger, a former congresswoman, cited a preference for Virginia broadcasters and issues over a national outlet like CNN. Earle-Sears, the state's lieutenant governor, said she had a scheduling conflict for the People's Debate. 'I also think perhaps Spanberger was a bit concerned that a national interviewer would keep trying to put the race in a national partisan context and try to highlight that when Spanberger was in the US House, she was one of the more conservative Democrats,' said Hult of the former Congresswoman's decision not to participate in the CNN debate. 'I think she didn't want to be put in the position of having to contrast herself over and over again with, for example, AOC or some of the other really visible national Democrats that might be brought up in a national debate-sponsored kind of setting.' That shift, and more success with fundraising, might be why Earle-Sears is more inclined to accept a debate invitation now, Hult said. 'Those things have changed pretty dramatically, so they now are on a little bit more equal footing arguably,' she said. 'Moreover, (Earle-Sears) has gotten a nod that the Republican president is supporting her running for office, and she also has the support of the entire statewide Republican party and a quite popular — by comparison to the president — Republican governor of the state of Virginia. I think all of those things make Earle-Sears think, well, now may be the time to accept a debate, but only in a particular location, and only at a particular time.' Meanwhile, the candidates for lieutenant governor, Democratic state Sen. Ghazala Hashmi and Republican former radio host John Reid, have no debates scheduled so far. Reid previously challenged Hashmi to 10 debates across the state. Hashmi's campaign said they would consider any formal debate invitations as they come in and as her schedule permits, but that they have yet to receive any official invitations from nonpartisan news outlets. Both campaigns said they were asked to participate together in a candidate forum on The Politics Hour, a weekly program on Washington, D.C. radio station station WAMU. Given all the candidates' arguments about debates, are they still relevant? 'We don't really have much evidence that they change many people's views on who to vote for,' Hult said. What they can do, she said, is mobilize people to turn out to vote — or to stay home. Early voting begins Sept.19. Election Day is Nov. 4. Kate Seltzer, (757)713-7881

This Clip Of Sean Hannity Trying To Take Down Gavin Newsom Is Going Viral For His Complete Lack Of Self-Awareness
This Clip Of Sean Hannity Trying To Take Down Gavin Newsom Is Going Viral For His Complete Lack Of Self-Awareness

Yahoo

time20 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

This Clip Of Sean Hannity Trying To Take Down Gavin Newsom Is Going Viral For His Complete Lack Of Self-Awareness

Sean Hannity's attempted slam of California Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) was irony defined for many of the Fox News host's critics. On Wednesday, Hannity devoted several minutes of his prime-time show to attacking Newsom, who has recently taken to trolling Donald Trump on social media by mimicking the president's bombastic and combative tone. Related: Top Trump ally Hannity denounced Newsom, a potential 2028 Democratic presidential contender, as a 'radical' whose policies had wrecked California and dismissed his Trump impersonations as 'embarrassing.' Then came the line that went viral: 'I have a point. Results matter. A new performative, confrontational style. Maybe it wins you points with the loony, radical base in your party. But America is not going to vote for that record.' You can watch the full clip here: @Acyn / Fox News / Via Related: Critics pounced on the remark, arguing it sounded more like a description of Trump — and Hannity himself — than of the governor. @truthstreamnews / Via @KeysToTheRace / Via Related: @ChefjparkJohn / Via @marysupoppinz/ / Via @JasonPYYC / Via Related: @robfirsching / Via @AllwhichIam / Via This article originally appeared on HuffPost. Also in In the News: Also in In the News: Also in In the News:

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store