
First time buyers warned about four 'hidden' issues to look out for during viewings
Owning you're own home remains a goal for many young people even as affordability continues to be a major challenge in recent years. Despite rising costs, the number of first time buyers has shot up by 19 percent in 2024 according to Lloyds Bank - marking the highest figure in a decade and signifying a resurgence in the market.
As demand for first-time buyer properties grow, real estate experts are keen to offer advice on what to look out for during viewings to help avoid potential future issues and costs.
The Home Builders Federation revealed that a huge 93.7 percent of new build buyers reported problems such as snags and defects after moving in. Older properties come with their fair share of problems too such as issues with damp which can cost up to £16,000 to fix, the Manchester Evening News reports.
Interior expert Johanna Constantinou at Tapi Carpets & Floors and estate agent Rachel Lansdell at Preston Baker have highlighted the 'hidden' home defects that first-time buyers should be aware of to avoid unexpected and costly repairs.
Gaps and cracks in flooring may signal underlying issues
'Look out for any small cracks or warping in smooth flooring, whether that's tiles, luxury vinyl or wooden floorboards, as this could be a sign of flooring absorbing excessive moisture and underlying damp problems," Johanna states.
"Persistent dampness can cause boards to lift or curl at the edges and may also be linked to leaks from plumbing or poor ventilation."
'Visible gaps between flooring and skirting boards specifically can even be a sign of subsidence, a significant problem that happens when the ground beneath a property shifts or sinks, leading to separation at joins.'
Be observant of missing roof tiles
Rachel says: "The most expensive fixes to a house are often problems with the roof or structural issues, like inside the walls or chimney."
'While you can't check the current condition of internal structures at an initial house viewing, missing or broken roof tiles can be a giveaway of potential internal damage."
"Broken roof tiles can let in rainwater in, allowing moisture to seep into the home's insulation, ceilings, walls, and even electrics, which can lead to rot, mould, and decay. Once a home's internal materials are affected by moisture, repair costs rise steeply.'
Ask the age of the boiler
'It's basically impossible to tell if there are plumbing issues when simply viewing a home, so always ask for the boiler age ahead of making decisions," said Rachel.
"As a rule of thumb, if the boiler is more than 10 years old or looks outdated, budget for a replacement, which costs around £2,000 to £4,000, and consider asking for a boiler check during your survey.'
Check the EPC
'An EPC, or Energy Performance Certificate, is an official document that shows how energy-efficient a home is, based on factors like insulation, heating systems, windows, and how much energy the home uses overall," Rachel says.
'Checking this before purchasing helps buyers to understand likely energy bills, while also including recommendations for improving energy efficiency which can lower these bills and therefore costs in the long term."
The experts advise first-time buyers should aways pay for a survey survey before making an offer so you can avoid more hidden complications.
'The biggest red flags that buyers often miss during viewings are hard to see, like structural issues, damp, roof issues and problems with electrics or heating systems, which is why you should always get a homebuyer's survey before committing to a purchase," Rachel advises.
"I would also recommend gas and electrical safety checks, too, if you are close to putting in an offer."
The experts also advise in investing in energy efficiency and damp proofing once you move in.
'To make your home more valuable overtime and prevent future costs, you should consider investing in high quality roofing and insulation if these are not up to standard already as this will improve energy efficiency overall, lowering bills," says Rachel.
"Even more affordable upgrades, like fitting double or tripled glazed windows, will lead to savings.'
Johanna added: 'Damp proofing your home will also save future expenses and protect your health. Affordable fixes, like sealing cracks, maintaining drains and gutters to prevent blockage, improving ventilation with extractor fans and replacing damp flooring all make a significant difference, saving you a big bill and a headache (literally and metaphorically).'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
9 hours ago
- The Independent
Investors ‘in limbo' over proposed share tax hikes, claim Tories
The Conservatives are urging Chancellor Rachel Reeves to urgently rule out increasing share taxes in the upcoming autumn budget. This pressure follows a leaked memo from Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner, reportedly proposing several tax hikes. Proposed measures in the memo include removing the £500 dividend allowance, axing inheritance tax relief for AIM shares, and increasing dividend tax rates. The Tories argue investors are 'in limbo' over the changes, which would pull millions more into paying investment levies. Labour responded by criticising the Conservatives' economic record and highlighting their own efforts to support businesses.


Telegraph
10 hours ago
- Telegraph
Labour is borrowing against our children's futures
Much of the debate about our public finances is intensely short term. The in-vogue concern at the moment is the fiscal 'headroom' that each Chancellor has to work with – that is, the buffer between their spending plans and the fiscal rules they set for themselves. Rachel Reeves appears to have cut hers so fine that someone sneezing in the Treasury could blow her off course. As it happens, increased borrowing costs and the Government's inability to bring limited reforms to the welfare system means it is highly likely that tax rises are on the way in the autumn, as the Conservatives have been predicting since the general election. But even this will do little to change the fundamental economic picture. The truth is that we live in an age of fiscal irresponsibility, where governments increasingly look to pass the burdens of the present onto the future. That even this short-termist strategy now seems to necessitate desperate tax rises should concern us greatly. In July, the Office for Budget Responsibility published its fiscal risk and sustainability report. For a technical document, it did not mince its words. Britain's deficit is the third highest amongst advanced European economies. Its debt level is the fourth highest after only Greece, Italy and France. Efforts to make our public finances more sustainable have met with only 'limited and temporary success'. There has been a 'substantial erosion of the UK's capacity to respond to future shocks and growing pressures on the public finances', and the scale and array of risks to the UK fiscal outlook is 'daunting'. The most serious liabilities Britain faces are not so much to do with day-to-day spending decisions as they are about the chronic, structural issues with our economy and the state's role within it. They include an unfunded state pension which is designed to increase exponentially over time, even as the number of working people paying for it shrinks, the levels of public spending on healthcare, which is set to rise to more than a fifth of GDP by 2070 (we now already spend more on health than the entire Portuguese economy), and a welfare system that will see us spending £100bn per annum on health and disability benefits as early as 2029-30. What makes these vast financial commitments 'irresponsible', however, is the way we are currently funding them: that is, increasingly by borrowing from the prosperity of future generations. The national debt already stands at about 100 per cent of GDP and is forecasted to grow to over 270 per cent by the 2070s. Even this does not fully factor in the vast state and public sector pension liabilities for the British state – which some commentators argue increases the total outstanding liabilities to some £11tn, or four times the size of the economy. Instead of making tough decisions on spending and taxation today, we are passing on the financial obligations to the taxpayers of the future, who will face higher debt servicing costs. Labour is in a bind. It won't – or can't – take on the responsibility of reducing the welfare bill. It is changing the way the government measures debt, not to give a better picture of the public finances, but simply so it can borrow more. Yet the costs of borrowing have risen to the third highest of any developed economy since it entered office. And so it is being buffeted towards raising taxes to pay for a totally unaffordable level of public expenditure. Some on the Left suggest that this is its own form of fiscal responsibility. But this fails to recognise that higher rates will harm the ultimate source of tax revenue, which is a productive economy. Reform isn't much better. They spy an opportunity to attract voters in the so-called 'upper Left' quadrant on the political spectrum – those with socially conservative but economically statist views and values. They advocate for tighter borders, but greater state involvement in the economy and more generous welfare spending. Cobbling together economic policies based simply on what is most likely to attract a particular section of the British public in the next election, however, is the very same political problem that has gotten us into this mess. So there's a gap in the political market. But if the Conservatives wish to be the party that the public trusts to restore the public finances, they will have to offer a drastic change to the status quo. And that will mean making some far harder decisions than those to which they have committed so far. Firstly, a truly fiscally responsible government would need to reverse a long-standing policy of seeking to take people out of paying tax. Before the post-2020 phenomenon of 'fiscal drag' – in which people were dragged into paying more tax by the combination of frozen thresholds and inflation – Conservatives bragged about taking people out of paying income tax altogether by increasing the personal allowance. We need a complete about-turn in this approach. It is the definition of fiscal irresponsibility to have more and more people benefiting from a system which they do not have a stake in financing. And it's bad politics. To generate a coalition in favour of lower tax rates, we need more people with a stake in sustainable public finances. Secondly, indexing benefits so that they cease to bear any relationship with our ability to pay for them is indefensible. When it comes to the state pension, there is no fund into which savings are built up for an individual worker. Current pensions are being paid for by those in work, and the triple lock introduced in 2010 means its funding requirement is always ratcheting upwards. This needs to be scrapped, a more proportionate index for the triple lock introduced, and efforts to increase private retirement savings radically boosted. Finally, the Conservative articulation of fiscal responsibility cannot come down on the side of raising taxes to accommodate high expenditure, as Labour have proposed. It must do the reverse. In particular, we must level with voters on the NHS. It is not the envy of the world. In fact, on metrics like healthy life expectancy, the only worse system is the US's model of fully private insurance. And it is cripplingly expensive. Again, the only less affordable system in the world is the American. The Dutch and Singaporean models suggest ways to improve both affordability and health outcomes. Fiscal responsibility is a signal. Balanced books, a lower debt burden and a smaller state demonstrate a commitment to the view that the centre of economic life ought not to be at the level of government but in the private, wealth creating sector. But it is not simply about balancing the books year to year. A Conservative Party wishing to present itself as the only force in British politics willing to make the necessary decisions in the cause of long-term prosperity must also address a short-termism which is driving us towards an economic iceberg, and sapping tomorrow's workers of their purchasing power. That means disavowing some policies with which it has been associated for far too long.


Daily Mirror
13 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
Teeth whitening solution so 'effective' shoppers of all ages love it is 30% off
MySweetSmile, one of the UK's top teeth whitening brands - are offering deals and discounts on their products for a limited time only Keeping your oral health in check is pretty crucial for maintaining a sparkling smile with healthy gums and fresh breath. However, like anything else, looking for top quality dental products can quickly become costly and with a plethora of options available, consumers can find it challenging to determine which products are truly worth their cost. MySweetSmile is one of the few brands that comes highly recommended - bagging awards and touted as the UK's top teeth whitening brand. Now, they're marking five years of business by offering a host of deals to say thanks to their customers - both new and existing. To kick things off, they're offering 30% off all products, including a complimentary mystery flavour toothpaste - either mint, strawberry or mango for customers. Alongside the toothpaste, shoppers can also take note of the brand's buy two get one free deal on all products and free two-day delivery on orders over £20 for UK-based shoppers. Lisa Snowdon loves this hair serum that's 'must have for hair loss' and hails 'crazy' results 'I lost 4 stone in a year but still eat takeaways by changing just two things' No codes are required as all offers are automatically applied at checkout and the offers are available site-wide from July 31 to August 7th. Customers can select from options such as the Teeth Whitening Powder, now priced at £20.99, down from £29.99. This product is touted as being clinically proven and dentist-approved, capable of lifting deep-set stains and preventing new ones from forming without resorting to harsh peroxides, causing sensitivity or damaging enamel. To celebrate their fifth year, MySweetSmile have a range of deals £29.99 £20.99 MySweetSmile Buy here Product Description The Teeth Whitening Strips are also available for £20.99, reduced from £29.99, offering easy-to-use, non-slip strips that deliver quick results without harming enamel, reports the Manchester Evening News. The Precision Teeth Whitening Pen has also been reduced by the brand's 30% discount. Its fine brush tip allows customers to apply the formula precisely where needed. Plus, it doesn't use any peroxide, meaning there should be no sensitivity caused to teeth. For customers with damaged or sensitive enamel, the Enamel Care Serum could be an ideal choice. It targets the root cause of sensitivity by repairing and strengthening the enamel. For optimal results, customers simply follow their regular night-time brushing routine before applying the serum, dispense two to three pumps onto their toothbrush, brush for two minutes and spit out any excess. Sensitive gums are a widespread concern, but now there's a solution with the Gum Serum from MySweetSmile, infused with hyaluronic acid for hydration, soothing inflammation and fortifying gum tissue. It's recommended to use after your usual toothbrushing routine, by applying two pumps onto the tongue and then spreading it across the gums before allowing it to work its magic for two minutes. Not all products suit everyone, and if this isn't the right fit, there are other options available. Take the Rapid White - Blue Light Tooth Whitening System, retailing at £23.33 from Boots, which promises to lighten teeth up to five shades in just two weeks and is designed with sensitive teeth in mind, being peroxide-free. Alternatively, the Spotlight Whitening Teeth Whitening Pen, priced at £14.95 from Lookfantastic, offers an easy-to-use pen that provides professional-level whitening at home and helps reduce stains for a more radiant smile. Feedback on the MySweetSmile website has been overwhelmingly positive, with one satisfied customer, Margaret, aged 63, exclaiming about the Teeth Whitening Powder: "I always thought my yellow teeth were just part of ageing, but after just a few uses of MySweetSmile, I can't stop smiling at the mirror. My teeth feel so much cleaner and brighter-it's like I've turned back the clock on my smile!". Another user called Emily, aged 39, revealed: "I was sceptical at first, but this really works. My teeth looked dull and yellow no matter how much I brushed, but now they're sparkling clean and bright. The compliments haven't stopped, and I feel so much more confident!". Tom, 34, commented on the Teeth Whitening Strips: "I'm always running around with work and barely have time for self-care. These strips fit perfectly into my busy routine, and the results are incredible! My teeth are whiter, and I feel so much more confident." However, on Amazon, some customers held different opinions, with one buyer noting: "I have only just started using this, so I have not seen much difference yet but the powder leaves your mouth smelling fresh." A separate reviewer mentioned: "I bought this as it was recommended online. I'm not a smoker and I haven't been drinking much, I do drink coffee regularly but I equally regularly clean my teeth. There's an initial improvement but I'm not sure it's what I expected. I used it every day in the first week and only noticed the difference post brushing. Shortly after that - little difference."