Shoals High School honored as Indiana's school of excellence
The Indiana Commission for Higher Education announced Wednesday that Shoals High School was recognized as Indiana's American College Application Campaign School of Excellence Award winner.
The high school in Martin County is one of 26 schools nationwide recognized for its commitment to postsecondary student success, specifically for students from low-income backgrounds.
According to a media release from the Indiana Commission for Higher Education, awardees are selected based on their participation in their state's college application campaign.
Education News: Students commemorate Holocaust victims on Remembrance Day
Shoals High School has a senior class of 45 students. Together, seniors filled out a combined 85 college applications during the campaign. In addition and as part of the campaign students from Shoals elementary, middle, and high schools participated in Indiana's 'College GO! Week' activities each day.
'The Commission congratulates Shoals High School on this incredible accomplishment,' Indiana Commissioner for Higher Education Chris Lowery stated. 'Our state needs partners like Shoals to encourage students to pursue their postsecondary plans so we can promote economic and social prosperity for all Hoosiers. Thank you to the educators, counselors, and administrators at Shoals for your exemplary participation in this year's initiative.'
'We are honored to receive the School of Excellence Award at Shoals High School,' Early College Director Megan Hawkins stated. 'We are blessed to have staff who provide resources, guidance, and love for students for their college and career ambitions. We are proud to continue to empower students as they take the next steps toward their futures; as it is the students who empower and motivate us.'
Education News: Nerd Herd heads back to robotics world stage
College Application Week is part of Indiana's annual College GO! initiative. It takes place every August through November. This was Indiana's 11th year participating in the initiative. 32 Indiana colleges and universities waived college application fees during the campaign.
'There's something that's so rewarding about seeing our state coordinators take part in helping students navigate the admission process,' ACAC Director Lisa King stated.
To learn more about Indiana's College GO! program, visit Learn More Indiana's website by clicking here.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Buzz Feed
3 days ago
- Buzz Feed
19 Of The Biggest Historical Lies People Still Believe
Recently, a post from Reddit user Repulsive-Finger-954 on the popular Ask Reddit forum caught my eye. In it, they asked people, "What is the biggest historical lie that many people believe?" and the answers were both entertaining and informative. I decided I had to share; so, here are some of the best: "Vikings didn't wear horned helmets." "People believe that Napoleon was this abnormally short man. He was 5'6, which was pretty average back then. I'm pretty sure it was this smear campaign of sorts that painted him as this weirdly short, unpowerful guy." "George Washington's dentures were not made of wood, but rather a combination of teeth from slaves, ivory (hippopotamus, walrus and/or elephant), animal teeth, and metals." "While Paul Revere is often credited with being the sole rider to warn the colonies of the British, he was actually one of five riders who alerted colonists on the night of April 18. Revere's mission relied on secrecy, and he didn't shout 'The British are coming!' as the phrase would have been confusing to locals who still considered themselves British. Instead, Revere's network of riders, signal guns, and church bells effectively spread the alarm." People believe that the Nazis were hated and opposed for their treatment of Jewish people from the beginning. There has been plenty of narrative building through the years around the idea that the Allies were seeking justice for the Jewish people from the start. It was only when we witnessed the extent of the Holocaust that the villainy of the Nazis became more widely recognized and acknowledged." "The idea that people used to believe the world was flat. In elementary school, I was taught that no one wanted to fund Columbus's voyage because they thought he'd just sail off the end of the world. Utter nonsense." "People believe that Thomas Edison invented the lightbulb. He did not. Several other men pioneered it before him." "People believe that women stayed home and only men worked. For the poor, which was the vast majority of people throughout history, everybody who could work worked, even the kids. If you didn't, the whole family would starve and die." "People believe that the US Civil War was over states' rights." "People believe that MLK was socially acceptable to white people during the 1960s, and not in favor of radically changing the socioeconomic order of the US. He was a socialist who was widely reviled by the white culture of the time. He's been re-imagined by white people as someone willing to accept slow electoral solutions to racial problems." "Many people still believe that Marie Antoinette said, 'Let them eat cake.'" "The myth that there ever was a famine in Ireland. It was a genocide, and the English were exporting enough meat and grain from Ireland to feed three times the Irish population." "People in ancient and medieval times lived past 30 or 40 on a regular basis. The 'life expectancy' was low due to child mortality." "The idea that Galileo was imprisoned because of the heliocentric model. Nope, it was because he pissed off the pope, who was funding his research." "There is a myth that the US has never experienced an authoritarian government. In actuality, a large portion of its history has been authoritarian. The Jim Crow South was an authoritarian government that existed until 1964." "The myth that carrots give you good eyesight. That lie came from Britain during WWII to hide the fact that they had a new technology called radar." "The idea that Catherine of Aragon failed Henry VIII because she didn't have a son and heir. She and Henry had — at least — three sons." "That Samurai despised guns and saw them as 'dishonorable tools.'" And finally: "That nothing much happened in the 'Dark Ages.'" What are your thoughts? Let me know in the comments. Better yet, tell me your own historical pet peeves that drive you up the wall! If you have something to share but prefer to remain anonymous, feel free to check out this anonymous form. Who knows — your comment could be included in a future BuzzFeed article! Please note: Some comments have been edited for length and/or clarity.
Los Angeles Times
3 days ago
- Los Angeles Times
Food for all over security for some
My grandmother escaped the Warsaw ghetto after her first of four sisters died from hunger. She slipped through a few missing bricks in the wall that sealed the Jewish population away from their Aryan neighbors, where they were trapped in poverty and malnourishment and subject to Nazi plans for extermination. Scholars report that 92,000 Jews died of starvation in the ghetto before 300,000 were deported to camps. After escaping, my grandmother — just a teenager — snuck food to her family several times before the rest of her family died, and my grandmother stayed hungry for many years, as she survived the Holocaust on her own. 'When you hungry, you soul flies out,' Bubbe, as I called her, said in her testimony of survival. Bubbe is most tragically poetic in her descriptions of hunger, and she never forgot the way her sister died asking for a piece of bread, just a shtickle fun broyt. Bulging eyes and blue lips. My grandmother's relationship to food was forever marked by the ghost of hunger. Once she was living safely in the American suburbs, she was never without a loaf of rye bread in the freezer. My grandmother knew about the essential dignity of every human being. At the end of the war, when she was liberated by the Russians in the Polish city of Lukov, she noticed the German soldiers walking around without boots, and she felt sad for them. 'You see a person is hurt,' she said, 'you want to help.' How we respond to the needs of those around us — this is what forms the basis of our character. In drawing a book about my grandmother's story, I thought often about the psychologist Abraham Maslow's 'hierarchy of needs.' At the bottom of the pyramid is our basic physiology, our need for food and water, and above that our need for security and safety. Only when these needs are met, can we focus on higher planes, seeking belonging, self-esteem and self-actualization. It is only because my grandparents fought so hard, endured so much, for their bread that I am in a position to reflect on what my grandmother's struggle for survival means for my identity, my sense of meaning and my politics. Her legacy taught me that every group of people deserves to live free from hunger and fear of violence in their homes, that we all need bread and boots. She taught me that we should tell the stories, all stories, of exile and loss and persecution. She taught me to love and believe in America, and that the Jews of the world are safest in liberal democracies, with governments that grant equal opportunity for all in their jurisdiction. As I learned more about Jewish history, I came to believe that the long story of Jewish suffering resulted in an attempt to solve 'the Jewish Problem' by creating a Palestinian Problem, that the Israeli government has never sufficiently reckoned with its role in Palestinian persecution, and that the fate of Palestinians and Israelis is, consequently, forever linked, and therefore the only viable future for either peoples lies in the two learning to break bread together. I can more easily imagine this future because I — unlike my grandmother, unlike my Jewish cousins in Israel, and unlike all Palestinians living under occupation — have not feared for basic survival. But those who've lost more than I have share this vision. And I believe it's my duty, at the very least, to hold on to my imagination. But in the face of hunger, words and ideas begin to melt, then evaporate. Hunger is stupifying. The mounting starvation statistics in Gaza change daily, and they are all bad. In May, 5,000 children diagnosed with malnutrition. A 24-hour period with 19 deaths from starvation. At least 1,400 people have been killed in Gaza while trying to access food since the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, an opaquely funded American and Israeli organization that 25 experts have called an 'insult to the humanitarian enterprise and standards,' began dominating distribution of aid in the Gaza Strip, in the name of diverting food from Hamas. The blockade, the system of severe restrictions on the movement of goods and people into and out of Gaza, has halted the flow of food and medical supplies, and frequent breakdowns in telecommunications have severely challenged the efforts to distribute what aid does get in. Outside of Gaza, we are in a position to quibble about statistics and argue about what words we use to describe other people's suffering. Many scholars have called the constant killings, the reduction of Palestinian infrastructure to rubble and the systematic blockade of humanitarian aid a genocide. For many Jewish people with direct connections to the Holocaust, the story of genocide is so total, so unimaginable, it's hard to reconcile a word with such totemic power with something happening right now, in front of our eyes, on our phones. Yet some Jewish Holocaust survivors identify with the images of Gaza's destruction and feel compelled to use the strongest language available in condemnation. Others use the terms ethnic cleansing, or crimes against humanity, while some just want to call this a war. These distinctions matter; a designation of genocide would, theoretically, oblige the international community to act, with sanctions or criminal prosecution for those responsible. But this semantic dialogue can produce a kind of blank despair. Starving children make fine distinctions feel hollow. The Israeli government claims there is 'no starvation' in Gaza, even as officials have moved to address this starvation in response to international and internal pressure, with pauses in fighting and minimal air drops. Israel's defenders admit there is a starvation problem in Gaza, but blame Hamas and Hamas-infiltrated international organizations for looting humanitarian aid, a claim that has been widely debunked. The Israeli government says this is a war of defense. This is the logic that has led, for example, to the siege of Gaza's already limited clean water supply. We can acknowledge the violence, the constant fear and the deep disappointment both peoples have experienced for decades, without equating these experiences, all the while seeing the moral imperative clearly: Food and water for all must come before security for some, all of which must come before ideology. This formulation implies that those wielding the most resources, Israeli and American institutions, must be willing to sacrifice some security in the name of ensuring hungry people are fed. There's no future for Israelis or Palestinians in which one people's security comes before another people's basic physiological needs, in wartime or after. All of us attending to the news today are squinting through intergenerational memories. I've looked at pictures of starving Gazans and been swept back to the Polish ghetto I never lived in, watching a family member die. I've seen Jewish people I love walk freely down the streets of American cities and perceive menace in symbols of Palestinian liberation they don't understand. I've listened to panicked complaints from Jewish acquaintances about how loud the sirens are at protests in front of Israeli embassies. To them, perhaps the sirens feel like war planes. The thing about those of us living at the top of Maslow's hierarchy is that sometimes we fall through loopholes and touch the panic of basic survival, bringing our identities, and our politics, with us. We can have compassion for each other in these moments. But we must anchor ourselves with these facts: At this point, in Gaza, some people aren't eating. This is why so many around the world are crying out and risking their safety and their status to protest. Our intergenerational grief should lead us all to cry together, in the name of those most vulnerable. Artists and activists don't have perfect plans for solving the most complex political crises of our lifetimes, and we don't command armies or wield many resources. What we can do is cry. We can cry about what is deeply wrong with now, and we can use our imaginations to light the way forward. Where our imaginations fixate might guide our collective priorities. So I imagine the children of Palestine in my drawings. They are breaking bread with my grandmother's sisters, if only in my imagination. Amy Kurzweil is a New Yorker cartoonist and the author of 'Artificial: A Love Story' and 'Flying Couch: A Graphic Memoir.'
Miami Herald
05-08-2025
- Miami Herald
81 years ago, they turned Anne Frank in. Would we save her today?
Monday marked the 81st anniversary of the day Anne Frank, her family and four others were discovered in 1944 by the Nazis after two years of hiding in a living area concealed by a bookcase in a secret annex in an Amsterdam company building. An informant had turned in the German-Jewish group to the Gestapo, ending their attempt to escape the concentration camps, where they were eventually taken and died, including 15-year-old Anne. Only Anne's father, Otto Frank, survived. After the war, he found his daughter's diary — the journal she'd kept during their time in hiding, where she revealed her views of life, family and personal growth. He edited it and published it. The book became an international sensation, a Hollywood movie and one of the world's most powerful documents against the Holocaust. For generations, 'Anne Frank: The Diary of a Young Girl' was required reading in American schools. You didn't have to identify with the angst of a teenage girl to be moved by her words. What stayed with most of us was her heartbreaking optimism: 'I still believe, in spite of everything, that people are truly good at heart,' she wrote. As we remember Anne Frank, it's worth asking: Could there be an Anne Frank in our time? And if so, how would we respond? I think the short answer is 'yes'— there are Anne Franks today. Young people trapped in war zones, fleeing persecution, and hiding from armed regimes still exist. Some are in basements in Gaza. Others shelter in Ukraine or cross borders from Syria, Sudan or Myanmar. Some even hide within U.S. borders — from detention and deportation. Frank's dad tried to escape with his family to the U.S., Great Britain and even Cuba, with no luck. The Nazis had in many cases stripped Jews of their German citizenship, leaving them as people without a country. Who would take them in? It's a situation that rings true today, in light of the Trump administration's war on undocumented immigrants and their removal from the U.S. Their stories may not be written in ink on checkered paper, but they are out there — shared in text messages, Instagram reels or TikTok videos. We live with flowery, girlish handwriting in a world saturated with information. I think today the musings of a thoughtful teenage girl would be considered 'blogging' from her hiding place that might briefly go viral, attract some sympathy, and then vanish into the algorithm's rearview mirror. Would we rescue her? Or would she become just another political flashpoint — debated, doubted as fake and dismissed depending on where she came from, how she looked? Anne Frank's diary became a symbol of human resilience not just because of her words, but because the world paused long enough to listen. In the postwar quiet, reflection was possible, some observers say. I visited the Anne Frank House in Amsterdam 10 years ago. The line to enter to see where the teen and her family and friends had hidden for two long years stretched around the block. The hiding place where the group lived felt claustrophobic. I could not have done it without a television, a radio and my cell phone. I suspect the Anne Franks of our era may be met with hashtags, temporary outrage, or even conspiracy theories. We are quicker to judge than to listen, and in doing so, we often overlook the very humanity Anne preserved in her pages. The lesson today isn't to deify Anne Frank, but to recognize her in others, as many who championed her after the war tried to do. Would we believe her if she were writing now? Would we repost her videos? Advocate for her safety? Or would we scroll past her TikTok story? Luisa Yanez is a member of the Miami Herald Editorial Board.
