Iowa Congressman Randy Feenstra confirms bid for Iowa governor
DES MOINES, Iowa (KCAU) — After a full day of speculation on Monday, U.S. Congressman Randy Feenstra has officially confirmed that he is running for Iowa governor.
In an X post on Tuesday morning, Feenstra confirmed that he will be running for Iowa governor. The same post was also made to his Facebook page.
Story continues below
Top Story: Iowa Congressman Randy Feenstra confirms bid for Iowa governor
Lights & Sirens: Sioux City firefighter taken to hospital following Mayday call during Morningside fire
Sports: Hawarden native Hunter Dekkers signs with New Orleans Saints
Feenstra's slogan is 'Taking Iowa to New Heights,' and he said that he will be 'standing shoulder-to-shoulder with President Trump to take on the radical Left and clean up Joe Biden's mess.'
In addition to the announcement, Feenstra has also launched a Feenstra for Governor website.
Feenstra's announcement comes a day after Iowa Auditor Rob Sand announced that he will also be running for governor.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
33 minutes ago
- Yahoo
‘No Kings' Protest planned for Saturday in downtown Wichita Falls
WICHITA FALLS (KFDX/KJTL) — 'No Kings' Protests will occur nationwide Saturday, coinciding with President Donald Trump's birthday and protests and riots against federal immigration raids. A local protest is scheduled for Saturday, June 14, from 10 a.m. to 1 p.m. in downtown Wichita Falls. According to the Facebook event for the local protest, Saturday, 'Is a national day of action and mass mobilization in response to increasing authoritarian excesses and corruption from Trump and his allies. We've watched as they've cracked down on free speech, detained people for their political views, threatened to deport American citizens, and defied the courts. They've done this all while continuing to serve and enrich their billionaire allies.' Organizers said these protests are not to come off as anti-military nor anti-veteran, as President Trump is throwing an Army parade to honor the 250th anniversary of the American Army. 'No Kings' Protests come as demonstrators gather across America to protest federal immigration raids in Los Angeles. More than 4,000 National Guard troops and 700 Marines have been deployed to provide security at the immigration protests and operations in Los Angeles. While some lawmakers said the mobilization of troops is illegal, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth defended the call Wednesday. 'The mission in Los Angeles, as you know well, sir, is not about lethality,' Hegseth said in response to questions during a Senate hearing. 'It's about maintaining law and order on behalf of law enforcement agents who deserve to do their job without being attacked by mobs of people.' The Associated Press contributed to this report. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
33 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Second major protest against Trump planned across Oregon, nationwide
Thousands of Oregonians are expected to take part in a wave of protests on Saturday, June 14, as part of the nationwide 'No Kings' movement — a coordinated series of protests against President Donald Trump and presidential overreach. More than 1,500 protests are planned across the country, including dozens in Oregon cities large and small. The official 'No Kings' website lists hundreds of protests. Here's where to find them. The demonstrations fall on a significant date: June 14 marks Trump's 79th birthday, as well as Flag Day, and the 250th anniversary of the U.S. Army. The Trump administration plans to hold a military-style parade in Washington, D.C., to celebrate the event, featuring tanks and other military displays, which critics say is emblematic of Trump's overreach as president. Organizers at Indivisible Oregon, the Portland-based chapter of the progressive group Indivisible, say the protests are intended to be peaceful demonstrations, pushing back against the planned display in Washington, D.C., which they call a troubling sign of Trump's increasing authoritarianism. 'This display of might, before a president who already behaves like a dictator and views the military as his personal foot soldiers, intended to intimidate opponents and solidify his image as a strongman, necessarily elicits comparisons with the worst totalitarian regimes — the Soviet Union, North Korea, China, Iraq, and Nazi Germany,' Indivisible Oregon wrote on its website. Protests follow months of unrest and political fallout The June 14 protests are the latest in a series of organized events against Trump and his policies, following Memorial Day rallies, May Day demonstrations, and the April 'Hands Off' protests. That earlier wave of actions targeted Trump's relationship with billionaire Elon Musk, who at the time headed the controversial Department of Government Efficiency. That group slashed federal budgets and shuttered agencies while increasing federal contracts for Musk's companies. Much has changed since the spring. Musk left the administration in May following significant financial losses at Tesla, where he is CEO. Since then, Musk has had a dramatic falling out with Trump, at one point writing on his social media platform, X, about the president's ties to registered sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. Many of those posts were later deleted. Concerns grow over federal crackdown on dissent In California, Trump has drawn sharp criticism for deploying Marines and members of the California National Guard to quell protests against immigration officials. Jules Boykoff, a political science professor at Pacific University who studies protest movements, said that decision may inspire others locally to stand up and protest. 'Some recent events have upped the poignancy of the moment,' Boykoff said. 'They have upped the ante politically. It wouldn't surprise me in the slightest if we saw enormous crowds across the country.' Gov. Tina Kotek said Monday that she has no plans to deploy the Oregon National Guard this weekend and pushed back strongly against federal interference. 'I am the commander in chief (of the Oregon National Guard),' Kotek told reporters June 9. 'We are taking care of our communities. If there is any activity that needs to be taken care of, it will be done by local law enforcement. Right now, all protests have been peaceful and there's no reason to think that it'll be otherwise.' 'This is what a healthy democracy looks like' Boykoff said the Trump administration uses violent police response as a way of crushing dissent and the country is experiencing a unique moment in its history. 'And what a moment it is, where the governor of Oregon has to proactively suggest not wanting the National Guard called out,' Boykoff said. 'The fact that she has to preemptively stand up for basic protocol speaks to the uniqueness of this moment. And that injects unpredictability as well.' But that should not stop people from exercising their rights, he said. 'Just because a protest doesn't lead to an automatic outcome doesn't mean that it's useless,' he said. 'This is how the fabric of social relations is woven, as people find who their allies are, their comrades are, and it builds moving forward. It's not always X to Y, it's often a circuitous path to social change.' Oregon is well known for its activism and its history of protests. Portland earned the nickname 'Little Beirut' because of protestors in the early 1990s. Boykoff said those demonstrations have helped current organizers learn and grow. 'That doesn't come around by accident,' Boykoff said. 'It comes from layers and layers of history and organizing. This is what democracy looks like. This is what taking full advantage of the First Amendment looks like. This is what a healthy democracy looks like … It's people meeting in community centers and basements and outside of city council meetings, talking about what they want to bring to the table.'
Yahoo
33 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Fact Check: Clarifying claims Louisiana voted 'to force a 9-year-old girl to deliver her rapist's baby'
Claim: In early June 2025, Louisiana lawmakers voted "to force a 9-year-old girl to deliver her rapist's baby." Rating: What's True: In early June 2025, Louisiana lawmakers rejected a bill that would have added exceptions for rape to the state's abortion ban, specifically allowing young rape victims to terminate their pregnancies. What's False: The proposed bill did not reference or target any specific case of a pregnant 9-year old. What's Undetermined: The claim originated from Louisiana state Rep. Patricia Moore's mention of a pregnant 9-year-old girl in her district. However, she did not provide additional details, and we were unable to independently confirm the existence or circumstances of the case. In early June 2025, a rumor spread that Louisiana lawmakers voted to deny abortion to a 9-year-old rape victim. One X post (archived) on the topic, which as of this writing had over 958,300 views, read, "Louisiana votes to force a 9-year-old girl to deliver her rapist's baby." It also quoted Democratic state Rep. Patricia Moore allegedly saying, "I'm constantly hearing that God would take a bad situation and turn it into good," additionally claiming that Moore spoke out against the bill "even after being made aware of the pregnant 9-year-old girl living in her district." Another Facebook post (archived) making the claim, which amassed over 25,000 reactions, read, "If a 9-year-old walked into an adoption agency with plans to be a mother, they would laugh her out of the room and explain that she's too young to become a mom. But if a 9-year-old is raped, conservatives believe he's the perfect age for motherhood." Similar claims spread on social media platforms including Instagram (archived) and Reddit (archived). In short, the claim was a mixture of true, false and undetermined information. In early June 2025, for the third year in a row, Louisiana lawmakers rejected a bill that would have added exceptions for rape to the state's abortion ban. Namely, the bill would have allowed young rape victims to terminate their pregnancies. However, the proposed legislation did not reference any specific case of a pregnant 9-year-old. The claim stemmed from a statement by Moore, who said she was aware of a 9-year-old girl in her district who had become pregnant. We were unable to independently verify the existence or circumstances of the child mentioned. We reached out to Moore to request more details about the case of the pregnant 9-year-old and will update this story if and when we hear back. Louisiana's abortion ban took effect in 2022 following the U.S. Supreme Court's decision to overturn Roe v. Wade. That decision eliminated federal protections for abortion and allowed individual states to set their own laws. Under the state's law, abortion is banned except in limited cases, such as when the pregnant woman's life is at serious risk, the fetus is "medically futile" or in cases of ectopic pregnancy or miscarriage. There is currently no exception for rape or incest. The in-question legislation was Democratic state Rep. Delisha Boyd's third attempt to create exceptions to Louisiana's abortion law. The proposed bill aimed to allow abortions for victims under 17 who became pregnant as a result of specific offenses such as rape or sexual battery that, if committed against a minor, would make an abortion legal in those cases. The bill said the victim wouldn't need to provide a police report, forensic evidence or proof that someone was being prosecuted for the crime in order to get the abortion. Legislators discussed the bill during a House Committee on Administration of Criminal Justice hearing on June 3, 2025. As shown in the image below, the bill that "provides for exceptions to the abortion laws of this state relative to rape and certain sex offenses" received three votes in favor ("Yea") and nine votes against ("Nay"). Therefore, the law did not proceed to the House floor for further consideration. (Louisiana House of Representatives) You can access the full text of the in-question bill here. A video circulating alongside the claims on Louisiana "denying abortion to 9-year-old rape victim" originated from an April 11, 2025, KLFY News 10 segment that aired before legislators voted on the bill. Moore made the statement about the pregnant 9-year-old during the hearing at 38:57 of the video recording available via the Louisiana House of Representatives' official website. Moore stated that she was "aware of a nine year old, in [her] area, pregnant" and that she was struggling to reconcile her feelings about the case with her religious beliefs. Moore also added that her mother was raped at the age of 13 and had her at 14. "So I do struggle with it. I know we got to protect our children, but this point right now, I cannot vote yes," she said. Boyd, who authored the bill, also mentioned she was aware of a "Louisiana girl who was raped and gave birth at 13 years old and a 9-year-old girl who became pregnant after being sexually assaulted." All in all, while it's true that Louisiana lawmakers rejected a bill that would have allowed abortion in cases of child rape, there was no confirmed evidence that the decision directly affected a specific 9-year-old. Moore mentioned being aware of such a case during the hearing but provided no details, and we were unable to independently verify the claim. As of this writing, Louisiana abortion law does not include an exception for rape or incest. - YouTube. Accessed 11 June 2025. Agenda - Administration of Criminal Justice. Accessed 11 June 2025. HB215. Accessed 11 June 2025. ---. Accessed 11 June 2025. LA House On-Demand Video. Accessed 11 June 2025. Louisiana House of Representatives 24-28. Accessed 11 June 2025. "Louisiana Lawmakers Reject Adding Exceptions for Some Rape Cases to Abortion Ban." AP News, 3 June 2025, Louisiana Laws - Louisiana State Legislature. Accessed 11 June 2025.
